- 30 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Currently there is no callback for cpufreq drivers which is called once the policy is ready to be used. There are some requirements where such a callback is required. One of them is registering a cooling device with the help of of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This routine tries to get 'struct cpufreq_policy' for CPUs which isn't yet initialed at the time ->init() is called and so we face issues while registering the cooling device. Because we can't register cooling device from ->init(), we need a callback that is called after the policy is ready to be used and hence we introduce ->ready() callback. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NLukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomeu Vizoso 提交于
Do it before it's assigned to cpufreq_cpu_data, otherwise when a driver tries to get the cpu frequency during initialization the policy kobj is referenced and we get this warning: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 64 at include/linux/kref.h:47 kobject_get+0x64/0x70() Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 64 Comm: irq/77-tegra-ac Not tainted 3.18.0-rc4-next-20141114ccu-00050-g3eff942 #326 [<c0016fac>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001272c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c001272c>] (show_stack) from [<c06085d8>] (dump_stack+0x98/0xd8) [<c06085d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c002892c>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x84/0xb4) [<c002892c>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c00289f8>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c00289f8>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0220290>] (kobject_get+0x64/0x70) [<c0220290>] (kobject_get) from [<c03e944c>] (cpufreq_cpu_get+0x88/0xc8) [<c03e944c>] (cpufreq_cpu_get) from [<c03e9500>] (cpufreq_get+0xc/0x64) [<c03e9500>] (cpufreq_get) from [<c0285288>] (actmon_thread_isr+0x134/0x198) [<c0285288>] (actmon_thread_isr) from [<c0069008>] (irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x40) [<c0069008>] (irq_thread_fn) from [<c0069324>] (irq_thread+0x134/0x174) [<c0069324>] (irq_thread) from [<c0040290>] (kthread+0xdc/0xf4) [<c0040290>] (kthread) from [<c000f4b8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace b7bd64a81b340c59 ]--- Signed-off-by: NTomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vince Hsu 提交于
When the user space tries to set scaling_(max|min)_freq through sysfs, the cpufreq_set_policy() asks other driver's opinions for the max/min frequencies. Some device drivers, like Tegra CPU EDP which is not upstreamed yet though, may constrain the CPU maximum frequency dynamically because of board design. So if the user space access happens and some driver is capping the cpu frequency at the same time, the user_policy->(max|min) is overridden by the capped value, and that's not expected by the user space. And if the user space is not invoked again, the CPU will always be capped by the user_policy->(max|min) even no drivers limit the CPU frequency any more. This patch preserves the user specified min/max settings, so that every time the cpufreq policy is updated, the new max/min can be re-evaluated correctly based on the user's expection and the present device drivers' status. Signed-off-by: NVince Hsu <vinceh@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
When resuming from s2ram on an SMP system without cpufreq operating points (e.g. there's no "operating-points" property for the CPU node in DT, or the platform doesn't use DT yet), the kernel crashes when bringing CPU 1 online: Enabling non-boot CPUs ... CPU1: Booted secondary processor Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000003c pgd = ee5e6b00 [0000003c] *pgd=6e579003, *pmd=6e588003, *pte=00000000 Internal error: Oops: a07 [#1] SMP ARM Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: s2ram Tainted: G W 3.18.0-rc3-koelsch-01614-g0377af242bb175c8-dirty #589 task: eeec5240 ti: ee704000 task.ti: ee704000 PC is at __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.24+0x24c/0x77c LR is at __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.24+0x244/0x77c pc : [<c0298efc>] lr : [<c0298ef4>] psr: 60000153 sp : ee705d48 ip : ee705d48 fp : ee705d84 r10: c04e0450 r9 : 00000000 r8 : 00000001 r7 : c05426a8 r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000001 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : 20000153 r0 : c0542734 Verify that policy is not NULL before dereferencing it to fix this. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Fixes: 8414809c (cpufreq: Preserve policy structure across suspend/resume) Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Currently the core does not expose scaling_cur_freq for set_policy() drivers this breaks some userspace monitoring tools. Change the core to expose this file for all drivers and if the set_policy() driver supports the get() callback use it to retrieve the current frequency. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73741 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 21 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
This commit extends the cpufreq_driver structure with an additional 'void *driver_data' field that can be filled by the ->probe() function of a cpufreq driver to pass additional custom information to the driver itself. A new function called cpufreq_get_driver_data() is added to allow a cpufreq driver to retrieve those driver data, since they are typically needed from a cpufreq_policy->init() callback, which does not have access to the cpufreq_driver structure. This function call is similar to the existing cpufreq_get_current_driver() function call. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Commit 8e30444e ("cpufreq: fix cpufreq suspend/resume for intel_pstate") introduced a bug where the governors wouldn't be stopped anymore for ->target{_index}() drivers during suspend. This happens because 'cpufreq_suspended' is updated before stopping the governors during suspend and due to this __cpufreq_governor() would return early due to this check: /* Don't start any governor operations if we are entering suspend */ if (cpufreq_suspended) return 0; Fixes: 8e30444e ("cpufreq: fix cpufreq suspend/resume for intel_pstate") Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+: 8e30444e "cpufreq: fix cpufreq suspend/resume for intel_pstate" Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
The kernel used to contain two functions for length-delimited, case-insensitive string comparison, strnicmp with correct semantics and a slightly buggy strncasecmp. The latter is the POSIX name, so strnicmp was renamed to strncasecmp, and strnicmp made into a wrapper for the new strncasecmp to avoid breaking existing users. To allow the compat wrapper strnicmp to be removed at some point in the future, and to avoid the extra indirection cost, do s/strnicmp/strncasecmp/g. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Preeti U Murthy 提交于
Commit 367dc4aa ("cpufreq: Add stop CPU callback to cpufreq_driver interface") introduced the stop CPU callback for intel_pstate drivers. During the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage, this callback is invoked so that drivers can take some action on the pstate of the cpu before it is taken offline. This callback was assumed to be useful only for those drivers which have implemented the set_policy CPU callback because they have no other way to take action about the cpufreq of a CPU which is being hotplugged out except in the exit callback which is called very late in the offline process. The drivers which implement the target/target_index callbacks were expected to take care of requirements like the ones that commit 367dc4aa addresses in the GOV_STOP notification event. But there are disadvantages to restricting the usage of stop CPU callback to cpufreq drivers that implement the set_policy callbacks and who want to take explicit action on the setting the cpufreq during a hotplug operation. 1.GOV_STOP gets called for every CPU offline and drivers would usually want to take action when the last cpu in the policy->cpus mask is taken offline. As long as there is more than one cpu in the policy->cpus mask, cpufreq core itself makes sure that the freq for the other cpus in this mask is set according to the maximum load. This is sensible and drivers which implement the target_index callback would mostly not want to modify that. However the cpufreq core leaves a loose end when the cpu in the policy->cpus mask is the last one to go offline; it does nothing explicit to the frequency of the core. Drivers may need a way to take some action here and stop CPU callback mechanism is the best way to do it today. 2. We cannot implement driver specific actions in the GOV_STOP mechanism. So we will need another driver callback which is invoked from here which is unnecessary. Therefore this patch extends the usage of stop CPU callback to be used by all cpufreq drivers as long as they have this callback implemented and irrespective of whether they are set_policy/target_index drivers. The assumption is if the drivers find the GOV_STOP path to be a suitable way of implementing what they want to do with the freq of the cpu going offine,they will not implement the stop CPU callback at all. Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Prarit Bhargava 提交于
While debugging a cpufreq-related hardware failure on a system I saw the following lockdep warning: ========================= [ BUG: held lock freed! ] 3.17.0-rc4+ #1 Tainted: G E ------------------------- insmod/2247 is freeing memory ffff88006e1b1400-ffff88006e1b17ff, with a lock still held there! (&policy->rwsem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8156d37d>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x47d/0xb80 3 locks held by insmod/2247: #0: (subsys mutex#5){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81485579>] subsys_interface_register+0x69/0x120 #1: (cpufreq_rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8156cf73>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x73/0xb80 #2: (&policy->rwsem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8156d37d>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x47d/0xb80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 2247 Comm: insmod Tainted: G E 3.17.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8, BIOS J06 08/24/2013 0000000000000000 000000008f3063c4 ffff88006f87bb30 ffffffff8171b358 ffff88006bcf3750 ffff88006f87bb68 ffffffff810e09e1 ffff88006e1b1400 ffffea0001b86c00 ffffffff8156d327 ffff880073003500 0000000000000246 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8171b358>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66 [<ffffffff810e09e1>] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x171/0x180 [<ffffffff8156d327>] ? __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x427/0xb80 [<ffffffff8121412b>] kfree+0xab/0x2b0 [<ffffffff8156d327>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x427/0xb80 [<ffffffff81724cf7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [<ffffffffa003517f>] ? pcc_cpufreq_do_osc+0x17f/0x17f [pcc_cpufreq] [<ffffffff8156da8e>] cpufreq_add_dev+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff814855d1>] subsys_interface_register+0xc1/0x120 [<ffffffff8156bcf2>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x112/0x340 [<ffffffff8121415a>] ? kfree+0xda/0x2b0 [<ffffffffa003517f>] ? pcc_cpufreq_do_osc+0x17f/0x17f [pcc_cpufreq] [<ffffffffa003562e>] pcc_cpufreq_init+0x4af/0xe81 [pcc_cpufreq] [<ffffffffa003517f>] ? pcc_cpufreq_do_osc+0x17f/0x17f [pcc_cpufreq] [<ffffffff81002144>] do_one_initcall+0xd4/0x210 [<ffffffff811f7472>] ? __vunmap+0xd2/0x120 [<ffffffff81127155>] load_module+0x1315/0x1b70 [<ffffffff811222a0>] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff811229d9>] ? copy_module_from_fd.isra.44+0x129/0x180 [<ffffffff81127b86>] SyS_finit_module+0xa6/0xd0 [<ffffffff81725b69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b cpufreq: __cpufreq_add_dev: ->get() failed insmod: ERROR: could not insert module pcc-cpufreq.ko: No such device The warning occurs in the __cpufreq_add_dev() code which does down_write(&policy->rwsem); ... if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) { policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu); if (!policy->cur) { pr_err("%s: ->get() failed\n", __func__); goto err_get_freq; } If cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu) returns an error we execute the code at err_get_freq, which does not up the policy->rwsem. This causes the lockdep warning. Trivial patch to up the policy->rwsem in the error path. After the patch has been applied, and an error occurs in the cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu) call we will now see cpufreq: __cpufreq_add_dev: ->get() failed cpufreq: __cpufreq_add_dev: ->get() failed modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'pcc_cpufreq': No such device Fixes: 4e97b631 (cpufreq: Initialize governor for a new policy under policy->rwsem) Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
Cpufreq core introduces cpufreq_suspended flag to let cpufreq sysfs nodes across S2RAM/S2DISK. But the flag is only set in the cpufreq_suspend() for cpufreq drivers which have target or target_index callback. This skips intel_pstate driver. This patch is to set the flag before checking target or target_index callback. Fixes: 2f0aea93 (cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate) Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+ [rjw: Subject] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We are calling kobject_move() from two separate places currently and both these places share another routine update_policy_cpu() which is handling everything around updating policy->cpu. Moving ownership of policy->kobj also lies under the role of update_policy_cpu() routine and must be handled from there. So, Lets move kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() and get rid of cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() as it doesn't have anything significant left. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We are returning -EINVAL instead of the error returned from kobject_move() when it fails. Propagate the actual error number. Also add a meaningful print when sysfs_create_link() fails. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
While hot-unplugging policy->cpu, we call cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() to nominate next owner of policy, i.e. policy->cpu. If we fail to move policy kobject under the new policy->cpu, we try to update policy->cpus with the old policy->cpu. This would have been required in case old-CPU is removed from policy->cpus in the first place. But its not done before calling cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(), but during the POST_DEAD notification which happens quite late in the hot-unplugging path. So, this is just some useless code hanging around, get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where clusters have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it. Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 cores per cluster. During suspend we start hot unplugging CPUs in order 1 to 3. When CPU2 is removed, policy->kobj would be moved to CPU3 and when CPU3 goes down we wouldn't free policy or its kobj as we want to retain permissions/values/etc. Now on resume, we will get CPU2 before CPU3 and will call __cpufreq_add_dev(). We will recover the old policy and update policy->cpu from 3 to 2 from update_policy_cpu(). But the kobj is still tied to CPU3 and isn't moved to CPU2. We wouldn't create a link for CPU2, but would try that for CPU3 while bringing it online. Which will report errors as CPU3 already has kobj assigned to it. This bug got introduced with commit 42f921a6, which overlooked this scenario. To fix this, lets move kobj to the new policy->cpu while bringing first CPU of a cluster back. Also do a WARN_ON() if kobject_move failed, as we would reach here only for the first CPU of a non-boot cluster. And we can't recover from this situation, if kobject_move() fails. Fixes: 42f921a6 (cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPUs which failed to come back after resume) Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Reported-and-tested-by: NBu Yitian <ybu@qti.qualcomm.com> Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Plattner 提交于
Commit bd0fa9bb introduced a failure path to cpufreq_update_policy() if cpufreq_driver->get(cpu) returns NULL. However, it jumps to the 'no_policy' label, which exits without unlocking any of the locks the function acquired earlier. This causes later calls into cpufreq to hang. Fix this by creating a new 'unlock' label and jumping to that instead. Fixes: bd0fa9bb ("cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy()") Link: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/751903/kernel-3-15-and-nv-drivers-337-340-failed-to-initialize-the-nvidia-kernel-module-gtx-550-ti-/Signed-off-by: NAaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com> Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Douglas Anderson, recently pointed out an interesting problem due to which udelay() was expiring earlier than it should. While transitioning between frequencies few platforms may temporarily switch to a stable frequency, waiting for the main PLL to stabilize. For example: When we transition between very low frequencies on exynos, like between 200MHz and 300MHz, we may temporarily switch to a PLL running at 800MHz. No CPUFREQ notification is sent for that. That means there's a period of time when we're running at 800MHz but loops_per_jiffy is calibrated at between 200MHz and 300MHz. And so udelay behaves badly. To get this fixed in a generic way, introduce another set of callbacks get_intermediate() and target_intermediate(), only for drivers with target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION unset. get_intermediate() should return a stable intermediate frequency platform wants to switch to, and target_intermediate() should set CPU to that frequency, before jumping to the frequency corresponding to 'index'. Core will take care of sending notifications and driver doesn't have to handle them in target_intermediate() or target_index(). NOTE: ->target_index() should restore to policy->restore_freq in case of failures as core would send notifications for that. Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another routine __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional impact. Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
On platforms that use cpufreq_for_each_* macros, build fails if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n, e.g. ARM/shmobile/koelsch/non-multiplatform: drivers/built-in.o: In function `clk_round_parent': clkdev.c:(.text+0xcf168): undefined reference to `cpufreq_next_valid' drivers/built-in.o: In function `clk_rate_table_find': clkdev.c:(.text+0xcf820): undefined reference to `cpufreq_next_valid' make[3]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 Fix this making cpufreq_next_valid function inline and move it to cpufreq.h. Fixes: 27e289dc (cpufreq: Introduce macros for cpufreq_frequency_table iteration) Reported-and-tested-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
Some cpufreq drivers were redundantly invoking the _begin() and _end() APIs around frequency transitions, and this double invocation (one from the cpufreq core and the other from the cpufreq driver) used to result in a self-deadlock, leading to system hangs during boot. (The _begin() API makes contending callers wait until the previous invocation is complete. Hence, the cpufreq driver would end up waiting on itself!). Now all such drivers have been fixed, but debugging this issue was not very straight-forward (even lockdep didn't catch this). So let us add a debug infrastructure to the cpufreq core to catch such issues more easily in the future. We add a new field called 'transition_task' to the policy structure, to keep track of the task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field, we make note of this task during _begin() and print a warning if we find a case where the same task is calling _begin() again, before completing the previous frequency transition using the corresponding _end(). We have left out ASYNC_NOTIFICATION drivers from this debug infrastructure for 2 reasons: 1. At the moment, we have no way to avoid a particular scenario where this debug infrastructure can emit false-positive warnings for such drivers. The scenario is depicted below: Task A Task B /* 1st freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... ... } Change the frequency /* 2nd freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... //waiting for B to ... //finish _end() for ... //the 1st transition ... | Got interrupt for successful ... | change of frequency (1st one). ... | ... | /* 1st freq transition */ ... | Invoke _end() { ... | ... ... V } ... ... } This scenario is actually deadlock-free because, once Task A changes the frequency, it is Task B's responsibility to invoke the corresponding _end() for the 1st frequency transition. Hence it is perfectly legal for Task A to go ahead and attempt another frequency transition in the meantime. (Of course it won't be able to proceed until Task B finishes the 1st _end(), but this doesn't cause a deadlock or a hang). The debug infrastructure cannot handle this scenario and will treat it as a deadlock and print a warning. To avoid this, we exclude such drivers from the purview of this code. 2. Luckily, we don't _need_ this infrastructure for ASYNC_NOTIFICATION drivers at all! The cpufreq core does not automatically invoke the _begin() and _end() APIs during frequency transitions in such drivers. Thus, the driver alone is responsible for invoking _begin()/_end() and hence there shouldn't be any conflicts which lead to double invocations. So, we can skip these drivers, since the probability that such drivers will hit this problem is extremely low, as outlined above. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
Many cpufreq drivers need to iterate over the cpufreq_frequency_table for various tasks. This patch introduces two macros which can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table keeping a common coding style across drivers: - cpufreq_for_each_entry: iterate over each entry of the table - cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry: iterate over each entry that contains a valid frequency. It should have no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NLad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
cpufreq_notify_transition() and cpufreq_notify_post_transition() shouldn't be called directly by cpufreq drivers anymore and so these should be marked static. Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFreq core has new infrastructure that would guarantee serialized calls to target() or target_index() callbacks. These are called cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end(). This patch converts existing drivers to use these new set of routines. Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
Whenever we change the frequency of a CPU, we call the PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized, i.e. PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers should strictly alternate, thereby preventing two different sets of PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE notifiers from interleaving arbitrarily. The following examples illustrate why this is important: Scenario 1: ----------- A thread reading the value of cpuinfo_cur_freq, will call __cpufreq_cpu_get()->cpufreq_out_of_sync()->cpufreq_notify_transition() The ondemand governor can decide to change the frequency of the CPU at the same time and hence it can end up sending the notifications via ->target(). If the notifiers are not serialized, the following sequence can occur: - PRECHANGE Notification for freq A (from cpuinfo_cur_freq) - PRECHANGE Notification for freq B (from target()) - Freq changed by target() to B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq A We can see from the above that the last POSTCHANGE Notification happens for freq A but the hardware is set to run at freq B. Where would we break then?: adjust_jiffies() in cpufreq.c & cpufreq_callback() in arch/arm/kernel/smp.c (which also adjusts the jiffies). All the loops_per_jiffy calculations will get messed up. Scenario 2: ----------- The governor calls __cpufreq_driver_target() to change the frequency. At the same time, if we change scaling_{min|max}_freq from sysfs, it will end up calling the governor's CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS notification, which will also call __cpufreq_driver_target(). And hence we end up issuing concurrent calls to ->target(). Typically, platforms have the following logic in their ->target() routines: (Eg: cpufreq-cpu0, omap, exynos, etc) A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage B. Change freq C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage Now, if the two concurrent calls to ->target() are X and Y, where X is trying to increase the freq and Y is trying to decrease it, we get the following race condition: X.A: voltage gets increased for larger freq Y.A: nothing happens Y.B: freq gets decreased Y.C: voltage gets decreased X.B: freq gets increased X.C: nothing happens Thus we can end up setting a freq which is not supported by the voltage we have set. That will probably make the clock to the CPU unstable and the system might not work properly anymore. This patch introduces a set of synchronization primitives to serialize frequency transitions, which are to be used as shown below: cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_freq_transition_end(); The _begin() call sends the PRECHANGE notification whereas the _end() call sends the POSTCHANGE notification. Also, all the necessary synchronization is handled within these calls. In particular, even drivers which set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag can also use these APIs for performing frequency transitions (ie., you can call _begin() from one task, and call the corresponding _end() from a different task). The actual synchronization underneath is not that complicated: The key challenge is to allow drivers to begin the transition from one thread and end it in a completely different thread (this is to enable drivers that do asynchronous POSTCHANGE notification from bottom-halves, to also use the same interface). To achieve this, a 'transition_ongoing' flag, a 'transition_lock' spinlock and a wait-queue are added per-policy. The flag and the wait-queue are used in conjunction to create an "uninterrupted flow" from _begin() to _end(). The spinlock is used to ensure that only one such "flow" is in flight at any given time. Put together, this provides us all the necessary synchronization. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
During suspend, we first stop governors and then suspend cpufreq drivers and resume must be exactly opposite of that. i.e. resume drivers first and then start governors. But the current code in resume enables governors first and then resume drivers. Fix it be changing code sequence there. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
This callback allows the driver to do clean up before the CPU is completely down and its state cannot be modified. This is used by the intel_pstate driver to reduce the requested P state prior to the core going away. This is required because the requested P state of the offline core is used to select the package P state. This effectively sets the floor package P state to the requested P state on the offline core. Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> [rjw: Minor modifications] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
Remove unnecessary braces from a single statement. Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
Fix 2 checkpatch errors about using assignment in if condition, 1 checkpatch error about a required space after comma and 3 warnings about line over 80 characters. Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Two cpufreq notifiers CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE and CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE have not been used for some time, so remove them to clean up code a bit. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
cpufreq drivers that provide the ->setpolicy() callback are supposed to have integrated governors, so they don't need to set ->target() or ->target_index() and may confuse the core if any of these callbacks is present. For this reason, add a check preventing ->setpolicy cpufreq drivers from registering if they have non-NULL ->target or ->target_index. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit da60ce9f (cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()) __cpufreq_add_dev() sometimes fails for CPUs handled by intel_pstate, because that driver may return 0 from its ->get() callback if it has not run long enough to collect enough samples on the given CPU. That didn't happen before commit da60ce9f which added policy->cur initialization to __cpufreq_add_dev() to help reduce code duplication in other cpufreq drivers. However, the code added by commit da60ce9f need not be executed for cpufreq drivers having the ->setpolicy callback defined, because the subsequent invocation of cpufreq_set_policy() will use that callback to initialize the policy anyway and it doesn't need policy->cur to be initialized upfront. The analogous code in cpufreq_update_policy() is also unnecessary for cpufreq drivers having ->setpolicy set and may be skipped for them as well. Since intel_pstate provides ->setpolicy, skipping the upfront policy->cur initialization for cpufreq drivers with that callback set will cover intel_pstate and the problem it's been having after commit da60ce9f will be addressed. Fixes: da60ce9f (cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71931Reported-and-tested-by: NPatrik Lundquist <patrik.lundquist@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We have used 'frozen' variable/function parameter at many places to distinguish between CPU offline/online on suspend/resume vs sysfs removals. We now have another variable cpufreq_suspended which can be used in these cases, so we can get rid of all those variables or function parameters. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
freq table is not per CPU but per policy, so it makes more sense to keep it within struct cpufreq_policy instead of a per-cpu variable. This patch does it. Over that, there is no need to set policy->freq_table to NULL in ->exit(), as policy structure is going to be freed soon. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
- Add missing newlines - Coalesce format fragments - Convert printks to pr_<level> - Align arguments Based-on-patch-by: NSören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Multiple platforms need to set CPUs to a particular frequency before suspending the system, so provide a common infrastructure for them. Those platforms only need to point their ->suspend callback pointers to the generic routine. Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This patch adds cpufreq suspend/resume calls to dpm_{suspend|resume}() for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors. Lan Tianyu (Intel) & Jinhyuk Choi (Broadcom) found an issue where the tunables configuration for clusters/sockets with non-boot CPUs was lost after system suspend/resume, as we were notifying governors with CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT on removal of the last CPU for that policy which caused the tunables memory to be freed. This is fixed by preventing any governor operations from being carried out between the device suspend and device resume stages of system suspend and resume, respectively. We could have added these callbacks at dpm_{suspend|resume}_noirq() level, but there is an additional problem that the majority of I/O devices is already suspended at that point and if cpufreq drivers want to change the frequency before suspending, then that not be possible on some platforms (which depend on peripherals like i2c, regulators, etc). Reported-and-tested-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Reported-by: NJinhyuk Choi <jinchoi@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 viresh kumar 提交于
We call __find_governor() during the addition of the first CPU of each policy from __cpufreq_add_dev() to find the last governor used for this CPU before it was hot-removed. After that we call cpufreq_parse_governor() in cpufreq_init_policy(), either with this governor, or with the default governor. Right after that policy->governor is set to NULL. While that code is not functionally problematic, the structure of it is suboptimal, because some of the code required in cpufreq_init_policy() is being executed by its caller, __cpufreq_add_dev(). So, it would make more sense to get all of it together in a single place to make code more readable. Accordingly, move the code needed for policy initialization to cpufreq_init_policy() and initialize policy->governor to NULL at the beginning. In order to clean up the code a bit more, some of the #ifdefs for CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU are dropped too. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
policy->rwsem is used to lock access to all parts of code modifying struct cpufreq_policy, but it's not used on a new policy created by __cpufreq_add_dev(). Because of that, if cpufreq_update_policy() is called in a tight loop on one CPU in parallel with offline/online of another CPU, then the following crash can be triggered: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 pgd = c0003000 [00000020] *pgd=80000000004003, *pmd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 206 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM PC is at __cpufreq_governor+0x10/0x1ac LR is at cpufreq_update_policy+0x114/0x150 ---[ end trace f23a8defea6cd706 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception CPU0: stopping CPU: 0 PID: 7136 Comm: mpdecision Tainted: G D W 3.10.0-gd727407-00074-g979ede8 #396 [<c0afe180>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) from [<c02a23ac>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x58) [<c02a23ac>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x58) from [<c02a23d8>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c) [<c02a23d8>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c) from [<c0803c68>] (cpufreq_set_policy+0xd4/0x2b8) [<c0803c68>] (cpufreq_set_policy+0xd4/0x2b8) from [<c0803e7c>] (cpufreq_init_policy+0x30/0x98) [<c0803e7c>] (cpufreq_init_policy+0x30/0x98) from [<c0805a18>] (__cpufreq_add_dev.isra.17+0x4dc/0x7a4) [<c0805a18>] (__cpufreq_add_dev.isra.17+0x4dc/0x7a4) from [<c0805d38>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x58/0x84) [<c0805d38>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x58/0x84) from [<c0afe180>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) [<c0afe180>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) from [<c02812dc>] (__cpu_notify+0x28/0x44) [<c02812dc>] (__cpu_notify+0x28/0x44) from [<c0aeed90>] (_cpu_up+0xf4/0x1dc) [<c0aeed90>] (_cpu_up+0xf4/0x1dc) from [<c0aeeed4>] (cpu_up+0x5c/0x78) [<c0aeeed4>] (cpu_up+0x5c/0x78) from [<c0aec808>] (store_online+0x44/0x74) [<c0aec808>] (store_online+0x44/0x74) from [<c03a40f4>] (sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x14c) [<c03a40f4>] (sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x14c) from [<c03517d4>] (vfs_write+0xd0/0x180) [<c03517d4>] (vfs_write+0xd0/0x180) from [<c0351ca8>] (SyS_write+0x38/0x68) [<c0351ca8>] (SyS_write+0x38/0x68) from [<c0205de0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30) Fix that by taking locks at appropriate places in __cpufreq_add_dev() as well. Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Suggested-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Policy must be fully initialized before it is being made available for use by others. Otherwise cpufreq_cpu_get() would be able to grab a half initialized policy structure that might not have affected_cpus (for example) populated. Then, anybody accessing those fields will get a wrong value and that will lead to unpredictable results. In order to fix this, do all the necessary initialization before we make the policy structure available via cpufreq_cpu_get(). That will guarantee that any code accessing fields of the policy will get correct data from them. Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Aaron Plattner 提交于
If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible for it to be called after cpufreq_driver is set but before cpufreq_cpu_data is written during subsys_interface_register. This happens because cpufreq_get doesn't take the cpufreq_driver_lock around its use of cpufreq_cpu_data. Fix this by using cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) to look up the policy rather than reading it out of cpufreq_cpu_data directly. cpufreq_cpu_get() takes the appropriate locks to prevent this race from happening. Since it's possible for policy to be NULL if the caller passes in an invalid CPU number or calls the function before cpufreq is initialized, delete the BUG_ON(!policy) and simply return 0. Don't try to return -ENOENT because that's negative and the function returns an unsigned integer. References: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=177934Signed-off-by: NAaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com> Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-