Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 12 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 30 1月, 2008 1 次提交
    • N
      spinlock: lockbreak cleanup · 95c354fe
      由 Nick Piggin 提交于 
      The break_lock data structure and code for spinlocks is quite nasty.
Not only does it double the size of a spinlock but it changes locking to
a potentially less optimal trylock.

Put all of that under CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK, and introduce a
__raw_spin_is_contended that uses the lock data itself to determine whether
there are waiters on the lock, to be used if CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is
not set.

Rename need_lockbreak to spin_needbreak, make it use spin_is_contended to
decouple it from the spinlock implementation, and make it typesafe (rwlocks
do not have any need_lockbreak sites -- why do they even get bloated up
with that break_lock then?).
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      95c354fe
  9. 29 1月, 2008 2 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: jbd2 stats through procfs · 8e85fb3f
      由 Johann Lombardi 提交于 
      The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2.
The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=113538565128617&w=2).
It provides statistics via procfs such as transaction lifetime and size.

Sometimes, investigating performance problems, i find useful to have
stats from jbd about transaction's lifetime, size, etc. here is a
patch for review and inclusion probably.

for example, stats after creation of 3M files in htree directory:

[root@bob ~]# cat /proc/fs/jbd/sda/history
R/C  tid   wait  run   lock  flush log   hndls  block inlog ctime write drop  close
R    261   8260  2720  0     0     750   9892   8170  8187
C    259                                                    750   0     4885  1
R    262   20    2200  10    0     770   9836   8170  8187
R    263   30    2200  10    0     3070  9812   8170  8187
R    264   0     5000  10    0     1340  0      0     0
C    261                                                    8240  3212  4957  0
R    265   8260  1470  0     0     4640  9854   8170  8187
R    266   0     5000  10    0     1460  0      0     0
C    262                                                    8210  2989  4868  0
R    267   8230  1490  10    0     4440  9875   8171  8188
R    268   0     5000  10    0     1260  0      0     0
C    263                                                    7710  2937  4908  0
R    269   7730  1470  10    0     3330  9841   8170  8187
R    270   0     5000  10    0     830   0      0     0
C    265                                                    8140  3234  4898  0
C    267                                                    720   0     4849  1
R    271   8630  2740  20    0     740   9819   8170  8187
C    269                                                    800   0     4214  1
R    272   40    2170  10    0     830   9716   8170  8187
R    273   40    2280  0     0     3530  9799   8170  8187
R    274   0     5000  10    0     990   0      0     0


where,

R     - line for transaction's life from T_RUNNING to T_FINISHED
C     - line for transaction's checkpointing
tid   - transaction's id
wait  - for how long we were waiting for new transaction to start
         (the longest period journal_start() took in this transaction)
run   - real transaction's lifetime (from T_RUNNING to T_LOCKED
lock  - how long we were waiting for all handles to close
         (time the transaction was in T_LOCKED)
flush - how long it took to flush all data (data=ordered)
log   - how long it took to write the transaction to the log
hndls - how many handles got to the transaction
block - how many blocks got to the transaction
inlog - how many blocks are written to the log (block + descriptors)
ctime - how long it took to checkpoint the transaction
write - how many blocks have been written during checkpointing
drop  - how many blocks have been dropped during checkpointing
close - how many running transactions have been closed to checkpoint this one

all times are in msec.


[root@bob ~]# cat /proc/fs/jbd/sda/info
280 transaction, each upto 8192 blocks
average:
  1633ms waiting for transaction
  3616ms running transaction
  5ms transaction was being locked
  1ms flushing data (in ordered mode)
  1799ms logging transaction
  11781 handles per transaction
  5629 blocks per transaction
  5641 logged blocks per transaction
Signed-off-by: NJohann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@bull.net>
Signed-off-by: NMariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      8e85fb3f
    • J
      jbd2: Fix assertion failure in fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c · f5a7a6b0
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Before we start committing a transaction, we call
__journal_clean_checkpoint_list() to cleanup transaction's written-back
buffers.

If this call happens to remove all of them (and there were already some
buffers), __journal_remove_checkpoint() will decide to free the transaction
because it isn't (yet) a committing transaction and soon we fail some
assertion - the transaction really isn't ready to be freed :).

We change the check in __journal_remove_checkpoint() to free only a
transaction in T_FINISHED state.  The locking there is subtle though (as
everywhere in JBD ;().  We use j_list_lock to protect the check and a
subsequent call to __journal_drop_transaction() and do the same in the end
of journal_commit_transaction() which is the only place where a transaction
can get to T_FINISHED state.

Probably I'm too paranoid here and such locking is not really necessary -
checkpoint lists are processed only from log_do_checkpoint() where a
transaction must be already committed to be processed or from
__journal_clean_checkpoint_list() where kjournald itself calls it and thus
transaction cannot change state either.  Better be safe if something
changes in future...
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      f5a7a6b0
  11. 09 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  13. 12 10月, 2006 2 次提交
  15. 27 9月, 2006 3 次提交
  17. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] JBD: split checkpoint lists · 78ce89c9
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Split the checkpoint list of the transaction into two lists.  In the first
list we keep the buffers that need to be submitted for IO.  In the second
list are kept buffers that were already submitted and we just have to wait
for the IO to complete.  This should simplify a handling of checkpoint
lists a bit and can eventually be also a performance gain.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      78ce89c9
  19. 23 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 15 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  25. 07 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 08 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  29. 03 6月, 2005 2 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] ext3: fix list scanning in __cleanup_transaction · 7e3b11a9
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Fix a bug in list scanning that can cause us to skip the last buffer on the
checkpoint list (and hence fail to do any progress under some rather
unfavorable conditions).

The problem is we first do jh=next_jh and then test

	} while (jh!=last_jh);

Hence we skip the last buffer on the list (if it was not the only buffer on
the list).  As we already do jh=next_jh; in the beginning of the loop we
are safe to just remove the assignment in the end.  It can happen that 'jh'
will be freed at the point we test jh != last_jh but that does not matter
as we never *dereference* the pointer.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      7e3b11a9
    • J
      [PATCH] ext3: fix log_do_checkpoint() assertion failure · 00ea8145
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Fix possible false assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint().  We might fail
to detect that we actually made a progress when cleaning up the checkpoint
lists if we don't retry after writing something to disk.  The patch was
confirmed to fix observed assertion failures for several users.

When we flushed some buffers we need to retry scanning the list.
Otherwise we can fail to detect our progress.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      00ea8145
  31. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
      1da177e4