1. 20 6月, 2006 2 次提交
  2. 11 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 22 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 13 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 08 5月, 2006 2 次提交
    • M
      [SPARC]: show device name in /proc/dvma_map · 4cfbd7eb
      Martin Habets 提交于
      This patch will set the device name in a resource, which will be shown
      in /proc/dvma_map.
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Habets <errandir_news@mph.eclipse.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4cfbd7eb
    • M
      [SPARC]: Remove duplicate symbol exports · bb3426ad
      Martin Habets 提交于
      This patch resolves the following build warnings seen in 2.6.17-rc3:
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'sys_close' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'memchr' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strstr' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strnlen' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strrchr' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strchr' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strcmp' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strncat' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strcat' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strncpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      WARNING: vmlinux: 'strcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Habets <errandir_news@mph.eclipse.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bb3426ad
  6. 04 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 15 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 11 4月, 2006 2 次提交
  9. 01 4月, 2006 2 次提交
  10. 24 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • B
      [SPARC]: Try to start getting SMP back into shape. · a54123e2
      Bob Breuer 提交于
      Todo items:
       - IRQ_INPROGRESS flag - use sparc64 irq buckets, or generic irq_desc?
       - sun4d
       - re-indent large chunks of sun4m_smp.c
       - some places assume sequential cpu numbering (i.e. 0,1 instead of 0,2)
      
      Last I checked (with 2.6.14), random programs segfault with dual
      HyperSPARC.  And with SuperSPARC II's, it seems stable but will
      eventually die from a write lock error (wrong lock owner or something).
      
      I haven't tried the HyperSPARC + highmem combination recently, so that
      may still be a problem.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a54123e2
  11. 23 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] more for_each_cpu() conversions · 394e3902
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      When we stop allocating percpu memory for not-possible CPUs we must not touch
      the percpu data for not-possible CPUs at all.  The correct way of doing this
      is to test cpu_possible() or to use for_each_cpu().
      
      This patch is a kernel-wide sweep of all instances of NR_CPUS.  I found very
      few instances of this bug, if any.  But the patch converts lots of open-coded
      test to use the preferred helper macros.
      
      Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
      Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
      Cc: Christian Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
      Cc: Philippe Elie <phil.el@wanadoo.fr>
      Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      394e3902
  12. 22 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  13. 20 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 13 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 08 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  16. 23 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  18. 13 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  19. 12 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 11 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  22. 29 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  23. 23 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  24. 16 12月, 2005 4 次提交
  25. 23 11月, 2005 1 次提交
    • H
      [PATCH] unpaged: fix sound Bad page states · f3d48f03
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      Earlier I unifdefed PageCompound, so that snd_pcm_mmap_control_nopage and
      others can give out a 0-order component of a higher-order page, which won't
      be mistakenly freed when zap_pte_range unmaps it.  But many Bad page states
      reported a PG_reserved was freed after all: I had missed that we need to
      say __GFP_COMP to get compound page behaviour.
      
      Some of these higher-order pages are allocated by snd_malloc_pages, some by
      snd_malloc_dev_pages; or if SBUS, by sbus_alloc_consistent - but that has
      no gfp arg, so add __GFP_COMP into its sparc32/64 implementations.
      
      I'm still rather puzzled that DRM seems not to need a similar change.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f3d48f03
  26. 10 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  27. 09 11月, 2005 2 次提交
    • N
      [PATCH] sched: resched and cpu_idle rework · 64c7c8f8
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Make some changes to the NEED_RESCHED and POLLING_NRFLAG to reduce
      confusion, and make their semantics rigid.  Improves efficiency of
      resched_task and some cpu_idle routines.
      
      * In resched_task:
      - TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only cleared with the task's runqueue lock held,
        and as we hold it during resched_task, then there is no need for an
        atomic test and set there. The only other time this should be set is
        when the task's quantum expires, in the timer interrupt - this is
        protected against because the rq lock is irq-safe.
      
      - If TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set, then we don't need to do anything. It
        won't get unset until the task get's schedule()d off.
      
      - If we are running on the same CPU as the task we resched, then set
        TIF_NEED_RESCHED and no further action is required.
      
      - If we are running on another CPU, and TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is *not* set
        after TIF_NEED_RESCHED has been set, then we need to send an IPI.
      
      Using these rules, we are able to remove the test and set operation in
      resched_task, and make clear the previously vague semantics of
      POLLING_NRFLAG.
      
      * In idle routines:
      - Enter cpu_idle with preempt disabled. When the need_resched() condition
        becomes true, explicitly call schedule(). This makes things a bit clearer
        (IMO), but haven't updated all architectures yet.
      
      - Many do a test and clear of TIF_NEED_RESCHED for some reason. According
        to the resched_task rules, this isn't needed (and actually breaks the
        assumption that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only cleared with the runqueue lock
        held). So remove that. Generally one less locked memory op when switching
        to the idle thread.
      
      - Many idle routines clear TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG, and only set it in the inner
        most polling idle loops. The above resched_task semantics allow it to be
        set until before the last time need_resched() is checked before going into
        a halt requiring interrupt wakeup.
      
        Many idle routines simply never enter such a halt, and so POLLING_NRFLAG
        can be always left set, completely eliminating resched IPIs when rescheduling
        the idle task.
      
        POLLING_NRFLAG width can be increased, to reduce the chance of resched IPIs.
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      64c7c8f8
    • N
      [PATCH] sched: disable preempt in idle tasks · 5bfb5d69
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Run idle threads with preempt disabled.
      
      Also corrected a bugs in arm26's cpu_idle (make it actually call schedule()).
      How did it ever work before?
      
      Might fix the CPU hotplugging hang which Nigel Cunningham noted.
      
      We think the bug hits if the idle thread is preempted after checking
      need_resched() and before going to sleep, then the CPU offlined.
      
      After calling stop_machine_run, the CPU eventually returns from preemption and
      into the idle thread and goes to sleep.  The CPU will continue executing
      previous idle and have no chance to call play_dead.
      
      By disabling preemption until we are ready to explicitly schedule, this bug is
      fixed and the idle threads generally become more robust.
      
      From: alexs <ashepard@u.washington.edu>
      
        PPC build fix
      
      From: Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
      
        MIPS build fix
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NYoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5bfb5d69
  28. 08 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  29. 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交