1. 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • B
      ACPICA: Update to GPIO region handler interface. · 75ec6e55
      Bob Moore 提交于
      Changes to correct several GPIO issues:
      
      1) The update_rule in a GPIO field definition is now ignored;
      a read-modify-write operation is never performed for GPIO fields.
      (Internally, this means that the field assembly/disassembly
      code is completely bypassed for GPIO.)
      
      2) The Address parameter passed to a GPIO region handler is
      now the bit offset of the field from a previous Connection()
      operator. Thus, it becomes a "Pin Number Index" into the
      Connection() resource descriptor.
      
      3) The bit_width parameter passed to a GPIO region handler is
      now the exact bit width of the GPIO field. Thus, it can be
      interpreted as "number of pins".
      
      Overall, we can now say that the region handler interface
      to GPIO handlers is a raw "bit/pin" addressed interface, not
      a byte-addressed interface like the system_memory handler interface.
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      75ec6e55
  2. 02 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 31 7月, 2014 10 次提交
  4. 24 7月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 09 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 08 7月, 2014 16 次提交
  8. 07 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 03 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 01 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to control early table checksum verification. · 47d68c7f
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      It is reported that Linux x86 kernel cannot map large tables. The following
      large SSDT table on such platform fails to pass checksum verification and
      cannot be installed:
       ACPI: SSDT 0x00000000B9638018 07A0C4 (v02 INTEL  S2600CP  00004000 INTL 20100331)
      
      It sounds strange that in the 64-bit virtual memory address space, we
      cannot map a single ACPI table to do checksum verification. The root cause
      is:
       1. ACPICA doesn't split IO memory mapping and table mapping;
       2. Linux x86 OSL implements acpi_os_map_memory() using a size limited fix-map
          mechanism during early boot stage, which is more suitable for only IO
          mappings.
      
      ACPICA originally only mapped table header for signature validation, and
      this header mapping is required by OSL override mechanism. There was no
      checksum verification because we could not map the whole table using this
      OSL. While the following ACPICA commit enforces checksum verification by
      mapping the whole table during Linux boot stage and it finally triggers
      this issue on some platforms:
       Commit: 86dfc6f3
       Subject: ACPICA: Tables: Fix table checksums verification before installation.
      
      Before doing further cleanups for the OSL table mapping and override
      implementation, this patch introduces an option for such OSPMs to
      temporarily discard the checksum verification feature. It then can be
      re-enabled easily when the ACPICA and the underlying OSL is ready.
      
      This patch also deletes a comment around the limitation of mappings because
      it is not correct. The limitation is not how many times we can map in the
      early stage, but the OSL mapping facility may not be suitable for mapping
      the ACPI tables and thus may complain us the size limitation.
      
      The acpi_tb_verify_table() is renamed to acpi_tb_verify_temp_table() due to the
      work around added, it now only applies to the table descriptor that hasn't
      been installed and cannot be used in other cases. Lv Zheng.
      Tested-by: NYuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      47d68c7f
  11. 13 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 07 5月, 2014 4 次提交
    • B
      ACPICA: Events: Update GPE handling and initialization code. · 7505da4c
      Bob Moore 提交于
      1) Eliminate most use of GAS structs, since they are not needed
      for GPEs.
      2) Allow raw GPE numbers > 255.
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      7505da4c
    • B
      ACPICA: Remove extraneous error message for large number of GPEs. · 21126b29
      Bob Moore 提交于
      Fixes a problem where an extraneous error message was emitted during
      initialization if there is a GPE block larger than 255 bits. Any
      GPE block larger than 120 GPEs could generate the error.
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      21126b29
    • L
      ACPICA: Tables: Remove old mechanism to validate if XSDT contains NULL entries. · 57429a40
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      With the NULL entry sanity check implemented, the XSDT validation is
      useless because:
      1. If XSDT contains NULL entries, it can be bypassed by the new sanity
         check mechanism;
      2. If RSDP contains a bad XSDT address, invoking XSDT validation will still
         lead to a kernel crash.
      
      This patch deletes the old XSDT validation solution and thus enables the
      new NULL entry sanity check solution.
      
      Note that if there are reports reporting regressions caused by the enabling
      of the new feature and disabling of the old feature, this commit should be
      bisected and reverted. Lv Zheng.
      
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73911
      References: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39811Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NBruce Chiarelli <mano155@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NSpyros Stathopoulos <spystath@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      57429a40
    • L
      ACPICA: Tables: Add new mechanism to skip NULL entries in RSDT and XSDT. · 0f929fbf
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      It is reported that there are buggy BIOSes in the world: AMI uses an XSDT
      compiler for early BIOSes, this compiler will generate XSDT with a NULL
      entry.  The affected BIOS versions are "AMI BIOS F2-F4".
      
      Original solution on Linux is to use an alternative heathy root table
      instead of the ill one.  This commit is:
        Commit: 671cc68d
        Subject: ACPICA: Back port and refine validation of the XSDT root table.
      
      This is an example of such XSDT dumped from B85-HD3 (AMI F3 BIOS):
      [000h 0000   4]                    Signature : "XSDT"    [Extended System Description Table]
      [004h 0004   4]                 Table Length : 00000074
      [008h 0008   1]                     Revision : 01
      [009h 0009   1]                     Checksum : 18
      [00Ah 0010   6]                       Oem ID : "ALASKA"
      [010h 0016   8]                 Oem Table ID : "A M I"
      [018h 0024   4]                 Oem Revision : 01072009
      [01Ch 0028   4]              Asl Compiler ID : "AMI "
      [020h 0032   4]        Asl Compiler Revision : 00010013
      
      [024h 0036   8]       ACPI Table Address   0 : 00000000BA5F8180
      [02Ch 0044   8]       ACPI Table Address   1 : 00000000BA5F8290
      [034h 0052   8]       ACPI Table Address   2 : 00000000BA5F8308
      [03Ch 0060   8]       ACPI Table Address   3 : 00000000BA5F8848
      [044h 0068   8]       ACPI Table Address   4 : 00000000BA5F9320
      [04Ch 0076   8]       ACPI Table Address   5 : 00000000BA5F9360
      [054h 0084   8]       ACPI Table Address   6 : 00000000BA5F9398
      [05Ch 0092   8]       ACPI Table Address   7 : 00000000BA5F9708
      [064h d100   8]       ACPI Table Address   8 : 00000000BA5FC9A8
      [06Ch 0108   8]       ACPI Table Address   9 : 0000000000000000
      
      But according to the bug report, the XSDT in fact is not broken. In the
      above XSDT, ACPI Table Address 1-8 contains the same value as RSDT.  The
      differences can only be seen on the following 2 entries:
      1. The first entry points to a FADT whose Revision is 5 while the first
         entry in RSDT points to a FADT whose Revision is 2.
         The FADT dumped from the address indicated by the first entry of XSDT:
          FACP @ 0x00000000BA5F8180
            0000: 46 41 43 50 0C 01 00 00<05>4B 41 4C 41 53 4B 41  FACP.....KALASKA
            ...
         The FADT dumped from the address indicated by the first entry of RSDT:
          FACP @ 0x00000000BA5ED0F0
            0000: 46 41 43 50 84 00 00 00<02>A7 41 4C 41 53 4B 41  FACP......ALASKA
            ...
      2. The last entry is a NULL terminator.
      According to the test result, the Revision 5 FADT is accessible.  Thus the
      original solution turns out to be a work around that is preventing the
      higher revision tables to be used for such platforms (they are all x86-64
      platforms, and should use XSDT and higher revision FADT).
      
      This patch offers a new solution, where a sanity check is performed before
      installing a table address from XSDT. If the entry is NULL, it is simply
      discarded.
      
      Note that, this patch doesn't remove the original solution, so for Linux
      kernel, this commit is actually a no-op, but it allows acpidump to be
      working on such platforms. By doing so, we allow another easy revertable
      commit to enable this feature so that when that commit is reverted, the
      useful sanity check will not be affected. Lv Zheng.
      
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73911
      References: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39811Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NBruce Chiarelli <mano155@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NSpyros Stathopoulos <spystath@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      0f929fbf