1. 09 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 07 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      Add arch_ptrace_stop · 1a669c2f
      Roland McGrath 提交于
      This adds support to allow asm/ptrace.h to define two new macros,
      arch_ptrace_stop_needed and arch_ptrace_stop.  These control special
      machine-specific actions to be done before a ptrace stop.  The new code
      compiles away to nothing when the new macros are not defined.  This is the
      case on all machines to begin with.
      
      On ia64, these macros will be defined to solve the long-standing issue of
      ptrace vs register backing store.
      Signed-off-by: NRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Cc: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1a669c2f
  3. 30 1月, 2008 3 次提交
  4. 03 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 18 7月, 2007 2 次提交
  6. 30 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 27 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • E
      [PATCH] ptrace: document the locking rules · 260ea101
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      After a lot of reading the code and thinking about how it behaves I have
      managed to figure out what the current ptrace locking rules are.  The
      current code is in much better that it appears at first glance.  The
      troublesome code paths are actually the code paths that violate the current
      rules.
      
      ptrace uses simple exclusive access as it's locking.  You can only touch
      task->ptrace if the task is stopped and you are the ptracer, or if the task
      is running and are the task itself.
      
      Very simple, very easy to maintain.  It just needs to be documented so
      people know not to touch ptrace from elsewhere.
      
      Currently we do have a few pieces of code that are in violation of this
      rule.  Particularly the core dump code, and ptrace_attach.  But so far the
      code looks fixable.
      Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
      Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      260ea101
  9. 16 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 09 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  11. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 08 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 05 9月, 2005 2 次提交
    • B
      [PATCH] Uml support: add PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP option to i386 · 1b38f006
      Bodo Stroesser 提交于
      This patch implements the new ptrace option PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP, which
      can be used by UML to singlestep a process: it will receive SINGLESTEP
      interceptions for normal instructions and syscalls, but syscall execution will
      be skipped just like with PTRACE_SYSEMU.
      Signed-off-by: NBodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      1b38f006
    • L
      [PATCH] UML Support - Ptrace: adds the host SYSEMU support, for UML and general usage · ed75e8d5
      Laurent Vivier 提交于
            Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
            Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>,
            Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
      
      Adds a new ptrace(2) mode, called PTRACE_SYSEMU, resembling PTRACE_SYSCALL
      except that the kernel does not execute the requested syscall; this is useful
      to improve performance for virtual environments, like UML, which want to run
      the syscall on their own.
      
      In fact, using PTRACE_SYSCALL means stopping child execution twice, on entry
      and on exit, and each time you also have two context switches; with SYSEMU you
      avoid the 2nd stop and so save two context switches per syscall.
      
      Also, some architectures don't have support in the host for changing the
      syscall number via ptrace(), which is currently needed to skip syscall
      execution (UML turns any syscall into getpid() to avoid it being executed on
      the host).  Fixing that is hard, while SYSEMU is easier to implement.
      
      * This version of the patch includes some suggestions of Jeff Dike to avoid
        adding any instructions to the syscall fast path, plus some other little
        changes, by myself, to make it work even when the syscall is executed with
        SYSENTER (but I'm unsure about them). It has been widely tested for quite a
        lot of time.
      
      * Various fixed were included to handle the various switches between
        various states, i.e. when for instance a syscall entry is traced with one of
        PT_SYSCALL / _SYSEMU / _SINGLESTEP and another one is used on exit.
        Basically, this is done by remembering which one of them was used even after
        the call to ptrace_notify().
      
      * We're combining TIF_SYSCALL_EMU with TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE or TIF_SINGLESTEP
        to make do_syscall_trace() notice that the current syscall was started with
        SYSEMU on entry, so that no notification ought to be done in the exit path;
        this is a bit of a hack, so this problem is solved in another way in next
        patches.
      
      * Also, the effects of the patch:
      "Ptrace - i386: fix Syscall Audit interaction with singlestep"
      are cancelled; they are restored back in the last patch of this series.
      
      Detailed descriptions of the patches doing this kind of processing follow (but
      I've already summed everything up).
      
      * Fix behaviour when changing interception kind #1.
      
        In do_syscall_trace(), we check the status of the TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag
        only after doing the debugger notification; but the debugger might have
        changed the status of this flag because he continued execution with
        PTRACE_SYSCALL, so this is wrong.  This patch fixes it by saving the flag
        status before calling ptrace_notify().
      
      * Fix behaviour when changing interception kind #2:
        avoid intercepting syscall on return when using SYSCALL again.
      
        A guest process switching from using PTRACE_SYSEMU to PTRACE_SYSCALL
        crashes.
      
        The problem is in arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.  The current SYSEMU patch
        inhibits the syscall-handler to be called, but does not prevent
        do_syscall_trace() to be called after this for syscall completion
        interception.
      
        The appended patch fixes this.  It reuses the flag TIF_SYSCALL_EMU to
        remember "we come from PTRACE_SYSEMU and now are in PTRACE_SYSCALL", since
        the flag is unused in the depicted situation.
      
      * Fix behaviour when changing interception kind #3:
        avoid intercepting syscall on return when using SINGLESTEP.
      
        When testing 2.6.9 and the skas3.v6 patch, with my latest patch and had
        problems with singlestepping on UML in SKAS with SYSEMU.  It looped
        receiving SIGTRAPs without moving forward.  EIP of the traced process was
        the same for all SIGTRAPs.
      
      What's missing is to handle switching from PTRACE_SYSCALL_EMU to
      PTRACE_SINGLESTEP in a way very similar to what is done for the change from
      PTRACE_SYSCALL_EMU to PTRACE_SYSCALL_TRACE.
      
      I.e., after calling ptrace(PTRACE_SYSEMU), on the return path, the debugger is
      notified and then wake ups the process; the syscall is executed (or skipped,
      when do_syscall_trace() returns 0, i.e.  when using PTRACE_SYSEMU), and
      do_syscall_trace() is called again.  Since we are on the return path of a
      SYSEMU'd syscall, if the wake up is performed through ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL),
      we must still avoid notifying the parent of the syscall exit.  Now, this
      behaviour is extended even to resuming with PTRACE_SINGLESTEP.
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ed75e8d5
  14. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4