Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 169
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 23 7月, 2015 3 次提交
  5. 18 7月, 2015 5 次提交
  7. 16 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 19 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      timer: Reduce timer migration overhead if disabled · bc7a34b8
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Eric reported that the timer_migration sysctl is not really nice
performance wise as it needs to check at every timer insertion whether
the feature is enabled or not. Further the check does not live in the
timer code, so we have an extra function call which checks an extra
cache line to figure out that it is disabled.

We can do better and store that information in the per cpu (hr)timer
bases. I pondered to use a static key, but that's a nightmare to
update from the nohz code and the timer base cache line is hot anyway
when we select a timer base.

The old logic enabled the timer migration unconditionally if
CONFIG_NO_HZ was set even if nohz was disabled on the kernel command
line.

With this modification, we start off with migration disabled. The user
visible sysctl is still set to enabled. If the kernel switches to NOHZ
migration is enabled, if the user did not disable it via the sysctl
prior to the switch. If nohz=off is on the kernel command line,
migration stays disabled no matter what.

Before:
  47.76%  hog       [.] main
  14.84%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
   9.55%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
   6.71%  [kernel]  [k] mod_timer
   6.24%  [kernel]  [k] lock_timer_base.isra.38
   3.76%  [kernel]  [k] detach_if_pending
   3.71%  [kernel]  [k] del_timer
   2.50%  [kernel]  [k] internal_add_timer
   1.51%  [kernel]  [k] get_nohz_timer_target
   1.28%  [kernel]  [k] __internal_add_timer
   0.78%  [kernel]  [k] timerfn
   0.48%  [kernel]  [k] wake_up_nohz_cpu

After:
  48.10%  hog       [.] main
  15.25%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
   9.76%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
   6.50%  [kernel]  [k] mod_timer
   6.44%  [kernel]  [k] lock_timer_base.isra.38
   3.87%  [kernel]  [k] detach_if_pending
   3.80%  [kernel]  [k] del_timer
   2.67%  [kernel]  [k] internal_add_timer
   1.33%  [kernel]  [k] __internal_add_timer
   0.73%  [kernel]  [k] timerfn
   0.54%  [kernel]  [k] wake_up_nohz_cpu
Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Wenbo Wang <wenbo.wang@memblaze.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150526224512.127050787@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      bc7a34b8
  11. 28 5月, 2015 12 次提交
  13. 22 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 13 3月, 2015 3 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Process offlining and onlining only at grace-period start · 0aa04b05
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Races between CPU hotplug and grace periods can be difficult to resolve,
so the ->onoff_mutex is used to exclude the two events.  Unfortunately,
this means that it is impossible for an outgoing CPU to perform the
last bits of its offlining from its last pass through the idle loop,
because sleeplocks cannot be acquired in that context.

This commit avoids these problems by buffering online and offline events
in a new ->qsmaskinitnext field in the leaf rcu_node structures.  When a
grace period starts, the events accumulated in this mask are applied to
the ->qsmaskinit field, and, if needed, up the rcu_node tree.  The special
case of all CPUs corresponding to a given leaf rcu_node structure being
offline while there are still elements in that structure's ->blkd_tasks
list is handled using a new ->wait_blkd_tasks field.  In this case,
propagating the offline bits up the tree is deferred until the beginning
of the grace period after all of the tasks have exited their RCU read-side
critical sections and removed themselves from the list, at which point
the ->wait_blkd_tasks flag is cleared.  If one of that leaf rcu_node
structure's CPUs comes back online before the list empties, then the
->wait_blkd_tasks flag is simply cleared.

This of course means that RCU's notion of which CPUs are offline can be
out of date.  This is OK because RCU need only wait on CPUs that were
online at the time that the grace period started.  In addition, RCU's
force-quiescent-state actions will handle the case where a CPU goes
offline after the grace period starts.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      0aa04b05
    • P
      rcu: Move rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code · cc99a310
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() function is invoked when the
last task blocking the current grace period exits its outermost
RCU read-side critical section.  Previously, this was called only
from rcu_read_unlock_special(), and was therefore defined only when
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=y.  However, this function will be invoked even when
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=n once CPU-hotplug operations are processed only at
the beginnings of RCU grace periods.  The reason for this change is that
the last task on a given leaf rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list
might well exit its RCU read-side critical section between the time that
recent CPU-hotplug operations were applied and when the new grace period
was initialized.  This situation could result in RCU waiting forever on
that leaf rcu_node structure, because if all that structure's CPUs were
already offline, there would be no quiescent-state events to drive that
structure's part of the grace period.

This commit therefore moves rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code
that is built unconditionally so that the quiescent-state-forcing code
can clean up after this situation, avoiding the grace-period stall.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      cc99a310
    • P
      rcu: Rework preemptible expedited bitmask handling · 8eb74b2b
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Currently, the rcu_node tree ->expmask bitmasks are initially set to
reflect the online CPUs.  This is pointless, because only the CPUs
preempted within RCU read-side critical sections by the preceding
synchronize_sched_expedited() need to be tracked.  This commit therefore
instead sets up these bitmasks based on the state of the ->blkd_tasks
lists.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      8eb74b2b
  17. 12 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  19. 04 3月, 2015 4 次提交
  21. 27 2月, 2015 3 次提交
  23. 14 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 12 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Clear need_qs flag to prevent splat · c0135d07
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      If the scheduling-clock interrupt sets the current tasks need_qs flag,
but if the current CPU passes through a quiescent state in the meantime,
then rcu_preempt_qs() will fail to clear the need_qs flag, which can fool
RCU into thinking that additional rcu_read_unlock_special() processing
is needed.  This commit therefore clears the need_qs flag before checking
for additional processing.

For this problem to occur, we need rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce equal
to true and current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs also equal to true.
This condition can occur as follows:

1.	CPU 0 is aware of the current preemptible RCU grace period,
	but has not yet passed through a quiescent state.  Among other
	things, this means that rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is false.

2.	Task A running on CPU 0 enters a preemptible RCU read-side
	critical section.

3.	CPU 0 takes a scheduling-clock interrupt, which notices the
	RCU read-side critical section and the need for a quiescent state,
	and thus sets current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs to true.

4.	Task A is preempted, enters the scheduler, eventually invoking
	rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() which in turn invokes
	rcu_preempt_qs().

	Because rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is false,
	control enters the body of the "if" statement, which sets
	rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce to true.

5.	At this point, CPU 0 takes an interrupt.  The interrupt
	handler contains an RCU read-side critical section, and
	the rcu_read_unlock() notes that current->rcu_read_unlock_special
	is nonzero, and thus invokes rcu_read_unlock_special().

6.	Once in rcu_read_unlock_special(), the fact that
	current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs is true becomes
	apparent, so rcu_read_unlock_special() invokes rcu_preempt_qs().
	Recursively, given that we interrupted out of that same
	function in the preceding step.

7.	Because rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is now true,
	rcu_preempt_qs() does nothing, and simply returns.

8.	Upon return to rcu_read_unlock_special(), it is noted that
	current->rcu_read_unlock_special is still nonzero (because
	the interrupted rcu_preempt_qs() had not yet gotten around
	to clearing current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs).

9.	Execution proceeds to the WARN_ON_ONCE(), which notes that
	we are in an interrupt handler and thus duly splats.

The solution, as noted above, is to make rcu_read_unlock_special()
clear out current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs after calling
rcu_preempt_qs().  The interrupted rcu_preempt_qs() will clear it again,
but this is harmless.  The worst that happens is that we clobber another
attempt to set this field, but this is not a problem because we just
got done reporting a quiescent state.
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Fix embarrassing build bug noted by Sasha Levin. ]
Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
      c0135d07
  27. 16 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Optionally run grace-period kthreads at real-time priority · a94844b2
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Recent testing has shown that under heavy load, running RCU's grace-period
kthreads at real-time priority can improve performance (according to 0day
test robot) and reduce the incidence of RCU CPU stall warnings.  However,
most systems do just fine with the default non-realtime priorities for
these kthreads, and it does not make sense to expose the entire user
base to any risk stemming from this change, given that this change is
of use only to a few users running extremely heavy workloads.

Therefore, this commit allows users to specify realtime priorities
for the grace-period kthreads, but leaves them running SCHED_OTHER
by default.  The realtime priority may be specified at build time
via the RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO Kconfig parameter, or at boot time via the
rcutree.kthread_prio parameter.  Either way, 0 says to continue the
default SCHED_OTHER behavior and values from 1-99 specify that priority
of SCHED_FIFO behavior.  Note that a value of 0 is not permitted when
the RCU_BOOST Kconfig parameter is specified.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      a94844b2