Previous patch in the bad block series added new sysfs interfaces
([unacknowledged_]bad_blocks) for each rdev without documentation.
Add it.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

This can show the log (providing it fits in one page) and
allows bad blocks to be 'acknowledged' meaning that they
have safely been recorded in metadata.

Clearing bad blocks is not allowed via sysfs (except for
code testing).  A bad block can only be cleared when
a write to the block succeeds.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

This the first step in allowing md to track bad-blocks per-device so
that we can fail individual blocks rather than the whole device.

This patch just adds a data structure for recording bad blocks, with
routines to add, remove, search the list.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

When calling bioset_create we pass the size of the front_pad as
   sizeof(mddev)
which looks suspicious as mddev is a pointer and so it looks like a
common mistake where
   sizeof(*mddev)
was intended.
The size is actually correct as we want to store a pointer in the
front padding of the bios created by the bioset, so make the intent
more explicit by using
   sizeof(mddev_t *)
Reported-by: NZdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

This patch causes MD to generate an event (for device-mapper) when the
synchronization thread is reaped.  This is expected behavior for device-mapper.
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Revert most of commit e384e585
  md/bitmap: prepare for storing write-intent-bitmap via dm-dirty-log.

MD should not need to use DM's dirty log - we decided to use md's
bitmaps instead.

Keeping the DIV_ROUND_UP clean-ups that were part of commit
e384e585, however.
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If device-mapper creates a RAID1 array that includes devices to
be rebuilt, it will deref a NULL pointer when finished because
sysfs is not used by device-mapper instantiated RAID devices.
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

While preparing to write a stripe we keep the parity block or blocks
locked (R5_LOCKED) - towards the end of schedule_reconstruction.

If the array is discovered to have failed before this write completes
we can leave those blocks LOCKED, and init_stripe will notice that a
free stripe still has a locked block and will complain.

So clear the R5_LOCKED flag in handle_failed_stripe, and demote the
'BUG' to a 'WARN_ON'.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO. Also included a couple of whitespace fixes on sync_page_io().
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

page_address() returns void pointer, so the casts can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Normally we would fail a device with a READ error.  However if doing
so causes the array to fail, it is better to leave the device
in place and just return the read error to the caller.

The current test for decide if the array will fail is overly
simplistic.
We have a function 'enough' which can tell if the array is failed or
not, so use it to guide the decision.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When we get a read error during recovery, RAID10 previously
arranged for the recovering device to appear to fail so that
the recovery stops and doesn't restart.  This is misleading and wrong.

Instead, make use of the new recovery_disabled handling and mark
the target device and having recovery disabled.

Add appropriate checks in add_disk and remove_disk so that devices
are removed and not re-added when recovery is disabled.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If we hit a read error while recovering a mirror, we want to abort the
recovery without necessarily failing the disk - as having a disk this
a read error is better than not having an array at all.

Currently this is managed with a per-array flag "recovery_disabled"
and is only implemented for RAID1.  For RAID10 we will need finer
grained control as we might want to disable recovery for individual
devices separately.

So push more of the decision making into the personality.
'recovery_disabled' is now a 'cookie' which is copied when the
personality want to disable recovery and is changed when a device is
added to the array as this is used as a trigger to 'try recovery
again'.

This will allow RAID10 to get the control that it needs.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Commit c89a8eee ("Allow faulty devices to be removed from a
readonly array.") added some work on ro array in the function,
but it couldn't be done since we didn't allow the ro array to be
handled from the beginning. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

There are places where sysfs links to rdev are handled
in a same way. Add the helper functions to consolidate
them.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

As per printk_ratelimit comment, it should not be used.
Signed-off-by: NChristian Dietrich <christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Using __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le() with ignoring its return value
can be replaced with __{set,clear}_bit_le().
Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() are now virtually identical.
So discard one and rename the other to 'analyse_stripe()'.

It always returns 0, so change it to 'void' and remove the 'done'
variable in handle_stripe().
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

The RAID6 version of this code is usable for RAID5 providing:
  - we test "conf->max_degraded" rather than "2" as appropriate
  - we make sure s->failed_num[1] is meaningful (and not '-1')
    when s->failed > 1

The 'return 1' must become 'goto finish' in the new location.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Apart from 'prexor' which can only be set for RAID5, and
'qd_idx' which can only be meaningful for RAID6, these two
chunks of code are nearly the same.

So combine them into one adding a test to call either
handle_parity_checks5 or handle_parity_checks6 as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

RAID6 is only allowed to choose 'reconstruct-write' while RAID5 is
also allow 'read-modify-write'
Apart from this difference, handle_stripe_dirtying[56] are nearly
identical.  So resolve these differences and create just one function.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Provided that ->failed_num[1] is not a valid device number (which is
easily achieved) fetch_block6 provides all the functionality of
fetch_block5.

So remove the latter and rename the former to simply "fetch_block".

Then handle_stripe_fill5 and handle_stripe_fill6 become the same and
can similarly be united.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Next patch will unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6.
First I want to make the differences a little more clear.

For RAID6 if we are writing at all and there is a failed device, then
we need to load or compute every block so we can do a
reconstruct-write.
This case isn't needed for RAID5 - we will do a read-modify-write in
that case.
So make that test a separate test in fetch_block6 rather than merged
with two other tests.

Make a similar change in fetch_block5 so the one bit that is not
needed for RAID6 is clearly separate.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

The difference between the RAID5 and RAID6 code here is easily
resolved using conf->max_degraded.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Prior to commit ab69ae12 the code in handle_stripe5 and
handle_stripe6 to "Finish reconstruct operations initiated by the
expansion process" was identical.
That commit added an identical stanza of code to each function, but in
different places.  That was careless.

The raid5 code was correct, so move that out into handle_stripe and
remove raid6 version.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

This arg is only used to differentiate between RAID5 and RAID6 but
that is not needed.  For RAID5, raid5_compute_sector will set qd_idx
to "~0" so j with certainly not equals qd_idx, so there is no need
for a guard on that condition.

So remove the guard and remove the arg from the declaration and
callers of handle_stripe_expansion.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

By defining the 'stripe_head_state' in 'handle_stripe', we can move
some common code out of handle_stripe[56]() and into handle_stripe.

The means that all accesses for stripe_head_state in handle_stripe[56]
need to be 's->' instead of 's.', but the compiler should inline
those functions and just use a direct stack reference, and future
patches while hoist most of this code up into handle_stripe()
so we will revert to "s.".
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Adding these three fields will allow more common code to be moved
to handle_stripe()

struct field rearrangement by Namhyung Kim.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

'struct stripe_head_state' stores state about the 'current' stripe
that is passed around while handling the stripe.
For RAID6 there is an extension structure: r6_state, which is also
passed around.
There is no value in keeping these separate, so move the fields from
the latter into the former.

This means that all code now needs to treat s->failed_num as an small
array, but this is a small cost.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

There is common code at the start of handle_stripe5 and
handle_stripe6.  Move it into handle_stripe.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

sh->lock is now mainly used to ensure that two threads aren't running
in the locked part of handle_stripe[56] at the same time.

That can more neatly be achieved with an 'active' flag which we set
while running handle_stripe.  If we find the flag is set, we simply
requeue the stripe for later by setting STRIPE_HANDLE.

For safety we take ->device_lock while examining the state of the
stripe and creating a summary in 'stripe_head_state / r6_state'.
This possibly isn't needed but as shared fields like ->toread,
->towrite are checked it is safer for now at least.

We leave the label after the old 'unlock' called "unlock" because it
will disappear in a few patches, so renaming seems pointless.

This leaves the stripe 'locked' for longer as we clear STRIPE_ACTIVE
later, but that is not a problem.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

Other places that change or follow dev->towrite and dev->written take
the device_lock as well as the sh->lock.
So it should really be held in these places too.
Also, doing so will allow sh->lock to be discarded.

with merged fixes by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

This is the start of a series of patches to remove sh->lock.

sync_request takes sh->lock before setting STRIPE_SYNCING to ensure
there is no race with testing it in handle_stripe[56].

Instead, use a new flag STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED and test it early
in handle_stripe[56] (after getting the same lock) and perform the
same set/clear operations if it was set.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>

In raid5::make_request(), once bio_data_dir(@bi) is detected
it never (and couldn't) be changed. Use the result always.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Replace kmem_cache_alloc + memset(,0,) to kmem_cache_zalloc.
I think it's not harmful since @conf->slab_cache already knows
actual size of struct stripe_head.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When performing a recovery, only first 2 slots in r10_bio are in use,
for read and write respectively. However all of pages in the write bio
are never used and just replaced to read bio's when the read completes.

Get rid of those unused pages and share read pages properly.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When normal-write and sync-read/write bio completes, we should
find out the disk number the bio belongs to. Factor those common
code out to a separate function.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Variable 'first' is initialized to zero and updated to @rdev->raid_disk
only if it is greater than 0. Thus condition '>= first' always implies
'>= 0' so the latter is not needed.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>