Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 08 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 22 10月, 2015 5 次提交
  7. 04 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 29 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  11. 12 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 06 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 05 5月, 2015 3 次提交
  17. 16 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  19. 13 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  21. 16 12月, 2014 2 次提交
    • H
      RDMA/cxgb4: Handle NET_XMIT return codes · e6b11163
      由 Hariprasad S 提交于 
      cxgb4_create_server() and cxgb4_create_server6() return NET_XMIT_*
values or a negative errno. iw_cxgb4 need to handle this correctly.
Signed-off-by: NHariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      e6b11163
    • H
      RDMA/cxgb4: Fix locking issue in process_mpa_request · 10be6b48
      由 Hariprasad Shenai 提交于 
      Fix the following lockdep report:

    =============================================
    [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
    3.17.0+ #3 Tainted: G            E
    ---------------------------------------------
    kworker/u64:3/299 is trying to acquire lock:
     (&epc->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa074e07a>]
    process_mpa_request+0x1aa/0x3e0 [iw_cxgb4]

    but task is already holding lock:
     (&epc->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa074e34e>] rx_data+0x9e/0x1f0 [iw_cxgb4]

    other info that might help us debug this:
     Possible unsafe locking scenario:

           CPU0
           ----
      lock(&epc->mutex);
      lock(&epc->mutex);

     *** DEADLOCK ***

     May be due to missing lock nesting notation

    3 locks held by kworker/u64:3/299:
     #0:  ("%s""iw_cxgb4"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8106f14d>]
    process_one_work+0x13d/0x4d0
     #1:  (skb_work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8106f14d>] process_one_work+0x13d/0x4d0
     #2:  (&epc->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa074e34e>] rx_data+0x9e/0x1f0
    [iw_cxgb4]

    stack backtrace:
    CPU: 2 PID: 299 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Tainted: G            E  3.17.0+ #3
    Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T110/0X744K, BIOS 1.2.1 01/28/2010
    Workqueue: iw_cxgb4 process_work [iw_cxgb4]
     ffff8800b91593d0 ffff8800b8a2f9f8 ffffffff815df107 0000000000000001
     ffff8800b9158750 ffff8800b8a2fa28 ffffffff8109f0e2 ffff8800bb768a00
     ffff8800b91593d0 ffff8800b9158750 0000000000000000 ffff8800b8a2fa88
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff815df107>] dump_stack+0x49/0x62
     [<ffffffff8109f0e2>] print_deadlock_bug+0xf2/0x100
     [<ffffffff810a0f04>] validate_chain+0x454/0x700
     [<ffffffff810a1574>] __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x580
     [<ffffffffa074e07a>] ? process_mpa_request+0x1aa/0x3e0 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffff810a17cc>] lock_acquire+0x9c/0x110
     [<ffffffffa074e07a>] ? process_mpa_request+0x1aa/0x3e0 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffff815e111b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x4b/0x360
     [<ffffffffa074e07a>] ? process_mpa_request+0x1aa/0x3e0 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffff810c181a>] ? del_timer_sync+0xaa/0xd0
     [<ffffffff810c1770>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x70/0x70
     [<ffffffffa074e07a>] process_mpa_request+0x1aa/0x3e0 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffffa074a3ec>] ? update_rx_credits+0xec/0x140 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffffa074e381>] rx_data+0xd1/0x1f0 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffff8109ff23>] ? mark_held_locks+0x73/0xa0
     [<ffffffff815e4b90>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0x70
     [<ffffffff810a020d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
     [<ffffffff810a02dd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
     [<ffffffffa074c931>] process_work+0x51/0x80 [iw_cxgb4]
     [<ffffffff8106f1c8>] process_one_work+0x1b8/0x4d0
     [<ffffffff8106f14d>] ? process_one_work+0x13d/0x4d0
     [<ffffffff8106f600>] worker_thread+0x120/0x3c0
     [<ffffffff8106f4e0>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
     [<ffffffff81074a0e>] kthread+0xde/0x100
     [<ffffffff815e4b40>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x40
     [<ffffffff81074930>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
     [<ffffffff815e512c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
     [<ffffffff81074930>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70

Based on original work by Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>.
Signed-off-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: NHariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      10be6b48
  23. 23 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  25. 14 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 11 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  29. 14 10月, 2014 3 次提交
  31. 22 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  33. 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • H
      cxgb4/iw_cxgb4: use firmware ord/ird resource limits · 4c2c5763
      由 Hariprasad Shenai 提交于 
      Advertise a larger max read queue depth for qps, and gather the resource limits
from fw and use them to avoid exhaustinq all the resources.

Design:

cxgb4:

Obtain the max_ordird_qp and max_ird_adapter device params from FW
at init time and pass them up to the ULDs when they attach.  If these
parameters are not available, due to older firmware, then hard-code
the values based on the known values for older firmware.
iw_cxgb4:

Fix the c4iw_query_device() to report these correct values based on
adapter parameters.  ibv_query_device() will always return:

max_qp_rd_atom = max_qp_init_rd_atom = min(module_max, max_ordird_qp)
max_res_rd_atom = max_ird_adapter

Bump up the per qp max module option to 32, allowing it to be increased
by the user up to the device max of max_ordird_qp.  32 seems to be
sufficient to maximize throughput for streaming read benchmarks.

Fail connection setup if the negotiated IRD exhausts the available
adapter ird resources.  So the driver will track the amount of ird
resource in use and not send an RI_WR/INIT to FW that would reduce the
available ird resources below zero.
Signed-off-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: NHariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4c2c5763
  35. 14 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  37. 09 7月, 2014 2 次提交
  39. 02 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  41. 11 6月, 2014 3 次提交
  43. 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  45. 29 4月, 2014 2 次提交
    • S
      RDMA/cxgb4: Force T5 connections to use TAHOE congestion control · 92e5011a
      由 Steve Wise 提交于 
      This is required to work around a T5 HW issue.
Signed-off-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      92e5011a
    • S
      RDMA/cxgb4: Fix endpoint mutex deadlocks · cc18b939
      由 Steve Wise 提交于 
      In cases where the cm calls c4iw_modify_rc_qp() with the endpoint
mutex held, they must be called with internal == 1.  rx_data() and
process_mpa_reply() are not doing this.  This causes a deadlock
because c4iw_modify_rc_qp() might call c4iw_ep_disconnect() in some
!internal cases, and c4iw_ep_disconnect() acquires the endpoint mutex.
The design was intended to only do the disconnect for !internal calls.

Change rx_data(), FPDU_MODE case, to call c4iw_modify_rc_qp() with
internal == 1, and then disconnect only after releasing the mutex.

Change process_mpa_reply() to call c4iw_modify_rc_qp(TERMINATE) with
internal == 1 and set a new attr flag telling it to send a TERMINATE
message.  Previously this was implied by !internal.

Change process_mpa_reply() to return whether the caller should
disconnect after releasing the endpoint mutex.  Now rx_data() will do
the disconnect in the cases where process_mpa_reply() wants to
disconnect after the TERMINATE is sent.

Change c4iw_modify_rc_qp() RTS->TERM to only disconnect if !internal,
and to send a TERMINATE message if attrs->send_term is 1.

Change abort_connection() to not aquire the ep mutex for setting the
state, and make all calls to abort_connection() do so with the mutex
held.
Signed-off-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      cc18b939