1. 30 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  2. 29 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  3. 20 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  4. 19 11月, 2005 3 次提交
  5. 18 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  6. 17 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  7. 16 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  8. 12 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  9. 11 11月, 2005 3 次提交
  10. 10 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  11. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 05 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 28 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] Change pragma pack(1) to attribute(packed) to allow cifs on arm to access · 0753ca7b
      Steve French 提交于
      unaligned structures coming in off the wire
      
      gcc on arm processors generates very odd code with pragma pack specified -
      although it does pack the structures in some sense - it does not allow you
      to access unaligned elements in nested structures at the right offset as other
      architectures do.  Oddly enough though, specifying the structures as packed
      the long way - one by one with the packed attribute does work.  Rather than
      fighting over whether this is a gcc bug or some obscure side effect
      of pragma pack, it is easier to do what most (all but 96 other places in
      the kernel) do - and replace pragma pack with dozens of attribute(packed)
      structure qualifiers.  Much more verbose ... but at least it works.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>  CG: -----------------------------------------------------------------------
      0753ca7b
  14. 21 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  15. 13 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  16. 12 10月, 2005 2 次提交
  17. 11 10月, 2005 9 次提交
  18. 08 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  19. 06 10月, 2005 4 次提交
  20. 04 10月, 2005 2 次提交