1. 03 7月, 2014 5 次提交
  2. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 15 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 13 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 05 12月, 2013 9 次提交
  7. 22 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 16 10月, 2013 5 次提交
  9. 14 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  10. 13 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  11. 12 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  12. 02 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 23 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 17 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • D
      Bluetooth: l2cap: add l2cap_user sub-modules · 2c8e1411
      David Herrmann 提交于
      Several sub-modules like HIDP, rfcomm, ... need to track l2cap
      connections. The l2cap_conn->hcon->dev object is used as parent for sysfs
      devices so the sub-modules need to be notified when the hci_conn object is
      removed from sysfs.
      
      As submodules normally use the l2cap layer, the l2cap_user objects are
      registered there instead of on the underlying hci_conn object. This avoids
      any direct dependency on the HCI layer and lets the l2cap core handle any
      specifics.
      
      This patch introduces l2cap_user objects which contain a "probe" and
      "remove" callback. You can register them on any l2cap_conn object and if
      it is active, the "probe" callback will get called. Otherwise, an error is
      returned.
      
      The l2cap_conn object will call your "remove" callback directly before it
      is removed from user-space. This allows you to remove your submodules
      _before_ the parent l2cap_conn and hci_conn object is removed.
      
      At any time you can asynchronously unregister your l2cap_user object if
      your submodule vanishes before the l2cap_conn object does.
      
      There is no way around l2cap_user. If we want wire-protocols in the
      kernel, we always want the hci_conn object as parent in the sysfs tree. We
      cannot use a channel here since we might need multiple channels for a
      single protocol.
      But the problem is, we _must_ get notified when an l2cap_conn object is
      removed. We cannot use reference-counting for object-removal! This is not
      how it works. If a hardware is removed, we should immediately remove the
      object from sysfs. Any other behavior would be inconsistent with the rest
      of the system. Also note that device_del() might sleep, but it doesn't
      wait for user-space or block very long. It only _unlinks_ the object from
      sysfs and the whole device-tree. Everything else is handled by ref-counts!
      This is exactly what the other sub-modules must do: unlink their devices
      when the "remove" l2cap_user callback is called. They should not do any
      cleanup or synchronous shutdowns.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
      2c8e1411
    • D
      Bluetooth: l2cap: introduce l2cap_conn ref-counting · 9c903e37
      David Herrmann 提交于
      If we want to use l2cap_conn outside of l2cap_core.c, we need refcounting
      for these objects. Otherwise, we cannot synchronize l2cap locks with
      outside locks and end up with deadlocks.
      
      Hence, introduce ref-counting for l2cap_conn objects. This doesn't affect
      l2cap internals at all, as they use a direct synchronization.
      We also keep a reference to the parent hci_conn for locking purposes as
      l2cap_conn depends on this. This doesn't affect the connection itself but
      only the lifetime of the (dead) object.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
      9c903e37
  15. 06 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 10 1月, 2013 1 次提交