- 27 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
since btrfs_kobj_rm_device() does nothing with fs_info Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_kobj_add_device() does not need fs_info any more. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 04 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Switch to div_u64 if the divisor is a numeric constant or sum of sizeof()s. We can remove a few instances of do_div that has the hidden semtantics of changing the 1st argument. Small power-of-two divisors are converted to bitshifts, large values are kept intact for clarity. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 21 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Switch to div_u64 if the divisor is a numeric constant or sum of sizeof()s. We can remove a few instances of do_div that has the hidden semtantics of changing the 1st argument. Small power-of-two divisors are converted to bitshifts, large values are kept intact for clarity. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
1: Remove no-need DEFINE_WAIT(wait) 2: Add likely() for BTRFS_FS_STATE_DEV_REPLACING condition 3: Use while loop instead of goto Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The commit c404e0dc (Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace) fixed a use-after-free problem which happened when removing the source device at the end of device replace, but at that time, btrfs didn't support device replace on raid56, so we didn't fix the problem on the raid56 profile. Currently, we implemented device replace for raid56, so we need kick that problem out before we enable that function for raid56. The fix method is very simple, we just increase the bio per-cpu counter before we submit a raid56 io, and decrease the counter when the raid56 io ends. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The following lockdep warning is triggered during xfstests: [ 1702.980872] ========================================================= [ 1702.981181] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1702.981482] 3.18.0-rc1 #27 Not tainted [ 1702.981781] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1702.982095] kswapd0/77 just changed the state of lock: [ 1702.982415] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa03b0b51>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x41/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 1702.982794] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1702.983160] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1702.984675] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1702.985524] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1702.986799] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1702.987681] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1702.988137] ---- ---- [ 1702.988598] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1702.989069] local_irq_disable(); [ 1702.989534] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1702.990038] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1702.990494] <Interrupt> [ 1702.990938] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1702.991407] *** DEADLOCK *** It is because the btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() will call memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL, which may flush fs page cache to free space, waiting for it self to do the commit, causing the deadlock. To solve the problem, move btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() out of the dev_replace lock range, also involing split the btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev() function into remove and free parts. Now only btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev() is called in dev_replace lock range, and kobj_{add/rm} and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() are called out of the lock range. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eryu Guan 提交于
device replace could fail due to another running scrub process or any other errors btrfs_scrub_dev() may hit, but this failure doesn't get returned to userspace. The following steps could reproduce this issue mkfs -t btrfs -f /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/btrfs while true; do btrfs scrub start -B /mnt/btrfs >/dev/null 2>&1; done & btrfs replace start -Bf /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs # if this replace succeeded, do the following and repeat until # you see this log in dmesg # BTRFS: btrfs_scrub_dev(/dev/sdb2, 2, /dev/sdb3) failed -115 #btrfs replace start -Bf /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/btrfs # once you see the error log in dmesg, check return value of # replace echo $? Introduce a new dev replace result BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_RESULT_SCRUB_INPROGRESS to catch -EINPROGRESS explicitly and return other errors directly to userspace. Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2014 11 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The problem is: Task0(device scan task) Task1(device replace task) scan_one_device() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) device = find_device() mutex_lock(&device_list_mutex) lock_chunk() rm_and_free_source_device unlock_chunk() mutex_unlock(&device_list_mutex) check device Destroying the target device if device replace fails also has the same problem. We fix this problem by locking uuid_mutex during destroying source device or target device, just like the device remove operation. It is a temporary solution, we can fix this problem and make the code more clear by atomic counter in the future. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
There were several problems about chunk mutex usage: - Lock chunk mutex when updating metadata. It would cause the nested deadlock because updating metadata might need allocate new chunks that need acquire chunk mutex. We remove chunk mutex at this case, because b-tree lock and other lock mechanism can help us. - ABBA deadlock occured between device_list_mutex and chunk_mutex. When we update device status, we must acquire device_list_mutex at the beginning, and then we might get chunk_mutex during the device status update because we need allocate new chunks for metadata COW. But at most place, we acquire chunk_mutex at first and then acquire device list mutex. We need change the lock order. - Some place we needn't acquire chunk_mutex. For example we needn't get chunk_mutex when we free a empty seed fs_devices structure. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
->total_bytes,->disk_total_bytes,->bytes_used is protected by chunk lock when we change them, but sometimes we read them without any lock, and we might get unexpected value. We fix this problem like inode's i_size. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
device->bytes_used will be changed when allocating a new chunk, and disk_total_size will be changed if resizing is successful. Meanwhile, the on-disk super blocks of the previous transaction might not be updated. Considering the consistency of the metadata in the previous transaction, We should use the size in the previous transaction to check if the super block is beyond the boundary of the device. Though it is not big problem because we don't use it now, but anyway it is better that we make it be consistent with the common metadata, maybe we will use it in the future. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
total_size will be changed when resizing a device, and disk_total_size will be changed if resizing is successful. Meanwhile, the on-disk super blocks of the previous transaction might not be updated. Considering the consistency of the metadata in the previous transaction, We should use the size in the previous transaction to check if the super block is beyond the boundary of the device. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We didn't protect the assignment of the target device, it might cause the problem that the super block update was skipped because we might find wrong size of the target device during the assignment. Fix it by moving the assignment sentences into the initialization function of the target device. And there is another merit that we can check if the target device is suitable more early. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
btrfs-transacion:5657 [stack snip] btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() percpu_counter_inc(&fs_info->bio_counter) ###bio_counter > 0(A) __btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###wait mutex(B) btrfs:32612 [stack snip] btrfs_dev_replace_start() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###hold mutex(B) btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked() wait until percpu_counter_sum == 0 ###wait on bio_counter(A) This bug can be triggered quite easily by the following test script: http://pastebin.com/MQmb37Cy This patch will fix the ABBA problem by calling btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). The consistency of btrfs devices list and their superblocks is protected by device_list_mutex, not btrfs_dev_replace_lock/unlock(). So it is safe the move btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). Reported-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
there is no matching open parenthesis for the closing parenthesis Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
reproducer: reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3882 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:892 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1c8/0x200 [btrfs]() which is WARN_ON(fs_devices->rw_devices); The problem here is that we did not add one to the rw_devices when we replace the seed device with a writable device. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
when we replace the device its corresponding sysfs entry has to be replaced as well Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gui Hecheng 提交于
To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL, and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that there is an invalid argument. Signed-off-by: NGui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock, or we would make the tasks wait for a long time. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem: - We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those mapping of the new chunks. - We might get the mapping information which including the source device before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was based on that mapping information after we freed the source device. For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix the first bug. For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec @bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio and dec @bio_counter when ending bios. Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56 yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will fix it in the future. Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Holton 提交于
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always used at the same place. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem, if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Zach Brown 提交于
fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink() and inc_nlink(). This doesn't belong in mainline. Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Zach Brown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
For both balance and replace, cancelling involves changing the on-disk state and committing a transaction, which is not a good thing to do on read-only filesystems. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev, can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents. Fix this by zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need a cast to print it. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Sweep of the simple cases. Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 14 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we create a snapshot, we need flush all delalloc inodes in the fs, just flushing the inodes in the source tree is OK. So we introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode list. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-