Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 163
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 31 3月, 2015 14 次提交
  5. 07 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 24 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      xprtrdma: Store RDMA credits in unsigned variables · 9b1dcbc8
      由 Chuck Lever 提交于 
      Dan Carpenter's static checker pointed out:

   net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c:879 rpcrdma_reply_handler()
   warn: can 'credits' be negative?

"credits" is defined as an int. The credits value comes from the
server as a 32-bit unsigned integer.

A malicious or broken server can plant a large unsigned integer in
that field which would result in an underflow in the following
logic, potentially triggering a deadlock of the mount point by
blocking the client from issuing more RPC requests.

net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c:

  876          credits = be32_to_cpu(headerp->rm_credit);
  877          if (credits == 0)
  878                  credits = 1;    /* don't deadlock */
  879          else if (credits > r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests)
  880                  credits = r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests;
  881
  882          cwnd = xprt->cwnd;
  883          xprt->cwnd = credits << RPC_CWNDSHIFT;
  884          if (xprt->cwnd > cwnd)
  885                  xprt_release_rqst_cong(rqst->rq_task);
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: eba8ff66 ("xprtrdma: Move credit update to RPC . . .")
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
      9b1dcbc8
  9. 06 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 31 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 30 1月, 2015 20 次提交
  15. 16 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      svcrdma: Handle additional inline content · a97c331f
      由 Chuck Lever 提交于 
      Most NFS RPCs place their large payload argument at the end of the
RPC header (eg, NFSv3 WRITE). For NFSv3 WRITE and SYMLINK, RPC/RDMA
sends the complete RPC header inline, and the payload argument in
the read list. Data in the read list is the last part of the XDR
stream.

One important case is not like this, however. NFSv4 COMPOUND is a
counted array of operations. A WRITE operation, with its large data
payload, can appear in the middle of the compound's operations
array. Thus NFSv4 WRITE compounds can have header content after the
WRITE payload.

The Linux client, for example, performs an NFSv4 WRITE like this:

  { PUTFH, WRITE, GETATTR }

Though RFC 5667 is not precise about this, the proper way to convey
this compound is to place the GETATTR inline, _after_ the front of
the RPC header. The receiver inserts the read list payload into the
XDR stream after the initial WRITE arguments, and before the GETATTR
operation, thanks to the value of the read list "position" field.

The Linux client currently sends the GETATTR at the end of the
RPC/RDMA read list, which is incorrect. It will be corrected in the
future.

The Linux server currently rejects NFSv4 compounds with inline
content after the read list. For the above NFSv4 WRITE compound, the
NFS compound header indicates there are three operations, but the
server finds nonsense when it looks in the XDR stream for the third
operation, and the compound fails with OP_ILLEGAL.

Move trailing inline content to the end of the XDR buffer's page
list. This presents incoming NFSv4 WRITE compounds to NFSD in the
same way the socket transport does.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      a97c331f