- 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Cleanup... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Haynes 提交于
As flexfiles has FF_FLAGS_NO_READ_IO, there is a need to generically support enforcing that a IOMODE_RW segment will not allow READ I/O. Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
There are several problems in the way a stateid is selected for a LAYOUTGET operation: We pick a stateid to use in the RPC prepare op, but that makes it difficult to serialize LAYOUTGETs that use the open stateid. That serialization is done in pnfs_update_layout, which occurs well before the rpc_prepare operation. Between those two events, the i_lock is dropped and reacquired. pnfs_update_layout can find that the list has lsegs in it and not do any serialization, but then later pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid ends up choosing the open stateid. This patch changes the client to select the stateid to use in the LAYOUTGET earlier, when we're searching for a usable layout segment. This way we can do it all while holding the i_lock the first time, and ensure that we serialize any LAYOUTGET call that uses a non-layout stateid. This also means a rework of how LAYOUTGET replies are handled, as we must now get the latest stateid if we want to retransmit in response to a retryable error. Most of those errors boil down to the fact that the layout state has changed in some fashion. Thus, what we really want to do is to re-search for a layout when it fails with a retryable error, so that we can avoid reissuing the RPC at all if possible. While the LAYOUTGET RPC is async, the initiating thread always waits for it to complete, so it's effectively synchronous anyway. Currently, when we need to retry a LAYOUTGET because of an error, we drive that retry via the rpc state machine. This means that once the call has been submitted, it runs until it completes. So, we must move the error handling for this RPC out of the rpc_call_done operation and into the caller. In order to handle errors like NFS4ERR_DELAY properly, we must also pass a pointer to the sliding timeout, which is now moved to the stack in pnfs_update_layout. The complicating errors are -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT and -NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER, as those involve a timeout after which we give up and return NULL back to the caller. So, there is some special handling for those errors to ensure that the layers driving the retries can handle that appropriately. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
LAYOUTRETURN is "special" in that servers and clients are expected to work with old stateids. When the client sends a LAYOUTRETURN with an old stateid in it then the server is expected to only tear down layout segments that were present when that seqid was current. Ensure that the client handles its accounting accordingly. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
When we want to selectively do a LAYOUTRETURN, we need to specify a stateid that represents most recent layout acquisition that is to be returned. When we mark a layout stateid to be returned, we update the return sequence number in the layout header with that value, if it's newer than the existing one. Then, when we go to do a LAYOUTRETURN on layout header put, we overwrite the seqid in the stateid with the saved one, and then zero it out. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In later patches, we're going to teach the client to be more selective about how it returns layouts. This means keeping a record of what the stateid's seqid was at the time that the server handed out a layout segment. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Like other resend paths, mark the (old) hdr as NFS_IOHDR_REDO. This ensures the hdr completion function will not count the (old) hdr as good bytes. Also, vector the error back through the hdr->task.tk_status like other retry calls. This fixes a bug with the FlexFiles layout where libaio was reporting more bytes read than requested. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_BEFORE_CLOSE is being used to signal that a layoutreturn is needed, either due to a layout recall or to a layout error. Rename it to NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED in order to clarify its purpose. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a bug whereby if all the layout segments could be immediately freed, the call to pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() would never result in a layoutreturn. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout segment is invalid, then we should not be adding more write requests to the commit list. Instead, those writes should be replayed after requesting a new layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the client needs to delay the layout callback, then speed up the recall process by marking the remaining layout segments to be actively returned by the client. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This ensures that we don't reuse the stateid if a layout return or implied layout return means that we've returned all layout segments Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a bug in which flexfiles clients are falling back to I/O through the MDS even when the FF_FLAGS_NO_IO_THRU_MDS flag is set. The flexfiles client will always report errors through the LAYOUTRETURN and/or LAYOUTERROR mechanisms, so it should normally be safe for it to retry the LAYOUTGET until it fails or succeeds. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
If we send a layoutreturn asynchronously before close, the close might reach server first and layoutreturn would fail with BADSTATEID because there is nothing keeping the layout stateid alive. Also do not pretend sending layoutreturn if we are not. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In order to ensure atomicity of updates, we merge the old layout segments into the new ones, and then invalidate the old ones. Also ensure that we order the list of layout segments so that RO segments are preferred over RW. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This is needed in order to allow merging of contiguous layout segments, and also to correct the ordering of layouts for those device drivers that don't necessarily want to place the read-write layouts first. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Eliminate a couple of holes in the structure, and move the 2 atomics into the same cacheline. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Allow advanced users to set the layoutstats timer in order to lengthen or shorten the period between layoutstat transmissions to the server. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
If we return delegation before closing, we fail to do roc check during close because NFS_LAYOUT_ROC is cleared by delegreturn and it causes layouts to be still hanging around after delegreturn + close, which is a voilation against protocol. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 19 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The helper pnfs_roc() has already verified that we have no delegations, and no further open files, hence no outstanding I/O and it has marked all the return-on-close lsegs as being invalid. Furthermore, it sets the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN bit, thus serialising the close/delegreturn with all future layoutget calls on this inode. The checks in pnfs_roc_drain() for valid layout segments are therefore redundant: those cannot exist until another layoutget completes. The other check for whether or not NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN is set, actually causes a hang, since we already know that we hold that flag. To fix, we therefore strip out all the functionality in pnfs_roc_drain() except the retrieval of the barrier state, and then rename the function accordingly. Reported-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Fixes: 5c4a79fb ("Don't prevent layoutgets when doing return-on-close") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 13 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Prevent a potential deadlock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
kbuild test robot reported: fs/built-in.o: In function `pnfs_report_layoutstat': >> (.text+0x151a1c): undefined reference to `nfs42_proc_layoutstats_generic' Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 24 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 28 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The LAYOUTCOMMIT operation means different things to different layout types. For blocks and objects, it is both a data and metadata consistency operation. For files and flexfiles, it is only a metadata consistency operation. This patch separates out the 2 cases, allowing the files/flexfiles layout drivers to optimise away the data consistency calls to layoutcommit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
pnfs_set_layoutcommit() and pnfs_commit_set_layoutcommit() are 100% identical except for the function arguments. Refactor to eliminate the difference. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The spec says that once all layouts that reference a given deviceid have been returned, then we are only allowed to continue to cache the deviceid if the metadata server supports notifications. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use of synchronize_rcu() when unmounting and potentially freeing a lot of deviceids is problematic. There really is no reason why we can't just use kfree_rcu() here. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Haynes 提交于
The File Layout's filelayout_mark_request_commit() is almost the Flex File Layout's ff_layout_mark_request_commit(). And that can be reduced by calling into nfs_request_add_commit_list(). Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2015 9 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Haynes 提交于
The flexfile layout is a new layout that extends the file layout. It is currently being drafted as a specification at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types/Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTao Peng <bergwolf@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
Also take care to stop waiting if someone clears retry bit. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
Use it to indicate that LD wants to retry layoutget. LD can set it whenever it wants the common pnfs code to return and retry pnfs path through a new layout. The bit gets cleared when client does a new layoutget, when client closes the file (ROC case), or when kernel needs to evict the inode (non-ROC case). Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
When it is set, generic pnfs would try to send layoutreturn right before last close/delegation_return regard less NFS_LAYOUT_ROC is set or not. LD can then make sure layoutreturn is always sent rather than being omitted. The difference against NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN is that NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_BEFORE_CLOSE does not block usage of the layout so LD can set it and expect generic layer to try pnfs path at the same time. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
If current IO cannot be completed due to some transient errors, LD may want to ask generic layer to resend the request through pnfs again. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Pass ds_commit_idx through the nfs commit path. It's used to select the commit bucket when using pnfs and is ignored when not using pnfs. Several functions had to be changed: nfs_retry_commit, nfs_mark_request_commit, pnfs_mark_request_commit and the pnfs layout driver .mark_request_commit functions. Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
This is needed to support mirrored writes - the first write can't just trash the lseg, we need to keep it around until all mirrors have written. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
And if we are to return the same type of layouts, don't bother sending more layoutgets. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <Thomas.Haynes@primarydata.com>
-