- 10 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
There are devices that forbid MIMO by the mean of the NVM. Detect thoses devices and forbid MIMO otherwise the firmware would crash. STBC is still allowed on these devices. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 24 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eran Harary 提交于
Add two new parameters to iwl_cfg: max_ht_ampdu_exponent and max_vht_ampdu_exponent. These parameters, if set, will set new values to the maximum of HT and VHT A-MPDU exponent for the A-MPDU length exponent. Signed-off-by: NEran Harary <eran.harary@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eyal Shapira 提交于
Use LDPC for Tx and publish support for Rx in case the chip supports LDPC. Enable it for the 7265 family. Signed-off-by: NEyal Shapira <eyalx.shapira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eliad Peller 提交于
MCS32 is currently not supported, so don't declare support for it. Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Happy new year! Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eyal Shapira 提交于
Not all chips support STBC so allow this to be another config parameter per chip type. If STBC is supported then publish it in the HT caps. Since 7260/7265/3160 chips support it - set the stbc support bit. Signed-off-by: NEyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
These two flags are used for the same purpose, just combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating radiation is allowed. Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags. Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels. Update all places in the tree using these flags with the following semantic patch: @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR) +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR) +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to remove duplicates and to fix some indentation. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [do all the driver updates in one go] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
I forgot to take them from TLV and took them from the NVM instead. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If all the pieces of iwlwifi are built into the kernel then there's no need for it to export its symbols to other modules, so prevent that. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
All hardware after 4965 supports this. It's likely that it wasn't set because for 4965 it was irrelevant (HT is only supported on 5 GHz there) and then never updated. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
7000.c was released as GPL only by mistake: it should be dual licensed - GPL / BSD. The file that contains the license in the kernel is COPYING and not LICENSE.GPL. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 31 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The new MVM (multi-virtual MAC) firmware driver requires NVM (non-volatile memory) parsing code and some PHY information database code. Add this separately. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 24 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Update Copyright notices to 2013. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eytan Lifshitz 提交于
Since we will have several forms of NVM (EEPROM, OTP, etc.) and they will have different layouts, make the parsed data more generic. This allows functional code to be independent of a specific layout. Also change some variables and function names from having "eeprom" to "nvm" in their name. Signed-off-by: NEytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If the EEPROM reading was successful, don't print a message by default, the EEPROM version isn't all that interesting. Change the message to DEBUG_INFO priority so it can still be obtained. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
My commit 26a7ca9a ("iwlwifi: refactor EEPROM reading/parsing") broke the 11n_disable module parameter's BIT(0) to disable all HT operation (using the other bits to disable aggregation only was unaffected). Restore this by overriding the SKU when parsing the EEPROM if the module parameter is set. Reported-by: NMatthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 06 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The EEPROM reading/parsing code is all mixed in the driver today, and the EEPROM is parsed only when we access data from it. This is problematic because the NVM needs to be parsed and that is independent of reading it. Also, the NVM format for new devices will be different and probably require a new parser. Therefore refactor the reading and parsing and create two independent components. Reading the EEPROM requires direct hardware accesses and therefore access to the transport, but parsing is independent and can be done on an NVM blob. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-