1. 24 9月, 2014 10 次提交
  2. 21 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 19 9月, 2014 21 次提交
  4. 16 9月, 2014 5 次提交
  5. 09 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  6. 08 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      sched, time: Atomically increment stime & utime · eb1b4af0
      Rik van Riel 提交于
      The functions task_cputime_adjusted and thread_group_cputime_adjusted()
      can be called locklessly, as well as concurrently on many different CPUs.
      
      This can occasionally lead to the utime and stime reported by times(), and
      other syscalls like it, going backward. The cause for this appears to be
      multiple threads racing in cputime_adjust(), both with values for utime or
      stime that is larger than the original, but each with a different value.
      
      Sometimes the larger value gets saved first, only to be immediately
      overwritten with a smaller value by another thread.
      
      Using atomic exchange prevents that problem, and ensures time
      progresses monotonically.
      Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
      Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
      Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
      Cc: srao@redhat.com
      Cc: lwoodman@redhat.com
      Cc: atheurer@redhat.com
      Cc: oleg@redhat.com
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408133138-22048-4-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      eb1b4af0