- 10 4月, 2017 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Instead of removing mark from object list from fsnotify_detach_mark(), remove the mark when last reference to the mark is dropped. This will allow fanotify to wait for userspace response to event without having to hold onto fsnotify_mark_srcu. To avoid pinning inodes by elevated refcount (and thus e.g. delaying file deletion) while someone holds mark reference, we detach connector from the object also from fsnotify_destroy_marks() and not only after removing last mark from the list as it was now. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we free fsnotify_mark_connector structure only when inode / vfsmount is getting freed. This can however impose noticeable memory overhead when marks get attached to inodes only temporarily. So free the connector structure once the last mark is detached from the object. Since notification infrastructure can be working with the connector under the protection of fsnotify_mark_srcu, we have to be careful and free the fsnotify_mark_connector only after SRCU period passes. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
So far list of marks attached to an object (inode / vfsmount) was protected by i_lock or mnt_root->d_lock. This dictates that the list must be empty before the object can be destroyed although the list is now anchored in the fsnotify_mark_connector structure. Protect the list by a spinlock in the fsnotify_mark_connector structure to decouple lifetime of a list of marks from a lifetime of the object. This also simplifies the code quite a bit since we don't have to differentiate between inode and vfsmount lists in quite a few places anymore. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Move locking of locks protecting a list of marks into fsnotify_recalc_mask(). This reduces code churn in the following patch which changes the lock protecting the list of marks. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently inode reference is held by fsnotify marks. Change the rules so that inode reference is held by fsnotify_mark_connector structure whenever the list is non-empty. This simplifies the code and is more logical. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Move pointer to inode / vfsmount from mark itself to the fsnotify_mark_connector structure. This is another step on the path towards decoupling inode / vfsmount lifetime from notification mark lifetime. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently notification marks are attached to object (inode or vfsmnt) by a hlist_head in the object. The list is also protected by a spinlock in the object. So while there is any mark attached to the list of marks, the object must be pinned in memory (and thus e.g. last iput() deleting inode cannot happen). Also for list iteration in fsnotify() to work, we must hold fsnotify_mark_srcu lock so that mark itself and mark->obj_list.next cannot get freed. Thus we are required to wait for response to fanotify events from userspace process with fsnotify_mark_srcu lock held. That causes issues when userspace process is buggy and does not reply to some event - basically the whole notification subsystem gets eventually stuck. So to be able to drop fsnotify_mark_srcu lock while waiting for response, we have to pin the mark in memory and make sure it stays in the object list (as removing the mark waiting for response could lead to lost notification events for groups later in the list). However we don't want inode reclaim to block on such mark as that would lead to system just locking up elsewhere. This commit is the first in the series that paves way towards solving these conflicting lifetime needs. Instead of anchoring the list of marks directly in the object, we anchor it in a dedicated structure (fsnotify_mark_connector) and just point to that structure from the object. The following commits will also add spinlock protecting the list and object pointer to the structure. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 24 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This patchset converts inotify to using the newly introduced per-userns sysctl infrastructure. Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple users in unprivileged containers map to the same underlying real user (i.e. pointing to the same user_struct) the inotify limits are going to be shared as well, allowing one user(or application) to exhaust all others limits. Fix this by switching the inotify sysctls to using the per-namespace/per-user limits. This will allow the server admin to set sensible global limits, which can further be tuned inside every individual user namespace. Additionally, in order to preserve the sysctl ABI make the existing inotify instances/watches sysctls modify the values of the initial user namespace. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 24 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
There are only two calls sites of fsnotify_duplicate_mark(). Those are in kernel/audit_tree.c and both are bogus. Vfsmount pointer is unused for audit tree, inode pointer and group gets set in fsnotify_add_mark_locked() later anyway, mask and free_mark are already set in alloc_chunk(). In fact, calling fsnotify_duplicate_mark() is actively harmful because following fsnotify_add_mark_locked() will leak group reference by overwriting the group pointer. So just remove the two calls to fsnotify_duplicate_mark() and the function. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> [PM: line wrapping to fit in 80 chars] Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 08 10月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Fanotify code has its own lock (access_lock) to protect a list of events waiting for a response from userspace. However this is somewhat awkward as the same list_head in the event is protected by notification_lock if it is part of the notification queue and by access_lock if it is part of the fanotify private queue which makes it difficult for any reliable checks in the generic code. So make fanotify use the same lock - notification_lock - for protecting its private event list. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-6-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
notification_mutex is used to protect the list of pending events. As such there's no reason to use a sleeping lock for it. Convert it to a spinlock. [jack@suse.cz: fixed version] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474031567-1831-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Tested-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fanotify_get_response() calls fsnotify_remove_event() when it finds that group is being released from fanotify_release() (bypass_perm is set). However the event it removes need not be only in the group's notification queue but it can have already moved to access_list (userspace read the event before closing the fanotify instance fd) which is protected by a different lock. Thus when fsnotify_remove_event() races with fanotify_release() operating on access_list, the list can get corrupted. Fix the problem by moving all the logic removing permission events from the lists to one place - fanotify_release(). Fixes: 5838d444 ("fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Tested-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Implement a function that can be called when a group is being shutdown to stop queueing new events to the group. Fanotify will use this. Fixes: 5838d444 ("fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
fsnotify_d_move()/__fsnotify_d_instantiate()/__fsnotify_update_dcache_flags() are identical to each other, regardless of the config. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Background: spufs used to mangle the order in which it had been building dentry trees. It was broken in a lot of ways, but most of them required the right timing to trigger until an fsnotify change had added one more - the one that was always triggered. Unfortunately, insteading of fixing their long-standing bug the spufs folks had chosen to paper over the fsnotify trigger. Eventually said bug had been spotted and killed off, but the pointless check in fsnotify has remained, complete with the implication that one *could* do that kind of crap. Again, a parent of any dentry should always be positive. Any code can rely upon that and anything violating that assert is a bug, *not* something to be accomodated. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 20 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Inotify instance is destroyed when all references to it are dropped. That not only means that the corresponding file descriptor needs to be closed but also that all corresponding instance marks are freed (as each mark holds a reference to the inotify instance). However marks are freed only after SRCU period ends which can take some time and thus if user rapidly creates and frees inotify instances, number of existing inotify instances can exceed max_user_instances limit although from user point of view there is always at most one existing instance. Thus inotify_init() returns EMFILE error which is hard to justify from user point of view. This problem is exposed by LTP inotify06 testcase on some machines. We fix the problem by making sure all group marks are properly freed while destroying inotify instance. We wait for SRCU period to end in that path anyway since we have to make sure there is no event being added to the instance while we are tearing down the instance. So it takes only some plumbing to allow for marks to be destroyed in that path as well and not from a dedicated work item. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
First of all, don't bother calling it if inode is NULL - that makes inode argument unused. Moreover, do it *before* dropping ->d_lock, not right after that (and don't bother grabbing ->d_lock in it, of course). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This reverts commit c510eff6 ("fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread"). Eryu reported that he was seeing some OOM kills kick in when running a testcase that adds and removes inotify marks on a file in a tight loop. The above commit changed the code to use call_srcu to clean up the marks. While that does (in principle) work, the srcu callback job is limited to cleaning up entries in small batches and only once per jiffy. It's easily possible to overwhelm that machinery with too many call_srcu callbacks, and Eryu's reproduer did just that. There's also another potential problem with using call_srcu here. While you can obviously sleep while holding the srcu_read_lock, the callbacks run under local_bh_disable, so you can't sleep there. It's possible when putting the last reference to the fsnotify_mark that we'll end up putting a chain of references including the fsnotify_group, uid, and associated keys. While I don't see any obvious ways that that could occurs, it's probably still best to avoid using call_srcu here after all. This patch reverts the above patch. A later patch will take a different approach to eliminated the dedicated thread here. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reported-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
At the time that this code was originally written, call_srcu didn't exist, so this thread was required to ensure that we waited for that SRCU grace period to settle before finally freeing the object. It does exist now however and we can much more efficiently use call_srcu to handle this. That also allows us to potentially use srcu_barrier to ensure that they are all of the callbacks have run before proceeding. In order to conserve space, we union the rcu_head with the g_list. This will be necessary for nfsd which will allocate marks from a dedicated slabcache. We have to be able to ensure that all of the objects are destroyed before destroying the cache. That's fairly Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 9月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() is subtle to use because it temporarily releases group->mark_mutex. To avoid future problems with this function, split it into two. fsnotify_detach_mark() is the part that needs group->mark_mutex and fsnotify_free_mark() is the part that must be called outside of group->mark_mutex. This way it's much clearer what's going on and we also avoid some pointless acquisitions of group->mark_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Free list is used when all marks on given inode / mount should be destroyed when inode / mount is going away. However we can free all of the marks without using a special list with some care. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
The process of reducing contention on per-superblock inode lists starts with moving the locking to match the per-superblock inode list. This takes the global lock out of the picture and reduces the contention problems to within a single filesystem. This doesn't get rid of contention as the locks still have global CPU scope, but it does isolate operations on different superblocks form each other. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
should_send_event is no longer part of struct fsnotify_ops, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 12月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
destroy_list is used to track marks which still need waiting for srcu period end before they can be freed. However by the time mark is added to destroy_list it isn't in group's list of marks anymore and thus we can reuse fsnotify_mark->g_list for queueing into destroy_list. This saves two pointers for each fsnotify_mark. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
There's a lot of common code in inode and mount marks handling. Factor it out to a common helper function. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 85816794 ("fanotify: Fix use after free for permission events") introduced a double free issue for permission events which are pending in group's notification queue while group is being destroyed. These events are freed from fanotify_handle_event() but they are not removed from groups notification queue and thus they get freed again from fsnotify_flush_notify(). Fix the problem by removing permission events from notification queue before freeing them if we skip processing access response. Also expand comments in fanotify_release() to explain group shutdown in detail. Fixes: 85816794Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NDouglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com> Tested-by: NDouglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com> Reported-by: NHeinrich Schuchard <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Rename fsnotify_add_notify_event() to fsnotify_add_event() since the "notify" part is duplicit. Rename fsnotify_remove_notify_event() and fsnotify_peek_notify_event() to fsnotify_remove_first_event() and fsnotify_peek_first_event() respectively since "notify" part is duplicit and they really look at the first event in the queue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
access_mutex is used only to guard operations on access_list. There's no need for sleeping within this lock so just make a spinlock out of it. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 7053aee2 "fsnotify: do not share events between notification groups" used overflow event statically allocated in a group with the size of the generic notification event. This causes problems because some code looks at type specific parts of event structure and gets confused by a random data it sees there and causes crashes. Fix the problem by allocating overflow event with type corresponding to the group type so code cannot get confused. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
My rework of handling of notification events (namely commit 7053aee2 "fsnotify: do not share events between notification groups") broke sending of cookies with inotify events. We didn't propagate the value passed to fsnotify() properly and passed 4 uninitialized bytes to userspace instead (so it is also an information leak). Sadly I didn't notice this during my testing because inotify cookies aren't used very much and LTP inotify tests ignore them. Fix the problem by passing the cookie value properly. Fixes: 7053aee2Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The event returned from fsnotify_add_notify_event() cannot ever be used safely as the event may be freed by the time the function returns (after dropping notification_mutex). So change the prototype to just return whether the event was added or merged into some existing event. Reported-and-tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reported-and-tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 22 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
After removing event structure creation from the generic layer there is no reason for separate .should_send_event and .handle_event callbacks. So just remove the first one. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently fsnotify framework creates one event structure for each notification event and links this event into all interested notification groups. This is done so that we save memory when several notification groups are interested in the event. However the need for event structure shared between inotify & fanotify bloats the event structure so the result is often higher memory consumption. Another problem is that fsnotify framework keeps path references with outstanding events so that fanotify can return open file descriptors with its events. This has the undesirable effect that filesystem cannot be unmounted while there are outstanding events - a regression for inotify compared to a situation before it was converted to fsnotify framework. For fanotify this problem is hard to avoid and users of fanotify should kind of expect this behavior when they ask for file descriptors from notified files. This patch changes fsnotify and its users to create separate event structure for each group. This allows for much simpler code (~400 lines removed by this patch) and also smaller event structures. For example on 64-bit system original struct fsnotify_event consumes 120 bytes, plus additional space for file name, additional 24 bytes for second and each subsequent group linking the event, and additional 32 bytes for each inotify group for private data. After the conversion inotify event consumes 48 bytes plus space for file name which is considerably less memory unless file names are long and there are several groups interested in the events (both of which are uncommon). Fanotify event fits in 56 bytes after the conversion (fanotify doesn't care about file names so its events don't have to have it allocated). A win unless there are four or more fanotify groups interested in the event. The conversion also solves the problem with unmount when only inotify is used as we don't have to grab path references for inotify events. [hughd@google.com: fanotify: fix corruption preventing startup] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: John McCutchan <john@johnmccutchan.com> Cc: Robert Love <rlove@rlove.org> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify is supposed to support async signal notification when information is available on the inotify fd. This patch moves that support to generic fsnotify functions so it can be used by all notification mechanisms. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:22PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > I finally built and tested a v3.0 kernel with these patches (I know I'm > SOOOOOO far behind). Not what I hoped for: > > > [ 150.937798] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of tmpfs. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > > [ 150.945290] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070 > > [ 150.946012] IP: [<ffffffff810ffd58>] shmem_free_inode+0x18/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] PGD 2bf9e067 PUD 2bf9f067 PMD 0 > > [ 150.946012] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > > [ 150.946012] CPU 0 > > [ 150.946012] Modules linked in: nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables ext4 jbd2 crc16 joydev ata_piix i2c_piix4 pcspkr uinput ipv6 autofs4 usbhid [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > > [ 150.946012] > > [ 150.946012] Pid: 2764, comm: syscall_thrash Not tainted 3.0.0+ #1 Red Hat KVM > > [ 150.946012] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810ffd58>] [<ffffffff810ffd58>] shmem_free_inode+0x18/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] RSP: 0018:ffff88002c2e5df8 EFLAGS: 00010282 > > [ 150.946012] RAX: 000000004e370d9f RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88003a029438 > > [ 150.946012] RDX: 0000000033630a5f RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88003491c240 > > [ 150.946012] RBP: ffff88002c2e5e08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > > [ 150.946012] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88003a029428 > > [ 150.946012] R13: ffff88003a029428 R14: ffff88003a029428 R15: ffff88003499a610 > > [ 150.946012] FS: 00007f5a05420700(0000) GS:ffff88003f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > [ 150.946012] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > > [ 150.946012] CR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000002a662000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > > [ 150.946012] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > [ 150.946012] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > [ 150.946012] Process syscall_thrash (pid: 2764, threadinfo ffff88002c2e4000, task ffff88002bfbc760) > > [ 150.946012] Stack: > > [ 150.946012] ffff88003a029438 ffff88003a029428 ffff88002c2e5e38 ffffffff81102f76 > > [ 150.946012] ffff88003a029438 ffff88003a029598 ffffffff8160f9c0 ffff88002c221250 > > [ 150.946012] ffff88002c2e5e68 ffffffff8115e9be ffff88002c2e5e68 ffff88003a029438 > > [ 150.946012] Call Trace: > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81102f76>] shmem_evict_inode+0x76/0x130 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff8115e9be>] evict+0x7e/0x170 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff8115ee40>] iput_final+0xd0/0x190 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff8115ef33>] iput+0x33/0x40 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81180205>] fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked+0x145/0x160 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81180316>] fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x36/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81181937>] sys_inotify_rm_watch+0x77/0xd0 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff815aca52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > [ 150.946012] Code: 67 4a 00 b8 e4 ff ff ff eb aa 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 10 48 89 1c 24 4c 89 64 24 08 48 8b 9f 40 05 00 00 > > [ 150.946012] 83 7b 70 00 74 1c 4c 8d a3 80 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 d2 5d 4a > > [ 150.946012] RIP [<ffffffff810ffd58>] shmem_free_inode+0x18/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] RSP <ffff88002c2e5df8> > > [ 150.946012] CR2: 0000000000000070 > > Looks at aweful lot like the problem from: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg46101.html > I tried to reproduce this bug with your test program, but without success. However, if I understand correctly, this occurs since we dont hold any locks when we call iput() in mark_destroy(), right? With the patches you tested, iput() is also not called within any lock, since the groups mark_mutex is released temporarily before iput() is called. This is, since the original codes behaviour is similar. However since we now have a mutex as the biggest lock, we can do what you suggested (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg46107.html) and call iput() with the mutex held to avoid the race. The patch below implements this. It uses nested locking to avoid deadlock in case we do the final iput() on an inode which still holds marks and thus would take the mutex again when calling fsnotify_inode_delete() in destroy_inode(). Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-