- 08 4月, 2012 40 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
Commits 2f5cdd5487 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Make secondary threads more robust against stray IPIs") and 1c2066b0f7 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Make virtual processor area registration more robust") added fields to struct kvm_vcpu_arch inside #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV regions, and added lines to arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c to generate assembler constants for their offsets. Unfortunately this led to compile errors on Book 3S machines for configs that had KVM enabled but not CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV. This fixes the problem by moving the offending lines inside #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV regions. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Bharat Bhushan 提交于
No instruction which can change Condition Register (CR) should be executed after Guest CR is loaded. So the guest CR is restored after the Exit Timing in lightweight_exit executes cmpw, which can clobber CR. Signed-off-by: NBharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
This adds code to measure "stolen" time per virtual core in units of timebase ticks, and to report the stolen time to the guest using the dispatch trace log (DTL). The guest can register an area of memory for the DTL for a given vcpu. The DTL is a ring buffer where KVM fills in one entry every time it enters the guest for that vcpu. Stolen time is measured as time when the virtual core is not running, either because the vcore is not runnable (e.g. some of its vcpus are executing elsewhere in the kernel or in userspace), or when the vcpu thread that is running the vcore is preempted. This includes time when all the vcpus are idle (i.e. have executed the H_CEDE hypercall), which is OK because the guest accounts stolen time while idle as idle time. Each vcpu keeps a record of how much stolen time has been reported to the guest for that vcpu so far. When we are about to enter the guest, we create a new DTL entry (if the guest vcpu has a DTL) and report the difference between total stolen time for the vcore and stolen time reported so far for the vcpu as the "enqueue to dispatch" time in the DTL entry. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
The PAPR API allows three sorts of per-virtual-processor areas to be registered (VPA, SLB shadow buffer, and dispatch trace log), and furthermore, these can be registered and unregistered for another virtual CPU. Currently we just update the vcpu fields pointing to these areas at the time of registration or unregistration. If this is done on another vcpu, there is the possibility that the target vcpu is using those fields at the time and could end up using a bogus pointer and corrupting memory. This fixes the race by making the target cpu itself do the update, so we can be sure that the update happens at a time when the fields aren't being used. Each area now has a struct kvmppc_vpa which is used to manage these updates. There is also a spinlock which protects access to all of the kvmppc_vpa structs, other than to the pinned_addr fields. (We could have just taken the spinlock when using the vpa, slb_shadow or dtl fields, but that would mean taking the spinlock on every guest entry and exit.) This also changes 'struct dtl' (which was undefined) to 'struct dtl_entry', which is what the rest of the kernel uses. Thanks to Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> for pointing out the need to initialize vcpu->arch.vpa_update_lock. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
Currently on POWER7, if we are running the guest on a core and we don't need all the hardware threads, we do nothing to ensure that the unused threads aren't executing in the kernel (other than checking that they are offline). We just assume they're napping and we don't do anything to stop them trying to enter the kernel while the guest is running. This means that a stray IPI can wake up the hardware thread and it will then try to enter the kernel, but since the core is in guest context, it will execute code from the guest in hypervisor mode once it turns the MMU on, which tends to lead to crashes or hangs in the host. This fixes the problem by adding two new one-byte flags in the kvmppc_host_state structure in the PACA which are used to interlock between the primary thread and the unused secondary threads when entering the guest. With these flags, the primary thread can ensure that the unused secondaries are not already in kernel mode (i.e. handling a stray IPI) and then indicate that they should not try to enter the kernel if they do get woken for any reason. Instead they will go into KVM code, find that there is no vcpu to run, acknowledge and clear the IPI and go back to nap mode. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
On PPC, CR2-CR4 are nonvolatile, thus have to be saved across function calls. We didn't respect that for any architecture until Paul spotted it in his patch for Book3S-HV. This patch saves/restores CR for all KVM capable PPC hosts. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Matt Evans 提交于
SPAPR support includes various in-kernel hypercalls, improving performance by cutting out the exit to userspace. H_BULK_REMOVE is implemented in this patch. Signed-off-by: NMatt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
So far, we've always called prepare_to_enter even when all we did was return to the host. This patch changes that semantic to only call prepare_to_enter when we actually want to get back into the guest. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we get a performance monitor interrupt, we need to make sure that the host receives it. So reinject it like we reinject the other host destined interrupts. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When reinjecting an interrupt into the host interrupt handler after we're back in host kernel land, we need to tell the kernel where the interrupt happened. We can't tell it that we were in guest state, because that might lead to random code walking host addresses. So instead, we tell it that we came from the interrupt reinject code. This helps getting reasonable numbers out of perf. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When during guest context we get a performance monitor interrupt, we currently bail out and oops. Let's route it to its correct handler instead. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The tlbncfg registers should be populated with their respective TLB's values. Fix the obvious typo. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
There was some unused code in the exit code path that must have been a leftover from earlier iterations. While it did no harm, it's superfluous and thus should be removed. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The comment for program interrupts triggered when using bookehv was misleading. Update it to mention why MSR_GS indicates that we have to inject an interrupt into the guest again, not emulate it. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When during guest execution we get a machine check interrupt, we don't know how to handle it yet. So let's add the error printing code back again that we dropped accidently earlier and tell user space that something went really wrong. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
For BookE HV the guest visible MSR is shared->msr and is identical to the MSR that is in use while the guest is running, because we can't trap reads from/to MSR. So shadow_msr is unused there. Indicate that with a comment. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We need to make sure that no MAS updates happen automatically while we have the guest MAS registers loaded. So move the disabling code a bit higher up so that it covers the full time we have guest values in MAS registers. The race this patch fixes should never occur, but it makes the code a bit more logical to do it this way around. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The SET_VCPU macro is a leftover from times when the vcpu struct wasn't stored in the thread on vcpu_load/put. It's not needed anymore. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Instead if doing #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT ... #else ... #endif we should rather do #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT ... #else ... #endif which is a lot easier to read. Change the bookehv implementation to stick with this rule. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When using exit timing stats, we clobber r9 in the NEED_EMU case, so better move that part down a few lines and fix it that way. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The semantics of BOOKE_IRQPRIO_MAX changed to denote the highest available irqprio + 1, so let's reflect that in the code too. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Instead of checking whether we should reschedule only when we exited due to an interrupt, let's always check before entering the guest back again. This gets the target more in line with the other archs. Also while at it, generalize the whole thing so that eventually we could have a single kvmppc_prepare_to_enter function for all ppc targets that does signal and reschedule checking for us. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we fail to emulate an instruction for the guest, we better go in and tell it that we failed to emulate it, by throwing an illegal instruction exception. Please beware that we basically never get around to telling the guest that we failed thanks to the debugging code right above it. If user space however decides that it wants to ignore the debug, we would at least do "the right thing" afterwards. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The e500mc patches left some debug code in that we don't need. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We can't run e500v2 kvm on e500mc kernels, so indicate that by making the 2 options mutually exclusive in kconfig. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The CONFIG_KVM_E500 option really indicates that we're running on a V2 machine, not on a machine of the generic E500 class. So indicate that properly and change the config name accordingly. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
There's always a chance we're unable to read a guest instruction. The guest could have its TLB mapped execute-, but not readable, something odd happens and our TLB gets flushed. So it's a good idea to be prepared for that case and have a fallback that allows us to fix things up in that case. Add fixup code that keeps guest code from potentially crashing our host kernel. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
If we hit any exception whatsoever in the restore path and r1/r2 aren't the host registers, we don't get a working oops. So it's always a good idea to restore them as early as possible. This time, it actually has practical reasons to do so too, since we need to have the host page fault handler fix up our guest instruction read code. And for that to work we need r1/r2 restored. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When setting MSR for an e500mc guest, we implicitly always set MSR_GS to make sure the guest is in guest state. Since we have this implicit rule there, we don't need to explicitly pass MSR_GS to set_msr(). Remove all explicit setters of MSR_GS. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When one vcpu wants to kick another, it can issue a special IPI instruction called msgsnd. This patch emulates this instruction, its clearing counterpart and the infrastructure required to actually trigger that interrupt inside a guest vcpu. With this patch, SMP guests on e500mc work. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
Add processor support for e500mc, using hardware virtualization support (GS-mode). Current issues include: - No support for external proxy (coreint) interrupt mode in the guest. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
e500mc has a normal PPC FPU, rather than SPE which is found on e500v1/v2. Based on code from Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
Chips such as e500mc that implement category E.HV in Power ISA 2.06 provide hardware virtualization features, including a new MSR mode for guest state. The guest OS can perform many operations without trapping into the hypervisor, including transitions to and from guest userspace. Since we can use SRR1[GS] to reliably tell whether an exception came from guest state, instead of messing around with IVPR, we use DO_KVM similarly to book3s. Current issues include: - Machine checks from guest state are not routed to the host handler. - The guest can cause a host oops by executing an emulated instruction in a page that lacks read permission. Existing e500/4xx support has the same problem. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: remove pt_regs usage] Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type. There is an existing set of arbitrary numbers that Linux passes, but it's an undocumented mess that sort of corresponds to server/classic exception vectors but not really. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
tlbilx is the new, preferred invalidation instruction. It is not found on e500 prior to e500mc, but there should be no harm in supporting it on all e500. Based on code from Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
Rather than invalidate everything when a TLB1 entry needs to be taken down, keep track of which host TLB1 entries are used for a given guest TLB1 entry, and invalidate just those entries. Based on code from Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com> and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
The PID handling is e500v1/v2-specific, and is moved to e500.c. The MMU sregs code and kvmppc_core_vcpu_translate will be shared with e500mc, and is moved from e500.c to e500_tlb.c. Partially based on patches from Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: fix bisectability] Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
Move vcpu to the beginning of vcpu_e500 to give it appropriate prominence, especially if more fields end up getting added to the end of vcpu_e500 (and vcpu ends up in the middle). Remove gratuitous "extern" and add parameter names to prototypes. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: fix bisectability] Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
Keeping two separate headers for e500-specific things was a pain, and wasn't even organized along any logical boundary. There was TLB stuff in <asm/kvm_e500.h> despite the existence of arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_tlb.h, and nothing in <asm/kvm_e500.h> needed to be referenced from outside arch/powerpc/kvm. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: fix bisectability] Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
This is in preparation for merging in the contents of arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_e500.h. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-