- 22 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
The add_new_disk returns with communication locked if __sendmsg returns failure, fix it with call unlock_comm before return. Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> CC: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christophe JAILLET 提交于
We know that 'bm_lockres' is NULL here, so 'lockres_free(bm_lockres)' is a no-op. According to resource handling in case of error a few lines below, it is likely that 'bitmap_free(bitmap)' was expected instead. Fixes: b98938d1 ("md-cluster: introduce cluster_check_sync_size") Signed-off-by: NChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 17 3月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
To update size for cluster raid, we need to make sure all nodes can perform the change successfully. However, it is possible that some of them can't do it due to failure (bitmap_resize could fail). So we need to consider the issue before we set the capacity unconditionally, and we use below steps to perform sanity check. 1. A change the size, then broadcast METADATA_UPDATED msg. 2. B and C receive METADATA_UPDATED change the size excepts call set_capacity, sync_size is not update if the change failed. Also call bitmap_update_sb to sync sb to disk. 3. A checks other node's sync_size, if sync_size has been updated in all nodes, then send CHANGE_CAPACITY msg otherwise send msg to revert previous change. 4. B and C call set_capacity if receive CHANGE_CAPACITY msg, otherwise pers->resize will be called to restore the old value. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Support resize is a little complex for clustered raid, since we need to ensure all the nodes share the same knowledge about the size of raid. We achieve the goal by check the sync_size which is in each node's bitmap, we can only change the capacity after cluster_check_sync_size returns 0. Also, get_bitmap_from_slot is added to get a slot's bitmap. And we exported some funcs since they are used in cluster_check_sync_size(). We can also reuse get_bitmap_from_slot to remove redundant code existed in bitmap_copy_from_slot. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
The msg type CHANGE_CAPACITY is introduced to support resize clustered raid in later patch, and it is sent after all the nodes have the same sync_size, receiver node just need to set new capacity once received this msg. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Previously, when node received METADATA_UPDATED msg, it just need to wakeup mddev->thread, then md_reload_sb will be called eventually. We taken the asynchronous way to avoid a deadlock issue, the deadlock issue could happen when one node is receiving the METADATA_UPDATED msg (wants reconfig_mutex) and trying to run the path: md_check_recovery -> mddev_trylock(hold reconfig_mutex) -> md_update_sb-metadata_update_start (want EX on token however token is got by the sending node) Since we will support resizing for clustered raid, and we need the metadata update handling to be synchronous so that the initiating node can detect failure, so we need to change the way for handling METADATA_UPDATED msg. But, we obviously need to avoid above deadlock with the sync way. To make this happen, we considered to not hold reconfig_mutex to call md_reload_sb, if some other thread has already taken reconfig_mutex and waiting for the 'token', then process_recvd_msg() can safely call md_reload_sb() without taking the mutex. This is because we can be certain that no other thread will take the mutex, and we also certain that the actions performed by md_reload_sb() won't interfere with anything that the other thread is in the middle of. To make this more concrete, we added a new cinfo->state bit MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD Which is set in lock_token() just before dlm_lock_sync() is called, and cleared just after. As lock_token() is always called with reconfig_mutex() held (the specific case is the resync_info_update which is distinguished well in previous patch), if process_recvd_msg() finds that the new bit is set, then the mutex must be held by some other thread, and it will keep waiting. So process_metadata_update() can call md_reload_sb() if either mddev_trylock() succeeds, or if MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD is set. The tricky bit is what to do if neither of these apply. We need to wait. Fortunately mddev_unlock() always calls wake_up() on mddev->thread->wqueue. So we can get lock_token() to call wake_up() on that when it sets the bit. There are also some related changes inside this commit: 1. remove RELOAD_SB related codes since there are not valid anymore. 2. mddev is added into md_cluster_info then we can get mddev inside lock_token. 3. add new parameter for lock_token to distinguish reconfig_mutex is held or not. And, we need to set MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD in below: 1. set it before unregister thread, otherwise a deadlock could appear if stop a resyncing array. This is because md_unregister_thread(&cinfo->recv_thread) is blocked by recv_daemon -> process_recvd_msg -> process_metadata_update. To resolve the issue, MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD is also need to be set before unregister thread. 2. set it in metadata_update_start to fix another deadlock. a. Node A sends METADATA_UPDATED msg (held Token lock). b. Node B wants to do resync, and is blocked since it can't get Token lock, but MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD is not set since the callchain (md_do_sync -> sync_request -> resync_info_update -> sendmsg -> lock_comm -> lock_token) doesn't hold reconfig_mutex. c. Node B trys to update sb (held reconfig_mutex), but stopped at wait_event() in metadata_update_start since we have set MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK flag in lock_comm (step 2). d. Then Node B receives METADATA_UPDATED msg from A, of course recv_daemon is blocked forever. Since metadata_update_start always calls lock_token with reconfig_mutex, we need to set MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD here as well, and lock_token don't need to set it twice unless lock_token is invoked from lock_comm. Finally, thanks to Neil for his great idea and help! Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 10 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
This memset is not needed. The lvb is already zeroed because it was recently allocated by lockres_init, which uses kzalloc(), and read_resync_info() doesn't need it to be zero anyway. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
To avoid memory leak, we need to free the cinfo which is allocated when node join cluster. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
When one node is perform resync or recovery, other nodes can't get resync lock and could block for a while before it holds the lock, so we can't stop array immediately for this scenario. To make array could be stop quickly, we check MD_CLOSING in dlm_lock_sync_interruptible to make us can interrupt the lock request. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
When some node leaves cluster, then it's bitmap need to be synced by another node, so "md*_recover" thread is triggered for the purpose. However, with below steps. we can find tasks hang happened either in B or C. 1. Node A create a resyncing cluster raid1, assemble it in other two nodes (B and C). 2. stop array in B and C. 3. stop array in A. linux44:~ # ps aux|grep md|grep D root 5938 0.0 0.1 19852 1964 pts/0 D+ 14:52 0:00 mdadm -S md0 root 5939 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D 14:52 0:00 [md0_recover] linux44:~ # cat /proc/5939/stack [<ffffffffa04cf321>] dlm_lock_sync+0x71/0x90 [md_cluster] [<ffffffffa04d0705>] recover_bitmaps+0x125/0x220 [md_cluster] [<ffffffffa052105d>] md_thread+0x16d/0x180 [md_mod] [<ffffffff8107ad94>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0 [<ffffffff8152a518>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 linux44:~ # cat /proc/5938/stack [<ffffffff8107afde>] kthread_stop+0x6e/0x120 [<ffffffffa0519da0>] md_unregister_thread+0x40/0x80 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa04cfd20>] leave+0x70/0x120 [md_cluster] [<ffffffffa0525e24>] md_cluster_stop+0x14/0x30 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa05269ab>] bitmap_free+0x14b/0x150 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa0523f3b>] do_md_stop+0x35b/0x5a0 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa0524e83>] md_ioctl+0x873/0x1590 [md_mod] [<ffffffff81288464>] blkdev_ioctl+0x214/0x7d0 [<ffffffff811dd3dd>] block_ioctl+0x3d/0x40 [<ffffffff811b92d4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2d4/0x4b0 [<ffffffff811b9538>] SyS_ioctl+0x88/0xa0 [<ffffffff8152a5c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b The problem is caused by recover_bitmaps can't reliably abort when the thread is unregistered. So dlm_lock_sync_interruptible is introduced to detect the thread's situation to fix the problem. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Previously, we used completion to sync between require dlm lock and sync_ast, however we will have to expose completion.wait and completion.done in dlm_lock_sync_interruptible (introduced later), it is not a common usage for completion, so convert related things to wait queue. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
We need to use rcu_read_lock/unlock to avoid potential race. Reported-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Since DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK is used in lockres_free, we don't need to call dlm_unlock_sync before free lock resource. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
For dlm_unlock, we need to pass flag to dlm_unlock as the third parameter instead of set res->flags. Also, DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK is more suitable for dlm_unlock since it works even the lock is on waiting or convert queue. Acked-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Fix to return error code -ENOMEM from the lockres_init() error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 10 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
We don't need to run the full path of recv_daemon if process_recvd_msg doesn't return 0. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
The in-memory bitmap is not ready when node joins cluster, so it doesn't make sense to make gather_all_resync_info() called so earlier, we need to call it after the node's bitmap is setup. Also, recv_thread could be wake up after node joins cluster, but it could cause problem if node receives RESYNCING message without persionality since mddev->pers->quiesce is called in process_suspend_info. This commit introduces a new cluster interface load_bitmaps to fix above problems, load_bitmaps is called in bitmap_load where bitmap and persionality are ready, and load_bitmaps does the following tasks: 1. call gather_all_resync_info to load all the node's bitmap info. 2. set MD_CLUSTER_ALREADY_IN_CLUSTER bit to recv_thread could be wake up, and wake up recv_thread if there is pending recv event. Then ack_bast only wakes up recv_thread after IN_CLUSTER bit is ready otherwise MD_CLUSTER_PENDING_RESYNC_EVENT is set. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 05 5月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
If the node received RESYNCING message which means another node will perform resync with the area, then we don't want to do it again in another node. Let's set RESYNC_MASK and clear NEEDED_MASK for the region from old-low to new-low which has finished syncing, and the region from old-hi to new-hi is about to syncing, bitmap_sync_with_cluste is introduced for the purpose. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
If a node joins the cluster while a message broadcast is under way, a lock issue could happen as follows. For a cluster which included two nodes, if node A is calling __sendmsg before up-convert CR to EX on ack, and node B released CR on ack. But if a new node C joins the cluster and it doesn't receive the message which A sent before, so it could hold CR on ack before A up-convert CR to EX on ack. So a node joining the cluster should get an EX lock on the "token" first to ensure no broadcast is ongoing, then release it after held CR on ack. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
The two threads need to be unregistered if a node can't join cluster successfully. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
In recovery case, we need to set MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED and wake up thread only if recover is not finished. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
If multiple nodes choose to attempt do resync at the same time they need to be serialized so they don't duplicate effort. This serialization is done by locking the 'resync' DLM lock. Currently if a node cannot get the lock immediately it doesn't request notification when the lock becomes available (i.e. DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE is set), so it may not reliably find out when it is safe to try again. Rather than trying to arrange an async wake-up when the lock becomes available, switch to using synchronous locking - this is a lot easier to think about. As it is not permitted to block in the 'raid1d' thread, move the locking to the resync thread. So the rsync thread is forked immediately, but it blocks until the resync lock is available. Once the lock is locked it checks again if any resync action is needed. A particular symptom of the current problem is that a node can get stuck with "resync=pending" indefinitely. Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
There are several places we allocate dlm_lock_resource, but not free it. leave() need free a lock resource too (from Guoqing) Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Cc: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
1. fix unbalanced parentheses. 2. add more description about that MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCKED_ALREADY will be cleared after set it in add_new_disk. Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Communication can happen through multiple threads. It is possible that one thread steps over another threads sequence. So, we use mutexes to protect both the send and receive sequences. Send communication is locked through state bit, MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK. Communication is locked with bit manipulation in order to allow "lock and hold" for the add operation. In case of an add operation, if the lock is held, MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCKED_ALREADY is set. When md_update_sb() calls metadata_update_start(), it checks (in a single statement to avoid races), if the communication is already locked. If yes, it merely returns zero, else it locks the token lockresource. Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Reloading of superblock must be performed under reconfig_mutex. However, this cannot be done with md_reload_sb because it would deadlock with the message DLM lock. So, we defer it in md_check_recovery() which is executed by mddev->thread. This introduces a new flag, MD_RELOAD_SB, which if set, will reload the superblock. And good_device_nr is also added to 'struct mddev' which is used to get the num of the good device within cluster raid. Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
For clustered raid, we need to do extra actions when change bitmap to none. 1. check if all the bitmap lock could be get or not, if yes then we can continue the change since cluster raid is only active in current node. Otherwise return fail and unlock the related bitmap locks 2. set nodes to 0 and then leave cluster environment. 3. release other nodes's bitmap lock. Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
The remove disk message does not need metadata_update_start(), but can be an independent message. Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
For cluster raid, if one disk couldn't be reach in one node, then other nodes would receive the REMOVE message for the disk. In receiving node, we can't call md_kick_rdev_from_array to remove the disk from array synchronously since the disk might still be busy in this node. So let's set a ClusterRemove flag on the disk, then let the thread to do the removal job eventually. Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
If a RESYNCING message with (0,0) has been sent before, do not send it again. This avoids a resync ping pong between the nodes. We read the bitmap lockresource's LVB to figure out the previous value of the RESYNCING message. Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The arg isn't used, so its presence is only confusing. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
It is common practice in the kernel to leave out this case. It isn't needed and adds little if any value. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
This patches fixes sparse warnings like incorrect type in assignment (different base types), cast to restricted __le64. Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
As cmsg.raid_slot is le32, comparing for >0 is not meaningful. So introduce cpu-endian 'raid_slot' and only assign to cmsg.raid_slot when we know value is valid. Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
-
- 13 10月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
During the past test, the node occasionally received the msg which is sent from itself, this case should not happen in theory, but it is better to avoid it in case something wrong happened. Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Since slot will be set within _sendmsg, we can remove the redundant code in resync_info_update. Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
-
由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
-