- 15 6月, 2012 12 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
It's a bug, but it happens to work, as BTRFS_COMPRESS_LZO == 2, which has only one bit set. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
If a file has 3 small extents: | ext1 | ext2 | ext3 | Running "btrfs fi defrag" will only defrag the last two extents, if those extent mappings hasn't been read into memory from disk. This bug was introduced by commit 17ce6ef8 ("Btrfs: add a check to decide if we should defrag the range") The cause is, that commit looked into previous and next extents using lookup_extent_mapping() only. While at it, remove the code that checks the previous extent, since it's sufficient to check the next extent. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I removed this in an earlier commit and I was wrong. Because compression can return from filemap_fdatawrite() without having actually set any of it's pages as writeback() it can make filemap_fdatawait() do essentially nothing, and then we won't find any ordered extents because they may not have been created yet. So not only does this make fsync() completely useless, but it will also screw up if you truncate on a non-page aligned offset since we zero out the end and then wait on ordered extents and then call drop caches. We can drop the cache before the io completes and then we try to unpin the extent we just wrote we won't find it and everything goes sideways. So fix this by putting it back and put a giant comment there to keep me from trying to remove it in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported lots of problems using compression on the new code and it turns out part of the problem was that igrab() was failing when we added a new ordered extent. This is because when writing out an inode under compression we immediately return without actually doing anything to the pages, and then in another thread at some point down the line actually do the ordered dance. The problem is between the point that we start writeback and we actually add the ordered extent we could be trying to reclaim the inode, which makes igrab() return NULL. So we need to do an igrab() when we create the async extent and then drop it when we are done with it. This makes sure we stay pinned in memory until the ordered extent can get a reference on it and we are good to go. With this patch we no longer panic in btrfs_finish_ordered_io(). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Because btrfs can remove the device that was mounted we need to have a ->show_devname so that in this case we can print out some other device in the file system to /proc/mount. So if there are multiple devices in a btrfs file system we will just print the device with the lowest devid that we can find. This will make everything consistent and deal with device removal properly. The drawback is if you mount with a device that is higher than the lowest devicd it won't show up as the mounted device in /proc/mounts, but this is a small price to pay. This was inspired by Miao Xie's patch. Thanks, Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Al pointed out that we can just toss out the old name on a device and add a new one arbitrarily, so anybody who uses device->name in printk could possibly use free'd memory. Instead of adding locking around all of this he suggested doing it with RCU, so I've introduced a struct rcu_string that does just that and have gone through and protected all accesses to device->name that aren't under the uuid_mutex with rcu_read_lock(). This protects us and I will use it for dealing with removing the device that we used to mount the file system in a later patch. Thanks, Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I was getting hung on umount when a transaction was aborted because a range of one of the free space inodes was still locked. This is because the nocow stuff doesn't unlock anything on error. This fixed the problem and I verified that is what was happening. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So we're forcing the eb's to have their ref count set to 1 so invalidatepage works but this breaks lots of things, for example root nodes, and is just plain wrong, we don't need to just evict all of this stuff. Also drop the invalidatepage altogether and add a page_cache_release(). With this patch we no longer hang when trying to access the root nodes after an aborted transaction and we no longer leak memory. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If a transaction commit fails we don't abort it so we don't set an error on the file system. This patch fixes that by actually calling the abort stuff and then adding a check for a fs error in the transaction start stuff to make sure it is caught properly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I was getting lots of hung tasks and a NULL pointer dereference because we are not cleaning up the transaction properly when it aborts. First we need to reset the running_transaction to NULL so we don't get a bad dereference for any start_transaction callers after this. Also we cannot rely on waitqueue_active() since it's just a list_empty(), so just call wake_up() directly since that will do the barrier for us and such. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The transaction abort stuff was throwing warnings from the list debugging code because we do a list_del_init outside of the delayed_refs spin lock. The delayed refs locking makes baby Jesus cry so it's not hard to get wrong, but we need to take the ref head mutex to make sure it's not being processed currently, and so if it is we need to drop the spin lock and then take and drop the mutex and do the search again. If we can take the mutex then we can safely remove the head from the list and carry on. Now when the transaction aborts I don't get the list debugging warnings. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
While doing my enospc work I got a transaction abortion that resulted in a panic when we tried to unlock_page() an already unlocked page. This is because we aren't calling extent_clear_unlock_delalloc with the locked page so it was unlocking all the pages in the range. This is wrong since __extent_writepage expects to have the page locked still unless we return *page_started as 1. This should keep us from panicing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 01 6月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
git://git.jan-o-sch.net/btrfs-unstable由 Chris Mason 提交于
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/ulist.h Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When we rewind REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operations, there's code that allocates a fresh buffer instead of cloning the old one. Setting that buffer's level correctly was missing in this case. When rewinding a MOVE_KEYS operation, btrfs_node_key_ptr_offset(slot) was missing for memmove_extent_buffer()'s arguments. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Logging for del_ptr when we're not deleting the last pointer was wrong. This fixes both, duplicate log entries and log sequence. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Replace duplicate code by small inline helper function. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
tree_mod_alloc calls __get_tree_mod_seq and must acquire a spinlock before doing so. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
We must build up the inode list with the extent lock held after following indirect refs. This also requires an extension to ulists, which allows to modify the stored aux value in case a key already exists in the list. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 31 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The sequence number for delayed refs is needed to postpone certain delayed refs for a very short period while walking backrefs. Before the tree modification log, we thought we'd only have to hold back those references that don't have a counter operation. While now we've the tree mod log, we're rewinding fs tree blocks to a defined consistent state. We cannot know in advance for which tree block we'll be doing rewind operations later. Therefore, we must postpone all the delayed refs for fs-tree blocks, even those having a counter operation. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 21 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into HEAD
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
During unmount, it could happen that the integrity checker printed a warning message "attempt to free ... on umount which is not yet iodone" which turned out to be a false positive. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
If a file_extent_item was located at the very end of a leaf and there was not enough space to hold a full item, but there was enough space to hold one of type BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE or PREALLOC, and it was only such a short item, a warning was printed anyway. This check is now fixed. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
Reduce ioprio class of scrub readahead threads to idle priority. This setting is fixed. This priority has shown the best performance during all measurements. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So dpkg fsync()'s the file and the directory containing the file whenever it writes to a file which is really slow in btrfs. This is partly because fsync()'ing a directory _always_ committed the transaction instead of just going to the tree log. This is because drop_objectid_items() would return 1 since it does a btrfs_search_slot() which returns 1. In tree-log jargon this means that we have to commit the transaction to be safe. So just check if ret is greater than 0 and set it to 0 if it does. With this patch we now use the tree-log instead of committing the entire transaction, which is twice as fast on my box. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have this check down in the actual logging code, but this is after we start a transaction and all that good stuff. So move the helper inode_in_log() out so we can call it in fsync() and avoid starting a transaction altogether and just exit if we've already fsync()'ed this file recently. You would notice this issue if you fsync()'ed a file over and over again until the transaction committed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
btrfs_read_buffer() has the possibility of returning the error. Therefore, I add the code in which the return value of btrfs_read_buffer() is checked. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
The device statistics are written into the device tree with each transaction commit. Only modified statistics are written. When a filesystem is mounted, the device statistics for each involved device are read from the device tree and used to initialize the counters. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
An ioctl interface is added to get the device statistic counters. A second ioctl is added to atomically get and reset these counters. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
The goal is to detect when drives start to get an increased error rate, when drives should be replaced soon. Therefore statistic counters are added that count IO errors (read, write and flush). Additionally, the software detected errors like checksum errors and corrupted blocks are counted. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Asias He 提交于
1) This function is not used anywhere. 2) Using the blk_abort_queue() to abort the queue seems not correct. blk_abort_queue() is used for timeout handling (block/blk-timeout.c). Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAsias He <asias@redhat.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If cow_file_range_inline fails with ENOSPC we abort the transaction which isn't very nice. This really shouldn't be happening anyways but there's no sense in making it a horrible error when we can easily just go allocate normal data space for this stuff. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Ceph was hitting this race where we would remove an inode from the per-root orphan list before we would release the space we had reserved for the inode. We actually don't need a list or anything, we just need to make sure the root doesn't try to free up the orphan reserve until after the inodes have released their reservations. So use an atomic counter instead of a list on the root and only decrement the counter after we've released our reservation. I've tested this as well as several others and we no longer see the warnings that you would see while running ceph. Thanks, Btrfs: fix how we deal with the orphan block rsv Ceph was hitting this race where we would remove an inode from the per-root orphan list before we would release the space we had reserved for the inode. We actually don't need a list or anything, we just need to make sure the root doesn't try to free up the orphan reserve until after the inodes have released their reservations. So use an atomic counter instead of a list on the root and only decrement the counter after we've released our reservation. I've tested this as well as several others and we no longer see the warnings that you would see while running ceph. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Miao pointed this out while I was working on an orphan problem that messing with a bitfield where different ranges are protected by different locks doesn't work out right. Turns out we've been doing this forever where we have different parts of the bit field protected by either no lock at all or different locks which could cause all sorts of weird problems including the issue I was hitting. So instead make a runtime_flags thing that we use the normal bit operations on that are all atomic so we can keep having our no/different locking for the different flags and then make force_compress it's own thing so it can be treated normally. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When we write out the free space cache we will write out everything that is in our in memory tree, and then we will just walk the pinned extents tree and write anything we see there. The problem with this is that during normal operations the pinned extents will be merged back into the free space tree normally, and then we can allocate space from the merged areas and commit them to the tree log. If we crash and replay the tree log we will crash again because the tree log will try to free up space from what looks like 2 seperate but contiguous entries, since one entry is from the original free space cache and the other was a pinned extent that was merged back. To fix this we just need to walk the free space tree after we load it and merge contiguous entries back together. This will keep the tree log stuff from breaking and it will make the allocator behave more nicely. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
In normal cases, we would not be allowed to do balance in RO mode. However, when we're using a seeding device and adding another device to sprout, things will change: $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb7 $ btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdb7 $ mount /dev/sdb7 /mnt/btrfs -o ro $ btrfs fi bal /mnt/btrfs -----------------------> fail. $ btrfs dev add /dev/sdb8 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs fi bal /mnt/btrfs -----------------------> works! It should not be designed as an exception, and we'd better add another check for mnt flags. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Fully utilize our extent state's new helper functions to use fastpath as much as possible. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb7 $ mount /dev/sdb7 /mnt/btrfs -o ro $ btrfs dev add /dev/sdb8 /mnt/btrfs ERROR: error adding the device '/dev/sdb8' - Invalid argument Since we mount with readonly options, and /dev/sdb7 is not a seeding one, a readonly notification is preferred. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We noticed that the ordered extent completion doesn't really rely on having a page and that it could be done independantly of ending the writeback on a page. This patch makes us not do the threaded endio stuff for normal buffered writes and direct writes so we can end page writeback as soon as possible (in irq context) and only start threads to do the ordered work when it is actually done. Compression needs to be reworked some to take advantage of this as well, but atm it has to do a find_get_page in its endio handler so it must be done in its own thread. This makes direct writes quite a bit faster. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are checking delalloc to see if it is ok to update the i_size. There are 2 cases it stops us from updating 1) If there is delalloc between our current disk_i_size and this ordered extent 2) If there is delalloc between our current ordered extent and the next ordered extent These tests are racy however since we can set delalloc for these ranges at any time. Also for the first case if we notice there is delalloc between disk_i_size and our ordered extent we will not update disk_i_size and assume that when that delalloc bit gets written out it will update everything properly. However if we crash before that we will have file extents outside of our i_size, which is not good, so this test is dangerous as well as racy. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-