- 03 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In the future, we want to move a request between engines. To achieve this, we first realise that we have two timelines in effect here. The first runs through the GTT is required for ordering vma access, which is tracked currently by engine. The second is implied by sequential execution of commands inside the ringbuffer. This timeline is one that maps to userspace's expectations when submitting requests (i.e. given the same context, batch A is executed before batch B). As the rings's timelines map to userspace and the GTT timeline an implementation detail, move the timeline from the GTT into the ring itself (per-context in logical-ring-contexts/execlists, or a global per-engine timeline for the shared ringbuffers in legacy submission. The two timelines are still assumed to be equivalent at the moment (no migrating requests between engines yet) and so we can simply move from one to the other without adding extra ordering. v2: Reinforce that one isn't allowed to mix the engine execution timeline with the client timeline from userspace (on the ring). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 30 4月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We don't need to track every ring for its lifetime as they are managed by the contexts/engines. What we do want to track are the live rings so that we can sporadically clean up requests if userspace falls behind. We can simply restrict the gt->rings list to being only gt->live_rings. v2: s/live/active/ for consistency with gt.active_requests Suggested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180430131503.5375-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In the next patch, rings are the central timeline as requests may jump between engines. Therefore in the future as we retire in order along the engine timeline, we may retire out-of-order within a ring (as the ring now occurs along multiple engines), leading to much hilarity in miscomputing the position of ring->head. As an added bonus, retiring along the ring reduces the penalty of having one execlists client do cleanup for another (old legacy submission shares a ring between all clients). The downside is that slow and irregular (off the critical path) process of cleaning up stale requests after userspace becomes a modicum less efficient. In the long run, it will become apparent that the ordered ring->request_list matches the ring->timeline, a fun challenge for the future will be unifying the two lists to avoid duplication! v2: We need both engine-order and ring-order processing to maintain our knowledge of where individual rings have completed upto as well as knowing what was last executing on any engine. And finally by decoupling retiring the contexts on the engine and the timelines along the rings, we do have to keep a reference to the context on each request (previously it was guaranteed by the context being pinned). v3: Not just a reference to the context, but we need to keep it pinned as we manipulate the rings; i.e. we need a pin for both the manipulation of the engine state during its retirements, and a separate pin for the manipulation of the ring state. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180430131503.5375-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Make life easier in upcoming patches by moving the context_pin and context_unpin vfuncs into inline helpers. v2: Fixup mock_engine to mark the context as pinned on use. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180430131503.5375-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 26 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The majority of the engine state dumping is too voluminous to be useful outside of a controlled setup, though a few do accompany severe errors. Keep the debug dumps next to the errors, but hide the others behind a CI compile flag. This becomes more useful when adding more dumps to latency sensitive paths. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180426103219.22181-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 19 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience. v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and ye olde gcc. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
There are different kind of workarounds (those that modify registers that live in the context image, those that modify global registers, those that whitelist registers, etc...) and they have different requirements in terms of where they are applied and how. Also, by splitting them apart, it should be easier to decide where a new workaround should go. v2: - Add multiple MISSING_CASE - Rebased v3: - Rename mmio_workarounds to gt_workarounds (Chris, Mika) - Create empty placeholders for BDW and CHV GT WAs - Rebased v4: Rebased v5: - Rebased - FORCE_TO_NONPRIV register exists since BDW, so make a path for it to achieve universality, even if empty (Chris) Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [ickle: appease checkpatch] Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
-
- 11 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Resetting the GPU doesn't affect the RPS/RC6 state, so we can stop forcibly reloading the registers. Ville suggested this many moons ago, I said at that time that sanitizing was no harm and meant that our bookkeeping was kept consistent with the HW. However, in a forthcoming series, we want to split rps/rc6 GT powermanagement and one of the key simplifications is the control of when we enable it. Performing a crude sanitize in the middle of i915_gem_reset() is then a huge wart. Suggested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180410133354.13425-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 07 4月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, we rely on inspecting the hangcheck state from within the i915_reset() routines to determine which engines were guilty of the hang. This is problematic for cases where we want to run i915_handle_error() and call i915_reset() independently of hangcheck. Instead of relying on the indirect parameter passing, turn it into an explicit parameter providing the set of stalled engines which then are treated as guilty until proven innocent. While we are removing the implicit stalled parameter, also make the reason into an explicit parameter to i915_reset(). We still need a back-channel for i915_handle_error() to hand over the task to the locked waiter, but let's keep that its own channel rather than incriminate another. This leaves stalled/seqno as being private to hangcheck, with no more nefarious snooping by reset, be it whole-device or per-engine. \o/ The only real issue now is that this makes it crystal clear that we don't actually do any testing of hangcheck per se in drv_selftest/live_hangcheck, merely of resets! Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406220354.18911-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
If we are resetting just one engine, we know it has stalled. So we can pass the stalled parameter directly to i915_gem_reset_engine(), which alleviates the necessity to poke at the generic engine->hangcheck.stalled magic variable, leaving that under control of hangcheck as its name implies. Other than simplifying by removing the indirect parameter along this path, this allows us to introduce new reset mechanisms that run independently of hangcheck. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406220354.18911-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We will want to park GEM before disengaging the drive^W^W^W unwedging. Since we already do the work for idling, expose the guts as a new function that we can then reuse. v2: Just skip if already parked; makes it more forgiving to use by future callers. v3: Extract mark_busy, rename it to i915_gem_unpark and place it next to i915_gem_park so that we can evaluate it for symmetry more easily. Calling GEM from inside i915_request looks to be a bit of a layering violation, for the moment I am imaging them as being notify_cb. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> #v1 Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406155144.27791-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 24 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
In upcoming patch, we want to perform more actions in early initialization of the uC. This reordering will help resolve new dependencies that will be introduced by future patch. v2: s/i915_gem_load_init/i915_gem_init_early (Chris) v3: s/i915_gem_load_cleanup/i915_gem_cleanup_early (Michal) Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180323123451.59244-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-
- 16 3月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
tasklet_kill() will spin waiting for the current tasklet to be executed. However, if tasklet_disable() has been called, then the tasklet is never executed but permanently put back onto the runlist until tasklet_enable() is called. Ergo, we cannot use tasklet_kill() inside a disable/enable pair. This is the case when we call set-wedge from inside i915_reset(), and another request was submitted to us concurrent to the reset. Fixes: 963ddd63 ("drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 68ad3612) Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that point, it will be lost. Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 47650db0) Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
If we fail to reset the GPU, we declare the machine wedged. However, the GPU may well still be running in the background with an in-flight request. So despite our efforts in cleaning up the request queue and faking the breadcrumb in the HWSP, the GPU may eventually write the in-flght seqno there breaking all of our assumptions and throwing the driver into a deep turmoil, wedging beyond wedged. To avoid this we ideally want to reset the GPU. Since that has already failed, make sure the rings have the stop bit set instead. This is part of the normal GPU reset sequence, but that is actually disabled by igt/gem_eio to force the wedged state. If we assume the worst, we must poke at the bit again before we give up. v2: Move the intel_gpu_reset() from set-wedged in the reset error path into i915_gem_set_wedged() itself. Even if the reset fails (e.g. if it is disabled by gem_eio), it still tries to make sure the engines are stopped. For i915_gem_set_wedged() callers from outside of i915_reset(), this should make sure the GPU is disabled while the driver is marked as being wedged. Testcase: igt/gem_eio Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180315151015.22741-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We still have an odd race with wedging/unwedging as shown by igt/gem_eio that defies expectations. Add some more trace_printks to try and visualize the flow over the precipice. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180315131451.4060-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 14 3月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jackie Li 提交于
GuC WOPCM registers are write-once registers. Current driver code accesses these registers without checking the accessibility to these registers which will lead to unpredictable driver behaviors if these registers were touch by other components (such as faulty BIOS code). This patch moves the GuC WOPCM registers updating code into intel_wopcm.c and adds check before and after the update to GuC WOPCM registers so that we can make sure the driver is in a known state after writing to these write-once registers. v6: - Made sure module reloading won't bug the kernel while doing locking status checking v7: - Fixed patch format issues v8: - Fixed coding style issue on register lock bit macro definition (Sagar) v9: - Avoided to use redundant !! to cast uint to bool (Chris) - Return error code instead of GEM_BUG_ON for locked with invalid register values case (Sagar) - Updated guc_wopcm_hw_init to use guc_wopcm as first parameter (Michal) - Added code to set and validate the HuC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC bit in GuC WOPCM offset register based on the presence of HuC firmware (Michal) - Use bit fields instead of macros for GuC WOPCM flags (Michal) v10: - Refined variable names, removed redundant comments (Joonas) - Introduced lockable_reg to handle the write once register write and propagate the write error to caller (Joonas) - Used lockable_reg abstraction to avoid locking bit check on generic i915_reg_t (Michal) - Added log message for error paths (Michal) - Removed hw_updated flag and only relies on real hardware status v11: - Replaced lockable_reg with simplified function (Michal) - Used new macros for locking bits of WOPCM size/offset registers instead of using BIT(0) directly (Michal) - use intel_wopcm_init_hw() called from intel_gem_init_hw() to do GuC WOPCM register setup instead of calling from intel_uc_init_hw() (Michal) v12: - Updated function kernel-doc to align with code changes (Michal) - Updated code to use wopcm pointer directly (Michal) v13: - Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar) BSpec: 10875, 10833 Signed-off-by: NJackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11) Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12) Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-5-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
-
由 Jackie Li 提交于
Hardware may have specific restrictions on GuC WOPCM offset and size. On Gen9, the value of the GuC WOPCM size register needs to be larger than the value of GuC WOPCM offset register + a Gen9 specific offset (144KB) for reserved GuC WOPCM. Fail to enforce such a restriction on GuC WOPCM size will lead to GuC firmware execution failures. On the other hand, with current static GuC WOPCM offset and size values (512KB for both offset and size), the GuC WOPCM size verification will fail on Gen9 even if it can be fixed by lowering the GuC WOPCM offset by calculating its value based on HuC firmware size (which is likely less than 200KB on Gen9), so that we can have a GuC WOPCM size value which is large enough to pass the GuC WOPCM size check. This patch updates the reserved GuC WOPCM size for RC6 context on Gen9 to 24KB to strictly align with the Gen9 GuC WOPCM layout. It also adds support to verify the GuC WOPCM size aganist the Gen9 hardware restrictions. To meet all above requirements, let's provide dynamic partitioning of the WOPCM that will be based on platform specific HuC/GuC firmware sizes. v2: - Removed intel_wopcm_init (Ville/Sagar/Joonas) - Renamed and Moved the intel_wopcm_partition into intel_guc (Sagar) - Removed unnecessary function calls (Joonas) - Init GuC WOPCM partition as soon as firmware fetching is completed v3: - Fixed indentation issues (Chris) - Removed layering violation code (Chris/Michal) - Created separat files for GuC wopcm code (Michal) - Used inline function to avoid code duplication (Michal) v4: - Preset the GuC WOPCM top during early GuC init (Chris) - Fail intel_uc_init_hw() as soon as GuC WOPCM partitioning failed v5: - Moved GuC DMA WOPCM register updating code into intel_wopcm.c - Took care of the locking status before writing to GuC DMA Write-Once registers. (Joonas) v6: - Made sure the GuC WOPCM size to be multiple of 4K (4K aligned) v8: - Updated comments and fixed naming issues (Sagar/Joonas) - Updated commit message to include more description about the hardware restriction on GuC WOPCM size (Sagar) v9: - Minor changes variable names and code comments (Sagar) - Added detailed GuC WOPCM layout drawing (Sagar/Michal) - Refined macro definitions to be reader friendly (Michal) - Removed redundent check to valid flag (Michal) - Unified first parameter for exported GuC WOPCM functions (Michal) - Refined the name and parameter list of hardware restriction checking functions (Michal) v10: - Used shorter function name for internal functions (Joonas) - Moved init-ealry function into c file (Joonas) - Consolidated and removed redundant size checks (Joonas/Michal) - Removed unnecessary unlikely() from code which is only called once during boot (Joonas) - More fixes to kernel-doc format and content (Michal) - Avoided the use of PAGE_MASK for 4K pages (Michal) - Added error log messages to error paths (Michal) v11: - Replaced intel_guc_wopcm with more generic intel_wopcm and attached intel_wopcm to drm_i915_private instead intel_guc (Michal) - dynamic calculation of GuC non-wopcm memory start (a.k.a WOPCM Top offset from GuC WOPCM base) (Michal) - Moved WOPCM marco definitions into .c source file (Michal) - Exported WOPCM layout diagram as kernel-doc (Michal) v12: - Updated naming, function kernel-doc to align with new changes (Michal) v13: - Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar) - Corrected one tense error in comment (Sagar) - Corrected typos and removed spurious comments (Joonas) Bspec: 12690 Signed-off-by: NJackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8) Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9) Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11) Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12) Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-2-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
If we timeout waiting for the GPU to idle, something went seriously wrong. We currently dump the engine state, but we can also dump the ftrace buffer showing our last operations (when available). In passing, note that since commit 559e040f ("drm/i915: Show the GPU state when declaring wedged", we now show the engine state twice, once in detecting the failed idle and then again on declaring wedged. v2: ftrace_dump() takes a parameter specifying whether to dump all cpu buffers or the local cpu's. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180309101114.1138-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Dhinakaran Pandiyan 提交于
i915_gem_obj_pin_to_display() calls frontbuffer_flush with origin set to DIRTYFB. The callers however are at a vantage point to decide if hardware frontbuffer tracking can do the flush for us. For example, legacy cursor updates, like flips, write to MMIO registers, which then triggers PSR flush by the hardware. Moving frontbuffer_flush out will enable us to skip a software initiated flush by setting origin to FLIP. Thanks to Chris for the idea. v2: Rebased due to Ville adding intel_plane_pin_fb(). Minor code reordering as fb_obj_flush doesn't need struct_mutex (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
- 13 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
Instead of dancing around uC on reset/suspend/resume scenarios, explicitly sanitize uC when we sanitize GEM to force uC reload and start from known beginning. v2: don't forget about reset path (Daniele) sanitize uc before gem initiated full reset (Daniele) v3: drop redundant disable_communication in init_hw (Daniele) Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180312130308.22952-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, we only allow ourselves to prune the fences so long as all the waits completed (i.e. all the fences we checked were signaled), and that the reservation snapshot did not change across the wait. However, if we only waited for a subset of the reservation object, i.e. just waiting for the last writer to complete as opposed to all readers as well, then we would erroneously conclude we could prune the fences as indeed although all of our waits were successful, they did not represent the totality of the reservation object. v2: We only need to check the shared fences due to construction (i.e. all of the shared fences will be later than the exclusive fence, if any). Fixes: e54ca977 ("drm/i915: Remove completed fences after a wait") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307171303.29466-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit fa73055b) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 09 3月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
tasklet_kill() will spin waiting for the current tasklet to be executed. However, if tasklet_disable() has been called, then the tasklet is never executed but permanently put back onto the runlist until tasklet_enable() is called. Ergo, we cannot use tasklet_kill() inside a disable/enable pair. This is the case when we call set-wedge from inside i915_reset(), and another request was submitted to us concurrent to the reset. Fixes: 963ddd63 ("drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that point, it will be lost. Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Before we reset the GPU after marking the device as wedged, we wait for all the remaining requests to be completed (and marked as EIO). Afterwards, we should flush the request lists so the next batch start with the driver in an idle state. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, we only allow ourselves to prune the fences so long as all the waits completed (i.e. all the fences we checked were signaled), and that the reservation snapshot did not change across the wait. However, if we only waited for a subset of the reservation object, i.e. just waiting for the last writer to complete as opposed to all readers as well, then we would erroneously conclude we could prune the fences as indeed although all of our waits were successful, they did not represent the totality of the reservation object. v2: We only need to check the shared fences due to construction (i.e. all of the shared fences will be later than the exclusive fence, if any). Fixes: e54ca977 ("drm/i915: Remove completed fences after a wait") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307171303.29466-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 06 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After staring hard at sequences like [ 28.199013] systemd-1 2..s. 26062228us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=0 [0?], tail=1 [1?] [ 28.199095] systemd-1 2..s. 26062229us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199177] systemd-1 2..s. 26062230us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.1, seqno=3, prio=-1024 [ 28.199258] systemd-1 2..s. 26062231us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 completed ctx=0 [ 28.199340] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26066853us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.1, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199421] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066863us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=1 [1?], tail=2 [2?] [ 28.199503] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066865us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199585] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067077us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[1]: ctx=3.1, seqno=2, prio=0 [ 28.199667] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067078us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199749] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=2 [2?], tail=3 [3?] [ 28.199830] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067085us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00008002:0x00000001, active=0x1 [ 28.199912] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067086us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199994] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=3 [3?], tail=4 [4?] [ 28.200096] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246088us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000014:0x00000001, active=0x5 [ 28.200178] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246089us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.0, seqno=0, prio=0 [ 28.200260] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246127us : execlists_submission_tasklet: execlists_submission_tasklet:886 GEM_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id) the conclusion is that the only place where the ports are reset to zero, is from engine->cancel_requests called during i915_gem_set_wedged(). The race is horrible as it results from calling set-wedged on active HW (the GPU reset failed) and as such we need to be careful as the HW state changes beneath us. Fortunately, it's the same scary conditions as affect normal reset, so we can reuse the same machinery to disable state tracking as we clobber it. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104945Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302113324.23189-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 963ddd63) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
We want to use higher level 'uc' functions as the main entry points to the GuC/HuC code to hide some details and keep code layered. While here, move call to disable_guc_interrupts after sending suspend action to the GuC to allow it work also with CTB as comm mechanism. v2: update commit msg (Sagar) Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302111550.21328-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After staring hard at sequences like [ 28.199013] systemd-1 2..s. 26062228us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=0 [0?], tail=1 [1?] [ 28.199095] systemd-1 2..s. 26062229us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199177] systemd-1 2..s. 26062230us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.1, seqno=3, prio=-1024 [ 28.199258] systemd-1 2..s. 26062231us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 completed ctx=0 [ 28.199340] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26066853us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.1, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199421] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066863us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=1 [1?], tail=2 [2?] [ 28.199503] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066865us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199585] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067077us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[1]: ctx=3.1, seqno=2, prio=0 [ 28.199667] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067078us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199749] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=2 [2?], tail=3 [3?] [ 28.199830] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067085us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00008002:0x00000001, active=0x1 [ 28.199912] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067086us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199994] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=3 [3?], tail=4 [4?] [ 28.200096] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246088us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000014:0x00000001, active=0x5 [ 28.200178] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246089us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.0, seqno=0, prio=0 [ 28.200260] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246127us : execlists_submission_tasklet: execlists_submission_tasklet:886 GEM_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id) the conclusion is that the only place where the ports are reset to zero, is from engine->cancel_requests called during i915_gem_set_wedged(). The race is horrible as it results from calling set-wedged on active HW (the GPU reset failed) and as such we need to be careful as the HW state changes beneath us. Fortunately, it's the same scary conditions as affect normal reset, so we can reuse the same machinery to disable state tracking as we clobber it. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104945Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302113324.23189-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 02 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Now that we can pass arbitrary commands into the base __wait_for() macro, we can reimplement the open-coded wait-for inside i915_gem_idle_work_handler() using the new macro. This means that instead of using ktime, we now use jiffies, and benefit from the exponential sleep backoff that allows a fast response if the HW settles quickly. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180301103338.5380-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 22 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency, execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.) In short, the spatch: @@ @@ - struct drm_i915_gem_request + struct i915_request A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using 'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members, 'request' is still much preferred for its clarity. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently we make the unilateral decision inside i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() where the VMA should resided (inside the fence and mappable region or above?). This is not our decision to make as it impacts on how the display engine can use the resulting scanout object, and it would rather instruct us where to place the VMA so that it can enable the features it wants. As such, make the pin flags an argument to i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() and control them from intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj() Whilst taking control of the mapping for ourselves, start tracking how we use it to avoid trying to free a fence we never claimed: <3>[ 227.151869] GEM_BUG_ON(vma->fence->pin_count <= 0) <4>[ 227.152064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 227.152068] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:391! <4>[ 227.152084] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI <0>[ 227.152092] Dumping ftrace buffer: <0>[ 227.152099] (ftrace buffer empty) <4>[ 227.152102] Modules linked in: i915 snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_codec_generic coretemp snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm lpc_ich e1000e mei_me mei prime_numbers <4>[ 227.152131] CPU: 1 PID: 1587 Comm: kworker/u16:49 Tainted: G U 4.16.0-rc1-gbab67b2f6177-kasan_7+ #1 <4>[ 227.152134] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 755 /0PU052, BIOS A08 02/19/2008 <4>[ 227.152236] Workqueue: events_unbound intel_atomic_commit_work [i915] <4>[ 227.152292] RIP: 0010:intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152295] RSP: 0018:ffff88005aad7b68 EFLAGS: 00010286 <4>[ 227.152300] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff88005c359580 RCX: 0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152304] RDX: 0000000000000026 RSI: ffffffff8707d840 RDI: ffffed000b55af63 <4>[ 227.152307] RBP: ffff880056817e58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152311] R10: ffff88005aad7b88 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800568184d0 <4>[ 227.152314] R13: ffff880065b5ab08 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 <4>[ 227.152318] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88006ac40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152322] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4>[ 227.152325] CR2: 00007f5fb25550a8 CR3: 0000000068c78000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 <4>[ 227.152328] Call Trace: <4>[ 227.152385] intel_cleanup_plane_fb+0x6b/0xd0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152395] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x166/0x280 <4>[ 227.152452] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x159d/0x3380 [i915] <4>[ 227.152463] ? process_one_work+0x66e/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152516] ? skl_update_crtcs+0x9c0/0x9c0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152523] ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390 <4>[ 227.152527] ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390 <4>[ 227.152534] process_one_work+0x71a/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152540] ? __schedule+0x815/0x1e20 <4>[ 227.152547] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2b0/0x2b0 <4>[ 227.152553] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x40 <4>[ 227.152559] worker_thread+0xdf/0xf60 <4>[ 227.152569] ? process_one_work+0x1460/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152573] kthread+0x2cf/0x3c0 <4>[ 227.152578] ? _kthread_create_on_node+0xa0/0xa0 <4>[ 227.152583] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4>[ 227.152591] Code: c6 00 11 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 bd 85 c0 e8 60 e7 a9 c4 0f ff e9 1f fe ff ff 48 c7 c6 40 10 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 ca 85 c0 e8 2b 95 bd c4 <0f> 0b 48 89 ef e8 4c 44 e8 c4 e9 ef fd ff ff e8 42 44 e8 c4 e9 <1>[ 227.152720] RIP: intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] RSP: ffff88005aad7b68 v2: i915_vma_pin_fence() is a no-op if a fence isn't required, so check vma->fence as well. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220134208.24988-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We cannot simply use !view as shorthand for all normal GGTT views as a few callers will always populate a i915_ggtt_view struct and set the type to NORMAL instead. So check for (!view || view->type == NORMAL) inside i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220134208.24988-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 20 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
During igt, we frequently call into the driver to reset both HW and driver state (idling the device, waiting for it to become idle and freeing off old objects) to ensure that we start each test/subtest/pass from known state. This process incurs an RCU barrier or two to ensure that any such pending frees are indeed flushed before we return. However, unconditionally waiting on the RCU barrier adds needless delay to many callers, which adds up to several seconds when repeated thousands of times. We can skip the rcu_barrier() if by tracking how many outstanding frees we have, we know there are none. The same path is used along suspend, where we may be able to save the unconditional RCU barrier. To put it into perspective with a completely meaningless microbenchmark, igt/gem_sync/idle is improved from 50ms to 30us on bdw. v2: Remove the extra synchronize_rcu() inside i915_drop_caches_set() Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180219220631.25001-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 16 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian König 提交于
i915 is the only driver using those fields in the drm_gem_object structure, so they only waste memory for all other drivers. Move the fields into drm_i915_gem_object instead and patch the i915 code with the following sed commands: sed -i "s/obj->base.read_domains/obj->read_domains/g" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.c drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*/*.c sed -i "s/obj->base.write_domain/obj->write_domain/g" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.c drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*/*.c Change is only compile tested. v2: move fields around as suggested by Chris. Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180216124338.9087-1-christian.koenig@amd.comSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 10 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Coccinelle patch: @@ identifier p; @@ -INTEL_INFO(p)->gen +INTEL_GEN(p) Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208130606.15556-12-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180209215847.6660-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 08 2月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Reduce the window of opportunity for set-wedged being called concurrently with reset (after i915_reset() has performed the i915_gem_unset_wedged()) by moving the set_bit(I915_WEDGED) to before we complete the inflight requests. When i915_reset() is being blocked on a request, such completion may allow it to start and beginning resetting the GPU before i915_gem_set_wedged() has finished (and so before set-wedge will have marked the device as wedged). As such, i915_gem_init_hw() may see a wedged device even from inside i915_reset(). References: 36703e79 ("drm/i915: Break modeset deadlocks on reset") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207151350.20883-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Since commit 5896a5c8 (drm/i915: Always stop the rings before a missing GPU reset) we attempt to stop the engines during gem_sanitize even if reset=0 and nothing bad happened on the gpu. The specs says that the STOP_RINGS bit needs to be cleared to resume normal operation, but for some reason the value of the bit seems to be changing without us writing to it (maybe rc6 entry/exit?), so normal operation resumes correctly. However, it still feels incorrect to stop the engines if there hasn't been any issue so skip the whole reset call in gem_sanitize if i915.reset=0 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207212440.13438-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Rather than having the high level ioctl interface guess the underlying implementation details, having the implementation declare what capabilities it exports. We define an intel_driver_caps, similar to the intel_device_info, which instead of trying to describe the HW gives details on what the driver itself supports. This is then populated by the engine backend for the new scheduler capability field for use elsewhere. v2: Use caps.scheduler for validating CONTEXT_PARAM_SET_PRIORITY (Mika) One less assumption of engine[RCS] \o/ Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207210544.26351-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
On blb and pnv, we are seeing sporadic i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang [drm:intel_gpu_reset [i915]] rcs0: timed out on STOP_RING [drm:i915_reset [i915]] *ERROR* Failed hw init on reset -5 which notably lack the actual root cause of the error. Ostensibly it should be the init_ring_common() that failed, but it's error paths are covered by DRM_ERROR. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207111545.17078-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-