- 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Commit a3172027 introduced test_transaction as a requirement for flushing old lists -- but it can never return 1 unless the transaction has already been flushed. As a result, we have a routine that iterates the j_realblocks list but doesn't actually do anything. Since it's been this way since 2006 and the latency numbers were what Chris expected, let's just rip it out. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 09 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
The reiserfs write lock replaced the BKL and uses similar semantics. Frederic's locking code makes a distinction between when the lock is nested and when it's being acquired/released, but I don't think that's the right distinction to make. The right distinction is between the lock being released at end-of-use and the lock being released for a schedule. The unlock should return the depth and the lock should restore it, rather than the other way around as it is now. This patch implements that and adds a number of places where the lock should be dropped. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
same story as with the previous patches - note that return value of blkdev_close() is lost, since there's nowhere the caller (__fput()) could return it to. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 01 6月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
This patch stops reiserfs using the VFS 'write_super()' method along with the s_dirt flag, because they are on their way out. The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and writes out all dirty superblock using the '->write_super()' call-back. But the problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every 5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use '->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove it together with the kernel thread. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
The 'journal_mark_dirty()' function currently first marks the superblock as dirty by setting 's_dirt' to 1, then does various sanity checks and returns, then actuall does all the magic with the journal. This is not an ideal order, though. It makes more sense to first do all the checks, then do all the internal stuff, and at the end notify the VFS that the superblock is now dirty. This patch moves the 's_dirt = 1' assignment from the very beginning of this function to the very end. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Turn 'reiserfs_flush_old_commits()' into a void function because the callers do not cares about what it returns anyway. We are going to remove the 'sb->s_dirt' field completely and this patch is a small step towards this direction. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h preparatory to splitting and killing it. Performed with the following command: perl -p -i -e 's!^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>.*\n!!' `grep -Irl '^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>' *` Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 1月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem is involved there. journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there. Just keep the it around these two calls for safety. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 12 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Justin TerAvest 提交于
fs_excl is a poor man's priority inheritance for filesystems to hint to the block layer that an operation is important. It was never clearly specified, not widely adopted, and will not prevent starvation in many cases (like across cgroups). fs_excl was introduced with the time sliced CFQ IO scheduler, to indicate when a process held FS exclusive resources and thus needed a boost. It doesn't cover all file systems, and it was never fully complete. Lets kill it. Signed-off-by: NJustin TerAvest <teravest@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 01 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
The maximum number of concurrent work items queued on commit_wq is bound by the number of active journals. Convert to alloc_workqueue() and use the default concurrency level so that they can be processed in parallel. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
The big kernel lock has been removed from all these files at some point, leaving only the #include. Remove this too as a cleanup. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 11月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
After recent blkdev_get() modifications, open_by_devnum() and open_bdev_exclusive() are simple wrappers around blkdev_get(). Replace them with blkdev_get_by_dev() and blkdev_get_by_path(). blkdev_get_by_dev() is identical to open_by_devnum(). blkdev_get_by_path() is slightly different in that it doesn't automatically add %FMODE_EXCL to @mode. All users are converted. Most conversions are mechanical and don't introduce any behavior difference. There are several exceptions. * btrfs now sets FMODE_EXCL in btrfs_device->mode, so there's no reason to OR it explicitly on blkdev_put(). * gfs2, nilfs2 and the generic mount_bdev() now set FMODE_EXCL in sb->s_mode. * With the above changes, sb->s_mode now always should contain FMODE_EXCL. WARN_ON_ONCE() added to kill_block_super() to detect errors. The new blkdev_get_*() functions are with proper docbook comments. While at it, add function description to blkdev_get() too. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@lazybastard.org> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
Over time, block layer has accumulated a set of APIs dealing with bdev open, close, claim and release. * blkdev_get/put() are the primary open and close functions. * bd_claim/release() deal with exclusive open. * open/close_bdev_exclusive() are combination of open and claim and the other way around, respectively. * bd_link/unlink_disk_holder() to create and remove holder/slave symlinks. * open_by_devnum() wraps bdget() + blkdev_get(). The interface is a bit confusing and the decoupling of open and claim makes it impossible to properly guarantee exclusive access as in-kernel open + claim sequence can disturb the existing exclusive open even before the block layer knows the current open if for another exclusive access. Reorganize the interface such that, * blkdev_get() is extended to include exclusive access management. @holder argument is added and, if is @FMODE_EXCL specified, it will gain exclusive access atomically w.r.t. other exclusive accesses. * blkdev_put() is similarly extended. It now takes @mode argument and if @FMODE_EXCL is set, it releases an exclusive access. Also, when the last exclusive claim is released, the holder/slave symlinks are removed automatically. * bd_claim/release() and close_bdev_exclusive() are no longer necessary and either made static or removed. * bd_link_disk_holder() remains the same but bd_unlink_disk_holder() is no longer necessary and removed. * open_bdev_exclusive() becomes a simple wrapper around lookup_bdev() and blkdev_get(). It also has an unexpected extra bdev_read_only() test which probably should be moved into blkdev_get(). * open_by_devnum() is modified to take @holder argument and pass it to blkdev_get(). Most of bdev open/close operations are unified into blkdev_get/put() and most exclusive accesses are tested atomically at the open time (as it should). This cleans up code and removes some, both valid and invalid, but unnecessary all the same, corner cases. open_bdev_exclusive() and open_by_devnum() can use further cleanup - rename to blkdev_get_by_path() and blkdev_get_by_devt() and drop special features. Well, let's leave them for another day. Most conversions are straight-forward. drbd conversion is a bit more involved as there was some reordering, but the logic should stay the same. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: NRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Acked-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Acked-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Cc: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Cc: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Cc: Leo Chen <leochen@broadcom.com> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org> Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 10 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Switch to the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA flag for log writes and remove the EOPNOTSUPP detection for barriers. Note that reiserfs had a fairly different code path for barriers before as it wa the only filesystem actually making use of them. The new code always uses the old non-barrier codepath and just sets the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA explicitly for the journal commits. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
These flags aren't real I/O types, but tell ll_rw_block to always lock the buffer instead of giving up on a failed trylock. Instead add a new write_dirty_buffer helper that implements this semantic and use it from the existing SWRITE* callers. Note that the ll_rw_block code had a bug where it didn't promote WRITE_SYNC_PLUG properly, which this patch fixes. In the ufs code clean up the helper that used to call ll_rw_block to mirror sync_dirty_buffer, which is the function it implements for compound buffers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Changli Gao 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChangli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
The reiserfs journal behaves inconsistently when determining whether to allow a mount of a read-only device. This is due to the use of the continue_replay variable to short circuit the journal scanning. If it's set, it's assumed that there are transactions to replay, but there may not be. If it's unset, it's assumed that there aren't any, and that may not be the case either. I've observed two failure cases: 1) Where a clean file system on a read-only device refuses to mount 2) Where a clean file system on a read-only device passes the optimization and then tries writing the journal header to update the latest mount id. The former is easily observable by using a freshly created file system on a read-only loopback device. This patch moves the check into journal_read_transaction, where it can bail out before it's about to replay a transaction. That way it can go through and skip transactions where appropriate, yet still refuse to mount a file system with outstanding transactions. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Vmalloc is called to allocate journal->j_cnode_free_list but we hold the reiserfs lock at this time, which raises a {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} lock inversion. Just drop the reiserfs lock at this time, as it's not even needed but kept for paranoid reasons. This fixes: [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 2.6.33-rc5 #1 --------------------------------- inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage. kswapd0/313 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c11118c8>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x28/0x50 {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at: [<c104ee32>] mark_held_locks+0x62/0x90 [<c104eefa>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x9a/0xc0 [<c108f7b6>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x26/0xf0 [<c108621c>] __get_vm_area_node+0x6c/0xf0 [<c108690e>] __vmalloc_node+0x7e/0xa0 [<c1086aab>] vmalloc+0x2b/0x30 [<c110e1fb>] journal_init+0x6cb/0xa10 [<c10f90a2>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x342/0xb80 [<c1095665>] get_sb_bdev+0x145/0x180 [<c10f68e1>] get_super_block+0x21/0x30 [<c1094520>] vfs_kern_mount+0x40/0xd0 [<c1094609>] do_kern_mount+0x39/0xd0 [<c10aaa97>] do_mount+0x2c7/0x6d0 [<c10aaf06>] sys_mount+0x66/0xa0 [<c16198a7>] mount_block_root+0xc4/0x245 [<c1619a81>] mount_root+0x59/0x5f [<c1619b98>] prepare_namespace+0x111/0x14b [<c1619269>] kernel_init+0xcf/0xdb [<c100303a>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1c irq event stamp: 63236801 hardirqs last enabled at (63236801): [<c134e7fa>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x9a/0x120 hardirqs last disabled at (63236800): [<c134e799>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x39/0x120 softirqs last enabled at (63218800): [<c102f451>] __do_softirq+0xc1/0x110 softirqs last disabled at (63218789): [<c102f4ed>] do_softirq+0x4d/0x60 other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by kswapd0/313: #0: (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<c1074bb4>] shrink_slab+0x24/0x170 #1: (&type->s_umount_key#19){++++..}, at: [<c10a2edd>] shrink_dcache_memory+0xfd/0x1a0 stack backtrace: Pid: 313, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.33-rc5 #1 Call Trace: [<c134db2c>] ? printk+0x18/0x1c [<c104e7ef>] print_usage_bug+0x15f/0x1a0 [<c104ebcf>] mark_lock+0x39f/0x5a0 [<c104d66b>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0x10 [<c1052c50>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xf0 [<c1050c24>] __lock_acquire+0x214/0xa70 [<c10438c5>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x95/0x110 [<c10514fa>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0 [<c11118c8>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x28/0x50 [<c134f03f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x2b0 [<c11118c8>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x28/0x50 [<c11118c8>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x28/0x50 [<c11118c8>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x28/0x50 [<c10f05b0>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x50/0x140 [<c10a653f>] ? generic_delete_inode+0x5f/0x150 [<c10f0560>] ? reiserfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x140 [<c10a657c>] generic_delete_inode+0x9c/0x150 [<c10a666d>] generic_drop_inode+0x3d/0x60 [<c10a5597>] iput+0x47/0x50 [<c10a2a4f>] dentry_iput+0x6f/0xf0 [<c10a2af4>] d_kill+0x24/0x50 [<c10a2d3d>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x21d/0x2b0 [<c10a2f0f>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x12f/0x1a0 [<c1074c9e>] shrink_slab+0x10e/0x170 [<c1075177>] kswapd+0x477/0x6a0 [<c1072d10>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x1b0 [<c103e160>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 [<c1074d00>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x6a0 [<c103de6c>] kthread+0x6c/0x80 [<c103de00>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80 [<c100303a>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1c Reported-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 02 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Keeping the reiserfs lock while freeing the journal on umount path triggers a lock inversion between bdev->bd_mutex and the reiserfs lock. We don't need the reiserfs lock at this stage. The filesystem is not usable anymore, and there are no more pending commits, everything got flushed (even this operation was done in parallel and didn't required the reiserfs lock from the current process). This fixes the following lockdep report: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.32-atom #172 ------------------------------------------------------- umount/3904 is trying to acquire lock: (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10de2c2>] __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160 but task is already holding lock: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1143279>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90 [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340 [<c1143229>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50 [<c111c485>] reiserfs_get_block+0x85/0x1620 [<c10e1040>] do_mpage_readpage+0x1f0/0x6d0 [<c10e1640>] mpage_readpages+0xc0/0x100 [<c1119b89>] reiserfs_readpages+0x19/0x20 [<c108f1ec>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1bc/0x260 [<c108f2b8>] ra_submit+0x28/0x40 [<c1087e3e>] filemap_fault+0x40e/0x420 [<c109b5fd>] __do_fault+0x3d/0x430 [<c109d47e>] handle_mm_fault+0x12e/0x790 [<c1022a65>] do_page_fault+0x135/0x330 [<c1403663>] error_code+0x6b/0x70 [<c10ef9ca>] load_elf_binary+0x82a/0x1a10 [<c10ba130>] search_binary_handler+0x90/0x1d0 [<c10bb70f>] do_execve+0x1df/0x250 [<c1001746>] sys_execve+0x46/0x70 [<c1002fa5>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> #2 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}: [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90 [<c109b1ab>] might_fault+0x8b/0xb0 [<c11b8f52>] copy_to_user+0x32/0x70 [<c10c3b94>] filldir64+0xa4/0xf0 [<c1109116>] sysfs_readdir+0x116/0x210 [<c10c3e1d>] vfs_readdir+0x8d/0xb0 [<c10c3ea9>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xb0 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 -> #1 (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}: [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90 [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340 [<c110951c>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x2c/0xb0 [<c1109aa0>] create_dir+0x40/0x90 [<c1109b1b>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2b/0x50 [<c11b2352>] kobject_add_internal+0xc2/0x1b0 [<c11b2531>] kobject_add_varg+0x31/0x50 [<c11b25ac>] kobject_add+0x2c/0x60 [<c1258294>] device_add+0x94/0x560 [<c11036ea>] add_partition+0x18a/0x2a0 [<c110418a>] rescan_partitions+0x33a/0x450 [<c10de5bf>] __blkdev_get+0x12f/0x2d0 [<c10de76a>] blkdev_get+0xa/0x10 [<c11034b8>] register_disk+0x108/0x130 [<c11a87a9>] add_disk+0xd9/0x130 [<c12998e5>] sd_probe_async+0x105/0x1d0 [<c10528af>] async_thread+0xcf/0x230 [<c104bfd4>] kthread+0x74/0x80 [<c1003aab>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x3c -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}: [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90 [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340 [<c10de2c2>] __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160 [<c10de40a>] blkdev_put+0xa/0x10 [<c113ce22>] free_journal_ram+0xd2/0x130 [<c113ea18>] do_journal_release+0x98/0x190 [<c113eb2a>] journal_release+0xa/0x10 [<c1128eb6>] reiserfs_put_super+0x36/0x130 [<c10b776f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x4f/0xe0 [<c10b7825>] kill_block_super+0x25/0x40 [<c11255df>] reiserfs_kill_sb+0x7f/0x90 [<c10b7f4a>] deactivate_super+0x7a/0x90 [<c10cccd8>] mntput_no_expire+0x98/0xd0 [<c10ccfcc>] sys_umount+0x4c/0x310 [<c10cd2a9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by umount/3904: #0: (&type->s_umount_key#30){+++++.}, at: [<c10b7f45>] deactivate_super+0x75/0x90 #1: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1143279>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40 stack backtrace: Pid: 3904, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #172 Call Trace: [<c13ff903>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a [<c105d33a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0 [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0 [<c108b66f>] ? free_pcppages_bulk+0x1f/0x250 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90 [<c10de2c2>] ? __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160 [<c10de2c2>] ? __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160 [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340 [<c10de2c2>] ? __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160 [<c105c932>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80 [<c10afe12>] ? kfree+0x92/0xd0 [<c10de2c2>] __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160 [<c105cc3b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 [<c10de40a>] blkdev_put+0xa/0x10 [<c113ce22>] free_journal_ram+0xd2/0x130 [<c113ea18>] do_journal_release+0x98/0x190 [<c113eb2a>] journal_release+0xa/0x10 [<c1128eb6>] reiserfs_put_super+0x36/0x130 [<c1050596>] ? up_write+0x16/0x30 [<c10b776f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x4f/0xe0 [<c10b7825>] kill_block_super+0x25/0x40 [<c10f41e0>] ? vfs_quota_off+0x0/0x20 [<c11255df>] reiserfs_kill_sb+0x7f/0x90 [<c10b7f4a>] deactivate_super+0x7a/0x90 [<c10cccd8>] mntput_no_expire+0x98/0xd0 [<c10ccfcc>] sys_umount+0x4c/0x310 [<c10cd2a9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 30 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Commit 500f5a0b (reiserfs: Fix possible recursive lock) fixed a vmalloc under reiserfs lock that triggered a lockdep warning because of a IN-FS-RECLAIM <-> RECLAIM-FS-ON locking dependency inversion. But this patch has ommitted another vmalloc call in the same path that allocates the journal. Relax the lock for this one too. Reported-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 05 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
While creating the reiserfs workqueue during the journal initialization, we are holding the reiserfs lock, but create_workqueue() also holds the cpu_add_remove_lock, creating then the following dependency: - reiserfs lock -> cpu_add_remove_lock But we also have the following existing dependencies: - mm->mmap_sem -> reiserfs lock - cpu_add_remove_lock -> cpu_hotplug.lock -> slub_lock -> sysfs_mutex The merged dependency chain then becomes: - mm->mmap_sem -> reiserfs lock -> cpu_add_remove_lock -> cpu_hotplug.lock -> slub_lock -> sysfs_mutex But when we fill a dir entry in sysfs_readir(), we are holding the sysfs_mutex and we also might fault while copying the directory entry to the user, leading to the following dependency: - sysfs_mutex -> mm->mmap_sem The end result is then a lock inversion between sysfs_mutex and mm->mmap_sem, as reported in the following lockdep warning: [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.31-07095-g25a3912 #4 ------------------------------------------------------- udevadm/790 is trying to acquire lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c1098942>] might_fault+0x72/0xc0 but task is already holding lock: (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c110813c>] sysfs_readdir+0x7c/0x260 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #4 (slub_lock){+++++.}: [...] -> #3 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #2 (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}: [...] This can be fixed by relaxing the reiserfs lock while creating the workqueue. This is fine to relax the lock here, we just keep it around to pass through reiserfs lock checks and for paranoid reasons. Reported-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Tested-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Cc: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
-
- 17 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Alexander Beregalov reported the following warning: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.31-03149-gdcc030a #1 ------------------------------------------------------- udevadm/716 is trying to acquire lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c107249a>] might_fault+0x4a/0xa0 but task is already holding lock: (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10cb9aa>] sysfs_readdir+0x5a/0x200 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #2 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [...] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}: [...] On reiserfs mount path, we take the reiserfs lock and while initializing the journal, we open the device, taking the bdev->bd_mutex. Then rescan_partition() may signal the change to sysfs. We have then the following dependency: reiserfs_lock -> bd_mutex -> sysfs_mutex Later, while entering reiserfs_readpage() after a pagefault in an mmaped reiserfs file, we are holding the mm->mmap_sem, and we are going to take the reiserfs lock too. We have then the following dependency: mm->mmap_sem -> reiserfs_lock which, expanded with the previous dependency gives us: mm->mmap_sem -> reiserfs_lock -> bd_mutex -> sysfs_mutex Now while entering the sysfs readdir path, we are holding the sysfs_mutex. And when we copy a directory entry to the user buffer, we might fault and then take the mm->mmap_sem lock. Which leads to the circular locking dependency reported. We can fix that by relaxing the reiserfs lock during the call to journal_init_dev(), which is the place where we open the mounted device. This is fine to relax the lock here because we are in the begining of the reiserfs mount path and there is nothing to protect at this time, the journal is not intialized. We just keep this lock around for paranoid reasons. Reported-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Tested-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Cc: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
-
- 14 9月, 2009 6 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
While searching a pathname, an inode mutex can be acquired in do_lookup() which calls reiserfs_lookup() which in turn acquires the write lock. On the other side reiserfs_fill_super() can acquire the write_lock and then call reiserfs_lookup_privroot() which can acquire an inode mutex (the root of the mount point). So we theoretically risk an AB - BA lock inversion that could lead to a deadlock. As for other lock dependencies found since the bkl to mutex conversion, the fix is to use reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() which drops the lock dependency to the write lock. [ Impact: fix a possible deadlock with reiserfs ] Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() is a hack to avoid any dependency between an internal reiserfs mutex and the write lock, it has been proposed to follow the old bkl logic. The code does the following: while (!mutex_trylock(m)) { reiserfs_write_unlock(s); schedule(); reiserfs_write_lock(s); } It then imitate the implicit behaviour of the lock when it was a Bkl and hadn't such dependency: mutex_lock(m) { if (fastpath) let's go else { wait_for_mutex() { schedule() { unlock_kernel() reacquire_lock_kernel() } } } } The problem is that by using such explicit schedule(), we don't benefit of the adaptive mutex spinning on owner. The logic in use now is: reiserfs_write_unlock(s); mutex_lock(m); // -> possible adaptive spinning reiserfs_write_lock(s); [ Impact: restore the use of adaptive spinning mutexes in reiserfs ] Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
flush_commit_list() uses ll_rw_block() to commit the pending log blocks. ll_rw_block() might sleep, and the bkl was released at this point. Then we can also relax the write lock at this point. [ Impact: release the reiserfs write lock when it is not needed ] Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
When do_journal_end() copies data to the journal blocks buffers in memory, it reschedules if needed between each block copied and dirtyfied. We can also release the write lock at this rescheduling stage, like did the bkl implicitly. [ Impact: release the reiserfs write lock when it is not needed ] Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Impact: fix a deadlock The j_flush_mutex is acquired safely in journal.c: if we can't take it, we free the reiserfs per superblock lock and wait a bit. But we have a remaining place in kupdate_transactions() where j_flush_mutex is still acquired traditionnaly. Thus the following scenario (warned by lockdep) can happen: A B mutex_lock(&write_lock) mutex_lock(&write_lock) mutex_lock(&j_flush_mutex) mutex_lock(&j_flush_mutex) //block mutex_unlock(&write_lock) sleep... mutex_lock(&write_lock) //deadlock Fix this by using reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() in kupdate_transactions(). Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> LKML-Reference: <1239660635-12940-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
This patch is an attempt to remove the Bkl based locking scheme from reiserfs and is intended. It is a bit inspired from an old attempt by Peter Zijlstra: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0704.2/2174.html The bkl is heavily used in this filesystem to prevent from concurrent write accesses on the filesystem. Reiserfs makes a deep use of the specific properties of the Bkl: - It can be acqquired recursively by a same task - It is released on the schedule() calls and reacquired when schedule() returns The two properties above are a roadmap for the reiserfs write locking so it's very hard to simply replace it with a common mutex. - We need a recursive-able locking unless we want to restructure several blocks of the code. - We need to identify the sites where the bkl was implictly relaxed (schedule, wait, sync, etc...) so that we can in turn release and reacquire our new lock explicitly. Such implicit releases of the lock are often required to let other resources producer/consumer do their job or we can suffer unexpected starvations or deadlocks. So the new lock that replaces the bkl here is a per superblock mutex with a specific property: it can be acquired recursively by a same task, like the bkl. For such purpose, we integrate a lock owner and a lock depth field on the superblock information structure. The first axis on this patch is to turn reiserfs_write_(un)lock() function into a wrapper to manage this mutex. Also some explicit calls to lock_kernel() have been converted to reiserfs_write_lock() helpers. The second axis is to find the important blocking sites (schedule...(), wait_on_buffer(), sync_dirty_buffer(), etc...) and then apply an explicit release of the write lock on these locations before blocking. Then we can safely wait for those who can give us resources or those who need some. Typically this is a fight between the current writer, the reiserfs workqueue (aka the async commiter) and the pdflush threads. The third axis is a consequence of the second. The write lock is usually on top of a lock dependency chain which can include the journal lock, the flush lock or the commit lock. So it's dangerous to release and trying to reacquire the write lock while we still hold other locks. This is fine with the bkl: T1 T2 lock_kernel() mutex_lock(A) unlock_kernel() // do something lock_kernel() mutex_lock(A) -> already locked by T1 schedule() (and then unlock_kernel()) lock_kernel() mutex_unlock(A) .... This is not fine with a mutex: T1 T2 mutex_lock(write) mutex_lock(A) mutex_unlock(write) // do something mutex_lock(write) mutex_lock(A) -> already locked by T1 schedule() mutex_lock(write) -> already locked by T2 deadlock The solution in this patch is to provide a helper which releases the write lock and sleep a bit if we can't lock a mutex that depend on it. It's another simulation of the bkl behaviour. The last axis is to locate the fs callbacks that are called with the bkl held, according to Documentation/filesystem/Locking. Those are: - reiserfs_remount - reiserfs_fill_super - reiserfs_put_super Reiserfs didn't need to explicitly lock because of the context of these callbacks. But now we must take care of that with the new locking. After this patch, reiserfs suffers from a slight performance regression (for now). On UP, a high volume write with dd reports an average of 27 MB/s instead of 30 MB/s without the patch applied. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> LKML-Reference: <1239070789-13354-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Commit 1faa16d2 accidentally broke the bdi congestion wait queue logic, causing us to wait on congestion for WRITE (== 1) when we really wanted BLK_RW_ASYNC (== 0) instead. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2009 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
This patch is a simple s/p_s_sb/sb/g to the reiserfs code. This is the first in a series of patches to rip out some of the awful variable naming in reiserfs. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
This patch strips trailing whitespace from the reiserfs code. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
This patch kills off reiserfs_journal_abort as it is never called, and combines __reiserfs_journal_abort_{soft,hard} into one function called reiserfs_abort_journal, which performs the same work. It is silent as opposed to the old version, since the message was always issued after a regular 'abort' message. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
ReiserFS panics can be somewhat inconsistent. In some cases: * a unique identifier may be associated with it * the function name may be included * the device may be printed separately This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them. reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
ReiserFS warnings can be somewhat inconsistent. In some cases: * a unique identifier may be associated with it * the function name may be included * the device may be printed separately This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them. reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
This patch fixes up the reiserfs code such that transaction ids are always unsigned ints. In places they can currently be signed ints or unsigned longs. The former just causes an annoying clm-2200 warning and may join a transaction when it should wait. The latter is just for correctness since the disk format uses a 32-bit transaction id. There aren't any runtime problems that result from it not wrapping at the correct location since the value is truncated correctly even on big endian systems. The 0 value might make it to disk, but the mount-time checks will bump it to 10 itself. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-