Never used as parameter, the only driver actually using this is nouveau
and there it is initialized after the BO is initialized.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Only used by the AGP backend and there it can be easily accessed using
ttm->bdev->glob.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The pointer is available as bo->bdev->glob as well.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Because ttm_bo_force_list_clean() is only called on two occasions:
1. By ttm_bo_evict_mm() during suspend.
2. By ttm_bo_clean_mm() when the driver unloads.
On both cases we absolutely don't want any memory allocation failure.
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

for saving memory and more bit flag can be used in future
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

(v2): Remove stray ; noticed by Felix
Signed-off-by: NTom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Correct indentation and {} brace style.
Signed-off-by: NTom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This to allow drivers to choose to avoid OOM invocation and handle
page allocation failures instead.

v2:
Remove extra new lines.
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Missed in the patche:
dc947770 drm/ttm: enable swapout for reserved BOs during allocation.
don't unreserve the BO if it is not reserved by itself.
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

If ttm_bo_swapout doesn't own the lock, don't release it. Someone
else probably depends on it still being locked.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

A BO that's already swapped would be added back to the swap-LRU list
for example if its validation failed under high memory pressure. This
could later lead to swapping it out again and leaking previous swap
storage.

This commit adds a condition to prevent that from happening.

v2: Check page_flags instead of swap_storage
Signed-off-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

if the bo shares same reservation object then not lock it again
at swapout time to make it possible to swap out.

v2: refine the commmit message
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

extract a function as ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable since eviction and
swapout can share same logic.

v2: modify commit message and add description in the code
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

forward the operation context to ttm_tt_bind as well,
and the ultimate goal is swapout enablement for reserved BOs.

v2: use common term rather than amd specific
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

forward the operation context to ttm_mem_global_alloc as well, and the
ultimate goal is swapout enablement for reserved BOs
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

remove the extra indirection because we have only one implementation anyway
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Thomas actually noticed that, but I didn't realized what he meant until
now.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Use pr_debug instead of TTM_DEBUG, fix the lockdep assert and remove the
unused constant.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Use the reservation wrapper for this.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We only need to wait for the contended lock when the reservation object is
shared or when we want to remove everything. A trylock should be sufficient
in all other cases.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

include ttm_bo_move_memcpy and ttm_bo_move_ttm
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

allow eviction of BOs reserved by the caller when they are
not part of the current working set.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Add some statistics how many bytes we have moved.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: NDieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Instead of passing the parameters manually.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: NDieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Instead of passing down the parameters manually to every function.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: NDieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Instead of specifying interruptible and no_wait_gpu manually.

v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: NDieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Instead of specifying if sleeping should be interruptible.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: NDieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Give moving a BO into place an operation context to work with.

v2: rebased
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: NDieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Not used any more.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

There is no guarantee that the next entry on the ddelete list stays on
the list when we drop the locks.

Completely rework this mess by moving processed entries on a temporary
list.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The code path isn't hit at the moment, but we need to take the lock to
add the BO back to the LRU.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Deleted BOs with the same reservation object can be reaped even if they
can't be reserved.

v2: rebase and we still need to remove/add the BO from/to the LRU.
v3: fix remove/add one more time, cleanup the logic a bit
v4: we should still check if the eviction is valuable
v5: add comment suggested by Michel
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Needed for the next patch.

v2: actually predicate all unlocks
v3: add some cleanups suggested by Michel.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Consistently use the reservation object wrappers instead of accessing
the ww_mutex directly.

Additional to that use the reservation object wrappers directly instead of
calling __ttm_bo_reserve with fixed parameters.

v2: fix typo
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Instead of having a confusing wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Needed for the next patch and makes the code quite a bit easier to
understand.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Fixes a use-after-free due to a race condition in
ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock, which allows one task to reserve a BO
and destroy its ttm_resv while another task is waiting for it to signal
in reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu.

v2:
* Always initialize bo->ttm_resv in ttm_bo_init_reserved
 (Christian König)

Fixes: 0d2bd2ae "drm/ttm: fix memory leak while individualizing BOs"
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> # v1
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

after individualize we need manually call reservation_object_fini()
if all fences on resv signaled during test, otherwise kmemory leak
Signed-off-by: NMonk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We need to free the reservation object before we take the BO
from the delayed delete list.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMonk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>