1. 06 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 15 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  3. 07 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 15 9月, 2017 4 次提交
    • D
      sched/wait: Add swq_has_sleeper() · 8cd641e3
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      Which is the equivalent of what we have in regular waitqueues.
      I'm not crazy about the name, but this also helps us get both
      apis closer -- which iirc comes originally from the -net folks.
      
      We also duplicate the comments for the lockless swait_active(),
      from wait.h. Future users will make use of this interface.
      Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      8cd641e3
    • M
      vfs: constify path argument to kernel_read_file_from_path · 711aab1d
      Mimi Zohar 提交于
      This patch constifies the path argument to kernel_read_file_from_path().
      Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      711aab1d
    • T
      sched/wait: Introduce wakeup boomark in wake_up_page_bit · 11a19c7b
      Tim Chen 提交于
      Now that we have added breaks in the wait queue scan and allow bookmark
      on scan position, we put this logic in the wake_up_page_bit function.
      
      We can have very long page wait list in large system where multiple
      pages share the same wait list. We break the wake up walk here to allow
      other cpus a chance to access the list, and not to disable the interrupts
      when traversing the list for too long.  This reduces the interrupt and
      rescheduling latency, and excessive page wait queue lock hold time.
      
      [ v2: Remove bookmark_wake_function ]
      Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      11a19c7b
    • T
      sched/wait: Break up long wake list walk · 2554db91
      Tim Chen 提交于
      We encountered workloads that have very long wake up list on large
      systems. A waker takes a long time to traverse the entire wake list and
      execute all the wake functions.
      
      We saw page wait list that are up to 3700+ entries long in tests of
      large 4 and 8 socket systems. It took 0.8 sec to traverse such list
      during wake up. Any other CPU that contends for the list spin lock will
      spin for a long time. It is a result of the numa balancing migration of
      hot pages that are shared by many threads.
      
      Multiple CPUs waking are queued up behind the lock, and the last one
      queued has to wait until all CPUs did all the wakeups.
      
      The page wait list is traversed with interrupt disabled, which caused
      various problems. This was the original cause that triggered the NMI
      watch dog timer in: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9800303/ . Only
      extending the NMI watch dog timer there helped.
      
      This patch bookmarks the waker's scan position in wake list and break
      the wake up walk, to allow access to the list before the waker resume
      its walk down the rest of the wait list. It lowers the interrupt and
      rescheduling latency.
      
      This patch also provides a performance boost when combined with the next
      patch to break up page wakeup list walk. We saw 22% improvement in the
      will-it-scale file pread2 test on a Xeon Phi system running 256 threads.
      
      [ v2: Merged in Linus' changes to remove the bookmark_wake_function, and
        simply access to flags. ]
      Reported-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2554db91
  5. 14 9月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      mm: treewide: remove GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag · 0ee931c4
      Michal Hocko 提交于
      GFP_TEMPORARY was introduced by commit e12ba74d ("Group short-lived
      and reclaimable kernel allocations") along with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE.  It's
      primary motivation was to allow users to tell that an allocation is
      short lived and so the allocator can try to place such allocations close
      together and prevent long term fragmentation.  As much as this sounds
      like a reasonable semantic it becomes much less clear when to use the
      highlevel GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag.  How long is temporary? Can the
      context holding that memory sleep? Can it take locks? It seems there is
      no good answer for those questions.
      
      The current implementation of GFP_TEMPORARY is basically GFP_KERNEL |
      __GFP_RECLAIMABLE which in itself is tricky because basically none of
      the existing caller provide a way to reclaim the allocated memory.  So
      this is rather misleading and hard to evaluate for any benefits.
      
      I have checked some random users and none of them has added the flag
      with a specific justification.  I suspect most of them just copied from
      other existing users and others just thought it might be a good idea to
      use without any measuring.  This suggests that GFP_TEMPORARY just
      motivates for cargo cult usage without any reasoning.
      
      I believe that our gfp flags are quite complex already and especially
      those with highlevel semantic should be clearly defined to prevent from
      confusion and abuse.  Therefore I propose dropping GFP_TEMPORARY and
      replace all existing users to simply use GFP_KERNEL.  Please note that
      SLAB users with shrinkers will still get __GFP_RECLAIMABLE heuristic and
      so they will be placed properly for memory fragmentation prevention.
      
      I can see reasons we might want some gfp flag to reflect shorterm
      allocations but I propose starting from a clear semantic definition and
      only then add users with proper justification.
      
      This was been brought up before LSF this year by Matthew [1] and it
      turned out that GFP_TEMPORARY really doesn't have a clear semantic.  It
      seems to be a heuristic without any measured advantage for most (if not
      all) its current users.  The follow up discussion has revealed that
      opinions on what might be temporary allocation differ a lot between
      developers.  So rather than trying to tweak existing users into a
      semantic which they haven't expected I propose to simply remove the flag
      and start from scratch if we really need a semantic for short term
      allocations.
      
      [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118054945.GD18349@bombadil.infradead.org
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: drm/i915: fix up]
        Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816144703.378d4f4d@canb.auug.org.au
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170728091904.14627-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
      Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
      Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      0ee931c4
  6. 12 9月, 2017 3 次提交
  7. 11 9月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      dax: remove the pmem_dax_ops->flush abstraction · c3ca015f
      Mikulas Patocka 提交于
      Commit abebfbe2 ("dm: add ->flush() dax operation support") is
      buggy. A DM device may be composed of multiple underlying devices and
      all of them need to be flushed. That commit just routes the flush
      request to the first device and ignores the other devices.
      
      It could be fixed by adding more complex logic to the device mapper. But
      there is only one implementation of the method pmem_dax_ops->flush - that
      is pmem_dax_flush() - and it calls arch_wb_cache_pmem(). Consequently, we
      don't need the pmem_dax_ops->flush abstraction at all, we can call
      arch_wb_cache_pmem() directly from dax_flush() because dax_dev->ops->flush
      can't ever reach anything different from arch_wb_cache_pmem().
      
      It should be also pointed out that for some uses of persistent memory it
      is needed to flush only a very small amount of data (such as 1 cacheline),
      and it would be overkill if we go through that device mapper machinery for
      a single flushed cache line.
      
      Fix this by removing the pmem_dax_ops->flush abstraction and call
      arch_wb_cache_pmem() directly from dax_flush(). Also, remove the device
      mapper code that forwards the flushes.
      
      Fixes: abebfbe2 ("dm: add ->flush() dax operation support")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
      c3ca015f
  8. 09 9月, 2017 27 次提交