Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 05 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 08 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • B
      x86/mce: Fix mce_rdmsrl() warning message · 38c54ccb
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      The MSR address we're dumping in there should be in hex, otherwise we
get funsies like:

  [    0.016000] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:428 mce_rdmsrl+0xd9/0xe0
  [    0.016000] mce: Unable to read msr -1073733631!
				       ^^^^^^^^^^^
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467968983-4874-5-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
[ Fixed capitalization of 'MSR'. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      38c54ccb
  7. 07 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 12 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 03 5月, 2016 6 次提交
  13. 13 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 18 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 01 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 19 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process · d90167a9
      由 Ashok Raj 提交于 
      Intel's MCA implementation broadcasts MCEs to all CPUs on the
node. This poses a problem for offlined CPUs which cannot
participate in the rendezvous process:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: Timeout: Not all CPUs entered broadcast exception handler
  Kernel Offset: disabled
  Rebooting in 100 seconds..

More specifically, Linux does a soft offline of a CPU when
writing a 0 to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online, which
doesn't prevent the #MC exception from being broadcasted to that
CPU.

Ensure that offline CPUs don't participate in the MCE rendezvous
and clear the RIP valid status bit so that a second MCE won't
cause a shutdown.

Without the patch, mce_start() will increment mce_callin and
wait for all CPUs. Offlined CPUs should avoid participating in
the rendezvous process altogether.
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
[ Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449742346-21470-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      d90167a9
  21. 24 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  23. 01 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  25. 28 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/mce: Don't clear shared banks on Intel when offlining CPUs · 6e06780a
      由 Ashok Raj 提交于 
      It is not safe to clear global MCi_CTL banks during CPU offline
or suspend/resume operations. These MSRs are either
thread-scoped (meaning private to a thread), or core-scoped
(private to threads in that core only), or with a socket scope:
visible and controllable from all threads in the socket.

When we offline a single CPU, clearing those MCi_CTL bits will
stop signaling for all the shared, i.e., socket-wide resources,
such as LLC, iMC, etc.

In addition, it might be possible to compromise the integrity of
an Intel Secure Guard eXtentions (SGX) system if the attacker
has control of the host system and is able to inject errors
which would be otherwise ignored when MCi_CTL bits are cleared.

Hence on SGX enabled systems, if MCi_CTL is cleared, SGX gets
disabled.
Tested-by: NSerge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
[ Cleanup text. ]
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441391390-16985-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6e06780a
  27. 13 8月, 2015 8 次提交
  29. 23 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 07 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/entry: Remove exception_enter() from most trap handlers · 8c84014f
      由 Andy Lutomirski 提交于 
      On 64-bit kernels, we don't need it any more: we handle context
tracking directly on entry from user mode and exit to user mode.

On 32-bit kernels, we don't support context tracking at all, so
these callbacks had no effect.

Note: this doesn't change do_page_fault().  Before we do that,
we need to make sure that there is no code that can page fault
from kernel mode with CONTEXT_USER.  The 32-bit fast system call
stack argument code is the only offender I'm aware of right now.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ae22f4dfebd799c916574089964592be218151f9.1435952415.git.luto@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      8c84014f
  33. 06 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  35. 07 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  37. 28 5月, 2015 2 次提交