Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 11月, 2016 3 次提交
  3. 15 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 04 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 26 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 09 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      x86/ACPI/PCI: Recognize that Interrupt Line 255 means "not connected" · e237a551
      由 Chen Fan 提交于 
      Per the x86-specific footnote to PCI spec r3.0, sec 6.2.4, the value 255 in
the Interrupt Line register means "unknown" or "no connection."
Previously, when we couldn't derive an IRQ from the _PRT, we fell back to
using the value from Interrupt Line as an IRQ.  It's questionable whether
we should do that at all, but the spec clearly suggests we shouldn't do it
for the value 255 on x86.

Calling request_irq() with IRQ 255 may succeed, but the driver won't
receive any interrupts.  Or, if IRQ 255 is shared with another device, it
may succeed, and the driver's ISR will be called at random times when the
*other* device interrupts.  Or it may fail if another device is using IRQ
255 with incompatible flags.  What we *want* is for request_irq() to fail
predictably so the driver can fall back to polling.

On x86, assume 255 in the Interrupt Line means the INTx line is not
connected.  In that case, set dev->irq to IRQ_NOTCONNECTED so request_irq()
will fail gracefully with -ENOTCONN.

We found this problem on a system where Secure Boot firmware assigned
Interrupt Line 255 to an i801_smbus device and another device was already
using MSI-X IRQ 255.  This was in v3.10, where i801_probe() fails if
request_irq() fails:

  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: enabling device (0140 -> 0143)
  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT C
  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: no GSI
  genirq: Flags mismatch irq 255. 00000080 (i801_smbus) vs. 00000000 (megasa)
  CPU: 0 PID: 2487 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1
  Hardware name: FUJITSU PRIMEQUEST 2800E2/D3736, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 2000 Serie5
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
    __setup_irq+0x54a/0x570
    request_threaded_irq+0xcc/0x170
    i801_probe+0x32f/0x508 [i2c_i801]
    local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to allocate irq 255: -16
  i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16

After aeb8a3d1 ("i2c: i801: Check if interrupts are disabled"),
i801_probe() will fall back to polling if request_irq() fails.  But we
still need this patch because request_irq() may succeed or fail depending
on other devices in the system.  If request_irq() fails, i801_smbus will
work by falling back to polling, but if it succeeds, i801_smbus won't work
because it expects interrupts that it may not receive.
Signed-off-by: NChen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      e237a551
  11. 12 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 08 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Implement irq_percpu_is_enabled() · f0cb3220
      由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于 
      Certain interrupt controller drivers have a register set that does not
make it easy to save/restore the mask of enabled/disabled interrupts
at suspend/resume time. At resume time, such drivers rely on the core
kernel irq subsystem to tell whether such or such interrupt is enabled
or not, in order to restore the proper state in the interrupt
controller register.

While the irqd_irq_disabled() provides the relevant information for
global interrupts, there is no similar function to query the
enabled/disabled state of a per-CPU interrupt.

Therefore, this commit complements the percpu_irq API with an
irq_percpu_is_enabled() function.

[ tglx: Simplified the implementation and added kerneldoc ]
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>
Cc: Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445347435-2333-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      f0cb3220
  15. 22 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Handle force threading of irqs with primary and thread handler · 2a1d3ab8
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Force threading of interrupts does not really deal with interrupts
which are requested with a primary and a threaded handler. The current
policy is to leave them alone and let the primary handler run in
interrupt context, but we set the ONESHOT flag for those interrupts as
well.

Kohji Okuno debugged a problem with the SDHCI driver where the
interrupt thread waits for a hardware interrupt to trigger, which can't
work well because the hardware interrupt is masked due to the ONESHOT
flag being set. He proposed to set the ONESHOT flag only if the
interrupt does not provide a thread handler.

Though that does not work either because these interrupts can be
shared. So the other interrupt would rightfully get the ONESHOT flag
set and therefor the same situation would happen again.

To deal with this proper, we need to force thread the primary handler
of such interrupts as well. That means that the primary interrupt
handler is treated as any other primary interrupt handler which is not
marked IRQF_NO_THREAD. The threaded handler becomes a separate thread
so the SDHCI flow logic can be handled gracefully.

The same issue was reported against 4.1-rt.
Reported-and-tested-by: NKohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
Reported-By: NMichal Smucr <msmucr@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NNathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1509211058080.5606@nanosSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      2a1d3ab8
  17. 22 4月, 2015 2 次提交
  19. 09 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      genirq: Allow the irqchip state of an IRQ to be save/restored · 1b7047ed
      由 Marc Zyngier 提交于 
      There is a number of cases where a kernel subsystem may want to
introspect the state of an interrupt at the irqchip level:

- When a peripheral is shared between virtual machines,
  its interrupt state becomes part of the guest's state,
  and must be switched accordingly. KVM on arm/arm64 requires
  this for its guest-visible timer
- Some GPIO controllers seem to require peeking into the
  interrupt controller they are connected to to report
  their internal state

This seem to be a pattern that is common enough for the core code
to try and support this without too many horrible hacks. Introduce
a pair of accessors (irq_get_irqchip_state/irq_set_irqchip_state)
to retrieve the bits that can be of interest to another subsystem:
pending, active, and masked.

- irq_get_irqchip_state returns the state of the interrupt according
  to a parameter set to IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
  IRQCHIP_STATE_MASKED or IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL.
- irq_set_irqchip_state similarly sets the state of the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Tested-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Phong Vo <pvo@apm.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
Cc: Y Vo <yvo@apm.com>
Cc: Toan Le <toanle@apm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426676484-21812-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      1b7047ed
  21. 06 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • V
      genirq: Remove the deprecated 'IRQF_DISABLED' request_irq() flag entirely · d8bf368d
      由 Valentin Rothberg 提交于 
      The IRQF_DISABLED flag is a NOOP and has been scheduled for removal
since Linux v2.6.36 by commit 6932bf37 ("genirq: Remove
IRQF_DISABLED from core code").

According to commit e58aa3d2 ("genirq: Run irq handlers with
interrupts disabled"), running IRQ handlers with interrupts
enabled can cause stack overflows when the interrupt line of the
issuing device is still active.

This patch ends the grace period for IRQF_DISABLED (i.e.,
SA_INTERRUPT in older versions of Linux) and removes the
definition and all remaining usages of this flag.

There's still a few non-functional references left in the kernel
source:

  - The bigger hunk in Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt is removed entirely
    as IRQF_DISABLED is gone now; the usage in older kernel versions
    (including the old SA_INTERRUPT flag) should be discouraged.  The
    trouble of using IRQF_SHARED is a general problem and not specific to
    any driver.

  - I left the reference in Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt untouched since
    it has already been removed in linux-next.

  - All remaining references are changelogs that I suggest to keep.
Signed-off-by: NValentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>
Cc: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Cc: Eyal Perry <eyalpe@mellanox.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Hongliang Tao <taohl@lemote.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Cc: iss_storagedev@hp.com
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425565425-12604-1-git-send-email-valentinrothberg@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d8bf368d
  23. 05 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines · 17f48034
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when requesting the IRQ or the
WARN_ON_ONCE() in irq_pm_install_action() will trigger.  That is
done to warn about situations in which unprepared interrupt handlers
may be run unnecessarily for suspended devices and may attempt to
access those devices by mistake.  However, it may cause drivers
that have no technical reasons for using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set
that flag just because they happen to share the interrupt line
with something like a timer.

Moreover, the generic handling of wakeup interrupts introduced by
commit 9ce7a258 (genirq: Simplify wakeup mechanism) only works
for IRQs without any NO_SUSPEND users, so the drivers of wakeup
devices needing to use shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines for
signaling system wakeup generally have to detect wakeup in their
interrupt handlers.  Thus if they happen to share an interrupt line
with a NO_SUSPEND user, they also need to request that their
interrupt handlers be run after suspend_device_irqs().

In both cases the reason for using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is not because
the driver in question has a genuine need to run its interrupt
handler after suspend_device_irqs(), but because it happens to
share the line with some other NO_SUSPEND user.  Otherwise, the
driver would do without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND just fine.

To make it possible to specify that condition explicitly, introduce
a new IRQ action handler flag for shared IRQs, IRQF_COND_SUSPEND,
that, when set, will indicate to the IRQ core that the interrupt
user is generally fine with suspending the IRQ, but it also can
tolerate handler invocations after suspend_device_irqs() and, in
particular, it is capable of detecting system wakeup and triggering
it as appropriate from its interrupt handler.

That will allow us to work around a problem with a shared timer
interrupt line on at91 platforms.

Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142252777602084&w=2
Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011&r=1&w=2
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/15/552Reported-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      17f48034
  25. 26 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      genirq / PM: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics · 737eb030
      由 Mark Rutland 提交于 
      The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is intended to be used for interrupts required
to be enabled during the suspend-resume cycle. This mostly consists of
IPIs and timer interrupts, potentially including chained irqchip
interrupts if these are necessary to handle timers or IPIs. If an
interrupt does not fall into one of the aforementioned categories,
requesting it with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is likely incorrect.

Using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND does not guarantee that the interrupt can wake the
system from a suspended state. For an interrupt to be able to trigger a
wakeup, it may be necessary to program various components of the system.
In these cases it is necessary to use {enable,disabled}_irq_wake.

Unfortunately, several drivers assume that IRQF_NO_SUSPEND ensures that
an IRQ can wake up the system, and the documentation can be read
ambiguously w.r.t. this property.

This patch updates the documentation regarding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to make
this caveat explicit, hopefully making future misuse rarer. Cleanup of
existing misuse will occur as part of later patch series.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      737eb030
  27. 18 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      genirq: Provide disable_hardirq() · 02cea395
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      For things like netpoll there is a need to disable an interrupt from
atomic context. Currently netpoll uses disable_irq() which will
sleep-wait on threaded handlers and thus forced_irqthreads breaks
things.

Provide disable_hardirq(), which uses synchronize_hardirq() to only wait
for active hardirq handlers; also change synchronize_hardirq() to
return the status of threaded handlers.

This will allow one to try-disable an interrupt from atomic context, or
in case of request_threaded_irq() to only wait for the hardirq part.
Suggested-by: NSabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eyal Perry <eyalpe@mellanox.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150205130623.GH5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
[ Fixed typos and such. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      02cea395
  29. 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  31. 01 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Simplify wakeup mechanism · 9ce7a258
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Currently we suspend wakeup interrupts by lazy disabling them and
check later whether the interrupt has fired, but that's not sufficient
for suspend to idle as there is no way to check that once we
transitioned into the CPU idle state.

So we change the mechanism in the following way:

1) Leave the wakeup interrupts enabled across suspend

2) Add a check to irq_may_run() which is called at the beginning of
   each flow handler whether the interrupt is an armed wakeup source.

   This check is basically free as it just extends the existing check
   for IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS. So no new conditional in the hot path.

   If the IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED flag is set, then the interrupt is
   disabled, marked as pending/suspended and the pm core is notified
   about the wakeup event.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ rjw: syscore.c and put irq_pm_check_wakeup() into pm.c ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      9ce7a258
  33. 21 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  35. 07 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      genirq: Provide irq_force_affinity fallback for non-SMP · 4c88d7f9
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      Patch 01f8fa4f "genirq: Allow forcing cpu affinity of interrupts" added
an irq_force_affinity() function, and 30ccf03b "clocksource: Exynos_mct:
Use irq_force_affinity() in cpu bringup" subsequently uses it. However, the
driver can be used with CONFIG_SMP disabled, but the function declaration
is only available for CONFIG_SMP, leading to this build error:

drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c:431:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_force_affinity' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   irq_force_affinity(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ + cpu], cpumask_of(cpu));

This patch introduces a dummy helper function for the non-SMP case
that always returns success, to get rid of the build error.
Since the patches causing the problem are marked for stable backports,
this one should be as well.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5619084.0zmrrIUZLV@wuerfelSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      4c88d7f9
  37. 28 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  39. 18 4月, 2014 2 次提交
  41. 20 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Provide irq_wake_thread() · a92444c6
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      In course of the sdhci/sdio discussion with Russell about killing the
sdio kthread hackery we discovered the need to be able to wake an
interrupt thread from software.

The rationale for this is, that sdio hardware can lack proper
interrupt support for certain features. So the driver needs to poll
the status registers, but at the same time it needs to be woken up by
an hardware interrupt.

To be able to get rid of the home brewn kthread construct of sdio we
need a way to wake an irq thread independent of an actual hardware
interrupt.

Provide an irq_wake_thread() function which wakes up the thread which
is associated to a given dev_id. This allows sdio to invoke the irq
thread from the hardware irq handler via the IRQ_WAKE_THREAD return
value and provides a possibility to wake it via a timer for the
polling scenarios. That allows to simplify the sdio logic
significantly.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140215003823.772565780@linutronix.de
      a92444c6
  43. 09 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  45. 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  47. 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 01 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      irq: Consolidate do_softirq() arch overriden implementations · 7d65f4a6
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      All arch overriden implementations of do_softirq() share the following
common code: disable irqs (to avoid races with the pending check),
check if there are softirqs pending, then execute __do_softirq() on
a specific stack.

Consolidate the common parts such that archs only worry about the
stack switch.
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      7d65f4a6
  51. 13 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  53. 12 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  55. 23 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      time: RCU permitted to stop idle entry via softirq · 803b0eba
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The can_stop_idle_tick() function complains if a softirq vector is
raised too late in the idle-entry process, presumably in order to
prevent dangling softirq invocations from being delayed across the
full idle period, which might be indefinitely long -- and if softirq
was asserted any later than the call to this function, such a delay
might well happen.

However, RCU needs to be able to use softirq to stop idle entry in
order to be able to drain RCU callbacks from the current CPU, which in
turn enables faster entry into dyntick-idle mode, which in turn reduces
power consumption.  Because RCU takes this action at a well-defined
point in the idle-entry path, it is safe for RCU to take this approach.

This commit therefore silences the error message that is sometimes
produced when the going-idle CPU suddenly finds that it has an RCU_SOFTIRQ
to process.  The error message will continue to be issued for other
softirq vectors.
Reported-by: NSedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NSedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
      803b0eba
  57. 19 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  59. 24 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      genirq: reimplement exit_irq_thread() hook via task_work_add() · 4d1d61a6
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      exit_irq_thread() and task->irq_thread are needed to handle the unexpected
(and unlikely) exit of irq-thread.

We can use task_work instead and make this all private to
kernel/irq/manage.c, cleanup plus micro-optimization.

1. rename exit_irq_thread() to irq_thread_dtor(), make it
   static, and move it up before irq_thread().

2. change irq_thread() to do task_work_add(irq_thread_dtor)
   at the start and task_work_cancel() before return.

   tracehook_notify_resume() can never play with kthreads,
   only do_exit()->exit_task_work() can call the callback
   and this is what we want.

3. remove task_struct->irq_thread and the special hook
   in do_exit().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      4d1d61a6
  61. 19 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  63. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  65. 03 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  67. 17 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  69. 03 10月, 2011 1 次提交