1. 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 12 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 17 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 30 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / processor: Do not request ACPI cpufreq module directly · 34411a69
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Function acpi_processor_load_module() used by the ACPI processor
      driver can only really work if the acpi-cpufreq module is available
      when acpi_processor_start() is executed which usually is not the case
      for systems loading the processor driver module from an initramfs.
      
      Moreover, that used to be a hackish workaround for module autoloading
      issues, but udev loads acpi-cpufreq just fine nowadays, so that
      function isn't really necessary any more.  For this reason, drop
      acpi_processor_load_module() entirely.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      34411a69
  5. 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 12 5月, 2013 2 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure · ac212b69
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
      non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
      and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
      existing processor driver functionality.
      
      The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate
      processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace
      and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure.  It also
      populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a
      corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver
      proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them
      if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's
      .attach() routine is running.
      
      There are a few reasons to make this change.
      
      First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI
      hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably,
      even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc.
      
      Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices
      before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort
      (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors
      if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of
      continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove
      is unset).  That is a more desirable behavior than what the current
      code does.
      
      Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver
      proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine,
      because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related
      to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible
      for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal
      symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate).
      
      Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the
      'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's
      directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead
      and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor
      device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under
      /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but
      that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about
      (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management).
      
      Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      ac212b69
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Move processor suspend/resume to syscore_ops · 0a3b15ac
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The system suspend routine of the ACPI processor driver saves
      the BUS_MASTER_RLD register and its resume routine restores it.
      However, there can be only one such register in the system and it
      really should be saved after non-boot CPUs have been offlined and
      restored before they are put back online during resume.
      
      For this reason, move the saving and restoration of BUS_MASTER_RLD
      to syscore suspend and syscore resume, respectively, and drop the no
      longer necessary suspend/resume callbacks from the ACPI processor
      driver.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      0a3b15ac
  7. 06 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • K
      acpi: Export the acpi_processor_get_performance_info · c705c78c
      Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
      The git commit d5aaffa9
      (cpufreq: handle cpufreq being disabled for all exported function)
      tightens the cpufreq API by returning errors when disable_cpufreq()
      had been called.
      
      The problem we are hitting is that the module xen-acpi-processor which
      uses the ACPI's functions: acpi_processor_register_performance,
      acpi_processor_preregister_performance, and acpi_processor_notify_smm
      fails at acpi_processor_register_performance with -22.
      
      Note that earlier during bootup in arch/x86/xen/setup.c there is also
      an call to cpufreq's API: disable_cpufreq().
      
      This is b/c we want the Linux kernel to parse the ACPI data, but leave
      the cpufreq decisions to the hypervisor.
      
      In v3.9 all the checks that d5aaffa9
      added are now hit and the calls to cpufreq_register_notifier will now
      fail. This means that acpi_processor_ppc_init ends up printing:
      
      "Warning: Processor Platform Limit not supported"
      
      and the acpi_processor_ppc_status is not set.
      
      The repercussions of that is that the call to
      acpi_processor_register_performance fails right away at:
      
      	if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
      
      and we don't progress any further on parsing and extracting the _P*
      objects.
      
      The only reason the Xen code called that function was b/c it was
      exported and the only way to gather the P-states. But we can also
      just make acpi_processor_get_performance_info be exported and not
      use acpi_processor_register_performance. This patch does so.
      Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      c705c78c
  8. 18 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • D
      cpuidle / ACPI : move cpuidle_device field out of the acpi_processor_power structure · 3d339dcb
      Daniel Lezcano 提交于
      Currently we have the cpuidle_device field in the acpi_processor_power structure.
      This adds a dependency between processor.h and cpuidle.h
      
      Although it is not a real problem, removing this dependency has the benefit of
      separating a bit more the cpuidle code from the rest of the acpi code.
      Also, the compilation should be a bit improved because we do no longer
      include cpuidle.h in processor.h. The preprocessor was generating 30418 loc
      and with this patch it generates 30256 loc for processor_thermal.c, a file
      which is not concerned at all by cpuidle, like processor_perflib.c and
      processor_throttling.c.
      
      That may sound ridiculous, but "small streams make big rivers" :P
      
      This patch moves this field into a static global per cpu variable like what is
      done in the intel_idle driver.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      3d339dcb
  9. 16 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 05 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 18 7月, 2012 3 次提交
  12. 01 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  13. 27 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  14. 20 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 07 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 17 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 29 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  18. 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 15 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 23 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 22 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  22. 15 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  23. 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's left · a29d8b8e
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      Add __percpu sparse annotations to places which didn't make it in one
      of the previous patches.  All converions are trivial.
      
      These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be
      in a different address space and warn if accessed without going
      through percpu accessors.  This patch doesn't affect normal builds.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      a29d8b8e
  24. 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  25. 22 12月, 2009 5 次提交
    • A
      ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processor · e59897fe
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      When we call _PDC, we get a handle to the processor, allocate the
      object list buffer as needed, and free it immediately after calling
      _PDC.
      
      There's no need to drag around this object list with us everywhere
      else, so let's just get rid of it.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      e59897fe
    • A
      ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interface · 43bab25c
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      When calling _PDC, we really only need the handle to the processor
      to call the method; we don't look at any other parts of the
      struct acpi_processor * given to us.
      
      In the early path, when we walk the namespace, we are given the
      handle directly, so just pass it through to acpi_processor_set_pdc()
      without stuffing it into a wasteful struct acpi_processor allocated
      on the stack each time
      
      This saves 2834 bytes of stack.
      
      Update the interface accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      43bab25c
    • A
      ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc · 47817254
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      The x86 and ia64 implementations of the function in $subject are
      exactly the same.
      
      Also, since the arch-specific implementations of setting _PDC have
      been completely hollowed out, remove the empty shells.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      47817254
    • A
      ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc() · 6c5807d7
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
      set in the input obj_list buffer.
      
      There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
      bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
      we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
      struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      6c5807d7
    • A
      ACPI: processor: call _PDC early · 78f16996
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT
      attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT.
      
      Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the
      EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT
      is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later.
      
      This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined
      methods.
      
      Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it
      as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are.
      
      Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows
      implementation more closely.
      
      Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads
      the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly.
      
      The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method
      to cover the hotplug case.
      
      Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
      
      Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      78f16996
  26. 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      [ACPI/CPUFREQ] Introduce bios_limit per cpu cpufreq sysfs interface · e2f74f35
      Thomas Renninger 提交于
      This interface is mainly intended (and implemented) for ACPI _PPC BIOS
      frequency limitations, but other cpufreq drivers can also use it for
      similar use-cases.
      
      Why is this needed:
      
      Currently it's not obvious why cpufreq got limited.
      People see cpufreq/scaling_max_freq reduced, but this could have
      happened by:
        - any userspace prog writing to scaling_max_freq
        - thermal limitations
        - hardware (_PPC in ACPI case) limitiations
      
      Therefore export bios_limit (in kHz) to:
        - Point the user that it's the BIOS (broken or intended) which limits
          frequency
        - Export it as a sysfs interface for userspace progs.
          While this was a rarely used feature on laptops, there will appear
          more and more server implemenations providing "Green IT" features like
          allowing the service processor to limit the frequency. People want
          to know about HW/BIOS frequency limitations.
      
      All ACPI P-state driven cpufreq drivers are covered with this patch:
        - powernow-k8
        - powernow-k7
        - acpi-cpufreq
      
      Tested with a patched DSDT which limits the first two cores (_PPC returns 1)
      via _PPC, exposed by bios_limit:
      # echo 2200000 >cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
      # cat cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
      2600000
      2600000
      2200000
      2200000
      # #scaling_max_freq shows general user/thermal/BIOS limitations
      
      # cat cpu*/cpufreq/bios_limit
      2600000
      2600000
      2800000
      2800000
      # #bios_limit only shows the HW/BIOS limitation
      
      CC: Pallipadi Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      CC: davej@codemonkey.org.uk
      CC: linux@dominikbrodowski.net
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      e2f74f35
  27. 06 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Z
      ACPI: Notify the _PPC evaluation status to the platform · d81c45e1
      Zhao Yakui 提交于
      According to the ACPI spec(section 8.4.4.3) OSPM should convey the _PPC
      evaluations status to the platform if there exists the _OST object.
      The _OST contains two arguments:
      	The first is the PERFORMANCE notificatin event.
      	The second is the status of _PPC object.
      OSPM will convey the _PPC evaluation status to the platform.
      Of course when the module parameter of "ignore_ppc" is added, OSPM won't
      evaluate the _PPC object. But it will call the _OST object.
      
      At the same time the _OST object will be evaluated only when the PERFORMANCE
      notification event is received.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d81c45e1
  28. 27 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 20 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  30. 23 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 04 4月, 2009 1 次提交