Now that the early kernel mapping logic can tolerate placements of
Image that cross swapper table boundaries, we can remove the logic
that adjusts the offset if the dice roll produced an offset that
puts the kernel right on top of one.
Reviewed-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Mirror arm behaviour for unimplemented syscalls: Below 2048 return
-ENOSYS, above 2048 raise SIGILL.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
[will: Tweak die string to identify as compat syscall]
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

do_task_stat() calls get_wchan(), which further does unwind_frame().
unwind_frame() restores frame->pc to original value in case function
graph tracer has modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook
a function return. However, if function graph tracer has hit a filtered
function, then we can't unwind it as ftrace_push_return_trace() has
biased the index(frame->graph) with a 'huge negative'
offset(-FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH).

Moreover, arm64 stack walker defines index(frame->graph) as unsigned
int, which can not compare a -ve number.

Similar problem we can have with calling of walk_stackframe() from
save_stack_trace_tsk() or dump_backtrace().

This patch fixes unwind_frame() to test the index for -ve value and
restore index accordingly before we can restore frame->pc.

Reproducer:

cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
echo schedule > set_graph_notrace
echo 1 > options/display-graph
echo wakeup > current_tracer
ps -ef | grep -i agent

Above commands result in:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff801bd3d1e000
pgd = ffff8003cbe97c00
[ffff801bd3d1e000] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
[...]
CPU: 5 PID: 11696 Comm: ps Not tainted 4.11.0+ #33
[...]
task: ffff8003c21ba000 task.stack: ffff8003cc6c0000
PC is at unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180
LR is at get_wchan+0xd4/0x134
pc : [<ffff00000808892c>] lr : [<ffff0000080860b8>] pstate: 60000145
sp : ffff8003cc6c3ab0
x29: ffff8003cc6c3ab0 x28: 0000000000000001
x27: 0000000000000026 x26: 0000000000000026
x25: 00000000000012d8 x24: 0000000000000000
x23: ffff8003c1c04000 x22: ffff000008c83000
x21: ffff8003c1c00000 x20: 000000000000000f
x19: ffff8003c1bc0000 x18: 0000fffffc593690
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001
x15: 0000b855670e2b60 x14: 0003e97f22cf1d0f
x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 00000000e8f4883e x10: 0000000154f47ec8
x9 : 0000000070f367c0 x8 : 0000000000000000
x7 : 00008003f7290000 x6 : 0000000000000018
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff8003c1c03cb0
x3 : ffff8003c1c03ca0 x2 : 00000017ffe80000
x1 : ffff8003cc6c3af8 x0 : ffff8003d3e9e000

Process ps (pid: 11696, stack limit = 0xffff8003cc6c0000)
Stack: (0xffff8003cc6c3ab0 to 0xffff8003cc6c4000)
[...]
[<ffff00000808892c>] unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180
[<ffff000008305008>] do_task_stat+0x864/0x870
[<ffff000008305c44>] proc_tgid_stat+0x3c/0x48
[<ffff0000082fde0c>] proc_single_show+0x5c/0xb8
[<ffff0000082b27e0>] seq_read+0x160/0x414
[<ffff000008289e6c>] __vfs_read+0x58/0x164
[<ffff00000828b164>] vfs_read+0x88/0x144
[<ffff00000828c2e8>] SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
[<ffff0000080834a0>] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4

Fixes: 20380bb3 (arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer)
Signed-off-by: NPratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: replace WARN_ON with WARN_ON_ONCE]
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

I recently noticed a crash on arm64 when feeding a bogus index
into BPF tail call helper. The crash would not occur when the
interpreter is used, but only in case of JIT. Output looks as
follows:

  [  347.007486] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffb850e96492510
  [...]
  [  347.043065] [fffb850e96492510] address between user and kernel address ranges
  [  347.050205] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
  [...]
  [  347.190829] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
  [  347.196128] x11: fffc047ebe782800 x10: ffff808fd7d0fd10
  [  347.201427] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000
  [  347.206726] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 001c991738000000
  [  347.212025] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 000000000000ba5a
  [  347.217325] x3 : 00000000000329c4 x2 : ffff808fd7cf0500
  [  347.222625] x1 : ffff808fd7d0fc00 x0 : ffff808fd7cf0500
  [  347.227926] Process test_verifier (pid: 4548, stack limit = 0x000000007467fa61)
  [  347.235221] Call trace:
  [  347.237656]  0xffff000002f3a4fc
  [  347.240784]  bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8
  [  347.244260]  bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x148/0x230
  [  347.248694]  SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110
  [  347.251999]  el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
  [  347.255564] Code: 9100075a d280220a 8b0a002a d37df04b (f86b694b)
  [...]

In this case the index used in BPF r3 is the same as in r1
at the time of the call, meaning we fed a pointer as index;
here, it had the value 0xffff808fd7cf0500 which sits in x2.

While I found tail calls to be working in general (also for
hitting the error cases), I noticed the following in the code
emission:

  # bpftool p d j i 988
  [...]
  38:   ldr     w10, [x1,x10]
  3c:   cmp     w2, w10
  40:   b.ge    0x000000000000007c              <-- signed cmp
  44:   mov     x10, #0x20                      // #32
  48:   cmp     x26, x10
  4c:   b.gt    0x000000000000007c
  50:   add     x26, x26, #0x1
  54:   mov     x10, #0x110                     // #272
  58:   add     x10, x1, x10
  5c:   lsl     x11, x2, #3
  60:   ldr     x11, [x10,x11]                  <-- faulting insn (f86b694b)
  64:   cbz     x11, 0x000000000000007c
  [...]

Meaning, the tests passed because commit ddb55992 ("arm64:
bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") was using signed compares
instead of unsigned which as a result had the test wrongly passing.

Change this but also the tail call count test both into unsigned
and cap the index as u32. Latter we did as well in 90caccdd
("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT") and is needed in addition here,
too. Tested on HiSilicon Hi1616.

Result after patch:

  # bpftool p d j i 268
  [...]
  38:	ldr	w10, [x1,x10]
  3c:	add	w2, w2, #0x0
  40:	cmp	w2, w10
  44:	b.cs	0x0000000000000080
  48:	mov	x10, #0x20                  	// #32
  4c:	cmp	x26, x10
  50:	b.hi	0x0000000000000080
  54:	add	x26, x26, #0x1
  58:	mov	x10, #0x110                 	// #272
  5c:	add	x10, x1, x10
  60:	lsl	x11, x2, #3
  64:	ldr	x11, [x10,x11]
  68:	cbz	x11, 0x0000000000000080
  [...]

Fixes: ddb55992 ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

ioremap_page_range doesn't honour break-before-make and attempts to put
down huge mappings (using p*d_set_huge) over the top of pre-existing
table entries. This leads to us leaking page table memory and also gives
rise to TLB conflicts and spurious aborts, which have been seen in
practice on Cortex-A75.

Until this has been resolved, refuse to put block mappings when the
existing entry is found to be present.

Fixes: 324420bf ("arm64: add support for ioremap() block mappings")
Reported-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Reported-by: NLei Li <lious.lilei@hisilicon.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On lkml suggestions were made to split up such trivial typo fixes into per subsystem
patches:

  --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
  +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
  @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ setup_uga32(void **uga_handle, unsigned long size, u32 *width, u32 *height)
          struct efi_uga_draw_protocol *uga = NULL, *first_uga;
          efi_guid_t uga_proto = EFI_UGA_PROTOCOL_GUID;
          unsigned long nr_ugas;
  -       u32 *handles = (u32 *)uga_handle;;
  +       u32 *handles = (u32 *)uga_handle;
          efi_status_t status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
          int i;

This patch is the result of the following script:

  $ sed -i 's/;;$/;/g' $(git grep -E ';;$'  | grep "\.[ch]:"  | grep -vwE 'for|ia64' | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq)

... followed by manual review to make sure it's all good.

Splitting this up is just crazy talk, let's get over with this and just do it.
Reported-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer field doesn't follow the usual ID registers
scheme. While value 0xf indicates a non-architected PMU is implemented,
values 0x1 to 0xe indicate an increasingly featureful architected PMU,
as if the field were unsigned.

For more details, see ARM DDI 0487C.a, D10.1.4, "Alternative ID scheme
used for the Performance Monitors Extension version".

Currently, we treat the field as signed, and erroneously bail out for
values 0x8 to 0xe. Let's correct that.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

__show_regs pretty prints PC and LR by attempting to map them to kernel
function names to improve the utility of crash reports. Unfortunately,
this mapping is applied even when the pt_regs corresponds to user mode,
resulting in a KASLR oracle.

Avoid this issue by only looking up the function symbols when the register
state indicates that we're actually running at EL1.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: NNCSC Security <security@ncsc.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Stop printing a (ratelimited) kernel message for each instance of an
unimplemented syscall being called. Userland making an unimplemented
syscall is not necessarily misbehaviour and to be expected with a
current userland running on an older kernel. Also, the current message
looks scary to users but does not actually indicate a real problem nor
help them narrow down the cause. Just rely on sys_ni_syscall() to return
-ENOSYS.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

aarch64 unhandled signal kernel messages are very verbose, suggesting
them to be more of a debugging aid:

sigsegv[33]: unhandled level 2 translation fault (11) at 0x00000000, esr
0x92000046, in sigsegv[400000+71000]
CPU: 1 PID: 33 Comm: sigsegv Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc3+ #3
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 60000000 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : 0x4003f4
lr : 0x4006bc
sp : 0000fffffe94a060
x29: 0000fffffe94a070 x28: 0000000000000000
x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 00000000004001b0
x23: 0000000000486ac8 x22: 00000000004001c8
x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000400be8
x19: 0000000000400b30 x18: 0000000000484728
x17: 000000000865ffc8 x16: 000000000000270f
x15: 00000000000000b0 x14: 0000000000000002
x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0008000020008008
x9 : 000000000000000f x8 : ffffffffffffffff
x7 : 0004000000000000 x6 : ffffffffffffffff
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
x3 : 00000000004003e4 x2 : 0000fffffe94a1e8
x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000000

Disable them by default, so they can be enabled using
/proc/sys/debug/exception-trace.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Our field definitions for CTR_EL0 suffer from a number of problems:

  - The IDC and DIC fields are missing, which causes us to enable CTR
    trapping on CPUs with either of these returning non-zero values.

  - The ERG is FTR_LOWER_SAFE, whereas it should be treated like CWG as
    FTR_HIGHER_SAFE so that applications can use it to avoid false sharing.

  - [nit] A RES1 field is described as "RAO"

This patch updates the CTR_EL0 field definitions to fix these issues.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In converting __range_ok() into a static inline, I inadvertently made
it more type-safe, but without considering the ordering of the relevant
conversions. This leads to quite a lot of Sparse noise about the fact
that we use __chk_user_ptr() after addr has already been converted from
a user pointer to an unsigned long.

Rather than just adding another cast for the sake of shutting Sparse up,
it seems reasonable to rework the types to make logical sense (although
the resulting codegen for __range_ok() remains identical). The only
callers this affects directly are our compat traps where the inferred
"user-pointer-ness" of a register value now warrants explicit casting.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Since commit e1a50de3 (arm64: cputype: Silence Sparse warnings),
compilation of arm64 architecture is broken with the following error
messages:

  AR      arch/arm64/kernel/built-in.o
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S: Assembler messages:
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:677: Error: found 'L', expected: ')'
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:677: Error: found 'L', expected: ')'
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:677: Error: found 'L', expected: ')'
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:677: Error: junk at end of line, first
  unrecognized character is `L'
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:677: Error: unexpected characters following
  instruction at operand 2 -- `movz x1,:abs_g1_s:0xff00ffffffUL'
  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:677: Error: unexpected characters following
  instruction at operand 2 -- `movk x1,:abs_g0_nc:0xff00ffffffUL'

This patch fixes the same by using the UL() macro correctly for
assigning the MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK macro value.

Fixes: e1a50de3 ("arm64: cputype: Silence Sparse warnings")
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NBhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Sparse makes a fair bit of noise about our MPIDR mask being implicitly
long - let's explicitly describe it as such rather than just relying on
the value forcing automatic promotion.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In many cases, page tables can be accessed concurrently by either another
CPU (due to things like fast gup) or by the hardware page table walker
itself, which may set access/dirty bits. In such cases, it is important
to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page table entries so that
entries cannot be torn, merged or subject to apparent loss of coherence
due to compiler transformations.

Whilst there are some scenarios where this cannot happen (e.g. pinned
kernel mappings for the linear region), the overhead of using READ_ONCE
/WRITE_ONCE everywhere is minimal and makes the code an awful lot easier
to reason about. This patch consistently uses these macros in the arch
code, as well as explicitly namespacing pointers to page table entries
from the entries themselves by using adopting a 'p' suffix for the former
(as is sometimes used elsewhere in the kernel source).
Tested-by: NYury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: NRichard Ruigrok <rruigrok@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

When KASAN is enabled, the swapper page table contains many identical
mappings of the zero page, which can lead to a stall during boot whilst
the G -> nG code continually walks the same page table entries looking
for global mappings.

This patch sets the nG bit (bit 11, which is IGNORED) in table entries
after processing the subtree so we can easily skip them if we see them
a second time.
Tested-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

References to CPU part number MIDR_QCOM_FALKOR were dropped from the
mailing list patch due to mainline/arm64 branch dependency. So this
patch adds the missing part number.

Fixes: ec82b567 ("arm64: Implement branch predictor hardening for Falkor")
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NShanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

SPCR is currently only enabled or ARM64 and x86 can use SPCR to setup
an early console.

General fixes include updating Documentation & Kconfig (for x86),
updating comments, and changing parse_spcr() to acpi_parse_spcr(),
and earlycon_init_is_deferred to earlycon_acpi_spcr_enable to be
more descriptive.

On x86, many systems have a valid SPCR table but the table version is
not 2 so the table version check must be a warning.

On ARM64 when the kernel parameter earlycon is used both the early console
and console are enabled.  On x86, only the earlycon should be enabled by
by default.  Modify acpi_parse_spcr() to allow options for initializing
the early console and console separately.
Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

with bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 over the kernel. Additionally to it:
* __check_eq_bitmap() now takes single nbits argument.
* __check_eq_u32_array is not used in new test but may be used in
  future. So I don't remove it here, but annotate as __used.

Tested on arm64 and 32-bit BE mips.

[arnd@arndb.de: perf: arm_dsu_pmu: convert to bitmap_from_arr32]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-2-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
[ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: fix net/core/ethtool.c]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180205071747.4ekxtsbgxkj5b2fz@yury-thinkpad
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-2-ynorov@caviumnetworks.comSigned-off-by: NYury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Right now the fact that KASAN uses a single shadow byte for 8 bytes of
memory is scattered all over the code.

This change defines KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT early in asm include files
and makes use of this constant where necessary.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/34937ca3b90736eaad91b568edf5684091f662e3.1515775666.git.andreyknvl@google.comSigned-off-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Acked-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Now that we've standardised on SMCCC v1.1 to perform the branch
prediction invalidation, let's drop the previous band-aid.
If vendors haven't updated their firmware to do SMCCC 1.1, they
haven't updated PSCI either, so we don't loose anything.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Add the detection and runtime code for ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1.
It is lovely. Really.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We want SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 to be fast. As fast as possible.
So let's intercept it as early as we can by testing for the
function call number as soon as we've identified a HVC call
coming from the guest.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

A new feature of SMCCC 1.1 is that it offers firmware-based CPU
workarounds. In particular, SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 provides
BP hardening for CVE-2017-5715.

If the host has some mitigation for this issue, report that
we deal with it using SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, as we apply the
host workaround on every guest exit.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We're about to need kvm_psci_version in HYP too. So let's turn it
into a static inline, and pass the kvm structure as a second
parameter (so that HYP can do a kern_hyp_va on it).
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The new SMC Calling Convention (v1.1) allows for a reduced overhead
when calling into the firmware, and provides a new feature discovery
mechanism.

Make it visible to KVM guests.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

As we're about to update the PSCI support, and because I'm lazy,
let's move the PSCI include file to include/kvm so that both
ARM architectures can find it.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).

Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: acfb3b88 ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

KVM doesn't follow the SMCCC when it comes to unimplemented calls,
and inject an UNDEF instead of returning an error. Since firmware
calls are now used for security mitigation, they are becoming more
common, and the undef is counter productive.

Instead, let's follow the SMCCC which states that -1 must be returned
to the caller when getting an unknown function number.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

It is possible to take an IRQ from EL0 following a branch to a kernel
address in such a way that the IRQ is prioritised over the instruction
abort. Whilst an attacker would need to get the stars to align here,
it might be sufficient with enough calibration so perform BP hardening
in the rare case that we see a kernel address in the ELR when handling
an IRQ from EL0.
Reported-by: NDan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Software-step and PC alignment fault exceptions have higher priority than
instruction abort exceptions, so apply the BP hardening hooks there too
if the user PC appears to reside in kernel space.
Reported-by: NDan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The arm64 futex code has some explicit dereferencing of user pointers
where performing atomic operations in response to a futex command. This
patch uses masking to limit any speculative futex operations to within
the user address space.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Like we've done for get_user and put_user, ensure that user pointers
are masked before invoking the underlying __arch_{clear,copy_*}_user
operations.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

access_ok isn't an expensive operation once the addr_limit for the current
thread has been loaded into the cache. Given that the initial access_ok
check preceding a sequence of __{get,put}_user operations will take
the brunt of the miss, we can make the __* variants identical to the
full-fat versions, which brings with it the benefits of address masking.

The likely cost in these sequences will be from toggling PAN/UAO, which
we can address later by implementing the *_unsafe versions.
Reviewed-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

A mispredicted conditional call to set_fs could result in the wrong
addr_limit being forwarded under speculation to a subsequent access_ok
check, potentially forming part of a spectre-v1 attack using uaccess
routines.

This patch prevents this forwarding from taking place, but putting heavy
barriers in set_fs after writing the addr_limit.
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In a similar manner to array_index_mask_nospec, this patch introduces an
assembly macro (mask_nospec64) which can be used to bound a value under
speculation. This macro is then used to ensure that the indirect branch
through the syscall table is bounded under speculation, with out-of-range
addresses speculating as calls to sys_io_setup (0).
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Similarly to x86, mitigate speculation past an access_ok() check by
masking the pointer against the address limit before use.

Even if we don't expect speculative writes per se, it is plausible that
a CPU may still speculate at least as far as fetching a cache line for
writing, hence we also harden put_user() and clear_user() for peace of
mind.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is
inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe
masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough
bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This
also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range
ending on the very top byte of kernel memory.

Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of
addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to
amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we
can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Provide an optimised, assembly implementation of array_index_mask_nospec()
for arm64 so that the compiler is not in a position to transform the code
in ways which affect its ability to inhibit speculation (e.g. by introducing
conditional branches).

This is similar to the sequence used by x86, modulo architectural differences
in the carry/borrow flags.
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

For CPUs capable of data value prediction, CSDB waits for any outstanding
predictions to architecturally resolve before allowing speculative execution
to continue. Provide macros to expose it to the arch code.
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>