- 30 4月, 2013 24 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
pipe_config is the new dev_priv! More seriously, this is actually better since a pipe_config can be thrown away if the modeset compute config stage fails. Whereas any state stored in dev_prive needs to be painstakingly restored, since otherwise a dpms off/on will wreak massive havoc. Yes, that even applies to state only used in ->mode_set callbacks, since we need to call those even for dpms on when the Haswell power well cleared everything out. Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Both intel_opregion_enable_asle() and intel_enable_asle() have shrunk considerably. Merge them together into a static function in i915_irq.c, and rename to better reflect the purpose and the related platforms. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Realize that intel_enable_asle() is never called on PCH-split platforms or on VLV. Rip out the GSE irq enable for PCH-split platforms, which also happens to be incorrect for IVB+. This should not cause any functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Stop calling intel_opregion_enable_asle() and consequently intel_enable_asle() on opregion init. It should not be necessary for these reasons: 1) On PCH split platforms, it only enables GSE interrupt, which is enabled in irq postinstall anyway. Moreover, the irq enable uses the wrong bit on IVB+. 2) On gen 2, it would enable a reserved pipestat bit. If there were gen 2 systems with opregion asle support, that is. And the gen 2 irq handler won't handle it anyway. 3) On gen 3-4, the irq postinstall will call intel_opregion_enable_asle() to enable the pipestat. In short, move the asle irq/pipestat enable responsibility to irq postinstall, which already happens to be in place. This should not cause any functional changes, but only do the one line change here for easier bisectability, just in case, and leave all the cleanups this allows to followup patches. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Only set ASLE driver readiness (ARDY) and technology enabled indicator (TCHE) once per opregion init. There should be no need to do that at irq postinstall time. Also clear driver readiness at fini. While at it, add defines for driver readiness. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Move near other defines, add TCHE in the name. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This does duplicate the logic in intel_crtc_mode_get a bit, but the issue is that we also should handle interlace modes and other insanity correctly. Hence I've opted for a sligthly more elaborate route where we first read out the crtc timings for the adjusted mode, and then optionally (not sure if we really need it) compute the modeline from that. v2: Also read out the pipe source dimensions into the requested mode. v3: Rebase on top of the moved cpu_transcoder. v4: Simplify CHECK_FLAGS logic as suggested by Chris Wilson. Also properly #undef that macro again. Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> (v3) [danvet: Use the existing mask for interlaced bits, spotted by Mika.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We want to use the fdi m/n values to easily compute the adjusted mode dotclock on pch ports. Hence make sure the values stored in the pipe config are always reliable. v2: Fixup FDI TU readout. v3: Rebase on top of moved cpu_transcoder. Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This code will get _really_ repetive, and we'll end up with tons more of this kind. So extract the common patterns. This should also help when we add a lazy pipe_config compare mode for fastboot. Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Spotted while changing related code. Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
So on a bunch of setups we only have 2 fdi lanes available, e.g. hsw VGA or 3 pipes on ivb. And seemingly a lot of modes don't quite fit into this, among them the default 1080p mode. The solution is to dither down the pipe a bit so that everything fits, which this patch implements. But ports compute their state under the assumption that the bpp they pick will be the one selected, e.g. the display port bw computations won't work otherwise. Now we could adjust our code to again up-dither to the computed DP link parameters, but that's pointless. So instead when the pipe needs to adjust parameters we need to retry the pipe_config computation at the encoder stage. Furthermore we need to inform encoders that they should not increase bandwidth requirements if possible. This is required for the hdmi code, which prefers the pipe to up-dither to either of the two possible hdmi bpc values. LVDS has a similar requirement, although that's probably only theoretical in nature: It's unlikely that we'll ever see an 8bpc high-res lvds panel (which is required to hit the 2 fdi lane limit). eDP is the only thing which could increase the pipe_bpp setting again, even when in the retry-loop. This could hit the WARN. Two reasons for not bothering: - On many eDP panels we'll get a black screen if the bpp settings don't match vbt. So failing the modeset is the right thing to do. But since that also means it's the only way to light up the panel, it should work. So we shouldn't be able to hit this WARN. - There are still opens around the eDP panel handling, and maybe we need additional tricks. Before that happens it's imo no use trying to be too clever. Worst case we just need to kill that WARN or maybe fail the compute config stage if the eDP connector can't get the bpp setting it wants. And since this can only happen with an fdi link in between and so for pch eDP panels it's rather unlikely to blow up, if ever. v2: Rebased on top of a bikeshed from Paulo. v3: Improve commit message around eDP handling with the stuff things with Imre. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We need to multiply the hdmi port dotclock by 1.5x since it's not really a dotclock, but the 10/8 encoding bitclock divided by 10. Also add correct limit checks for the dotclock and reject modes which don't fit. HDMI 1.4 would allow more, but our hw doesn't support that unfortunately :( Somehow I suspect 12bpc hdmi output never really worked - we really need an i-g-t testcase to check all the different pixel modes and outputs. v2: Fixup the adjusted port clock handling - we need to make sure that the fdi link code still gets the real pixelclock. v3: g4x/vlv don't support 12bpc hdmi output so drop the bogus comment. Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> [danvet: Switch dotclock limit check to <= as suggested by Ville.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This allows us to use all 4 fdi lanes on fdi B when the cpu eDP is running on pipe C. Yay! v2: Encapsulate test into a little helper function, as suggested by Chris Wilson. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This nicely allows us to drop some hacks which have only been used to work around modeset failures due to lack of fdi lanes. v2: Implement proper checking for Haswell platforms - the fdi link to the LPT PCH has only 2 lanes. Note that we already filter out impossible modes in intel_crt_mode_valid. Unfortunately LPT does not support 6bpc on the fdi rx, so we can't pull clever tricks to squeeze in a few more modes. v2: Rebased on top of Ben Widawsky's num_pipes reorg. v3: Rebase on top of Ville's pipe debug output ocd rampage. v4: Fixup rebase fail spotted by Ville. v5: Fixup rebase fail spotted by Imre Deak. I suck. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Again in preparation to move the configuration checks into the pipe_config computation stage of the modeset sequence. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Now that it's split up, we can easily move it around and precompute the fdi lane configuration. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
And also move the computed m_n values into the pipe_config. This is a prep step to move the fdi state computation completely into the prepare phase of the modeset sequence. Which will allow us to handle fdi link bw constraints in a better way. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
v2: Introduce some nice #defines for the FDI lane width fields and put them to good use. Suggested by Ville. v3: Fixup the mask vs. shift copy&pasta fail Imre Deak spotted, and use the shift #define also in the mask. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We need this for two reasons: - Correct handling of shared fdi lanes on ivb with fastboot. - Handling fdi link bw limits when we only have two fdi lanes by dithering down a bit. Just search&replace in this patch, no functional change at all. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Totally untested due to lack of screens supporting more than 8bpc. But now we should have closed all holes in our bpp handling, so this should be safe. The last missing piece was 10bpc support for g4x/vlv, since we directly use the pipe bpp to feed the display link (and anyway, only the cpt has any means to have a pipe bpp != the display link bpp). Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The current code is rather ... ugly. The only thing it managed to pull off is getting 6bpc on DP working on g4x. Then someone added another custom hack for 6bpc eDP on vlv. Fix up this entire mess by properly implementing the PIPECONF-based dither/bpc controls on g4x/vlv. Note that compared to pch based platforms g4x/vlv don't support 12bpc modes. g4x is already caught, extend the check for vlv. The other fixup is to restrict the lvds-specific dithering to early gen4 devices - g4x should use the pipeconf dither controls. Note that on gen2/3 the dither control is in the panel fitter even. v2: Don't enable dithering when the pipe is in 10 bpc mode. Quoting from Bspec "PIPEACONF - Pipe A Configuration Register, bit 4": "Programming note: Dithering should only be enabled for 8 bpc or 6 bpc." v3: Actually drop the old ugly dither code. v4: Explain in a short comment why g4x/vlv shouldn't dither for 30 bpp pipes (Jesse). v5: Also clear the dither type correctly as spotted by Ville. v6: As Ville pointed out we need to indeed set the dithering both in the pipeconf register (for DP outputs) and in the LVDS port register (for LVDS ouputs). Otherwise LVDS panel will not get properly dithered. The old patch got away with this since it forgot to clear the LVDS dither bit ... v7: Remove redundant BPC_MASK clearing, spotted by Ville. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
They can get at the adjusted mode through intel_crtc->config. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We've had our fair share of woes already which showed that we can't rely on the bpc limits in the EDID for eDP panels without risking black screens. So now we limit the depth by what the BIOS recommends in the VBT: commit 2f4f649a Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Mon Nov 12 14:33:44 2012 +0200 drm/i915: do not ignore eDP bpc settings from vbt But that's not enough, since at least the panel on my ASUS Zenbook Prime here is also unhappy if the bpc is too low. Hence just take the firmware value and dither to get what flimsy panels want. Like before we ensure that we don't change the bpp if the firmware doesn't provide a value, see commit 9a30a61f Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Mon Nov 12 14:33:45 2012 +0200 drm/i915: do not default to 18 bpp for eDP if missing from VBT v2: Apparently there are some horribly broken eDP panels around which only work if the DP link is set up as if we want to driver a 24bpp mode, but still only work if the data is feed at 18bpp. See commit 57c21963 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Thu Apr 4 17:19:37 2013 +0200 drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes for the gory details. Adjust the patch accordingly and update all the relevant comments. v3: Give up on the cargo-culting v2 attempt and just enfore the edp bpp value if it's there. Broken panels be damned! Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Tested-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This hack is getting a bit messy, but this plugs the leak for now until we have the cpu_transcoder properly pipe_config'ed. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 4月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Instead of repeatedly bombarding the user with a request to reboot and increase the stolen size with every fb refresh, just inform them the first time only. v2: Rearrange code so the hint to increase the amount of memory stolen by the BIOS is only emitted if we fail to find sufficient stolen memory for FBC. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [danvet: Fixup formatting code mismatch that gcc spotted.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 26 4月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
We prevent invalid ones from getting here in the first place, but it doesn't hurt to have an extra sanity check. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
And put the pfit stuff into substructs while we're at it. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
This gets the panel fitter working on eDP on VLV, and should also apply to eDP panels on G4x chipsets (if we ever detect and mark an all-in-one panel as eDP anyway). A few cleanups are still possible on top of this, for example the LVDS border control could be placed in the LVDS encoder structure and updated based on the result of the panel fitter calculation. Multi-pipe fitting isn't handled correctly either if we ever get a config that wants to try the panel fitter on more than one output at a time. v2: use pipe_config for storing pfit values (Daniel) add i9xx_pfit_enable function for use by 9xx and VLV (Daniel) v3: fixup conflicts and lvds_dither check Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> [danvet: fix up botched conflict resolution from Jesse: - border = LVDS_BORDER_ENABLE was lost for CENTER scaling - comment about gen2/3 panel fitter scaling was lost - dev_priv->lvds_dither reintroduced.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We only ever check whether it's strictly bigger than one, so all the is_sdvo/is_hdmi checks are redundant. Flatten the code a bit. Also, s/temp/dpll_md/ Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
If we compute the pch pll state, we _have_ a pch encoder. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
g4x dplls and ilk+ pch plls have a separate field for the reduced p1 setting, so this restriction does not apply. Only older platforms have the restriction that the p1 divisors must match. This unnecessary restriction has been introduced in commit cec2f356 Author: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Date: Tue Jan 10 15:09:36 2012 -0800 drm/i915: Only look for matching clocks for LVDS downcloc Note that with lvds the p2 divisors _always_ match for LVDS, and we don't support auto-downclocking anywhere else. On eDP downclocking works with separate data m/n settings, using the same link clock. Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Up to now we've relied on the bios to get this right for us. Let's try out whether our code has improved a bit, since we should dither always when the output bpp doesn't match the plane bpp. - gen5+ should be fine, since we only use the bios hint as an upgrade. - gen4 changes, since here dithering is still controlled in the lvds register. - gen2/3 has implicit dithering depeding upon whether you use 2 or 3 lvds pairs (which makes sense, since it only supports 8bpc pipe outpu configurations). - hsw doesn't support lvds. v2: Remove redudant dither setting. v3: Completly drop reliance on dev_priv->lvds_dither. v4: Enable dithering on gen2/3 only when we have a 18bpp panel, since up-dithering to a 24bpp panel is not supported by the hw. Spotted by Ville. v5: Also only enable lvds port dithering on gen4 for 18bpp modes. In practice this only excludes dithering a 10bpc plane down for a 24bpp lvds panel. Not something we truly care about. Again noticed by Ville. v6: Actually git add. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
With the exception of hsw, which has dedicated DP clocks which run at the fixed frequency already, and vlv, which doesn't have optmized pre-defined dp clock parameters (yet). v2: Ville asked me to elaborate a bit more on the longer-term goals wrt dpll settings computation: So ultimately my idea is that in the compute config stage first the crtc code puts the default platform pll limits into the pipe_config. Then encoders can either overwrite that limit structure with their own special stuff (mostly for lvds madness). Or they can pick some or all of the parameters (e.g. just the p2 switchover on hdmi, or all the clock parameters for dp/sdvo tv). Once that's done then the generic crtc code can fill out any missing bits (using the find_best_pll code) and then try to assign which pll to use (if it's a platform with shared plls). In the end the modeset could should simply write the computed stuff into registers and never be able to fail. Of course there's still a lot of data to be moved into pipe_config to make this all happen, hence some of the temporary ugliness. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (v1) Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This was somehow lost in the pipe_config->dpll introduction in commit f47709a9 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Thu Mar 28 10:42:02 2013 +0100 drm/i915: create pipe_config->dpll for clock state While at it, extract a few small helpers for common computations. v2: Use the newly added helpers more thanks to Ville's trick to typedef the legacy intel_clock_t as the new-world struct dpll. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We need the dpll/fp/fp2 values only when we need a pch pll. So move them together with the code to acquire such a pll. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 25 4月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Between ivb, hsw and vlv, only Ivybridge has sprites with scaling capabilities. Also make max_downscale coherent with that. v2: Rebase on top of the recent ivb/vlv/hsw sprite scaling fixes. Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (v1) Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
v2: Make TRANSCODER_EDP handling more explicit. (Imre) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
With the previous work asle and gse interrupt handlers should now be functionally the same. Drop the duplicated code. v2: Drop intel_opregion_gse_intr() also in the !CONFIG_ACPI path. (Damien) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
In theory, the BIOS should not even request these from us now that we aren't claiming we support these, but when it does anyway, don't pretend it succeeded. It should be the right thing to do, but might confuse the BIOS. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-