We need a barrir before calling waitqueue_active otherwise we will miss
wakeups.  So in places that do atomic_dec(); then atomic_read() use
atomic_dec_return() which imply a memory barrier (see memory-barriers.txt)
and then add an explicit memory barrier everywhere else that need them.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Fix a real bug caught by coccinelle.

fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1013:1-11: second lock on line 1013
Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>

The otime field is not zeroed, so users will see random otime in an old
filesystem with a new kernel which has otime support in the future.

The reserved bytes are also not zeroed, and we'll have compatibility
issue if we make use of those bytes.
Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>

Those crazy gentoo guys have been complaining about ENOSPC errors on their
portage volumes.  This is because doing things like untar tends to create
lots of new files which will soak up all the reservation space in the
delayed inodes.  Usually this gets papered over by the fact that we will try
and commit the transaction, however if this happens in the wrong spot or we
choose not to commit the transaction you will be screwed.  So add the
ability to expclitly flush delayed inodes to free up space.  Please test
this out guys to make sure it works since as usual I cannot reproduce.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

the items of the delayed inodes were forgotten to be freed, this patch
fixes it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Miao pointed this out while I was working on an orphan problem that messing
with a bitfield where different ranges are protected by different locks
doesn't work out right.  Turns out we've been doing this forever where we
have different parts of the bit field protected by either no lock at all or
different locks which could cause all sorts of weird problems including the
issue I was hitting.  So instead make a runtime_flags thing that we use the
normal bit operations on that are all atomic so we can keep having our
no/different locking for the different flags and then make force_compress
it's own thing so it can be treated normally.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody
would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which
serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's
sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the
board, and not just in file write.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

 btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in-
 progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic
 errors and ENOMEM more gracefully.

 This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with
 the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out."
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

This in addition to a script in my btrfs-tracing tree will help track down space
leaks when we're getting space left over in block groups on umount.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

btrfs_update_inode is sometimes called with a null reservation.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

Josef sent along an incremental to the inode reservation
code to make sure we try and fall back to directly updating
the inode item if things go horribly wrong.

This reworks that patch slightly, adding a fallback function
that will always try to update the inode item directly without
going through the delayed_inode code.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

People have been reporting ENOSPC crashes in finish_ordered_io.  This is because
we try to steal from the delalloc block rsv to satisfy a reservation to update
the inode.  The problem with this is we don't explicitly save space for updating
the inode when doing delalloc.  This is kind of a problem and we've gotten away
with this because way back when we just stole from the delalloc reserve without
any questions, and this worked out fine because generally speaking the leaf had
been modified either by the mtime update when we did the original write or
because we just updated the leaf when we inserted the file extent item, only on
rare occasions had the leaf not actually been modified, and that was still ok
because we'd just use a block or two out of the over-reservation that is
delalloc.

Then came the delayed inode stuff.  This is amazing, except it wants a full
reservation for updating the inode since it may do it at some point down the
road after we've written the blocks and we have to recow everything again.  This
worked out because the delayed inode stuff just stole from the global reserve,
that is until recently when I changed that because it caused other problems.

So here we are, we're doing everything right and being screwed for it.  So take
an extra reservation for the inode at delalloc reservation time and carry it
through the life of the delalloc reservation.  If we need it we can steal it in
the delayed inode stuff.  If we have already stolen it try and do a normal
metadata reservation.  If that fails try to steal from the delalloc reservation.
If _that_ fails we'll get a WARN_ON() so I can start thinking of a better way to
solve this and in the meantime we'll steal from the global reserve.

With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in a loop for a couple of hours and didn't see
any problems.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

We all keep getting those stupid warnings from use_block_rsv when running
stress.sh, and it's because the delayed insertion stuff is being stupid.  It's
not the delayed insertion stuffs fault, it's all just stupid.  When marking an
inode dirty for oh say updating the time on it, we just do a
btrfs_join_transaction, which doesn't reserve any space.  This is stupid because
we're going to have to have space reserve to make this change, but we do it
because it's fast because chances are we're going to call it over and over again
and it doesn't matter.  Well thanks to the delayed insertion stuff this is
mostly the case, so we do actually need to make this reservation.  So if
trans->bytes_reserved is 0 then try to do a normal reservation.  If not return
ENOSPC which will make the btrfs_dirty_inode start a proper transaction which
will let it do the whole ENOSPC dance and reserve enough space for the delayed
insertion to steal the reservation from the transaction.

The other stupid thing we do is not reserve space for the inode when writing to
the thing.  Usually this is ok since we have to update the time so we'd have
already done all this work before we get to the endio stuff, so it doesn't
matter.  But this is stupid because we could write the data after the
transaction commits where we changed the mtime of the inode so we have to cow
all the way down to the inode anyway.  This used to be masked by the delalloc
reservation stuff, but because we delay the update it doesn't get masked in this
case.  So again the delayed insertion stuff bites us in the ass.  So if our
trans->block_rsv is delalloc, just steal the reservation from the delalloc
reserve.  Hopefully this won't bite us in the ass, but I've said that before.

With this patch stress.sh no longer spits out those stupid warnings (famous last
words).  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

I've been hitting warnings in use_block_rsv when running the delayed insertion
stuff.  It's because we will readjust global block rsv based on what is in use,
which means we could end up discarding reservations that are for the delayed
insertion stuff.  So instead create a seperate block rsv for the delayed
insertion stuff.  This will also make it easier to debug problems with the
delayed insertion reservations since we will know that only the delayed
insertion code touches this block_rsv.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

Replace remaining direct i_nlink updates with a new set_nlink()
updater function.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Tested-by: NToshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant
lock contention, especially in the root node.   This
commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer
lock.

The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it
extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a
read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking.  Atomics
count the number of blocking readers or writers at any
given time.

It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code
and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs
to decide when it should continue spinning.

In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster.  In write
heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention
on the root node lock.

We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often
during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some
delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again,
we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to
initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may
cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the
following oops:

[ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the
insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17)
[ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301!
[SNIP]
[ 5447.790721] Call Trace:
[ 5447.793191]  [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs]
[ 5447.800156]  [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs]
[ 5447.806517]  [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs]
[ 5447.812876]  [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs]
[ 5447.818961]  [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92
[ 5447.824090]  [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b
[ 5447.829133]  [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef
[ 5447.834438]  [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44
[ 5447.841216]  [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67
[ 5447.847846]  [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87
[ 5447.853156]  [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d
[ 5447.859072]  [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80
[ 5447.864636]  [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173
[ 5447.870112]  [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26
[ 5447.875682]  [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10
[ 5447.880882]  [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae
[ 5447.886153]  [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22
[ 5447.891114]  [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Fix it by reusing the old delayed node.
Reported-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

Snapshot creation has two phases.  One is the initial snapshot setup,
and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify
the root we are snapshotting.

The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a
delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot,
and delayed directory item insertion.

This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we
record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from
trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to
global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops
happened:

[ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681
btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]()
[ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
[ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c
ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables
arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211
snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill
pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco
i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd
mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi
ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper
drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G        W   2.6.39+ #1
[ 9792.654920] Call Trace:
[ 9792.654922]  [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
[ 9792.654925]  [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[ 9792.654933]  [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]
[ 9792.654945]  [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs]
[ 9792.654953]  [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs]
[ 9792.654963]  [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs]
[ 9792.654970]  [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs]
[ 9792.654978]  [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs]
[ 9792.654986]  [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs]
[ 9792.654997]  [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs]
[ 9792.655022]  [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs]
[ 9792.655025]  [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22
[ 9792.655027]  [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50
[ 9792.655039]  [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs]
[ 9792.655051]  [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs]
[ 9792.655062]  [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs]
[ 9792.655064]  [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a
[ 9792.655075]  [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs]
[ 9792.655077]  [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111
[ 9792.655079]  [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132
[ 9792.655081]  [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155
[ 9792.655083]  [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23
[ 9792.655085]  [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171
[ 9792.655087]  [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36
[ 9792.655090]  [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b
[ 9792.655092]  [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]---

This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the
correct one.
Reported-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powercp ppc64_defconfig)
produced this warning:

fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_delayed_update_inode':
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1598:6: warning: 'ret' may be used
uninitialized in this function

Introduced by commit 16cdcec7 ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
operation").

This fixes a bug in btrfs_update_inode(): if the returned value from
btrfs_delayed_update_inode is a nonzero garbage, inode stat data are not
updated and several call paths may hit a BUG_ON or fail with strange
code.
Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

The nitems counter needs to start at zero
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

Changelog V5 -> V6:
- Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the
  root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go.

Changelog V4 -> V5:
- Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by
  Chris Mason.
- Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch.
- Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by
  Itaru Kitayama.

Changelog V3 -> V4:
- Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache
  inode in time.

Changelog V2 -> V3:
- Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items
  balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh.
- Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment.
- Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason

Changelog V1 -> V2:
- break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes,
  which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the
  delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item.
- introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes.

Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions,
such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on.

If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the
performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name
index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update.

Implementation:
- introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to
  manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory.
  One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the
  other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with
  by the work thread.
- Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name
  index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to
  manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree.
- introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used
  to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion
  and deletion and the delayed inode update.
  When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some
  delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then
  go back.
  When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all
  the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work
  queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some
  threshold value.
- When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the
  information into the delayed inserting rb-tree.
  And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items
  balance. (The balance policy is above.)
- When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it
  in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not,
  add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree.
  Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the
  delayed items and do delayed items balance.
  (The same to inserting manipulation)
- When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the
  inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after
  dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion.
- We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the
  delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more
  inode updates.
- If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node.
- the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode.
- Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items
  and the delayed inode update.

I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the
performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%.

Before applying this patch:
Create files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 1.096108
        Average time: 0.000022
Delete files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 1.510403
        Average time: 0.000030

After applying this patch:
Create files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 0.932899
        Average time: 0.000019
Delete files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 1.215732
        Average time: 0.000024

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3

Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help!
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: NItaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>