1. 12 6月, 2009 16 次提交
  2. 29 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • O
      flat: fix data sections alignment · c3dc5bec
      Oskar Schirmer 提交于
      The flat loader uses an architecture's flat_stack_align() to align the
      stack but assumes word-alignment is enough for the data sections.
      
      However, on the Xtensa S6000 we have registers up to 128bit width
      which can be used from userspace and therefor need userspace stack and
      data-section alignment of at least this size.
      
      This patch drops flat_stack_align() and uses the same alignment that
      is required for slab caches, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN, or wordsize if it's
      not defined by the architecture.
      
      It also fixes m32r which was obviously kaput, aligning an
      uninitialized stack entry instead of the stack pointer.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NOskar Schirmer <os@emlix.com>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
      Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Acked-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <jw@emlix.com>
      Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c3dc5bec
  3. 27 5月, 2009 4 次提交
  4. 22 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 07 4月, 2009 5 次提交
  6. 03 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner · 99b76233
      Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
      Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
      as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
      ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
      in module refcount underflow.
      
      We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
      and ->data.
      
      But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
      and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
      switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
      some thoughts.
      
      ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
      protection.
      
      rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
      And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
      We definitely don't want such modular code.
      
      Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.
      
      So, let's nuke it.
      
      Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.
      
      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      99b76233
  8. 30 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 29 3月, 2009 3 次提交
  10. 28 3月, 2009 7 次提交