If we hold a delegation, we don't need to care about whether or not
the inode attributes are up to date. We know we can cache the results
of this call regardless.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Again, when revalidating the inode, we don't need to ask for attributes
for which we are authoritative.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Allow the getattr() callback to check things like whether or not we hold
a delegation so that it can adjust the attributes that it is asking for.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When we hold a delegation, we should not need to request attributes such
as the file size or the change attribute. For some servers, avoiding
asking for these unneeded attributes can improve the overall system
performance.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If the server recalls the layout that was just handed out, we risk hitting
a race as described in RFC5661 Section 2.10.6.3 unless we ensure that we
release the sequence slot after processing the LAYOUTGET operation that
was sent as part of the OPEN compound.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The flag was not always being cleared after LAYOUTGET on OPEN.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Move the actual freeing of the struct nfs4_layoutget into fs/nfs/pnfs.c
where it can be reused by the layoutget on open code.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

This triggers when have no pre-existing inode to attach to.
The preexisting case is saved for later.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

It will be needed now by the pnfs code.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

They work better in the new alloc_init function.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Preparing to add conditional LAYOUTGET to OPEN rpc, the LAYOUTGET
will need the ctx info.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

nfs_init_sequence() will clear this for us.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If the wait for a LOCK operation is interrupted, and then the file is
closed, the locks cleanup code will assume that no new locks will be added
to the inode after it has completed.  We already have a mechanism to detect
if there was signal, so let's use that to avoid recreating the local lock
once the RPC completes.  Also skip re-sending the LOCK operation for the
various error cases if we were signaled.
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
[Trond: Fix inverted test of locks_lock_inode_wait()]
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If we get an ESTALE error in response to an RPC call operating on the
file on the MDS, we should immediately cancel the layout for that file.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Ensure that we pass down the inode of the file being deleted so
that we can return any delegation being held.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Even then it isn't really necessary. The reason why we may not want to
pass in a stateid in other cases is that we cannot use the delegation
credential.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Having these exist as two functions doesn't seem to add anything useful,
and I think merging them together makes this easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

We currently have a separate function just to set this, but I think it
makes more sense to set it at the same time as the other values in
nfs4_init_sequence()
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Rather than doing this in the generic NFS client code.  Let's put this
with the other v4 stuff so it's all in one place.
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

This doesn't really need to be in the generic NFS client code, and I
think it makes more sense to keep the v4 code in one place.
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When we use EXCLUSIVE4_1 mode, the server returns an attribute mask where
all the bits indicate which attributes were set, and where the verifier
was stored. In order to figure out which attribute we have to resend,
we need to clear out the attributes that are set in exclcreat_bitmask.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
[Anna: Fixed typo NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4 -> NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE]
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Neither nfs_inode_set_delegation() nor nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() are
generic code. They have no business delving into NFSv4 OPEN xdr structures,
so let's replace the "struct nfs_openres" parameter.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we hold a delegation, then the results of the ACCESS call are protected
anyway.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Currently, if the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag is set, for instance by
a call to nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(), then it will not be cleared
until all the attributes have been revalidated. This means, for instance,
that NFSv4 writes will always force a full attribute revalidation.

Track the ctime, mtime, size and change attribute separately from the
other attributes so that we can have nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked()
set them correctly, and later have the cache consistency bitmask be
able to clear them.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Starting with NFSv4.1, the server is able to deduce the client id from
the SEQUENCE op which means it can always figure out whether or not
the client is holding a delegation on a file that is being changed.
For that reason, RFC5661 does not require a delegation to be unconditionally
recalled on operations such as SETATTR, RENAME, or REMOVE.

Note that for now, we continue to return READ delegations since that is
still expected by the Linux knfsd server.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Ensure that when we do finally delete the file, then we return the
delegation.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Move the delegation recall out of the generic code, and into the NFSv4
specific callback.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Move the delegation return out of generic code and down into the
NFSv4 specific unlink code.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Move the delegation return out of generic code.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The 'fmode' argument can take an FMODE_EXEC value, which we want to
filter out before comparing to the delegation type.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we have a RECLAIM_COMPLETE with a populated cl_lock_waitq, then
that implies that a reconnect has occurred. Since we can't expect a
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callback at that point, just wake up the entire queue
so that all the tasks can re-poll for their locks.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The task is expected to sleep for a while here, and it's possible that
a new EXCHANGE_ID has occurred in the interim, and we were assigned a
new clientid. Since this is a per-client list, there isn't a lot of
value in vetting the clientid on the incoming request.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

We may get a notification and lose the race to another client. Ensure
that we wait again for a notification in that case.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly
managed by the server. The exception there is when the client
holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once
there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR.
Tested-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>