- 21 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
With all the patches we have queued in the BKL removal tree, only a few dozen modules are left that actually rely on the BKL, and even there are lots of low-hanging fruit. We need to decide what to do about them, this patch illustrates one of the options: Every user of the BKL is marked as 'depends on BKL' in Kconfig, and the CONFIG_BKL becomes a user-visible option. If it gets disabled, no BKL using module can be built any more and the BKL code itself is compiled out. The one exception is file locking, which is practically always enabled and does a 'select BKL' instead. This effectively forces CONFIG_BKL to be enabled until we have solved the fs/lockd mess and can apply the patch that removes the BKL from fs/locks.c. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 18 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Randy Dunlap reports: ERROR: "svc_gss_principal" [fs/nfs/nfs.ko] undefined! because in fs/nfs/Kconfig, NFS_V4 selects RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 and/or in fs/nfsd/Kconfig, NFSD_V4 selects RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5. RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 does 5 selects, but none of these is enforced/followed by the fs/nfs[d]/Kconfig configs: select SUNRPC_GSS select CRYPTO select CRYPTO_MD5 select CRYPTO_DES select CRYPTO_CBC Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Manish Katiyar 提交于
Enable NFSD only when FILE_LOCKING is enabled, since we don't want to support NFSD without FILE_LOCKING. Signed-off-by: NManish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
- 22 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
-