- 08 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 chandan 提交于
The following call trace is seen when generic/095 test is executed, WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2769 at /home/chandan/code/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/inode.c:8967 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x284/0x2a0() Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 2769 Comm: umount Not tainted 4.2.0-rc5+ #31 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20150306_163512-brownie 04/01/2014 ffffffff81c08150 ffff8802ec9cbce8 ffffffff81984058 ffff8802ffd8feb0 0000000000000000 ffff8802ec9cbd28 ffffffff81050385 ffff8802ec9cbd38 ffff8802d12f8588 ffff8802d12f8588 ffff8802f15ab000 ffff8800bb96c0b0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81984058>] dump_stack+0x45/0x57 [<ffffffff81050385>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0xc0 [<ffffffff81050465>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff81340294>] btrfs_destroy_inode+0x284/0x2a0 [<ffffffff8117ce07>] destroy_inode+0x37/0x60 [<ffffffff8117cf39>] evict+0x109/0x170 [<ffffffff8117cfd5>] dispose_list+0x35/0x50 [<ffffffff8117dd3a>] evict_inodes+0xaa/0x100 [<ffffffff81165667>] generic_shutdown_super+0x47/0xf0 [<ffffffff81165951>] kill_anon_super+0x11/0x20 [<ffffffff81302093>] btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x110 [<ffffffff81165c99>] deactivate_locked_super+0x39/0x70 [<ffffffff811660cf>] deactivate_super+0x5f/0x70 [<ffffffff81180e1e>] cleanup_mnt+0x3e/0x90 [<ffffffff81180ebd>] __cleanup_mnt+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff81069c06>] task_work_run+0x96/0xb0 [<ffffffff81003a3d>] do_notify_resume+0x3d/0x50 [<ffffffff8198cbc2>] int_signal+0x12/0x17 This means that the inode had non-zero "outstanding extents" during eviction. This occurs because, during direct I/O a task which successfully used up its reserved data space would set BTRFS_INODE_DIO_READY bit and does not clear the bit after finishing the DIO write. A future DIO write could actually fail and the unused reserve space won't be freed because of the previously set BTRFS_INODE_DIO_READY bit. Clearing the BTRFS_INODE_DIO_READY bit in btrfs_direct_IO() caused the following issue, |-----------------------------------+-------------------------------------| | Task A | Task B | |-----------------------------------+-------------------------------------| | Start direct i/o write on inode X.| | | reserve space | | | Allocate ordered extent | | | release reserved space | | | Set BTRFS_INODE_DIO_READY bit. | | | | splice() | | | Transfer data from pipe buffer to | | | destination file. | | | - kmap(pipe buffer page) | | | - Start direct i/o write on | | | inode X. | | | - reserve space | | | - dio_refill_pages() | | | - sdio->blocks_available == 0 | | | - Since a kernel address is | | | being passed instead of a | | | user space address, | | | iov_iter_get_pages() returns | | | -EFAULT. | | | - Since BTRFS_INODE_DIO_READY is | | | set, we don't release reserved | | | space. | | | - Clear BTRFS_INODE_DIO_READY bit.| | -EIOCBQUEUED is returned. | | |-----------------------------------+-------------------------------------| Hence this commit introduces "struct btrfs_dio_data" to track the usage of reserved data space. The remaining unused "reserve space" can now be freed reliably. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 15 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
In btrfs_evict_inode, we properly truncate the page cache for evicted inodes but then we call btrfs_wait_ordered_range for every inode as well. It's the right thing to do for regular files but results in incorrect behavior for device inodes for block devices. filemap_fdatawrite_range gets called with inode->i_mapping which gets resolved to the block device inode before getting passed to wbc_attach_fdatawrite_inode and ultimately to inode_to_bdi. What happens next depends on whether there's an open file handle associated with the inode. If there is, we write to the block device, which is unexpected behavior. If there isn't, we through normally and inode->i_data is used. We can also end up racing against open/close which can result in crashes when i_mapping points to a block device inode that has been closed. Since there can't be any page cache associated with special file inodes, it's safe to skip the btrfs_wait_ordered_range call entirely and avoid the problem. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100911Tested-by: NChristoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de> Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
We need not check path before btrfs_free_path() is called because path is checked in btrfs_free_path(). Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 14 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kent Overstreet 提交于
We can always fill up the bio now, no need to estimate the possible size based on queue parameters. Acked-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> [hch: rebased and wrote a changelog] Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NMing Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This attaches accounting information to bios as we submit them so the new blkio controllers can throttle on btrfs filesystems. Not much is required, we're just associating bios with blkcgs during clone, calling wbc_init_bio()/wbc_account_io() during writepages submission, and attaching the bios to the current context during direct IO. Finally if we are splitting bios during btrfs_map_bio, this attaches accounting information to the split. The end result is able to throttle nicely on single disk filesystems. A little more work is required for multi-device filesystems. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we remove a hard link from an inode, the inode gets evicted, then we fsync the inode and then power fail/crash, when the log tree is replayed, the parent directory inode still has entries pointing to the name that no longer exists, while our inode no longer has the BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY item matching the deleted hard link (as expected), leaving the filesystem in an inconsistent state. The stale directory entries can not be deleted (an attempt to delete them causes -ESTALE errors), which makes it impossible to delete the parent directory. This happens because we track the id of the transaction where the last unlink operation for the inode happened (last_unlink_trans) in an in-memory only field of the inode, that is, a value that is never persisted in the inode item stored on the fs/subvol btree. So if an inode is evicted and loaded again, the value for last_unlink_trans is set to 0, which prevents the fsync from logging the parent directory at btrfs_log_inode_parent(). So fix this by setting last_unlink_trans to the id of the transaction that last modified the inode when we load the inode. This is a pessimistic approach but it always ensures correctness with the trade off of ocassional full transaction commits when an fsync is done against the inode in the same transaction where it was evicted and reloaded when our inode is a directory and often logging its parent unnecessarily when our inode is not a directory. The following test case for fstests triggers the problem: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { _cleanup_flakey rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter . ./common/dmflakey # real QA test starts here _need_to_be_root _supported_fs generic _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _require_dm_flakey _require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV rm -f $seqres.full _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _init_flakey _mount_flakey # Create our test file with 2 hard links. mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir touch $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo ln $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/bar # Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted. sync # Now remove one of the links, trigger inode eviction and then fsync # our inode. unlink $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/bar echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo # Silently drop all writes on our scratch device to simulate a power failure. _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_DROP_WRITES _unmount_flakey # Allow writes again and mount the fs to trigger log/journal replay. _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES _mount_flakey # Now verify our directory entries. echo "Entries in testdir:" ls -1 $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir # If we remove our inode, its parent should become empty and therefore we should # be able to remove the parent. rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/* rmdir $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir _unmount_flakey # The fstests framework will call fsck against our filesystem which will verify # that all metadata is in a consistent state. status=0 exit The test failed on btrfs with: generic/098 4s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/098.out.bad) --- tests/generic/098.out 2015-07-23 18:01:12.616175932 +0100 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/098.out.bad 2015-07-23 18:04:58.924138308 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ QA output created by 098 Entries in testdir: +bar foo +rm: cannot remove '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/testdir/foo': Stale file handle +rmdir: failed to remove '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/testdir': Directory not empty ... (Run 'diff -u tests/generic/098.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/098.out.bad' to see the entire diff) _check_btrfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/sdc is inconsistent (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/098.full) $ cat /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/098.full (...) checking fs roots root 5 inode 258 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong unresolved ref dir 257 index 0 namelen 3 name foo filetype 1 errors 6, no dir index, no inode ref unresolved ref dir 257 index 3 namelen 3 name bar filetype 1 errors 5, no dir item, no inode ref Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc (...) Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently we have two different ways to signal an I/O error on a BIO: (1) by clearing the BIO_UPTODATE flag (2) by returning a Linux errno value to the bi_end_io callback The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single possible error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of not beeing persistent when bios are queued up, and are not passed along from child to parent bio in the ever more popular chaining scenario. Having both mechanisms available has the additional drawback of utterly confusing driver authors and introducing bugs where various I/O submitters only deal with one of them, and the others have to add boilerplate code to deal with both kinds of error returns. So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly in struct bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all this up. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If the no_holes feature is enabled, we attempt to shrink a file to a size that ends up in the middle of a hole and we don't have any file extent items in the fs/subvol tree that go beyond the new file size (or any ordered extents that will insert such file extent items), we end up not updating the inode's disk_i_size, we only update the inode's i_size. This means that after unmounting and mounting the filesystem, or after the inode is evicted and reloaded, its i_size ends up being incorrect (an inode's i_size is set to the disk_i_size field when an inode is loaded). This happens when btrfs_truncate_inode_items() doesn't find any file extent items to drop - in this case it never makes a call to btrfs_ordered_update_i_size() in order to update the inode's disk_i_size. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt # Create our test file with some data and durably persist it. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 128K" /mnt/foo $ sync # Append some data to the file, increasing its size, and leave a hole # between the old size and the start offset if the following write. So # our file gets a hole in the range [128Kb, 256Kb[. $ xfs_io -c "truncate 160K" /mnt/foo # We expect to see our file with a size of 160Kb, with the first 128Kb # of data all having the value 0xaa and the remaining 32Kb of data all # having the value 0x00. $ od -t x1 /mnt/foo 0000000 aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa * 0400000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 * 0500000 # Now cleanly unmount and mount again the filesystem. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt # We expect to get the same result as before, a file with a size of # 160Kb, with the first 128Kb of data all having the value 0xaa and the # remaining 32Kb of data all having the value 0x00. $ od -t x1 /mnt/foo 0000000 aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa * 0400000 In the example above the file size/data do not match what they were before the remount. Fix this by always calling btrfs_ordered_update_i_size() with a size matching the size the file was truncated to if btrfs_truncate_inode_items() is not called for a log tree and no file extent items were dropped. This ensures the same behaviour as when the no_holes feature is not enabled. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 02 7月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
While running generic/019, dmesg got several warnings from btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(). Test generic/019 produces some disk failures so sumbit dio will get errors, in which case, btrfs_direct_IO() goes to the error handling and free bytes_may_use, but the problem is that bytes_may_use has been free'd during get_block(). This adds a runtime flag to show if we've gone through get_block(), if so, don't do the cleanup work. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The hang is uncoverd by generic/019. btrfs_endio_direct_write() skips the "finish_ordered_fn" part when it hits an error, thus those added ordered extents will never get processed, which block processes that waiting for them via btrfs_start_ordered_extent(). This fixes the above, and meanwhile finish_ordered_fn will do the space accounting work. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The comment was not correct about the part where it says the endio callback of the bio might have not yet been called - update it to mention that by that time the endio callback execution might still be in progress only. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we fail to submit a bio for a direct IO request, we were grabbing the corresponding ordered extent and decrementing its reference count twice, once for our lookup reference and once for the ordered tree reference. This was a problem because it caused the ordered extent to be freed without removing it from the ordered tree and any lists it might be attached to, leaving dangling pointers to the ordered extent around. Example trace with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y: [161779.858707] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000087654330 [161779.859983] IP: [<ffffffff8124ca68>] rb_prev+0x22/0x3b [161779.860636] PGD 34d818067 PUD 0 [161779.860636] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC (...) [161779.860636] Call Trace: [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b36a6>] __tree_search+0xd9/0xf9 [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b3708>] tree_search+0x42/0x63 [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b4868>] ? btrfs_lookup_ordered_range+0x2d/0xa5 [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b4873>] btrfs_lookup_ordered_range+0x38/0xa5 [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06aab8e>] btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x11b/0x615 [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffff8119727f>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x5ff/0xb43 [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06aaa73>] ? btrfs_page_exists_in_range+0x1ad/0x1ad [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffff811977f5>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32/0x34 [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a10ae>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x198/0x21f [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffff81112ca1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06affaa>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x15f/0x3e0 [btrfs] [161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b004c>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x201/0x3e0 [btrfs] (...) We were also not freeing the btrfs_dio_private we allocated previously, which kmemleak reported with the following trace in its sysfs file: unreferenced object 0xffff8803f553bf80 (size 96): comm "xfs_io", pid 4501, jiffies 4295039588 (age 173.936s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 88 6c 9b f5 02 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .l.............. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c4 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff81161ffe>] create_object+0x172/0x29a [<ffffffff8145870f>] kmemleak_alloc+0x25/0x41 [<ffffffff81154e64>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.40+0x16/0x18 [<ffffffff811579ed>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xfb/0x148 [<ffffffffa03d8cff>] btrfs_submit_direct+0x65/0x16a [btrfs] [<ffffffff811968dc>] dio_bio_submit+0x62/0x8f [<ffffffff811975fe>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x97e/0xb43 [<ffffffff811977f5>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32/0x34 [<ffffffffa03d70ae>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x198/0x21f [btrfs] [<ffffffff81112ca1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [<ffffffffa03e604d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x201/0x3e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8116586a>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [<ffffffff81165da9>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [<ffffffff81166675>] SyS_pwrite64+0x64/0x82 [<ffffffff81464fd7>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff For read requests we weren't doing any cleanup either (none of the work done by btrfs_endio_direct_read()), so a failure submitting a bio for a read request would leave a range in the inode's io_tree locked forever, blocking any future operations (both reads and writes) against that range. So fix this by making sure we do the same cleanup that we do for the case where the bio submission succeeds. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Zygo Blaxell and other users have reported occasional hangs while an inode is being evicted, leading to traces like the following: [ 5281.972322] INFO: task rm:20488 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 5281.973836] Not tainted 4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2 [ 5281.974818] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 5281.976364] rm D ffff8800724cfc38 0 20488 7747 0x00000000 [ 5281.977506] ffff8800724cfc38 ffff8800724cfc38 ffff880065da5c50 0000000000000001 [ 5281.978461] ffff8800724cffd8 ffff8801540a5f50 0000000000000008 ffff8801540a5f78 [ 5281.979541] ffff8801540a5f50 ffff8800724cfc58 ffffffff8143107e 0000000000000123 [ 5281.981396] Call Trace: [ 5281.982066] [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83 [ 5281.983341] [<ffffffffa03b33cf>] wait_on_state+0xac/0xcd [btrfs] [ 5281.985127] [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31 [ 5281.986715] [<ffffffffa03b4b71>] wait_extent_bit.constprop.32+0x7c/0xde [btrfs] [ 5281.988680] [<ffffffffa03b540b>] lock_extent_bits+0x5d/0x88 [btrfs] [ 5281.990200] [<ffffffffa03a621d>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x24e/0x5be [btrfs] [ 5281.991781] [<ffffffff8116964d>] evict+0xa0/0x148 [ 5281.992735] [<ffffffff8116a43d>] iput+0x18f/0x1e5 [ 5281.993796] [<ffffffff81160d4a>] do_unlinkat+0x15b/0x1fa [ 5281.994806] [<ffffffff81435b54>] ? ret_from_sys_call+0x1d/0x58 [ 5281.996120] [<ffffffff8107d314>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x18f/0x1ab [ 5281.997562] [<ffffffff8123960b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 5281.998815] [<ffffffff81161a16>] SyS_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 5281.999920] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 [ 5282.001299] 1 lock held by rm/20488: [ 5282.002066] #0: (sb_writers#12){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8116dd81>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b This happens when we have readahead, which calls readpages(), happening right before the inode eviction handler is invoked. So the reason is essentially: 1) readpages() is called while a reference on the inode is held, so eviction can not be triggered before readpages() returns. It also locks one or more ranges in the inode's io_tree (which is done at extent_io.c:__do_contiguous_readpages()); 2) readpages() submits several read bios, all with an end io callback that runs extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_readpage() and that is executed by other task when a bio finishes, corresponding to a work queue (fs_info->end_io_workers) worker kthread. This callback unlocks the ranges in the inode's io_tree that were previously locked in step 1; 3) readpages() returns, the reference on the inode is dropped; 4) One or more of the read bios previously submitted are still not complete (their end io callback was not yet invoked or has not yet finished execution); 5) Inode eviction is triggered (through an unlink call for example). The inode reference count was not incremented before submitting the read bios, therefore this is possible; 6) The eviction handler starts executing and enters the loop that iterates over all extent states in the inode's io_tree; 7) The loop picks one extent state record and uses its ->start and ->end fields, after releasing the inode's io_tree spinlock, to call lock_extent_bits() and clear_extent_bit(). The call to lock the range [state->start, state->end] blocks because the whole range or a part of it was locked by the previous call to readpages() and the corresponding end io callback, which unlocks the range was not yet executed; 8) The end io callback for the read bio is executed and unlocks the range [state->start, state->end] (or a superset of that range). And at clear_extent_bit() the extent_state record state is used as a second argument to split_state(), which sets state->start to a larger value; 9) The task executing the eviction handler is woken up by the task executing the bio's end io callback (through clear_state_bit) and the eviction handler locks the range [old value for state->start, state->end]. Shortly after, when calling clear_extent_bit(), it unlocks the range [new value for state->start, state->end], so it ends up unlocking only part of the range that it locked, leaving an extent state record in the io_tree that represents the unlocked subrange; 10) The eviction handler loop, in its next iteration, gets the extent_state record for the subrange that it did not unlock in the previous step and then tries to lock it, resulting in an hang. So fix this by not using the ->start and ->end fields of an existing extent_state record. This is a simple solution, and an alternative could be to bump the inode's reference count before submitting each read bio and having it dropped in the bio's end io callback. But that would be a more invasive/complex change and would not protect against other possible places that are not holding a reference on the inode as well. Something to consider in the future. Many thanks to Zygo Blaxell for reporting, in the mailing list, the issue, a set of scripts to trigger it and testing this fix. Reported-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Tested-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yang Dongsheng 提交于
We need to fill inode when we found a node for it in delayed_nodes_tree. But we did not fill the ->last_trans currently, it will cause the test of xfstest/generic/311 fail. Scenario of the 311 is shown as below: Problem: (1). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT) (2). pwrite(test_fd, buf, 4096, 0) (3). close(test_fd) (4). drop_all_caches() <-------- "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (5). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT) (6). fsync(test_fd); <-------- we did not get the correct log entry for the file Reason: When we re-open this file in (5), we would find a node in delayed_nodes_tree and fill the inode we are lookup with the information. But the ->last_trans is not filled, then the fsync() will check the ->last_trans and found it's 0 then say this inode is already in our tree which is commited, not recording the extents for it. Fix: This patch fill the ->last_trans properly and set the runtime_flags if needed in this situation. Then we can get the log entries we expected after (6) and generic/311 passed. Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
do_blockdev_direct_IO() increments and decrements the inode ->i_dio_count for each IO operation. It does this to protect against truncate of a file. Block devices don't need this sort of protection. For a capable multiqueue setup, this atomic int is the only shared state between applications accessing the device for O_DIRECT, and it presents a scaling wall for that. In my testing, as much as 30% of system time is spent incrementing and decrementing this value. A mixed read/write workload improved from ~2.5M IOPS to ~9.6M IOPS, with better latencies too. Before: clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 33], 5.00th=[ 34], 10.00th=[ 34], 20.00th=[ 34], | 30.00th=[ 34], 40.00th=[ 34], 50.00th=[ 35], 60.00th=[ 35], | 70.00th=[ 35], 80.00th=[ 35], 90.00th=[ 37], 95.00th=[ 80], | 99.00th=[ 98], 99.50th=[ 151], 99.90th=[ 155], 99.95th=[ 155], | 99.99th=[ 165] After: clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 95], 5.00th=[ 108], 10.00th=[ 129], 20.00th=[ 149], | 30.00th=[ 155], 40.00th=[ 161], 50.00th=[ 167], 60.00th=[ 171], | 70.00th=[ 177], 80.00th=[ 185], 90.00th=[ 201], 95.00th=[ 270], | 99.00th=[ 390], 99.50th=[ 398], 99.90th=[ 418], 99.95th=[ 422], | 99.99th=[ 438] In other setups, Robert Elliott reported seeing good performance improvements: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/557 The more applications accessing the device, the worse it gets. Add a new direct-io flags, DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT, which tells do_blockdev_direct_IO() that it need not worry about incrementing or decrementing the inode i_dio_count for this caller. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) <elliott@hp.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 4月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于
There are two problems in qgroup: a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K, qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup is not available to user. b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it, it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup. The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to write and release it in transaction committed. In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account when the data is written in commit_transaction(). Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于
Currently, for pre_alloc or delay_alloc, the bytes will be accounted in space_info by the three guys. space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used. But on the other hand, in qgroup, there are only two counters to account the bytes, qgroup->reserved and qgroup->excl. And qg->reserved accounts bytes in space_info->bytes_may_use and qg->excl accounts bytes in space_info->used. So the bytes in space_info->reserved is not accounted in qgroup. If so, there is a window we can exceed the quota limit when bytes is in space_info->reserved. Example: # btrfs quota enable /mnt # btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt # for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done # sync # btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 20987904 20987904 0 10485760 --- --- qg->excl is 20987904 larger than max_excl 10485760. This patch introduce a new counter named may_use to qgroup, then there are three counters in qgroup to account bytes in space_info as below. space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used. qgroup->may_use --- qgroup->reserved --- qgroup->excl With this patch applied: # btrfs quota enable /mnt # btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt # for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done fallocate: /mnt/data9: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data10: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data11: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data12: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data13: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data14: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data15: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data16: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data17: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data18: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data19: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded # sync # btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 9453568 9453568 0 10485760 --- --- Reported-by: NCyril SCETBON <cyril.scetbon@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Steps to reproduce: while true; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs_dir/file count=[fs_size * 75%] rm /btrfs_dir/file sync done And we'll see dd failed because btrfs return NO_SPACE. Reason: Normally, btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() in end to free fs space for next write, but sometimes it hadn't done work on time, because btrfs-cleaner thread get delayed-iputs from list before, but do iput() after next write. This is log: [ 2569.050776] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() begin [ 2569.084280] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() [ 2569.085418] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() done btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() [ 2569.087554] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() end [ 2569.191081] comm=dd begin [ 2569.790112] comm=dd func=__btrfs_buffered_write() ret=-28 [ 2569.847479] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 0 + 32677888 = 32677888 [ 2569.849530] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 32677888 + 23834624 = 56512512 ... [ 2569.903893] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 943976448 + 21762048 = 965738496 [ 2569.908270] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() end Fix: Make btrfs_commit_transaction() wait current running btrfs-cleaner's delayed-iputs() done in end. Test: Use script similar to above(more complex), before patch: 7 failed in 100 * 20 loop. after patch: 0 failed in 100 * 20 loop. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 12 4月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Now that no one is using rw, remove it completely. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The rw parameter to direct_IO is redundant with iov_iter->type, and treated slightly differently just about everywhere it's used: some users do rw & WRITE, and others do rw == WRITE where they should be doing a bitwise check. Simplify this with the new iov_iter_rw() helper, which always returns either READ or WRITE. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Most filesystems call through to these at some point, so we'll start here. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 4月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
btrfs_evict_inode() needs to be more careful about stealing from the global_rsv. We dont' want to end up aborting commit with ENOSPC just because the evict_inode code was too greedy. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When truncate starts, it allocates some space in the block reserves so that we'll have enough to update metadata along the way. For very large files, we can easily go through all of that space as we loop through the extents. This changes truncate to refill the space reservation as it progresses through the file. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order to delete the corresponding crcs. This adds accounting so that we keep track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build up too much delayed crc work. This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global reserves. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When we are deleting large files with large extents, we are building up a huge set of delayed refs for processing. Truncate isn't checking often enough to see if we need to back off and process those, or let a commit proceed. The end result is long stalls after the rm, and very long commit times. During the commits, other processes back up waiting to start new transactions and we get into trouble. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guenter Roeck 提交于
Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO': fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment' due to a missing include file. Fixes: 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h") Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
struct kiocb now is a generic I/O container, so move it to fs.h. Also do a #include diet for aio.h while we're at it. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are keeping track of how many extents we need to reserve properly based on the amount we want to write, but we were still incrementing outstanding_extents if we wrote less than what we requested. This isn't quite right since we will be limited to our max extent size. So instead lets do something horrible! Keep track of how many outstanding_extents we reserved, and decrement each time we allocate an extent. If we use our entire reserve make sure to jack up outstanding_extents on the inode so the accounting works out properly. Thanks, Reported-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I introduced a regression wrt outstanding_extents accounting. These are tricky areas that aren't easily covered by xfstests as we could change MAX_EXTENT_SIZE at any time. So add sanity tests to cover the various conditions that are tricky in order to make sure we don't introduce regressions in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
My fix Btrfs: fix merge delalloc logic only fixed half of the problems, it didn't fix the case where we have two large extents on either side and then join them together with a new small extent. We need to instead keep track of how many extents we have accounted for with each side of the new extent, and then see how many extents we need for the new large extent. If they match then we know we need to keep our reservation, otherwise we need to drop our reservation. This shows up with a case like this [BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE+4K][4K HOLE][BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE+4K] Previously the logic would have said that the number extents required for the new size (3) is larger than the number of extents required for the largest side (2) therefore we need to keep our reservation. But this isn't the case, since both sides require a reservation of 2 which leads to 4 for the whole range currently reserved, but we only need 3, so we need to drop one of the reservations. The same problem existed for splits, we'd think we only need 3 extents when creating the hole but in reality we need 4. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
My patch to properly count outstanding extents wrt MAX_EXTENT_SIZE introduced a regression when re-dirtying already dirty areas. We have logic in split to make sure we are taking the largest space into account but didn't have it for merge, so it was sometimes making us think we were turning a tiny extent into a huge extent, when in reality we already had a huge extent and needed to use the other side in our logic. This fixes the regression that was reported by a user on list. Thanks, Reported-by: NMarkus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Convert kmalloc(nr * size, ..) to kmalloc_array that does additional overflow checks, the zeroing variant is kcalloc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 03 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
A block-local variable stores error code but btrfs_get_blocks_direct may not return it in the end as there's a ret defined in the function scope. CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.6+ Fixes: d187663e ("Btrfs: lock extents as we map them in DIO") Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
On our gluster boxes we stream large tar balls of backups onto our fses. With 160gb of ram this means we get really large contiguous ranges of dirty data, but the way our ENOSPC stuff works is that as long as it's contiguous we only hold metadata reservation for one extent. The problem is we limit our extents to 128mb, so we'll end up with at least 800 extents so our enospc accounting is quite a bit lower than what we need. To keep track of this make sure we increase outstanding_extents for every multiple of the max extent size so we can be sure to have enough reserved metadata space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We do this to get the space accounting, but this is just needless churn on the io_tree, so just drop setting/clearing delalloc and just drop the reserved data space when we have a successfull allocation. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have this weird dance where we always inc outstanding_extents when we do a O_DIRECT write, even if we allocate the entire range. To get around this we also drop the metadata space if we successfully write. This is an unnecessary dance, we only need to jack up outstanding_extents if we don't satisfy the entire range request in get_blocks_direct, otherwise we are good using our original reservation. So drop the unconditional inc and the drop of the metadata space that we have for the unconditional inc. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 chandan r 提交于
This patch adds a new member to the 'struct btrfs_inode' structure to hold the file creation time. Signed-off-by: Nchandan <chandanrmail@gmail.com> [refreshed, removed btrfs_inode_otime] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
They just opencode taking address of the timespec member. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-