- 24 5月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
Merging the mmu and non-mmu directories we ended up with duplicate implementations of memcpy(). One is a little more optimized for the >= 68020 case, but that can easily be inserted into a single implementation of memcpy(). Clean up the exporting of this symbol too, otherwise we end up exporting it twice on a no-mmu build. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
Merging the mmu and non-mmu directories we ended up with duplicate implementations of memset(). One is a little more optimized for the >= 68020 case, but that can easily be inserted into a single implementation of memset(). Clean up the exporting of this symbol too, otherwise we end up exporting it twice on a no-mmu build. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
Merging the mmu and non-mmu directories we ended up with duplicate (and identical) implementations of memmove(). Remove one of them. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
We can easily support the slight differences in libs needed by the mmu and non-mmu builds in a single Makefile, so merge them back into a single file again. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
The implementation of gcc's muldi3 support function differs only in the use of the machine's 64 bit sized mul or not. (It isn't based on using an MMU or not). Merge the current mmu and non-mmu versions of arc/m68k/lib/muldi3 and use the appropriate pre-processor conditionals to get the right version for all m68k processor types. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
-
- 25 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
There is a lot of common code that could be shared between the m68k and m68knommu arch branches. It makes sense to merge the two branches into a single directory structure so that we can more easily share that common code. This is a brute force merge, based on a script from Stephen King <sfking@fdwdc.com>, which was originally written by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>. > The script was inspired by the script Sam Ravnborg used to merge the > includes from m68knommu. For those files common to both arches but > differing in content, the m68k version of the file is renamed to > <file>_mm.<ext> and the m68knommu version of the file is moved into the > corresponding m68k directory and renamed <file>_no.<ext> and a small > wrapper file <file>.<ext> is used to select between the two version. Files > that are common to both but don't differ are removed from the m68knommu > tree and files and directories that are unique to the m68knommu tree are > moved to the m68k tree. Finally, the arch/m68knommu tree is removed. > > To select between the the versions of the files, the wrapper uses > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > #include <file>_mm.<ext> > #else > #include <file>_no.<ext> > #endif On top of this file merge I have done a simplistic merge of m68k and m68knommu Kconfig, which primarily attempts to keep existing options and menus in place. Other than a handful of options being moved it produces identical .config outputs on m68k and m68knommu targets I tested it on. With this in place there is now quite a bit of scope for merge cleanups in future patches. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
-
- 16 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
The m68k arch implements its own memcmp() function. It is not optimized in any way (it is the most strait forward coding of memcmp you can get). Remove it and use the kernels standard memcmp() implementation. This also goes part of the way to fixing a regression caused by commit ea61bc46 ("m68k/m68knommu: merge MMU and non-MMU string.h"), which breaks non-coldfire non-mmu builds (which is the 68x328 and 68360 families). They currently have no memcmp() function defined, since there is none in the m68knommu/lib functions. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
-
- 21 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mathieu Desnoyers 提交于
> This is a no-no for those archs that still use -traditional. > > I dunno if this is a problem for you at the moment and the > > right fix is anyway to nuke -traditional. > > > > Sam Signed-off-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Whether we sidestep it in init/main.c or not, such situations will arise again; compiler does generate calls of strcat() on optimizations, so we really ought to have an out-of-line version... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the unlikely() was unnecessary. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
m68k: implement __clear_user(), which is needed by fs/signalfd.c Since we always let the MMU do all checking, clear_user() and __clear_user() are identical. The old clear_user() is renamed to __clear_user() for consistency. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
net/rxrpc/af-rxrpc.ko needs csum_partial_copy_from_user Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* sanitize prototypes, annotate Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 10月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Zippel 提交于
Jump to the correct exit label after exception Signed-off-by: NRoman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Roman Zippel 提交于
- cleanup asm of string functions - deinline strncat()/strncmp() - provide non-inlined strcpy() Signed-off-by: NRoman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Zippel 提交于
This uninlines a few large functions in uaccess.h and cleans up the rest. It includes a (hopefully temporary) workaround for the broken typeof of gcc-4.1. Signed-off-by: NRoman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 05 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Zippel 提交于
Use the builtin functions for memset/memclr/memcpy, special optimizations for page operations have dedicated functions now. Uninline memmove/memchr and move all functions into a single file and clean it up a little. Signed-off-by: NRoman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-