- 14 2月, 2018 12 次提交
-
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html Cc: Hanna Hawa <hannah@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.htmlSigned-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.htmlSigned-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the wrongly stated X11 to MIT. As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.htmlSigned-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Baruch Siach 提交于
A 'C' was missing in the model name, this patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Baruch Siach 提交于
Add description of the J25 and J27 UART headers of the Macchiatobin. They use uart peripherals that the CP0 (J25) and CP1 (J27) provide. Even though J25 and J27 are labeled as UART header, the pins on these headers can be muxed for other purposes. But the UART functionality is useful when the board is mounted in an ATX style enclosure, since the console UART is not accessible through the microUSB at CON9. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Baruch Siach 提交于
The CP110 component has 4 uart peripherals. All of them use the same clock gate for slow peripherals that is shared with the i2c and spi peripherals. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
This extra clock is needed to access the registers of the I2C controller used on the Armada 7K/8K SoCs. This follows the changes already made in the binding documentation (as well as in the driver) in: commit 1534156e ("i2c: mv64xxx: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock") Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
由 Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
This extra clock is needed to access the registers of the SPI controller used on Armada 7K/8K SoCs. This follows the changes already made in the binding documentation (as well as in the driver) in: 'commit 92ae112e ("spi: orion: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock")'. Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2018 28 次提交
-
-
由 Prarit Bhargava 提交于
SPCR is currently only enabled or ARM64 and x86 can use SPCR to setup an early console. General fixes include updating Documentation & Kconfig (for x86), updating comments, and changing parse_spcr() to acpi_parse_spcr(), and earlycon_init_is_deferred to earlycon_acpi_spcr_enable to be more descriptive. On x86, many systems have a valid SPCR table but the table version is not 2 so the table version check must be a warning. On ARM64 when the kernel parameter earlycon is used both the early console and console are enabled. On x86, only the earlycon should be enabled by by default. Modify acpi_parse_spcr() to allow options for initializing the early console and console separately. Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Tested-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Yury Norov 提交于
with bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 over the kernel. Additionally to it: * __check_eq_bitmap() now takes single nbits argument. * __check_eq_u32_array is not used in new test but may be used in future. So I don't remove it here, but annotate as __used. Tested on arm64 and 32-bit BE mips. [arnd@arndb.de: perf: arm_dsu_pmu: convert to bitmap_from_arr32] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-2-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com [ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: fix net/core/ethtool.c] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180205071747.4ekxtsbgxkj5b2fz@yury-thinkpad Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-2-ynorov@caviumnetworks.comSigned-off-by: NYury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>, Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Andrey Konovalov 提交于
Right now the fact that KASAN uses a single shadow byte for 8 bytes of memory is scattered all over the code. This change defines KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT early in asm include files and makes use of this constant where necessary. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/34937ca3b90736eaad91b568edf5684091f662e3.1515775666.git.andreyknvl@google.comSigned-off-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Acked-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we've standardised on SMCCC v1.1 to perform the branch prediction invalidation, let's drop the previous band-aid. If vendors haven't updated their firmware to do SMCCC 1.1, they haven't updated PSCI either, so we don't loose anything. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add the detection and runtime code for ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1. It is lovely. Really. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We want SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 to be fast. As fast as possible. So let's intercept it as early as we can by testing for the function call number as soon as we've identified a HVC call coming from the guest. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
A new feature of SMCCC 1.1 is that it offers firmware-based CPU workarounds. In particular, SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 provides BP hardening for CVE-2017-5715. If the host has some mitigation for this issue, report that we deal with it using SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, as we apply the host workaround on every guest exit. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We're about to need kvm_psci_version in HYP too. So let's turn it into a static inline, and pass the kvm structure as a second parameter (so that HYP can do a kern_hyp_va on it). Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The new SMC Calling Convention (v1.1) allows for a reduced overhead when calling into the firmware, and provides a new feature discovery mechanism. Make it visible to KVM guests. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
As we're about to update the PSCI support, and because I'm lazy, let's move the PSCI include file to include/kvm so that both ARM architectures can find it. Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped). Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever stuck... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: acfb3b88 ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls") Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
KVM doesn't follow the SMCCC when it comes to unimplemented calls, and inject an UNDEF instead of returning an error. Since firmware calls are now used for security mitigation, they are becoming more common, and the undef is counter productive. Instead, let's follow the SMCCC which states that -1 must be returned to the caller when getting an unknown function number. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
It is possible to take an IRQ from EL0 following a branch to a kernel address in such a way that the IRQ is prioritised over the instruction abort. Whilst an attacker would need to get the stars to align here, it might be sufficient with enough calibration so perform BP hardening in the rare case that we see a kernel address in the ELR when handling an IRQ from EL0. Reported-by: NDan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Software-step and PC alignment fault exceptions have higher priority than instruction abort exceptions, so apply the BP hardening hooks there too if the user PC appears to reside in kernel space. Reported-by: NDan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
The arm64 futex code has some explicit dereferencing of user pointers where performing atomic operations in response to a futex command. This patch uses masking to limit any speculative futex operations to within the user address space. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Like we've done for get_user and put_user, ensure that user pointers are masked before invoking the underlying __arch_{clear,copy_*}_user operations. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
access_ok isn't an expensive operation once the addr_limit for the current thread has been loaded into the cache. Given that the initial access_ok check preceding a sequence of __{get,put}_user operations will take the brunt of the miss, we can make the __* variants identical to the full-fat versions, which brings with it the benefits of address masking. The likely cost in these sequences will be from toggling PAN/UAO, which we can address later by implementing the *_unsafe versions. Reviewed-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
A mispredicted conditional call to set_fs could result in the wrong addr_limit being forwarded under speculation to a subsequent access_ok check, potentially forming part of a spectre-v1 attack using uaccess routines. This patch prevents this forwarding from taking place, but putting heavy barriers in set_fs after writing the addr_limit. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
In a similar manner to array_index_mask_nospec, this patch introduces an assembly macro (mask_nospec64) which can be used to bound a value under speculation. This macro is then used to ensure that the indirect branch through the syscall table is bounded under speculation, with out-of-range addresses speculating as calls to sys_io_setup (0). Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Robin Murphy 提交于
Similarly to x86, mitigate speculation past an access_ok() check by masking the pointer against the address limit before use. Even if we don't expect speculative writes per se, it is plausible that a CPU may still speculate at least as far as fetching a cache line for writing, hence we also harden put_user() and clear_user() for peace of mind. Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Robin Murphy 提交于
Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range ending on the very top byte of kernel memory. Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere. Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Robin Murphy 提交于
Provide an optimised, assembly implementation of array_index_mask_nospec() for arm64 so that the compiler is not in a position to transform the code in ways which affect its ability to inhibit speculation (e.g. by introducing conditional branches). This is similar to the sequence used by x86, modulo architectural differences in the carry/borrow flags. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
For CPUs capable of data value prediction, CSDB waits for any outstanding predictions to architecturally resolve before allowing speculative execution to continue. Provide macros to expose it to the arch code. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
The identity map is mapped as both writeable and executable by the SWAPPER_MM_MMUFLAGS and this is relied upon by the kpti code to manage a synchronisation flag. Update the .pushsection flags to reflect the actual mapping attributes. Reported-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
pte_to_phys lives in assembler.h and takes its destination register as the first argument. Move phys_to_pte out of head.S to sit with its counterpart and rejig it to follow the same calling convention. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
We don't fully understand the Cavium ThunderX erratum, but it appears that mapping the kernel as nG can lead to horrible consequences such as attempting to execute userspace from kernel context. Since kpti isn't enabled for these CPUs anyway, simplify the comment justifying the lack of post_ttbr_update_workaround in the exception trampoline. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Since AArch64 assembly instructions take the destination register as their first operand, do the same thing for the phys_to_ttbr macro. Acked-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Cavium ThunderX's erratum 27456 results in a corruption of icache entries that are loaded from memory that is mapped as non-global (i.e. ASID-tagged). As KPTI is based on memory being mapped non-global, let's prevent it from kicking in if this erratum is detected. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> [will: Update comment] Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-