1. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      drm/i915/guc: reset GuC and retry on firmware load failure · 6b332fa2
      Arun Siluvery 提交于
      Due to timing issues in the HW, some of the status bits required for GuC
      authentication occasionally don't get set; when that happens, the GuC
      cannot be initialized and we will be left with a wedged GPU. The W/A
      suggested is to perform a soft reset of the GuC and attempt to reload
      the F/W again for few times before giving up.
      
      As the failure is dependent on timing, tests performed by triggering
      manual full gpu reset (i915_wedged) showed that we could sometimes hit
      this after several thousand iterations, but sometimes tests ran even
      longer without any issues. Reset and reload mechanism proved helpful
      when we indeed hit f/w load failure, so it is better to include this
      to improve driver stability.
      
      This change implements the following WAs,
      
      	WaEnableuKernelHeaderValidFix:skl,bxt
      	WaEnableGuCBootHashCheckNotSet:skl,bxt
      Signed-off-by: NArun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      6b332fa2
  2. 24 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 17 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 16 3月, 2016 2 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915: More intel_engine_cs renaming · 666796da
      Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
      Some trivial ones, first pass done with Coccinelle:
      
      @@
      @@
      (
      - I915_NUM_RINGS
      + I915_NUM_ENGINES
      |
      - intel_ring_flag
      + intel_engine_flag
      |
      - for_each_ring
      + for_each_engine
      |
      - i915_gem_request_get_ring
      + i915_gem_request_get_engine
      |
      - intel_ring_idle
      + intel_engine_idle
      |
      - i915_gem_reset_ring_status
      + i915_gem_reset_engine_status
      |
      - i915_gem_reset_ring_cleanup
      + i915_gem_reset_engine_cleanup
      |
      - init_ring_lists
      + init_engine_lists
      )
      
      But that didn't fully work so I cleaned it up with:
      
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/I915_NUM_RINGS/I915_NUM_ENGINES/ $f; done
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/i915_gem_request_get_ring/i915_gem_request_get_engine/ $f; done
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/intel_ring_flag/intel_engine_flag/ $f; done
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/intel_ring_idle/intel_engine_idle/ $f; done
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/init_ring_lists/init_engine_lists/ $f; done
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/i915_gem_reset_ring_cleanup/i915_gem_reset_engine_cleanup/ $f; done
      for f in *.[hc]; do sed -i -e s/i915_gem_reset_ring_status/i915_gem_reset_engine_status/ $f; done
      
      v2: Rebase.
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      666796da
    • T
      drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables · e2f80391
      Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
      Done by the Coccinelle script below plus a manual
      intervention to GEN8_RING_SEMAPHORE_INIT.
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - struct intel_engine_cs *ring = E;
      + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = E;
      <+...
      - ring
      + engine
      ...+>
      @@
      @@
      - struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
      + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
      <+...
      - ring
      + engine
      ...+>
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      e2f80391
  5. 16 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 18 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 05 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 04 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Fix locking around GuC firmware load · bf248ca1
      Daniel Stone 提交于
      The GuC firmware load requires struct_mutex to create a GEM object,
      but this collides badly with request_firmware. Move struct_mutex
      locking down into the loader itself, so we don't hold it across the
      entire load process, including request_firmware.
      
      [   20.451400] ======================================================
      [   20.451420] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      [   20.451441] 4.3.0-rc5+ #1 Tainted: G        W
      [   20.451457] -------------------------------------------------------
      [   20.451477] plymouthd/371 is trying to acquire lock:
      [   20.451494]  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0093c62>]
      drm_gem_mmap+0x112/0x290 [drm]
      [   20.451538]
                     but task is already holding lock:
      [   20.451557]  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff811fd9ac>]
      vm_mmap_pgoff+0x8c/0xf0
      [   20.451591]
                     which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      [   20.451617]
                     the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [   20.451640]
                     -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
      [   20.451661]        [<ffffffff8110644e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1c0
      [   20.451683]        [<ffffffff8120ec9a>] __might_fault+0x7a/0xa0
      [   20.451705]        [<ffffffff8127e34e>] filldir+0x9e/0x130
      [   20.451726]        [<ffffffff81295b86>] dcache_readdir+0x186/0x230
      [   20.451748]        [<ffffffff8127e117>] iterate_dir+0x97/0x130
      [   20.451769]        [<ffffffff8127e66a>] SyS_getdents+0x9a/0x130
      [   20.451790]        [<ffffffff8184f2f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
      [   20.451829]
                     -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#2){+.+.+.}:
      [   20.451852]        [<ffffffff8110644e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1c0
      [   20.451872]        [<ffffffff8184b516>] mutex_lock_nested+0x86/0x400
      [   20.451893]        [<ffffffff81277790>] walk_component+0x1d0/0x2a0
      [   20.451914]        [<ffffffff812779f0>] link_path_walk+0x190/0x5a0
      [   20.451935]        [<ffffffff8127803b>] path_openat+0xab/0x1260
      [   20.451955]        [<ffffffff8127a651>] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
      [   20.451975]        [<ffffffff81267e67>] file_open_name+0xf7/0x150
      [   20.451995]        [<ffffffff81267ef3>] filp_open+0x33/0x60
      [   20.452014]        [<ffffffff8157e1e7>] _request_firmware+0x277/0x880
      [   20.452038]        [<ffffffff8157e9e4>] request_firmware_work_func+0x34/0x80
      [   20.452060]        [<ffffffff810c7020>] process_one_work+0x230/0x680
      [   20.452082]        [<ffffffff810c74be>] worker_thread+0x4e/0x450
      [   20.452102]        [<ffffffff810ce511>] kthread+0x101/0x120
      [   20.452121]        [<ffffffff8184f66f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
      [   20.452140]
                     -> #1 (umhelper_sem){++++.+}:
      [   20.452159]        [<ffffffff8110644e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1c0
      [   20.452178]        [<ffffffff8184c5c1>] down_read+0x51/0xa0
      [   20.452197]        [<ffffffff810c203b>]
      usermodehelper_read_trylock+0x5b/0x130
      [   20.452221]        [<ffffffff8157e147>] _request_firmware+0x1d7/0x880
      [   20.452242]        [<ffffffff8157e821>] request_firmware+0x31/0x50
      [   20.452262]        [<ffffffffa01b54a4>]
      intel_guc_ucode_init+0xf4/0x400 [i915]
      [   20.452305]        [<ffffffffa0213913>] i915_driver_load+0xd63/0x16e0 [i915]
      [   20.452343]        [<ffffffffa00987d9>] drm_dev_register+0xa9/0xc0 [drm]
      [   20.452369]        [<ffffffffa009ae3d>] drm_get_pci_dev+0x8d/0x1e0 [drm]
      [   20.452396]        [<ffffffffa01521e4>] i915_pci_probe+0x34/0x50 [i915]
      [   20.452421]        [<ffffffff81464675>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
      [   20.452443]        [<ffffffff81465a6d>] pci_device_probe+0xfd/0x140
      [   20.452464]        [<ffffffff8156a2e4>] driver_probe_device+0x224/0x480
      [   20.452486]        [<ffffffff8156a5c8>] __driver_attach+0x88/0x90
      [   20.452505]        [<ffffffff81567cf3>] bus_for_each_dev+0x73/0xc0
      [   20.452526]        [<ffffffff81569a7e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
      [   20.452546]        [<ffffffff815695ae>] bus_add_driver+0x1ee/0x280
      [   20.452566]        [<ffffffff8156b100>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
      [   20.453197]        [<ffffffff81464050>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70
      [   20.453845]        [<ffffffffa009b070>] drm_pci_init+0xe0/0x110 [drm]
      [   20.454497]        [<ffffffffa027f092>] 0xffffffffa027f092
      [   20.455156]        [<ffffffff81002123>] do_one_initcall+0xb3/0x200
      [   20.455796]        [<ffffffff811d8c01>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1e7
      [   20.456434]        [<ffffffff8114c4e6>] load_module+0x2126/0x27d0
      [   20.457071]        [<ffffffff8114cdf9>] SyS_finit_module+0xb9/0xf0
      [   20.457738]        [<ffffffff8184f2f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
      [   20.458370]
                     -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}:
      [   20.459773]        [<ffffffff8110584f>] __lock_acquire+0x191f/0x1ba0
      [   20.460451]        [<ffffffff8110644e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1c0
      [   20.461074]        [<ffffffffa0093c88>] drm_gem_mmap+0x138/0x290 [drm]
      [   20.461693]        [<ffffffff8121a5ec>] mmap_region+0x3ec/0x670
      [   20.462298]        [<ffffffff8121abb2>] do_mmap+0x342/0x420
      [   20.462901]        [<ffffffff811fd9d2>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0xb2/0xf0
      [   20.463532]        [<ffffffff81218f62>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x1f2/0x290
      [   20.464118]        [<ffffffff8102187b>] SyS_mmap+0x1b/0x30
      [   20.464702]        [<ffffffff8184f2f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
      [   20.465289]
                     other info that might help us debug this:
      
      [   20.467179] Chain exists of:
                       &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#2 -->
      &mm->mmap_sem
      
      [   20.468928]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [   20.470161]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [   20.470745]        ----                    ----
      [   20.471325]   lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
      [   20.471902]                                lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#2);
      [   20.472538]                                lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
      [   20.473118]   lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
      [   20.473704]
                      *** DEADLOCK ***
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      bf248ca1
  9. 31 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 29 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 21 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  12. 06 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 02 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 30 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  15. 14 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  16. 02 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 15 8月, 2015 4 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Interrupt routing for GuC submission · 4df001d3
      Dave Gordon 提交于
      Turn on interrupt steering to route necessary interrupts to GuC.
      
      v6:
          Rebased
      
      Issue: VIZ-4884
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4df001d3
    • D
      drm/i915: Implementation of GuC submission client · 44a28b1d
      Dave Gordon 提交于
      A GuC client has its own doorbell and workqueue. It maintains the
      doorbell cache line, process description object and work queue item.
      
      A default guc_client is created for the i915 driver to use for
      normal-priority in-order submission.
      
      Note that the created client is not yet ready for use; doorbell
      allocation will fail as we haven't yet linked the GuC's context
      descriptor to the default contexts for each ring (see later patch).
      
      v2:
          Defer adding structure members until needed [Chris Wilson]
          Rationalise type declarations [Chris Wilson]
      
      v5:
          Add GuC per-engine submission & seqno statistics.
          Move wq locking to encompass both get_space() and add_item().
          Take forcewake lock in host2guc_action() [Tom O'Rourke]
      
      v6:
          Fix GuC doorbell cacheline selection code (the
              cacheline-within-page calculation was wrong).
          Rename GuC priorities to make them closer to the names used in
              the GuC firmware source, matching what the autogenerated
              versions will (probably) be.
          Add per-ring statistics to client.
      
      Issue: VIZ-4884
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      44a28b1d
    • A
      drm/i915: Prepare for GuC-based command submission · bac427f8
      Alex Dai 提交于
      This adds the first of the data structures used to communicate with the
      GuC (the pool of guc_context structures).
      
      We create a GuC-specific wrapper round the GEM object allocator as all
      GEM objects shared with the GuC must be pinned into GGTT space at an
      address that is NOT in the range [0..WOPCM_TOP), as that range of GGTT
      addresses is not accessible to the GuC (from the GuC's point of view,
      it's permanently reserved for other objects such as the BootROM & SRAM).
      
      Later, we will need to allocate additional GuC-sharable objects for the
      submission client(s) and the GuC's debug log.
      
      v2:
          Remove redundant initialisation [Chris Wilson]
          Defer adding struct members until needed [Chris Wilson]
          Local functions should pass dev_priv rather than dev [Chris Wilson]
      
      v5:
          Invalidate GuC TLB after allocating and pinning a new object
      
      v6:
          Rebased
      
      Issue: VIZ-4884
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      bac427f8
    • A
      drm/i915: GuC-specific firmware loader · 33a732f4
      Alex Dai 提交于
      This fetches the required firmware image from the filesystem,
      then loads it into the GuC's memory via a dedicated DMA engine.
      
      This patch is derived from GuC loading work originally done by
      Vinit Azad and Ben Widawsky.
      
      v2:
          Various improvements per review comments by Chris Wilson
      
      v3:
          Removed 'wait' parameter to intel_guc_ucode_load() as firmware
              prefetch is no longer supported in the common firmware loader,
      	per Daniel Vetter's request.
          Firmware checker callback fn now returns errno rather than bool.
      
      v4:
          Squash uC-independent code into GuC-specifc loader [Daniel Vetter]
          Don't keep the driver working (by falling back to execlist mode)
              if GuC firmware loading fails [Daniel Vetter]
      
      v5:
          Clarify WOPCM-related #defines [Tom O'Rourke]
          Delete obsolete code no longer required with current h/w & f/w
              [Tom O'Rourke]
          Move the call to intel_guc_ucode_init() later, so that it can
              allocate GEM objects, and have it fetch the firmware; then
      	intel_guc_ucode_load() doesn't need to fetch it later.
              [Daniel Vetter].
      
      v6:
          Update comment describing intel_guc_ucode_load() [Tom O'Rourke]
      
      Issue: VIZ-4884
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      33a732f4