Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 3月, 2012 4 次提交
    • S
      pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device · 6e5e959d
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      The API model is changed from:

p = pinctrl_get(dev, "state1");
pinctrl_enable(p);
...
pinctrl_disable(p);
pinctrl_put(p);
p = pinctrl_get(dev, "state2");
pinctrl_enable(p);
...
pinctrl_disable(p);
pinctrl_put(p);

to this:

p = pinctrl_get(dev);
s1 = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, "state1");
s2 = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, "state2");
pinctrl_select_state(p, s1);
...
pinctrl_select_state(p, s2);
...
pinctrl_put(p);

This allows devices to directly transition between states without
disabling the pin controller programming and put()/get()ing the
configuration data each time. This model will also better suit pinconf
programming, which doesn't have a concept of "disable".

The special-case hogging feature of pin controllers is re-written to use
the regular APIs instead of special-case code. Hence, the pinmux-hogs
debugfs file is removed; see the top-level pinctrl-handles files for
equivalent data.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      6e5e959d
    • S
      pinctrl: add usecount to pins for muxing · 0e3db173
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      Multiple mapping table entries could reference the same pin, and hence
"own" it. This would be unusual now that pinctrl_get() represents a single
state for a client device, but in the future when it represents all known
states for a device, this is quite likely. Implement reference counting
for pin ownership to handle this.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      0e3db173
    • S
      pinctrl: refactor struct pinctrl handling in core.c vs pinmux.c · 7ecdb16f
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      This change separates two aspects of struct pinctrl:

a) The data representation of the parsed mapping table, into:

   1) The top-level struct pinctrl object, a single entity returned
      by pinctrl_get().

   2) The parsed version of each mapping table entry, struct
      pinctrl_setting, of which there is one per mapping table entry.

b) The code that handles this; the code for (1) above is in core.c, and
   the code to parse/execute each entry in (2) above is in pinmux.c, while
   the iteration over multiple settings is lifted to core.c.

This will allow the following future changes:

1) pinctrl_get() API rework, so that struct pinctrl represents all states
   for the device, and the device can select between them without calling
   put()/get() again.

2) To support that, a struct pinctrl_state object will be inserted into
   the data model between the struct pinctrl and struct pinctrl_setting.

3) The mapping table will be extended to allow specification of pin config
   settings too. To support this, struct pinctrl_setting will be enhanced
   to store either mux settings or config settings, and functions will be
   added to pinconf.c to parse/execute pin configuration settings.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      7ecdb16f
    • S
      pinctrl: fix and simplify locking · 57b676f9
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      There are many problems with the current pinctrl locking:

struct pinctrl_dev's gpio_ranges_lock isn't effective;
pinctrl_match_gpio_range() only holds this lock while searching for a gpio
range, but the found range is return and manipulated after releading the
lock. This could allow pinctrl_remove_gpio_range() for that range while it
is in use, and the caller may very well delete the range after removing it,
causing pinctrl code to touch the now-free range object.

Solving this requires the introduction of a higher-level lock, at least
a lock per pin controller, which both gpio range registration and
pinctrl_get()/put() will acquire.

There is missing locking on HW programming; pin controllers may pack the
configuration for different pins/groups/config options/... into one
register, and hence have to read-modify-write the register. This needs to
be protected, but currently isn't. Related, a future change will add a
"complete" op to the pin controller drivers, the idea being that each
state's programming will be programmed into the pinctrl driver followed
by the "complete" call, which may e.g. flush a register cache to HW. For
this to work, it must not be possible to interleave the pinctrl driver
calls for different devices.

As above, solving this requires the introduction of a higher-level lock,
at least a lock per pin controller, which will be held for the duration
of any pinctrl_enable()/disable() call.

However, each pinctrl mapping table entry may affect a different pin
controller if necessary. Hence, with a per-pin-controller lock, almost
any pinctrl API may need to acquire multiple locks, one per controller.
To avoid deadlock, these would need to be acquired in the same order in
all cases. This is extremely difficult to implement in the case of
pinctrl_get(), which doesn't know which pin controllers to lock until it
has parsed the entire mapping table, since it contains somewhat arbitrary
data.

The simplest solution here is to introduce a single lock that covers all
pin controllers at once. This will be acquired by all pinctrl APIs.

This then makes struct pinctrl's mutex irrelevant, since that single lock
will always be held whenever this mutex is currently held.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      57b676f9
  3. 02 3月, 2012 4 次提交
  5. 01 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 24 2月, 2012 4 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2012 14 次提交
  11. 11 2月, 2012 4 次提交
  13. 02 2月, 2012 3 次提交
  15. 30 1月, 2012 5 次提交