- 06 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
[ Upstream commit 82e40f558de566fdee214bec68096bbd5e64a6a4 ] A guest is not allowed to inject a SGI (or clear its pending state) by writing to GICD_ISPENDR0 (resp. GICD_ICPENDR0), as these bits are defined as WI (as per ARM IHI 0048B 4.3.7 and 4.3.8). Make sure we correctly emulate the architecture. Fixes: 96b29800 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add PENDING registers handlers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+ Reported-by: NAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 25 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
commit 5eeaf10eec394b28fad2c58f1f5c3a5da0e87d1c upstream. Since commit commit 328e5664 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Defer touching GICH_VMCR to vcpu_load/put"), we leave ICH_VMCR_EL2 (or its GICv2 equivalent) loaded as long as we can, only syncing it back when we're scheduled out. There is a small snag with that though: kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(), which is indirectly called from kvm_vcpu_check_block(), needs to evaluate the guest's view of ICC_PMR_EL1. At the point were we call kvm_vcpu_check_block(), the vcpu is still loaded, and whatever changes to PMR is not visible in memory until we do a vcpu_put(). Things go really south if the guest does the following: mov x0, #0 // or any small value masking interrupts msr ICC_PMR_EL1, x0 [vcpu preempted, then rescheduled, VMCR sampled] mov x0, #ff // allow all interrupts msr ICC_PMR_EL1, x0 wfi // traps to EL2, so samping of VMCR [interrupt arrives just after WFI] Here, the hypervisor's view of PMR is zero, while the guest has enabled its interrupts. kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() will then say that no interrupts are pending (despite an interrupt being received) and we'll block for no reason. If the guest doesn't have a periodic interrupt firing once it has blocked, it will stay there forever. To avoid this unfortuante situation, let's resync VMCR from kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(), ensuring that a following kvm_vcpu_check_block() will observe the latest value of PMR. This has been found by booting an arm64 Linux guest with the pseudo NMI feature, and thus using interrupt priorities to mask interrupts instead of the usual PSTATE masking. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.12 Fixes: 328e5664 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Defer touching GICH_VMCR to vcpu_load/put") Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 04 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
[ Upstream commit a6ecfb11bf37743c1ac49b266595582b107b61d4 ] When halting a guest, QEMU flushes the virtual ITS caches, which amounts to writing to the various tables that the guest has allocated. When doing this, we fail to take the srcu lock, and the kernel shouts loudly if running a lockdep kernel: [ 69.680416] ============================= [ 69.680819] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 69.681526] 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #18 Not tainted [ 69.682096] ----------------------------- [ 69.682501] ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 69.683225] [ 69.683225] other info that might help us debug this: [ 69.683225] [ 69.683975] [ 69.683975] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 69.684598] 6 locks held by qemu-system-aar/4097: [ 69.685059] #0: 0000000034196013 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x244/0x3a0 [ 69.686087] #1: 00000000f2ed935e (&its->its_lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x250/0x3a0 [ 69.686919] #2: 000000005e71ea54 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.687698] #3: 00000000c17e548d (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.688475] #4: 00000000ba386017 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.689978] #5: 00000000c2c3c335 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [ 69.690729] [ 69.690729] stack backtrace: [ 69.691151] CPU: 2 PID: 4097 Comm: qemu-system-aar Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #18 [ 69.691984] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019 [ 69.692831] Call trace: [ 69.694072] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcc/0x110 [ 69.694490] gfn_to_memslot+0x174/0x190 [ 69.694853] kvm_write_guest+0x50/0xb0 [ 69.695209] vgic_its_save_tables_v0+0x248/0x330 [ 69.695639] vgic_its_set_attr+0x298/0x3a0 [ 69.696024] kvm_device_ioctl_attr+0x9c/0xd8 [ 69.696424] kvm_device_ioctl+0x8c/0xf8 [ 69.696788] do_vfs_ioctl+0xc8/0x960 [ 69.697128] ksys_ioctl+0x8c/0xa0 [ 69.697445] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 [ 69.697817] el0_svc_common+0xd8/0x138 [ 69.698173] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [ 69.698528] el0_svc+0x8/0xc The fix is to obviously take the srcu lock, just like we do on the read side of things since bf308242. One wonders why this wasn't fixed at the same time, but hey... Fixes: bf308242 ("KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC/ITS: protect kvm_read_guest() calls with SRCU lock") Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin (Microsoft) <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 12 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jia He 提交于
kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate is only called with IRQ being disabled. There is thus no need to call spin_lock_irqsave/restore in vgic_fold_lr_state and vgic_prune_ap_list. This patch replace them with the non irq-safe version. Signed-off-by: NJia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> [maz: commit message tidy-up] Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
Now when we have a group configuration on the struct IRQ, use this state when populating the LR and signaling interrupts as either group 0 or group 1 to the VM. Depending on the model of the emulated GIC, and the guest's configuration of the VMCR, interrupts may be signaled as IRQs or FIQs to the VM. Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 21 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
When booting a 64 KB pages kernel on a ACPI GICv3 system that implements support for v2 emulation, the following warning is produced GICV size 0x2000 not a multiple of page size 0x10000 and support for v2 emulation is disabled, preventing GICv2 VMs from being able to run on such hosts. The reason is that vgic_v3_probe() performs a sanity check on the size of the window (it should be a multiple of the page size), while the ACPI MADT parsing code hardcodes the size of the window to 8 KB. This makes sense, considering that ACPI does not bother to describe the size in the first place, under the assumption that platforms implementing ACPI will follow the architecture and not put anything else in the same 64 KB window. So let's just drop the sanity check altogether, and assume that the window is at least 64 KB in size. Fixes: 90977732 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: vgic_init: implement kvm_vgic_hyp_init") Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 25 5月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
Now all the internals are ready to handle multiple redistributor regions, let's allow the userspace to register them. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
On vcpu first run, we eventually know the actual number of vcpus. This is a synchronization point to check all redistributors were assigned. On kvm_vgic_map_resources() we check both dist and redist were set, eventually check potential base address inconsistencies. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
vgic_v3_check_base() currently only handles the case of a unique legacy redistributor region whose size is not explicitly set but inferred, instead, from the number of online vcpus. We adapt it to handle the case of multiple redistributor regions with explicitly defined size. We rely on two new helpers: - vgic_v3_rdist_overlap() is used to detect overlap with the dist region if defined - vgic_v3_rd_region_size computes the size of the redist region, would it be a legacy unique region or a new explicitly sized region. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
We introduce vgic_v3_rdist_free_slot to help identifying where we can place a new 2x64KB redistributor. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
At the moment KVM supports a single rdist region. We want to support several separate rdist regions so let's introduce a list of them. This patch currently only cares about a single entry in this list as the functionality to register several redist regions is not yet there. So this only translates the existing code into something functionally similar using that new data struct. The redistributor region handle is stored in the vgic_cpu structure to allow later computation of the TYPER last bit. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andre Przywara 提交于
kvm_read_guest() will eventually look up in kvm_memslots(), which requires either to hold the kvm->slots_lock or to be inside a kvm->srcu critical section. In contrast to x86 and s390 we don't take the SRCU lock on every guest exit, so we have to do it individually for each kvm_read_guest() call. Use the newly introduced wrapper for that. Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Reported-by: NJan Glauber <jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 27 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we make sure we don't inject multiple instances of the same GICv2 SGI at the same time, we've made another bug more obvious: If we exit with an active SGI, we completely lose track of which vcpu it came from. On the next entry, we restore it with 0 as a source, and if that wasn't the right one, too bad. While this doesn't seem to trouble GIC-400, the architectural model gets offended and doesn't deactivate the interrupt on EOI. Another connected issue is that we will happilly make pending an interrupt from another vcpu, overriding the above zero with something that is just as inconsistent. Don't do that. The final issue is that we signal a maintenance interrupt when no pending interrupts are present in the LR. Assuming we've fixed the two issues above, we end-up in a situation where we keep exiting as soon as we've reached the active state, and not be able to inject the following pending. The fix comes in 3 parts: - GICv2 SGIs have their source vcpu saved if they are active on exit, and restored on entry - Multi-SGIs cannot go via the Pending+Active state, as this would corrupt the source field - Multi-SGIs are converted to using MI on EOI instead of NPIE Fixes: 16ca6a60 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Don't populate multiple LRs with the same vintid") Reported-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
It was recently reported that VFIO mediated devices, and anything that VFIO exposes as level interrupts, do no strictly follow the expected logic of such interrupts as it only lowers the input line when the guest has EOId the interrupt at the GIC level, rather than when it Acked the interrupt at the device level. THe GIC's Active+Pending state is fundamentally incompatible with this behaviour, as it prevents KVM from observing the EOI, and in turn results in VFIO never dropping the line. This results in an interrupt storm in the guest, which it really never expected. As we cannot really change VFIO to follow the strict rules of level signalling, let's forbid the A+P state altogether, as it is in the end only an optimization. It ensures that we will transition via an invalid state, which we can use to notify VFIO of the EOI. Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Tested-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Tested-by: NShunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We can finally get completely rid of any calls to the VGICv3 save/restore functions when the AP lists are empty on VHE systems. This requires carefully factoring out trap configuration from saving and restoring state, and carefully choosing what to do on the VHE and non-VHE path. One of the challenges is that we cannot save/restore the VMCR lazily because we can only write the VMCR when ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE is cleared when emulating a GICv2-on-GICv3, since otherwise all Group-0 interrupts end up being delivered as FIQ. To solve this problem, and still provide fast performance in the fast path of exiting a VM when no interrupts are pending (which also optimized the latency for actually delivering virtual interrupts coming from physical interrupts), we orchestrate a dance of only doing the activate/deactivate traps in vgic load/put for VHE systems (which can have ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE cleared when running in the host), and doing the configuration on every round-trip on non-VHE systems. Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
The APRs can only have bits set when the guest acknowledges an interrupt in the LR and can only have a bit cleared when the guest EOIs an interrupt in the LR. Therefore, if we have no LRs with any pending/active interrupts, the APR cannot change value and there is no need to clear it on every exit from the VM (hint: it will have already been cleared when we exited the guest the last time with the LRs all EOIed). The only case we need to take care of is when we migrate the VCPU away from a CPU or migrate a new VCPU onto a CPU, or when we return to userspace to capture the state of the VCPU for migration. To make sure this works, factor out the APR save/restore functionality into separate functions called from the VCPU (and by extension VGIC) put/load hooks. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
There is really no need to store the vgic_elrsr on the VGIC data structures as the only need we have for the elrsr is to figure out if an LR is inactive when we save the VGIC state upon returning from the guest. We can might as well store this in a temporary local variable. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The vgic code is trying to be clever when injecting GICv2 SGIs, and will happily populate LRs with the same interrupt number if they come from multiple vcpus (after all, they are distinct interrupt sources). Unfortunately, this is against the letter of the architecture, and the GICv2 architecture spec says "Each valid interrupt stored in the List registers must have a unique VirtualID for that virtual CPU interface.". GICv3 has similar (although slightly ambiguous) restrictions. This results in guests locking up when using GICv2-on-GICv3, for example. The obvious fix is to stop trying so hard, and inject a single vcpu per SGI per guest entry. After all, pending SGIs with multiple source vcpus are pretty rare, and are mostly seen in scenario where the physical CPUs are severely overcomitted. But as we now only inject a single instance of a multi-source SGI per vcpu entry, we may delay those interrupts for longer than strictly necessary, and run the risk of injecting lower priority interrupts in the meantime. In order to address this, we adopt a three stage strategy: - If we encounter a multi-source SGI in the AP list while computing its depth, we force the list to be sorted - When populating the LRs, we prevent the injection of any interrupt of lower priority than that of the first multi-source SGI we've injected. - Finally, the injection of a multi-source SGI triggers the request of a maintenance interrupt when there will be no pending interrupt in the LRs (HCR_NPIE). At the point where the last pending interrupt in the LRs switches from Pending to Active, the maintenance interrupt will be delivered, allowing us to add the remaining SGIs using the same process. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0919e84c ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add IRQ sync/flush framework") Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 02 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only observe rising edges as input to the VGIC, and we don't set the EOI flag and therefore are not told when the level goes down, so that we can re-queue a new interrupt when the level goes up. One way to solve this problem is to side-step the logic of the VGIC and special case the validation in the injection path, but it has the unfortunate drawback of having to peak into the physical GIC state whenever we want to know if the interrupt is pending on the virtual distributor. Instead, we can maintain the current semantics of a level triggered interrupt by sort of treating it as an edge-triggered interrupt, following from the fact that we only observe an asserting edge. This requires us to be a bit careful when populating the LRs and when folding the state back in though: * We lower the line level when populating the LR, so that when subsequently observing an asserting edge, the VGIC will do the right thing. * If the guest never acked the interrupt while running (for example if it had masked interrupts at the CPU level while running), we have to preserve the pending state of the LR and move it back to the line_level field of the struct irq when folding LR state. If the guest never acked the interrupt while running, but changed the device state and lowered the line (again with interrupts masked) then we need to observe this change in the line_level. Both of the above situations are solved by sampling the physical line and set the line level when folding the LR back. * Finally, if the guest never acked the interrupt while running and sampling the line reveals that the device state has changed and the line has been lowered, we must clear the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be told when the interrupt becomes asserted again. This has the added benefit of making the timer optimization patches (https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2017-July/026343.html) a bit simpler, because the timer code doesn't have to clear the active state on the sync anymore. It also potentially improves the performance of the timer implementation because the GIC knows the state or the LR and only needs to clear the active state when the pending bit in the LR is still set, where the timer has to always clear it when returning from running the guest with an injected timer interrupt. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 29 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The current pending table parsing code assumes that we keep the previous read of the pending bits, but keep that variable in the current block, making sure it is discarded on each loop. We end-up using whatever is on the stack. Who knows, it might just be the right thing... Fixes: 28077125 ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SAVE_PENDING_TABLES") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.12 Reported-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 10 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
All it takes is the has_v4 flag to be set in gic_kvm_info as well as "kvm-arm.vgic_v4_enable=1" being passed on the command line for GICv4 to be enabled in KVM. Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 06 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We are about to optimize our timer handling logic which involves injecting irqs to the vgic directly from the irq handler. Unfortunately, the injection path can take any AP list lock and irq lock and we must therefore make sure to use spin_lock_irqsave where ever interrupts are enabled and we are taking any of those locks, to avoid deadlocking between process context and the ISR. This changes a lot of the VGIC code, but the good news are that the changes are mostly mechanical. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc,zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 15 6月, 2017 8 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to facilitate debug, let's log which class of GICv3 system registers are trapped. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we're able to safely handle common sysreg access, let's give the user the opportunity to enable it by passing a specific command-line option (vgic_v3.common_trap). Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 David Daney 提交于
Some Cavium Thunder CPUs suffer a problem where a KVM guest may inadvertently cause the host kernel to quit receiving interrupts. Use the Group-0/1 trapping in order to deal with it. [maz]: Adapted patch to the Group-0/1 trapping, reworked commit log Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we're able to safely handle Group-0 sysreg access, let's give the user the opportunity to enable it by passing a specific command-line option (vgic_v3.group0_trap). Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to be able to trap Group-0 GICv3 system registers, we need to set ICH_HCR_EL2.TALL0 begore entering the guest. This is conditionnaly done after having restored the guest's state, and cleared on exit. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we're able to safely handle Group-1 sysreg access, let's give the user the opportunity to enable it by passing a specific command-line option (vgic_v3.group1_trap). Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to be able to trap Group-1 GICv3 system registers, we need to set ICH_HCR_EL2.TALL1 before entering the guest. This is conditionally done after having restored the guest's state, and cleared on exit. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to start handling guest access to GICv3 system registers, let's add a hook that will get called when we trap a system register access. This is gated by a new static key (vgic_v3_cpuif_trap). Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 24 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system. Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead. Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reported-by: Nwanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When an interrupt is injected with the HW bit set (indicating that deactivation should be propagated to the physical distributor), special care must be taken so that we never mark the corresponding LR with the Active+Pending state (as the pending state is kept in the physycal distributor). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 59529f69 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add GICv3 world switch backend") Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 09 5月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We have to register the ITS iodevice before running the VM, because in migration scenarios, we may be restoring a live device that wishes to inject MSIs before the VCPUs have started. All we need to register the ITS io device is the base address of the ITS, so we can simply register that when the base address of the ITS is set. [ Code to fix concurrency issues when setting the ITS base address and to fix the undef base address check written by Marc Zyngier ] Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
Instead of waiting with registering KVM iodevs until the first VCPU is run, we can actually create the iodevs when the redist base address is set. The only downside is that we must now also check if we need to do this for VCPUs which are created after creating the VGIC, because there is no enforced ordering between creating the VGIC (and setting its base addresses) and creating the VCPUs. Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
As we are about to fiddle with the IO device registration mechanism, let's be a little more careful when setting base addresses as early as possible. When setting a base address, we can check that there's address space enough for its scope and when the last of the two base addresses (dist and redist) get set, we can also check if the regions overlap at that time. This allows us to provide error messages to the user at time when trying to set the base address, as opposed to later when trying to run the VM. To do this, we make vgic_v3_check_base available in the core vgic-v3 code as well as in the other parts of the GICv3 code, namely the MMIO config code. We also return true for undefined base addresses so that the function can be used before all base addresses are set; all callers already check for uninitialized addresses before calling this function. Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
Split out the function to register all the redistributor iodevs into a function that handles a single redistributor at a time in preparation for being able to call this per VCPU as these get created. Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
This patch adds a new attribute to GICV3 KVM device KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL group. This allows userspace to flush all GICR pending tables into guest RAM. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Eric Auger 提交于
this new helper synchronizes the irq pending_latch with the LPI pending bit status found in rdist pending table. As the status is consumed, we reset the bit in pending table. As we need the PENDBASER_ADDRESS() in vgic-v3, let's move its definition in the irqchip header. We restore the full length of the field, ie [51:16]. Same for PROPBASER_ADDRESS with full field length of [51:12]. Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 19 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When emulating a GICv2-on-GICv3, special care must be taken to only save/restore VMCR_EL2 when ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE is cleared. Otherwise, all Group-0 interrupts end-up being delivered as FIQ, which is probably not what the guest expects, as demonstrated here with an unhappy EFI: FIQ Exception at 0x000000013BD21CC4 This means that we cannot perform the load/put trick when dealing with VMCR_EL2 (because the host has SRE set), and we have to deal with it in the world-switch. Fortunately, this is not the most common case (modern guests should be able to deal with GICv3 directly), and the performance is not worse than what it was before the VMCR optimization. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 09 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
There is no need to call any functions to fold LRs when we don't use any LRs and we don't need to mess with overflow flags, take spinlocks, or prune the AP list if the AP list is empty. Note: list_empty is a single atomic read (uses READ_ONCE) and can therefore check if a list is empty or not without the need to take the spinlock protecting the list. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-