1. 23 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      posix_timers: Fix pre-condition to stop the tick on full dynticks · 6ac29178
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      The test that checks if a CPU can stop its tick from posix CPU
      timers angle was mistakenly inverted.
      
      What we want is to prevent the tick from being stopped as long
      as the current CPU's task runs a posix CPU timer.
      
      Fix this.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
      Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
      Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      6ac29178
  2. 19 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • F
      posix_timers: New API to prevent from stopping the tick when timers are running · 555347f6
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Bring a new helper that the full dynticks infrastructure can
      call in order to know if it can safely stop the tick from
      the posix cpu timers subsystem point of view.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
      Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
      Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      555347f6
    • F
      posix_timers: Kick full dynticks CPUs when a posix cpu timer is armed · a8572160
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Kick the full dynticks CPUs when a posix cpu timer is enqueued by
      way of a standard call to posix_cpu_timer_set() or set_process_cpu_timer().
      This also include rescheduled firing timers.
      
      This way they can re-evaluate the state of (and possibly restart) their
      tick against the new expiry modification.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
      Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
      Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      a8572160
  3. 15 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 28 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      cputime: Use accessors to read task cputime stats · 6fac4829
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      This is in preparation for the full dynticks feature. While
      remotely reading the cputime of a task running in a full
      dynticks CPU, we'll need to do some extra-computation. This
      way we can account the time it spent tickless in userspace
      since its last cputime snapshot.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      6fac4829
  5. 17 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 29 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 15 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 18 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • P
      cputimer: Cure lock inversion · bcd5cff7
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      There's a lock inversion between the cputimer->lock and rq->lock;
      notably the two callchains involved are:
      
       update_rlimit_cpu()
         sighand->siglock
         set_process_cpu_timer()
           cpu_timer_sample_group()
             thread_group_cputimer()
               cputimer->lock
               thread_group_cputime()
                 task_sched_runtime()
                   ->pi_lock
                   rq->lock
      
       scheduler_tick()
         rq->lock
         task_tick_fair()
           update_curr()
             account_group_exec()
               cputimer->lock
      
      Where the first one is enabling a CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID timer, and
      the second one is keeping up-to-date.
      
      This problem was introduced by e8abccb7 ("posix-cpu-timers: Cure
      SMP accounting oddities").
      
      Cure the problem by removing the cputimer->lock and rq->lock nesting,
      this leaves concurrent enablers doing duplicate work, but the time
      wasted should be on the same order otherwise wasted spinning on the
      lock and the greater-than assignment filter should ensure we preserve
      monotonicity.
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Reported-by: NSimon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1318928713.21167.4.camel@twinsSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      bcd5cff7
  9. 30 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • P
      posix-cpu-timers: Cure SMP wobbles · d670ec13
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      David reported:
      
        Attached below is a watered-down version of rt/tst-cpuclock2.c from
        GLIBC.  Just build it with "gcc -o test test.c -lpthread -lrt" or
        similar.
      
        Run it several times, and you will see cases where the main thread
        will measure a process clock difference before and after the nanosleep
        which is smaller than the cpu-burner thread's individual thread clock
        difference.  This doesn't make any sense since the cpu-burner thread
        is part of the top-level process's thread group.
      
        I've reproduced this on both x86-64 and sparc64 (using both 32-bit and
        64-bit binaries).
      
        For example:
      
        [davem@boricha build-x86_64-linux]$ ./test
        process: before(0.001221967) after(0.498624371) diff(497402404)
        thread:  before(0.000081692) after(0.498316431) diff(498234739)
        self:    before(0.001223521) after(0.001240219) diff(16698)
        [davem@boricha build-x86_64-linux]$ 
      
        The diff of 'process' should always be >= the diff of 'thread'.
      
        I make sure to wrap the 'thread' clock measurements the most tightly
        around the nanosleep() call, and that the 'process' clock measurements
        are the outer-most ones.
      
        ---
        #include <unistd.h>
        #include <stdio.h>
        #include <stdlib.h>
        #include <time.h>
        #include <fcntl.h>
        #include <string.h>
        #include <errno.h>
        #include <pthread.h>
      
        static pthread_barrier_t barrier;
      
        static void *chew_cpu(void *arg)
        {
      	  pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
      	  while (1)
      		  __asm__ __volatile__("" : : : "memory");
      	  return NULL;
        }
      
        int main(void)
        {
      	  clockid_t process_clock, my_thread_clock, th_clock;
      	  struct timespec process_before, process_after;
      	  struct timespec me_before, me_after;
      	  struct timespec th_before, th_after;
      	  struct timespec sleeptime;
      	  unsigned long diff;
      	  pthread_t th;
      	  int err;
      
      	  err = clock_getcpuclockid(0, &process_clock);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = pthread_getcpuclockid(pthread_self(), &my_thread_clock);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
      	  err = pthread_create(&th, NULL, chew_cpu, NULL);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = pthread_getcpuclockid(th, &th_clock);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(process_clock, &process_before);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(my_thread_clock, &me_before);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(th_clock, &th_before);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  sleeptime.tv_sec = 0;
      	  sleeptime.tv_nsec = 500000000;
      	  nanosleep(&sleeptime, NULL);
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(th_clock, &th_after);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(my_thread_clock, &me_after);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(process_clock, &process_after);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  diff = process_after.tv_nsec - process_before.tv_nsec;
      	  printf("process: before(%lu.%.9lu) after(%lu.%.9lu) diff(%lu)\n",
      		 process_before.tv_sec, process_before.tv_nsec,
      		 process_after.tv_sec, process_after.tv_nsec, diff);
      	  diff = th_after.tv_nsec - th_before.tv_nsec;
      	  printf("thread:  before(%lu.%.9lu) after(%lu.%.9lu) diff(%lu)\n",
      		 th_before.tv_sec, th_before.tv_nsec,
      		 th_after.tv_sec, th_after.tv_nsec, diff);
      	  diff = me_after.tv_nsec - me_before.tv_nsec;
      	  printf("self:    before(%lu.%.9lu) after(%lu.%.9lu) diff(%lu)\n",
      		 me_before.tv_sec, me_before.tv_nsec,
      		 me_after.tv_sec, me_after.tv_nsec, diff);
      
      	  return 0;
        }
      
      This is due to us using p->se.sum_exec_runtime in
      thread_group_cputime() where we iterate the thread group and sum all
      data. This does not take time since the last schedule operation (tick
      or otherwise) into account. We can cure this by using
      task_sched_runtime() at the cost of having to take locks.
      
      This also means we can (and must) do away with
      thread_group_sched_runtime() since the modified thread_group_cputime()
      is now more accurate and would deadlock when called from
      thread_group_sched_runtime().
      
      Aside of that it makes the function safe on 32 bit systems. The old
      code added t->se.sum_exec_runtime unprotected. sum_exec_runtime is a
      64bit value and could be changed on another cpu at the same time.
      Reported-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1314874459.7945.22.camel@twinsTested-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      d670ec13
  10. 13 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 08 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • P
      posix-cpu-timers: Cure SMP accounting oddities · e8abccb7
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      David reported:
      
        Attached below is a watered-down version of rt/tst-cpuclock2.c from
        GLIBC.  Just build it with "gcc -o test test.c -lpthread -lrt" or
        similar.
      
        Run it several times, and you will see cases where the main thread
        will measure a process clock difference before and after the nanosleep
        which is smaller than the cpu-burner thread's individual thread clock
        difference.  This doesn't make any sense since the cpu-burner thread
        is part of the top-level process's thread group.
      
        I've reproduced this on both x86-64 and sparc64 (using both 32-bit and
        64-bit binaries).
      
        For example:
      
        [davem@boricha build-x86_64-linux]$ ./test
        process: before(0.001221967) after(0.498624371) diff(497402404)
        thread:  before(0.000081692) after(0.498316431) diff(498234739)
        self:    before(0.001223521) after(0.001240219) diff(16698)
        [davem@boricha build-x86_64-linux]$
      
        The diff of 'process' should always be >= the diff of 'thread'.
      
        I make sure to wrap the 'thread' clock measurements the most tightly
        around the nanosleep() call, and that the 'process' clock measurements
        are the outer-most ones.
      
        ---
        #include <unistd.h>
        #include <stdio.h>
        #include <stdlib.h>
        #include <time.h>
        #include <fcntl.h>
        #include <string.h>
        #include <errno.h>
        #include <pthread.h>
      
        static pthread_barrier_t barrier;
      
        static void *chew_cpu(void *arg)
        {
      	  pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
      	  while (1)
      		  __asm__ __volatile__("" : : : "memory");
      	  return NULL;
        }
      
        int main(void)
        {
      	  clockid_t process_clock, my_thread_clock, th_clock;
      	  struct timespec process_before, process_after;
      	  struct timespec me_before, me_after;
      	  struct timespec th_before, th_after;
      	  struct timespec sleeptime;
      	  unsigned long diff;
      	  pthread_t th;
      	  int err;
      
      	  err = clock_getcpuclockid(0, &process_clock);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = pthread_getcpuclockid(pthread_self(), &my_thread_clock);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
      	  err = pthread_create(&th, NULL, chew_cpu, NULL);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = pthread_getcpuclockid(th, &th_clock);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(process_clock, &process_before);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(my_thread_clock, &me_before);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(th_clock, &th_before);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  sleeptime.tv_sec = 0;
      	  sleeptime.tv_nsec = 500000000;
      	  nanosleep(&sleeptime, NULL);
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(th_clock, &th_after);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(my_thread_clock, &me_after);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  err = clock_gettime(process_clock, &process_after);
      	  if (err)
      		  return 1;
      
      	  diff = process_after.tv_nsec - process_before.tv_nsec;
      	  printf("process: before(%lu.%.9lu) after(%lu.%.9lu) diff(%lu)\n",
      		 process_before.tv_sec, process_before.tv_nsec,
      		 process_after.tv_sec, process_after.tv_nsec, diff);
      	  diff = th_after.tv_nsec - th_before.tv_nsec;
      	  printf("thread:  before(%lu.%.9lu) after(%lu.%.9lu) diff(%lu)\n",
      		 th_before.tv_sec, th_before.tv_nsec,
      		 th_after.tv_sec, th_after.tv_nsec, diff);
      	  diff = me_after.tv_nsec - me_before.tv_nsec;
      	  printf("self:    before(%lu.%.9lu) after(%lu.%.9lu) diff(%lu)\n",
      		 me_before.tv_sec, me_before.tv_nsec,
      		 me_after.tv_sec, me_after.tv_nsec, diff);
      
      	  return 0;
        }
      
      This is due to us using p->se.sum_exec_runtime in
      thread_group_cputime() where we iterate the thread group and sum all
      data. This does not take time since the last schedule operation (tick
      or otherwise) into account. We can cure this by using
      task_sched_runtime() at the cost of having to take locks.
      
      This also means we can (and must) do away with
      thread_group_sched_runtime() since the modified thread_group_cputime()
      is now more accurate and would deadlock when called from
      thread_group_sched_runtime().
      Reported-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1314874459.7945.22.camel@twins
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      e8abccb7
  12. 23 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  14. 02 2月, 2011 7 次提交
  15. 10 11月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      posix-cpu-timers: Rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid call · c0deae8c
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Commit 4221a991 "Add RCU check for
      find_task_by_vpid()" introduced rcu_lockdep_assert to find_task_by_pid_ns.
      Add rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock to call find_task_by_vpid.
      
      Tetsuo Handa wrote:
      | Quoting from one of posts in that thead
      | http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/2/8/4536388
      |
      || Usually tasklist gives enough protection, but if copy_process() fails
      || it calls free_pid() lockless and does call_rcu(delayed_put_pid().
      || This means, without rcu lock find_pid_ns() can't scan the hash table
      || safely.
      
      Thomas Gleixner wrote:
      | We can remove the tasklist_lock while at it. rcu_read_lock is enough.
      
      Patch also replaces thread_group_leader with has_group_leader_pid
      in accordance to comment by Oleg Nesterov:
      
      | ... thread_group_leader() check is not relaible without 
      | tasklist. If we race with de_thread() find_task_by_vpid() can find
      | the new leader before it updates its ->group_leader.
      |
      | perhaps it makes sense to change posix_cpu_timer_create() to use 
      | has_group_leader_pid() instead, just to make this code not look racy
      | and avoid adding new problems.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      LKML-Reference: <20101103165256.GD30053@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      c0deae8c
  16. 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 18 6月, 2010 3 次提交
    • O
      sched: Fix the racy usage of thread_group_cputimer() in fastpath_timer_check() · 8d1f431c
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      fastpath_timer_check()->thread_group_cputimer() is racy and
      unneeded.
      
      It is racy because another thread can clear ->running before
      thread_group_cputimer() takes cputimer->lock. In this case
      thread_group_cputimer() will set ->running = true again and call
      thread_group_cputime(). But since we do not hold tasklist or
      siglock, we can race with fork/exit and copy the wrong results
      into cputimer->cputime.
      
      It is unneeded because if ->running == true we can just use
      the numbers in cputimer->cputime we already have.
      
      Change fastpath_timer_check() to copy cputimer->cputime into
      the local variable under cputimer->lock. We do not re-check
      ->running under cputimer->lock, run_posix_cpu_timers() does
      this check later.
      
      Note: we can add more optimizations on top of this change.
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      LKML-Reference: <20100611180446.GA13025@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8d1f431c
    • O
      sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand() · 0bdd2ed4
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      run_posix_cpu_timers() doesn't work if current has already passed
      exit_notify(). This was needed to prevent the races with do_wait().
      
      Since ea6d290c ->signal is always valid and can't go away. We can
      remove the "tsk->exit_state == 0" in fastpath_timer_check() and
      convert run_posix_cpu_timers() to use lock_task_sighand().
      
      Note: it makes sense to take group_leader's sighand instead, the
      sub-thread still uses CPU after release_task(). But we need more
      changes to do this.
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      LKML-Reference: <20100610231018.GA25942@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      0bdd2ed4
    • O
      sched: thread_group_cputime: Simplify, document the "alive" check · bfac7009
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      thread_group_cputime() looks as if it is rcu-safe, but in fact this
      was wrong until ea6d290c which pins task->signal to task_struct.
      It checks ->sighand != NULL under rcu, but this can't help if ->signal
      can go away. Fortunately the caller either holds ->siglock, or it is
      fastpath_timer_check() which uses current and checks exit_state == 0.
      
      - Since ea6d290c commit tsk->signal is stable, we can read it first
        and avoid the initialization from INIT_CPUTIME.
      
      - Even if tsk->signal is always valid, we still have to check it
        is safe to use next_thread() under rcu_read_lock(). Currently
        the code checks ->sighand != NULL, change it to use pid_alive()
        which is commonly used to ensure the task wasn't unhashed before
        we take rcu_read_lock().
      
        Add the comment to explain this check.
      
      - Change the main loop to use the while_each_thread() helper.
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      LKML-Reference: <20100610230956.GA25921@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      bfac7009
  18. 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • O
      posix-cpu-timers: avoid "task->signal != NULL" checks · d30fda35
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      Preparation to make task->signal immutable, no functional changes.
      
      posix-cpu-timers.c checks task->signal != NULL to ensure this task is
      alive and didn't pass __exit_signal().  This is correct but we are going
      to change the lifetime rules for ->signal and never reset this pointer.
      
      Change the code to check ->sighand instead, it doesn't matter which
      pointer we check under tasklist, they both are cleared simultaneously.
      
      As Roland pointed out, some of these changes are not strictly needed and
      probably it makes sense to revert them later, when ->signal will be pinned
      to task_struct.  But this patch tries to ensure the subsequent changes in
      fork/exit can't make any visible impact on posix cpu timers.
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d30fda35
  19. 10 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      posix-cpu-timers: Optimize run_posix_cpu_timers() · 29f87b79
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      We can optimize and simplify things taking into account signal->cputimer
      is always running when we have configured any process wide cpu timer.
      
      In check_process_timers(), we don't have to check if new updated value of
      signal->cputime_expires is smaller, since we maintain new first expiration
      time ({prof,virt,sched}_expires) in code flow and all other writes to
      expiration cache are protected by sighand->siglock .
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      29f87b79
  20. 13 3月, 2010 6 次提交
    • S
      cpu-timers: Avoid iterating over all threads in fastpath_timer_check() · c2873937
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      Spread p->sighand->siglock locking scope to make sure that
      fastpath_timer_check() never iterates over all threads. Without
      locking there is small possibility that signal->cputimer will stop
      running while we write values to signal->cputime_expires.
      
      Calling thread_group_cputime() from fastpath_timer_check() is not only
      bad because it is slow, also it is racy with __exit_signal() which can
      lead to invalid signal->{s,u}time values.
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      c2873937
    • S
      cpu-timers: Change SIGEV_NONE timer implementation · 1f169f84
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      When user sets up a timer without associated signal and process does
      not use any other cpu timers and does not exit, tsk->signal->cputimer
      is enabled and running forever.
      
      Avoid running the timer for no reason.
      
      I used below program to check patch does not break current user space
      visible behavior.
      
       #include <sys/time.h>
       #include <signal.h>
       #include <stdio.h>
       #include <stdlib.h>
       #include <string.h>
       #include <time.h>
       #include <unistd.h>
       #include <assert.h>
      
       void consume_cpu(void)
       {
      	int i = 0;
      	int count = 0;
      
      	for(i=0; i<100000000; i++)
      		count++;
       }
      
       int main(void)
       {
      	int i;
      	struct sigaction act;
      	struct sigevent evt = { };
      	timer_t tid;
      	struct itimerspec spec = { };
      
      	evt.sigev_notify = SIGEV_NONE;
      	assert(timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &evt,  &tid) == 0);
      
      	spec.it_value.tv_sec = 10;
      	assert(timer_settime(tid, 0, &spec,  NULL) == 0);
      
      	for (i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
      		consume_cpu();
      		memset(&spec, 0, sizeof(spec));
      		assert(timer_gettime(tid, &spec) == 0);
      		printf("%lu.%09lu\n",
      			(unsigned long) spec.it_value.tv_sec,
      			(unsigned long) spec.it_value.tv_nsec);
      	}
      
      	assert(timer_delete(tid) == 0);
      	return 0;
       }
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      1f169f84
    • S
      cpu-timers: Return correct previous timer reload value · ae1a78ee
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      According POSIX we need to correctly set old timer it_interval value when
      user request that in timer_settime().  Tested using below program.
      
       #include <sys/time.h>
       #include <signal.h>
       #include <stdio.h>
       #include <stdlib.h>
       #include <time.h>
       #include <unistd.h>
       #include <assert.h>
      
       int main(void)
       {
      	struct sigaction act;
      	struct sigevent evt = { };
      	timer_t tid;
      	struct itimerspec spec, u_spec, k_spec;
      
      	evt.sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL;
      	evt.sigev_signo = SIGPROF;
      	assert(timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &evt,  &tid) == 0);
      
      	spec.it_value.tv_sec = 1;
      	spec.it_value.tv_nsec = 2;
      	spec.it_interval.tv_sec = 3;
      	spec.it_interval.tv_nsec = 4;
      	u_spec = spec;
      	assert(timer_settime(tid, 0, &spec,  NULL) == 0);
      
      	spec.it_value.tv_sec = 5;
      	spec.it_value.tv_nsec = 6;
      	spec.it_interval.tv_sec = 7;
      	spec.it_interval.tv_nsec = 8;
      	assert(timer_settime(tid, 0, &spec,  &k_spec) == 0);
      
       #define PRT(val) printf(#val ":\t%d/%d\n", (int) u_spec.val, (int) k_spec.val)
      	PRT(it_value.tv_sec);
      	PRT(it_value.tv_nsec);
      	PRT(it_interval.tv_sec);
      	PRT(it_interval.tv_nsec);
      
      	return 0;
       }
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      ae1a78ee
    • S
      cpu-timers: Cleanup arm_timer() · 5eb9aa64
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      5eb9aa64
    • S
      cpu-timers: Simplify RLIMIT_CPU handling · f55db609
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      Let always set signal->cputime_expires expiration cache when setting
      new itimer, POSIX 1.b timer, and RLIMIT_CPU.  Since we are
      initializing prof_exp expiration cache during fork(), this allows to
      remove "RLIMIT_CPU != inf" check from fastpath_timer_check() and do
      some other cleanups.
      
      Checked against regression using test cases from:
      http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123749066504641&w=4
      http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123811277916642&w=2Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      f55db609
    • S
      posix-cpu-timers: Reset expire cache when no timer is running · 15365c10
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      When a process deletes cpu timer or a timer expires we do not clear
      the expiration cache sig->cputimer_expires.
      
      As a result the fastpath_timer_check() which prevents us to loop over
      all threads in case no timer is active is not working and we run the
      slow path needlessly on every tick.
      
      Zero sig->cputimer_expires in stop_process_timers().
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Spencer Candland <spencer@bluehost.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      15365c10
  21. 07 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  22. 18 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • X
      itimers: Add tracepoints for itimer · 3f0a525e
      Xiao Guangrong 提交于
      Add tracepoints for all itimer variants: ITIMER_REAL, ITIMER_VIRTUAL
      and ITIMER_PROF.
      
      [ tglx: Fixed comments and made the output more readable, parseable
        	and consistent. Replaced pid_vnr by pid_nr because the hrtimer
        	callback can happen in any namespace ]
      Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
      Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      LKML-Reference: <4A7F8B6E.2010109@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      3f0a525e
  24. 09 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 03 8月, 2009 1 次提交