Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 2月, 2014 6 次提交
  3. 14 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 05 2月, 2014 2 次提交
    • D
      bonding: fail_over_mac should only affect AB mode in bond_set_mac_address() · cc689aaa
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      The fail_over_mac could be set to active or follow in any time for all modes,
so if the fail_over_mac is not none and the current mode is not active-backup,
the bond_set_mac_address() could not change the master and slave's MAC address.

In bond_set_mac_address(), the fail_over_mac should only affect AB mode, so modify
to check the mode in addition to fail_over_mac when setting bond's MAC address.

Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cc689aaa
    • D
      bonding: fail_over_mac should only affect AB mode at enslave and removal processing · 00503b6f
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      According to bonding.txt, the fail_over_ma should only affect active-backup mode,
but I found that the fail_over_mac could be set to active or follow in all
modes, this will cause new slave could not be set to bond's MAC address at
enslave processing and restore its own MAC address at removal processing.

The correct way to fix the problem is that we should not add restrictions when
setting options, just need to modify the bond enslave and removal processing
to check the mode in addition to fail_over_mac when setting a slave's MAC during
enslavement. The change active slave processing already only calls the fail_over_mac
function when in active-backup mode.

Thanks for Jay's suggestion.

The patch also modify the pr_warning() to pr_warn().

Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      00503b6f
  9. 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      bonding: fix locking in bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() · 6fde8f03
      由 Ding Tianhong 提交于 
      The commit 1d3ee88a
(bonding: add netlink attributes to slave link dev)
has add rtmsg_ifinfo() in bond_set_active_slave() and
bond_set_backup_slave(), so the two function need to
called in RTNL lock, but bond_loadbalance_arp_mon()
only calling these functions in RCU, warning message
will occurs.

fix this by add a new function bond_slave_state_change(),
which will reset the slave's state after slave link check,
so remove the bond_set_xxx_slave() from the cycle and only
record the slave_state_changed, this will call the new
function to set all slaves to new state in RTNL later.

Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6fde8f03
  11. 28 1月, 2014 2 次提交
    • V
      bonding: restructure locking of bond_ab_arp_probe() · f2ebd477
      由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于 
      Currently we're calling it from under RCU context, however we're using some
functions that require rtnl to be held.

Fix this by restructuring the locking - don't call it under any locks,
aquire rcu_read_lock() if we're sending _only_ (i.e. we have the active
slave present), and use rtnl locking otherwise - if we need to modify
(in)active flags of a slave.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f2ebd477
    • V
      bonding: RCUify bond_ab_arp_probe · 98b90f26
      由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于 
      Currently bond_ab_arp_probe() is always called under rcu_read_lock(),
however to work with curr_active_slave we're still holding the
curr_slave_lock.

To remove that curr_slave_lock - rcu_dereference the bond's
curr_active_slave and use it further - so that we're sure the slave won't
go away, and we don't care if it will change in the meanwhile.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      98b90f26
  13. 24 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 23 1月, 2014 25 次提交