1. 27 4月, 2007 2 次提交
  2. 27 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 27 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 23 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 11 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  6. 29 1月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 13 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 22 11月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      WorkStruct: Pass the work_struct pointer instead of context data · 65f27f38
      David Howells 提交于
      Pass the work_struct pointer to the work function rather than context data.
      The work function can use container_of() to work out the data.
      
      For the cases where the container of the work_struct may go away the moment the
      pending bit is cleared, it is made possible to defer the release of the
      structure by deferring the clearing of the pending bit.
      
      To make this work, an extra flag is introduced into the management side of the
      work_struct.  This governs auto-release of the structure upon execution.
      
      Ordinarily, the work queue executor would release the work_struct for further
      scheduling or deallocation by clearing the pending bit prior to jumping to the
      work function.  This means that, unless the driver makes some guarantee itself
      that the work_struct won't go away, the work function may not access anything
      else in the work_struct or its container lest they be deallocated..  This is a
      problem if the auxiliary data is taken away (as done by the last patch).
      
      However, if the pending bit is *not* cleared before jumping to the work
      function, then the work function *may* access the work_struct and its container
      with no problems.  But then the work function must itself release the
      work_struct by calling work_release().
      
      In most cases, automatic release is fine, so this is the default.  Special
      initiators exist for the non-auto-release case (ending in _NAR).
      Signed-Off-By: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      65f27f38
  10. 21 11月, 2006 1 次提交
    • L
      Add "pure_initcall" for static variable initialization · b3438f82
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This is a quick hack to overcome the fact that SRCU currently does not
      allow static initializers, and we need to sometimes initialize those
      things before any other initializers (even "core" ones) can do so.
      
      Currently we don't allow this at all for modules, and the only user that
      needs is right now is cpufreq. As reported by Thomas Gleixner:
      
         "Commit b4dfdbb3 ("[PATCH] cpufreq:
          make the transition_notifier chain use SRCU breaks cpu frequency
          notification users, which register the callback > on core_init
          level."
      
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b3438f82
  11. 07 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  12. 16 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • V
      [CPUFREQ][8/8] acpi-cpufreq: Add support for freq feedback from hardware · dfde5d62
      Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
      Enable ondemand governor and acpi-cpufreq to use IA32_APERF and IA32_MPERF MSR
      to get active frequency feedback for the last sampling interval. This will
      make ondemand take right frequency decisions when hardware coordination of
      frequency is going on.
      
      Without APERF/MPERF, ondemand can take wrong decision at times due
      to underlying hardware coordination or TM2.
      Example:
      * CPU 0 and CPU 1 are hardware cooridnated.
      * CPU 1 running at highest frequency.
      * CPU 0 was running at highest freq. Now ondemand reduces it to
        some intermediate frequency based on utilization.
      * Due to underlying hardware coordination with other CPU 1, CPU 0 continues to
        run at highest frequency (as long as other CPU is at highest).
      * When ondemand samples CPU 0 again next time, without actual frequency
        feedback from APERF/MPERF, it will think that previous frequency change
        was successful and can go to wrong target frequency. This is because it
        thinks that utilization it has got this sampling interval is when running at
        intermediate frequency, rather than actual highest frequency.
      
      More information about IA32_APERF IA32_MPERF MSR:
      Refer to IA-32 Intel® Architecture Software Developer's Manual at
      http://developer.intel.comSigned-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      dfde5d62
  13. 04 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] cpufreq: make the transition_notifier chain use SRCU · b4dfdbb3
      Alan Stern 提交于
      This patch (as762) changes the cpufreq_transition_notifier_list from a
      blocking_notifier_head to an srcu_notifier_head.  This will prevent errors
      caused attempting to call down_read() to access the notifier chain at a
      time when interrupts must remain disabled, during system suspend.
      
      It's not clear to me whether this is really necessary; perhaps the chain
      could be made into an atomic_notifier.  However a couple of the callout
      routines do use blocking operations, so this approach seems safer.
      
      The head of the notifier chain needs to be initialized before use; this is
      done by an __init routine at core_initcall time.  If this turns out not to
      be a good choice, it can easily be changed.
      Signed-off-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b4dfdbb3
  14. 27 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 12 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  16. 01 8月, 2006 3 次提交
    • J
      [CPUFREQ] [2/2] demand load governor modules. · ea714970
      Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
      Demand-load cpufreq governor modules if needed.
      Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      ea714970
    • J
      [CPUFREQ] [1/2] add __find_governor helper and clean up some error handling. · 3bcb09a3
      Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
      Adds a __find_governor() helper function to look up a governor by
      name.  Also restructures some error handling to conform to the
      "single-exit" model which is generally preferred for kernel code.
      Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      3bcb09a3
    • M
      [CPUFREQ] return error when failing to set minfreq · 9c9a43ed
      Mattia Dongili 提交于
      I just stumbled on this bug/feature, this is how to reproduce it:
      
      # echo 450000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
      # echo 450000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
      # echo powersave > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
      # cpufreq-info -p
      450000 450000 powersave
      # echo 1800000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq ; echo $?
      0
      # cpufreq-info -p
      450000 450000 powersave
      
      Here it is. The kernel refuses to set a min_freq higher than the
      max_freq but it allows a max_freq lower than min_freq (lowering min_freq
      also).
      
      This behaviour is pretty straightforward (but undocumented) and it
      doesn't return an error altough failing to accomplish the requested
      action (set min_freq).
      The problem (IMO) is basically that userspace is not allowed to set a
      full policy atomically while the kernel always does that thus it must
      enforce an ordering on operations.
      
      The attached patch returns -EINVAL if trying to increase frequencies
      starting from scaling_min_freq and documents the correct ordering of writes.
      Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
      Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux at dominikbrodowski.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      
      --
      9c9a43ed
  17. 26 7月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare · 153d7f3f
      Arjan van de Ven 提交于
      The patch below moves the cpu hotplugging higher up in the cpufreq
      layering; this is needed to avoid recursive taking of the cpu hotplug
      lock and to otherwise detangle the mess.
      
      The new rules are:
      1. you must do lock_cpu_hotplug() around the following functions:
         __cpufreq_driver_target
         __cpufreq_governor (for CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS operation only)
         __cpufreq_set_policy
      2. governer methods (.governer) must NOT take the lock_cpu_hotplug()
         lock in any way; they are called with the lock taken already
      3. if your governer spawns a thread that does things, like calling
         __cpufreq_driver_target, your thread must honor rule #1.
      4. the policy lock and other cpufreq internal locks nest within
         the lock_cpu_hotplug() lock.
      
      I'm not entirely happy about how the __cpufreq_governor rule ended up
      (conditional locking rule depending on the argument) but basically all
      callers pass this as a constant so it's not too horrible.
      
      The patch also removes the cpufreq_governor() function since during the
      locking audit it turned out to be entirely unused (so no need to fix it)
      
      The patch works on my testbox, but it could use more testing
      (otoh... it can't be much worse than the current code)
      Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      153d7f3f
  18. 08 7月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] Fix cpufreq vs hotplug lockdep recursion. · a496e25d
      Dave Jones 提交于
      [ There's some not quite baked bits in cpufreq-git right now
        so sending this on as a patch instead ]
      
      On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 07:58 -0700, Tom London wrote:
      
      > After installing .2356 I get this each time I boot:
      > =======================================================
      > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      > -------------------------------------------------------
      > S06cpuspeed/1620 is trying to acquire lock:
      >  (dbs_mutex){--..}, at: [<c060d6bb>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
      >
      > but task is already holding lock:
      >  (cpucontrol){--..}, at: [<c060d6bb>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
      >
      > which lock already depends on the new lock.
      >
      
      make sure the cpu hotplug recursive mutex (yuck) is taken early in the
      cpufreq codepaths to avoid a AB-BA deadlock.
      Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      a496e25d
  19. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 28 6月, 2006 3 次提交
  21. 05 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  22. 26 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 19 4月, 2006 2 次提交
    • A
      [CPUFREQ] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c: static functions mustn't be exported · 7b14dedd
      Adrian Bunk 提交于
      This patch removes the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL of the static function cpufreq_parse_governor().
      Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      7b14dedd
    • T
      [CPUFREQ] If max_freq got reduced (e.g. by _PPC) a write to sysfs... · 7970e08b
      Thomas Renninger 提交于
      [CPUFREQ] If max_freq got reduced (e.g. by _PPC) a write to sysfs scaling_governor let cpufreq core stuck at low max_freq for ever
      
      The previous patch had bugs (locking and refcount).
      
      This one could also be related to the latest DELL reports.
      But they only slip into this if a user prog (e.g. powersave daemon does when
      AC got (un) plugged due to a scheme change) echos something to
      /sys/../cpufreq/scaling_governor
      while the frequencies got limited by BIOS.
      
      This one works:
      
      Subject: Max freq stucks at low freq if reduced by _PPC and sysfs gov access
      
      The problem is reproducable by(if machine is limiting freqs via BIOS):
       - Unplugging AC -> max freq gets limited
       - echo ${governor} >/sys/.../cpufreq/scaling_governor (policy->user_data.max
         gets overridden with policy->max and will never come up again.)
      
      This patch exchanged the cpufreq_set_policy call to __cpufreq_set_policy and
      duplicated it's functionality but did not override user_data.max.
      The same happens with overridding min/max values. If freqs are limited and
      you override the min freq value, the max freq global value will also get
      stuck to the limited freq, even if BIOS allows all freqs again.
      Last scenario does only happen if BIOS does not reduce the frequency
      to the lowest value (should never happen, just for correctness...)
      
       drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
       1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: N"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      7970e08b
  24. 29 3月, 2006 2 次提交
  25. 28 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] Notifier chain update: API changes · e041c683
      Alan Stern 提交于
      The kernel's implementation of notifier chains is unsafe.  There is no
      protection against entries being added to or removed from a chain while the
      chain is in use.  The issues were discussed in this thread:
      
          http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113018709002036&w=2
      
      We noticed that notifier chains in the kernel fall into two basic usage
      classes:
      
      	"Blocking" chains are always called from a process context
      	and the callout routines are allowed to sleep;
      
      	"Atomic" chains can be called from an atomic context and
      	the callout routines are not allowed to sleep.
      
      We decided to codify this distinction and make it part of the API.  Therefore
      this set of patches introduces three new, parallel APIs: one for blocking
      notifiers, one for atomic notifiers, and one for "raw" notifiers (which is
      really just the old API under a new name).  New kinds of data structures are
      used for the heads of the chains, and new routines are defined for
      registration, unregistration, and calling a chain.  The three APIs are
      explained in include/linux/notifier.h and their implementation is in
      kernel/sys.c.
      
      With atomic and blocking chains, the implementation guarantees that the chain
      links will not be corrupted and that chain callers will not get messed up by
      entries being added or removed.  For raw chains the implementation provides no
      guarantees at all; users of this API must provide their own protections.  (The
      idea was that situations may come up where the assumptions of the atomic and
      blocking APIs are not appropriate, so it should be possible for users to
      handle these things in their own way.)
      
      There are some limitations, which should not be too hard to live with.  For
      atomic/blocking chains, registration and unregistration must always be done in
      a process context since the chain is protected by a mutex/rwsem.  Also, a
      callout routine for a non-raw chain must not try to register or unregister
      entries on its own chain.  (This did happen in a couple of places and the code
      had to be changed to avoid it.)
      
      Since atomic chains may be called from within an NMI handler, they cannot use
      spinlocks for synchronization.  Instead we use RCU.  The overhead falls almost
      entirely in the unregister routine, which is okay since unregistration is much
      less frequent that calling a chain.
      
      Here is the list of chains that we adjusted and their classifications.  None
      of them use the raw API, so for the moment it is only a placeholder.
      
        ATOMIC CHAINS
        -------------
      arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:		i386die_chain
      arch/ia64/kernel/traps.c:		ia64die_chain
      arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:		powerpc_die_chain
      arch/sparc64/kernel/traps.c:		sparc64die_chain
      arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c:		die_chain
      drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:	xaction_notifier_list
      kernel/panic.c:				panic_notifier_list
      kernel/profile.c:			task_free_notifier
      net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:		hci_notifier
      net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c:	ip_conntrack_chain
      net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c:	ip_conntrack_expect_chain
      net/ipv6/addrconf.c:			inet6addr_chain
      net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:	nf_conntrack_chain
      net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:	nf_conntrack_expect_chain
      net/netlink/af_netlink.c:		netlink_chain
      
        BLOCKING CHAINS
        ---------------
      arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c:	pSeries_reconfig_chain
      arch/s390/kernel/process.c:		idle_chain
      arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c		idle_notifier
      drivers/base/memory.c:			memory_chain
      drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c		cpufreq_policy_notifier_list
      drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c		cpufreq_transition_notifier_list
      drivers/macintosh/adb.c:		adb_client_list
      drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c		sleep_notifier_list
      drivers/macintosh/via-pmu68k.c		sleep_notifier_list
      drivers/macintosh/windfarm_core.c	wf_client_list
      drivers/usb/core/notify.c		usb_notifier_list
      drivers/video/fbmem.c			fb_notifier_list
      kernel/cpu.c				cpu_chain
      kernel/module.c				module_notify_list
      kernel/profile.c			munmap_notifier
      kernel/profile.c			task_exit_notifier
      kernel/sys.c				reboot_notifier_list
      net/core/dev.c				netdev_chain
      net/decnet/dn_dev.c:			dnaddr_chain
      net/ipv4/devinet.c:			inetaddr_chain
      
      It's possible that some of these classifications are wrong.  If they are,
      please let us know or submit a patch to fix them.  Note that any chain that
      gets called very frequently should be atomic, because the rwsem read-locking
      used for blocking chains is very likely to incur cache misses on SMP systems.
      (However, if the chain's callout routines may sleep then the chain cannot be
      atomic.)
      
      The patch set was written by Alan Stern and Chandra Seetharaman, incorporating
      material written by Keith Owens and suggestions from Paul McKenney and Andrew
      Morton.
      
      [jes@sgi.com: restructure the notifier chain initialization macros]
      Signed-off-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NChandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e041c683
  26. 05 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 28 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  28. 03 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  29. 01 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  30. 27 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  31. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交