Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions
of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock
operations using register_hotplug_dock_device().

That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI
dock operations to be dropped in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock
operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to
struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that
callback if available.  Also rename the existing .event() callback
in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible
confusion in the future.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Instead of requiring a set of special dock operations to be registered
via register_hotplug_dock_device() for each ACPI dock device, it is
much more straightforward to use callback pointers from the devices'
hotplug contexts if available.

For this reason, modify dock_hotplug_event() to use callback pointers
from the hotplug contexts of ACPI devices and fall back to using the
special dock operarions only if those callbacks are missing.  Also
make the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem set the .fixup
callback pointer in the hotplug contexts of devices handled by it to
a new function, acpiphp_post_dock_fixup(), so that the dock station
driver can use the callbacks from those contexts instead of special
dock operations registered via register_hotplug_dock_device().

Along with the above changes drop the ACPIPHP's dock operations that
are not necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Rework the ACPI dock station driver to store ACPI device object
pointers instead of ACPI handles in its internal data structures.

The purpose is moslty to make subsequent simplifications possible,
but also this allows the overall code size to be reduced slightly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In order for the ACPI dock station code to be able to use the
callbacks pointed to by the ACPI device objects' hotplug contexts
add a .fixup() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context.
That callback will be useful to handle PCI devices located in
dock stations.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After recent changes adding dock station handling to the ACPI hotplug
core, it is not necessary to clear the .event() pointer in the
ACPIPHP device hotplug context for dock stations any more, so don't
do that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To allow user space to check which ACPI device object the dock
station is represented by, make acpi_dock_add() indicate to
platform_device_register_full() which ACPI device object should
be the companion of the new platform device.

This also ensures that the ACPI device object in question will
not go away while the dock platform device is present (which is
always).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when
acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run
acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function.  Instead, if
acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device
object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that
happen and modify the function's header accordingly
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan
before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock
device objects.  Then, it registers a notify handler for each of
them for handling dock events.

However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront.  They
very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase
of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI
drivers to ACPI device objects.  Then, the dependent devices can be
added to the in the second phase.  That makes it possible to drop
the extra namespace scan, so do it.

Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all
of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may
be dispatched from the global notify handler for them.  Do that and
drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more.

Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the
ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects
and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea,
because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway.
For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI
device objects representing dock stations and the container scan
handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, ACPIPHP does not add hotplug context to devices that
should be handled by the native PCI hotplug (PCIeHP) code.  The
reason why was because PCIeHP didn't know about the devices'
connections with ACPI and would not clean up things properly
during an eject of an ACPI-backed device, for example.

However, after recent changes that made the ACPI core create struct
acpi_device objects for all namespace nodes regardless of the
underlying devices' status and added PCI rescan-remove locking to
both ACPIPHP and PCIeHP, that concern is not valid any more.
Namely, after those changes PCIeHP need not care about the ACPI
side of things any more and it should be serialized with respect to
ACPIPHP and they won't be running concurrently with each other in
any case.

For this reason, make ACPIPHP to add its hotplug context to
all devices with ACPI companions, even the ones that should be
handled by PCIeHP in principle.  That may work around hotplug
issues on some systems where PCIeHP is supposed to work, but it
doesn't and the ACPI hotplug signaling works instead.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The name of register_slot() doesn't really reflect what the function
is does, so rename it to acpiphp_add_context() and add a proper
kerneldoc comment to it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After recent ACPI core changes acpi_bus_get_device() will always
succeed for dock station ACPI device objects, so show_docked()
should not use that function's return value as an indicator of
whether or not the dock device is present.

Make it use acpi_device_enumerated() for this purpose.

Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI specification (ACPI 5.0A, Section 6.3.7) says:

 _STA may return bit 0 clear (not present) with bit 3 set (device is
 functional). This case is used to indicate a valid device for which
 no device driver should be loaded (for example, a bridge device.)
 Children of this device may be present and valid. OSPM should
 continue enumeration below a device whose _STA returns this bit
 combination.

Evidently, some BIOSes follow that and return 0x0A from _STA, which
causes problems to happen when they trigger bus check or device check
notifications for those devices too.  Namely, ACPIPHP thinks that they
are gone and may drop them, for example, if such a notification is
triggered during a resume from system suspend.

To fix that, modify ACPICA to regard devies as present and
functioning if _STA returns both the ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED
and ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING bits set for them.
Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
[rjw: Subject and changelog, minor code modifications]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for
all device nodes in the namespace) acpi_bus_get_device() will always
return 0 for dock devices in dock_notify(), so the dock station
docking code under ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK will never be executed
and docking will not work as a result of that.

Fix the problem by making dock_notify() use acpi_device_enumerated()
to check the presence of the device instead of checking the return
value of acpi_bus_get_device().

Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since acpi_device_hotplug() assumes that ACPI handles of device
objects passed to it will not become invalid while acpi_scan_lock
is being held, make acpiphp_disable_slot() acquire acpi_scan_lock,
because it generally causes _EJ0 to be executed for one of the
devices in the slot and that may cause its ACPI handle to become
invalid.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

While we are at it, don't do kmap() under kmap_atomic(), *especially*
for a page we'd allocated with GFP_KERNEL.  It's spelled "page_address",
and had that been more than that, we'd have a real trouble - kmap_high()
can block, and doing that while holding kmap_atomic() is a Bad Idea(tm).
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

On archs like S390 or um this driver cannot build nor work.
Make it depend on HAS_IOMEM to bypass build failures.

drivers/built-in.o: In function `dw_wdt_drv_probe':
drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c:302: undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource'
Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: NWim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>

Remove use of regmap_irq_get_virq() in driver probe which was
conflicting with use of platform_get_irq_byname().
platform_get_irq_byname() already returns the VIRQ number due
to MFD core translation so using regmap_irq_get_virq() on that
returned value results in an incorrect IRQ being requested.
The driver probes then fail because of this.
Signed-off-by: NAdam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Since the only existing caller of acpiphp_check_host_bridge(),
which is acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent(), already has a struct
acpi_device pointer needed to obtain the ACPIPHP context, it
doesn't make sense to execute acpi_bus_get_device() on its
handle in acpiphp_handle_to_bridge() just in order to get that
pointer back.

For this reason, modify acpiphp_check_host_bridge() to take
a struct acpi_device pointer as its argument and rearrange the
code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all
devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all
hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to
the same function for all hotplug devices.

This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device
hotplug code.  Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does
significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler,
or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices
had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed
before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any
more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler()
can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To avoid the need to install a hotplug notify handler for each ACPI
namespace node representing a device and having a matching scan
handler, move the check whether or not the ejection of the given
device is enabled through its scan handler from acpi_hotplug_notify_cb()
to acpi_generic_hotplug_event().  Also, move the execution of
ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS _OST to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(),
because in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() or in acpi_eject_store() we really
don't know whether or not the eject is going to be in progress (for
example, acpi_hotplug_execute() may still fail without queuing up the
work item).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its
hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing
hotplug devices.  However, after recent changes causing struct
acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a
device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more.
Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI
handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and
hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a
result of a concurrent table unload).

In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty
release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to
acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that
function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn().  For this reason, it's
better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to
struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it
use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler.  At the same
time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new
.hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI
device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic
ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan
handlers.

This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the
ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device
hotplug consolidation possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When memory allocation failed, drive should return error as ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Commit c420619d "pinctrl: pinconf: remove checks on ops->pin_config_get"
removed the check on (ops != NULL) when performing pinconf_pins_show() or
pinconf_groups_show(). As these entries are always enabled, even if
pinconf is not supported, reading will result in an oops due to NULL
ops.

Instead of checking for ops, remove the corresponding debugfs entries if
pinconf and/or pinmux are not implemented.

Tested on OMAP3 (pinctrl-single).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

the evergreen CS parser has allowed this for a while, just port
the code to the r600 one.

This is required before geom shaders can be made work.

v2: agd5f: minor cleanup and add additional 7xx reg.
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

I totally sign inverted my way out of this one.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: N"Sabrina Dubroca" <sd@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock
protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of
the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to
by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the
acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference
of that pointer under get_device().  Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device()
runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn()
queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after
a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify().

An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device
pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before
it subsequent dereference in the "if" block.

To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function,
acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device()
except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned
by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex.  Then,
make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use
acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to
ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one
point.

In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper
around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device()
and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device()
too.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Introduce a new function, acpi_get_data_full(), working in analogy
with acpi_get_data() except that it can execute a callback provided
as its 4th argument right after acpi_ns_get_attached_data() has
returned a success.

That will allow Linux to reference count the object pointed to by
*data before the namespace mutex is released so as to ensure that it
will not be freed going forward until the reference to it acquired
by acpi_get_data_full() is dropped.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Since hotplug_event() can get the ACPI handle needed for debug
printouts from its context argument, there's no need to pass the
handle to it.  Moreover, the second argument's type may be changed
to (struct acpiphp_context *), because that's what is always passed
to hotplug_event() as the second argument anyway.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Make hotplug_event() use acpi_handle_debug() instead of an open-coded
debug message printing and clean up the messages printed by it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

A few lines of code can be cut from hotplug_event() by defining
and initializing the slot variable at the top of the function,
so do that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

After recent PCI core changes related to the rescan/remove locking,
the code sections under crit_sect mutexes from ACPIPHP slot objects
are always executed under the general PCI rescan/remove lock.
For this reason, the crit_sect mutexes are simply redundant, so drop
them.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

acpiphp_bus_add() is only called from one place, so move the code out
of it into that place and drop it.  Also make that code use
func_to_acpi_device() to get the struct acpi_device pointer it needs
instead of calling acpi_bus_get_device() which may be costly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

After recent modifications of the ACPI core making it create a struct
acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device
regardless of the current status of that device the ACPIPHP code
can store a struct acpi_device pointer instead of an ACPI handle
in struct acpiphp_context.  This immediately makes it possible to
avoid making potentially costly calls to acpi_bus_get_device() in
two places and allows some more simplifications to be made going
forward.

The reason why that is correct is because ACPIPHP only installs
hotify handlers for namespace nodes that exist when
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() is called for their parent bridge.
That only happens if the parent bridge has an ACPI companion
associated with it, which means that the ACPI namespace scope
in question has been scanned already at that point.  That, in
turn, means that struct acpi_device objects have been created
for all namespace nodes in that scope and pointers to those
objects can be stored directly instead of their ACPI handles.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If a struct acpi_device pointer is passed to acpiphp_no_hotplug()
instead of an ACPI handle, the function won't need to call
acpi_bus_get_device(), which may be costly, any more.  Then,
trim_stale_devices() can call acpiphp_no_hotplug() passing
the struct acpi_device object it already has directly to that
function.

Make those changes and update slot_no_hotplug() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If trim_stale_devices() calls acpi_bus_trim() directly, we can
save a potentially costly acpi_bus_get_device() invocation.  After
making that change acpiphp_bus_trim() would only be called from one
place, so move the code from it to that place and drop it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The err label in register_slot() is only jumped to from one place,
so move the code under the label to that place and drop the label.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Add proper kerneldoc comments describing acpiphp_enumerate_slots()
and acpiphp_remove_slots().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>