- 12 4月, 2015 40 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The rw parameter to direct_IO is redundant with iov_iter->type, and treated slightly differently just about everywhere it's used: some users do rw & WRITE, and others do rw == WRITE where they should be doing a bitwise check. Simplify this with the new iov_iter_rw() helper, which always returns either READ or WRITE. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
And use iov_iter_rw() instead. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Most filesystems call through to these at some point, so we'll start here. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
no remaining users Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all remaining instances of aio_{read,write} (all 4 of them) have explicit ->read and ->write resp.; do_sync_read/do_sync_write is never called by __vfs_read/__vfs_write anymore and no other users had been left. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
store reference to iter instead of that to iovec Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we just change the calling conventions here; more work to follow. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
All places outside of core VFS that checked ->read and ->write for being NULL or called the methods directly are gone now, so NULL {read,write} with non-NULL {read,write}_iter will do the right thing in all cases. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and fix the case when the area we are asked to read crosses a hugepage boundary Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and request the same from the local cache - all filesystems with anything usable for that support those already. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
do it in ->direct_IO()... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and make it loop Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
just handle it in ->direct_IO() Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Don't mess with kmap() - just use ITER_BVEC. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and make it loop until it's done Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We check if ->ki_pos is positive. However, by that point we have already done rw_verify_area(), which would have rejected such unless the file had been one of /dev/mem, /dev/kmem and /proc/kcore. All of which do not have vectored rw methods, so we would've bailed out even earlier. This check had been introduced before rw_verify_area() had been added there - in fact, it was a subset of checks done on sync paths by rw_verify_area() (back then the /dev/mem exception didn't exist at all). The rest of checks (mandatory locking, etc.) hadn't been added until later. Unfortunately, by the time the call of rw_verify_area() got added, the /dev/mem exception had already appeared, so it wasn't obvious that the older explicit check downstream had become dead code. It *is* a dead code, though, since the few files for which the exception applies do not have ->aio_{read,write}() or ->{read,write}_iter() and for them we won't reach that check anyway. What's more, even if we ever introduce vectored methods for /dev/mem and friends, they'll have to cope with negative positions anyway, since readv(2) and writev(2) are using the same checks as read(2) and write(2) - i.e. rw_verify_area(). Let's bury it. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Way, way back kiocb used to be picked from arrays, so ioctx_alloc() checked for multiplication overflow when calculating the size of such array. By the time fs/aio.c went into the tree (in 2002) they were already allocated one-by-one by kmem_cache_alloc(), so that check had already become pointless. Let's bury it... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's actually shorter that way *and* later we'll want iocb in scope of generic_write_check() caller. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
identical to import_single_range() Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We don't need req in either of those. We don't need nr_segs in caller. We don't really need len in caller either - iov_iter_count(&iter) will do. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
the only non-trivial detail is that we do it before rw_verify_area(), so we'd better cap the length ourselves in aio_setup_single_rw() case (for vectored case rw_copy_check_uvector() will do that for us). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
get it closer to matching {compat_,}rw_copy_check_uvector(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Andrew Elble 提交于
We have observed a BUG() crash in fs/attr.c:notify_change(). The crash occurs during an rsync into a filesystem that is exported via NFS. 1.) fs/attr.c:notify_change() modifies the caller's version of attr. 2.) 6de0ec00 ("VFS: make notify_change pass ATTR_KILL_S*ID to setattr operations") introduced a BUG() restriction such that "no function will ever call notify_change() with both ATTR_MODE and ATTR_KILL_S*ID set". Under some circumstances though, it will have assisted in setting the caller's version of attr to this very combination. 3.) 27ac0ffe ("locks: break delegations on any attribute modification") introduced code to handle breaking delegations. This can result in notify_change() being re-called. attr _must_ be explicitly reset to avoid triggering the BUG() established in #2. 4.) The path that that triggers this is via fs/open.c:chmod_common(). The combination of attr flags set here and in the first call to notify_change() along with a later failed break_deleg_wait() results in notify_change() being called again via retry_deleg without resetting attr. Solution is to move retry_deleg in chmod_common() a bit further up to ensure attr is completely reset. There are other places where this seemingly could occur, such as fs/utimes.c:utimes_common(), but the attr flags are not initially set in such a way to trigger this. Fixes: 27ac0ffe ("locks: break delegations on any attribute modification") Reported-by: NEric Meddaugh <etmsys@rit.edu> Tested-by: NEric Meddaugh <etmsys@rit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Elble <aweits@rit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
On a distributed filesystem it's possible for lookup to discover that a directory it just found is already cached elsewhere in the directory heirarchy. The dcache won't let us keep the directory in both places, so we have to move the dentry to the new location from the place we previously had it cached. If the parent has changed, then this requires all the same locks as we'd need to do a cross-directory rename. But we're already in lookup holding one parent's i_mutex, so it's too late to acquire those locks in the right order. The (unreliable) solution in __d_unalias is to trylock() the required locks and return -EBUSY if it fails. I see no particular reason for returning -EBUSY, and -ESTALE is already the result of some other lookup races on NFS. I think -ESTALE is the more helpful error return. It also allows us to take advantage of the logic Jeff Layton added in c6a94284 "vfs: fix renameat to retry on ESTALE errors" and ancestors, which hopefully resolves some of these errors before they're returned to userspace. I can reproduce these cases using NFS with: ssh root@$client ' mount -olookupcache=pos '$server':'$export' /mnt/ mkdir /mnt/TO mkdir /mnt/DIR touch /mnt/DIR/test.txt while true; do strace -e open cat /mnt/DIR/test.txt 2>&1 | grep EBUSY done ' ssh root@$server ' while true; do mv $export/DIR $export/TO/DIR mv $export/TO/DIR $export/DIR done ' It also helps to add some other concurrent use of the directory on the client (e.g., "ls /mnt/TO"). And you can replace the server-side mv's by client-side mv's that are repeatedly killed. (If the client is interrupted while waiting for the RENAME response then it's left with a dentry that has to go under one parent or the other, but it doesn't yet know which.) Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Anton Altaparmakov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
For one thing, LOOKUP_DIRECTORY will be dealt with in do_last(). For another, name can be an empty string, but not NULL - no callers pass that and it would oops immediately if they would. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-