1. 09 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 10 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      fs: try to clone files first in vfs_copy_file_range · a76b5b04
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      A clone is a perfectly fine implementation of a file copy, so most
      file systems just implement the copy that way.  Instead of duplicating
      this logic move it to the VFS.  Currently btrfs and XFS implement copies
      the same way as clones and there is no behavior change for them, cifs
      only implements clones and grow support for copy_file_range with this
      patch.  NFS implements both, so this will allow copy_file_range to work
      on servers that only implement CLONE and be lot more efficient on servers
      that implements CLONE and COPY.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      a76b5b04
  3. 06 12月, 2016 7 次提交
  4. 30 11月, 2016 4 次提交
  5. 25 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 27 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 22 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 26 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  11. 26 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  12. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 06 5月, 2016 5 次提交
  14. 03 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 02 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 29 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 28 4月, 2016 6 次提交
  18. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  19. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交