1. 07 12月, 2013 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI / ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child devices lookup · 5ce79d20
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      It is much more efficient to use acpi_find_child_device()
      for child devices lookup in acpi_pci_find_device() and pass
      ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) to it directly instead of obtaining
      ACPI_HANDLE() of ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) and passing it to
      acpi_find_child() which has to run acpi_bus_get_device() to
      obtain ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) from that again.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
      5ce79d20
    • L
      ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header files · 8b48463f
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and
      <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h>
      inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't
      necessary.
      
      First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
      should not be included directly from any files that are built for
      CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about
      undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds.  For CONFIG_ACPI set,
      <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it
      provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case.
      
      Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always
      have to be met.  Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included
      prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the
      latter depends on are always there.  And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides
      basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other
      ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds.  That also is taken care of including
      <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate.
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff)
      Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff)
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      8b48463f
  2. 15 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  3. 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 20 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges · 60f75b8e
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only
      one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus
      address exactly.  In practice, however, there are systems in which
      multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching
      exactly the same address.  In those cases we use _STA to determine
      which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems
      are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the
      given physical (usually PCI) device this way.
      
      Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many
      device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the
      same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all
      should be regarded as enabled according to the spec.  Still, if
      those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this
      is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can
      try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the
      ACPI namespace.  With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we
      are not expected to use this way.
      
      Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI
      namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics
      adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding
      a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement
      this idea.
      
      Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments:
      the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for
      the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a
      bridge and make it work as outlined above.  Reimplement the function
      currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to
      acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make
      the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information
      passed as the last argument to it.  [Lan Tianyu notices that it is
      not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's
      subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use
      hdr_type instead.]
      
      This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit
      33f767d7 (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which
      overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means
      "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back",
      so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of
      depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks
      ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones.
      Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to
      terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going
      through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively
      changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and
      that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order"
      callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was
      ineffective).
      
      As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit
      33f767d7 actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI
      device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively
      is a bridge).  Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are
      expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace,
      so the regression can be addressed as described above.
      
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561Reported-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: NVladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
      60f75b8e
  6. 01 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 23 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 15 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 29 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 13 4月, 2013 3 次提交
  11. 04 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / glue: Add .match() callback to struct acpi_bus_type · 53540098
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      USB uses the .find_bridge() callback from struct acpi_bus_type
      incorrectly, because as a result of the way it is used by USB every
      device in the system that doesn't have a bus type or parent is
      passed to usb_acpi_find_device() for inspection.
      
      What USB actually needs, though, is to call usb_acpi_find_device()
      for USB ports that don't have a bus type defined, but have
      usb_port_device_type as their device type, as well as for USB
      devices.
      
      To fix that replace the struct bus_type pointer in struct
      acpi_bus_type used for matching devices to specific subsystems
      with a .match() callback to be used for this purpose and update
      the users of struct acpi_bus_type, including USB, accordingly.
      Define the .match() callback routine for USB, usb_acpi_bus_match(),
      in such a way that it will cover both USB devices and USB ports
      and remove the now redundant .find_bridge() callback pointer from
      usb_acpi_bus.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
      53540098
  13. 17 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 17 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources · bc9b6407
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device
      to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI
      core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then
      it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required
      by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on.
      
      Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices
      depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they
      should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0
      state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices
      the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices
      depend on what power resources.
      
      For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a
      new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used
      internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code
      from kernel subsystems using ACPI.
      
      For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be
      resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into
      D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in
      the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
      and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage
      such dependencies.  Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new
      functions accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      bc9b6407
  15. 14 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance · 6c0cc950
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
      acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
      "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
      the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
      (to put it lightly).
      
      This is how it works, roughly:
      
        1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
           creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
           object to acpi_pci_root_add().
      
        2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
           populates its "device" field with its argument's address
           (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
      
        3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
           to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
           passed to pci_create_root_bus().
      
        4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
           and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
      
        5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
           acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
      
      So far, so good.  Now it starts to be "interesting".
      
        6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
           the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
           acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
           given device object.
      
        7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
           device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
           root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
      
        8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
           root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
           and bus numbers.  Its handle is then used to initialize the
           ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
           acpi_bind_one().  However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
           started with in step 1.
      
      Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
      thanks to commit f3fd0c8a (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
      initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
      ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
      
      Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
      defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
      interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
      that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
      passed to device_register().  Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
      implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
      acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
      aren't necessary any more.
      
      Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
      bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      6c0cc950
  16. 03 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  17. 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  18. 24 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account · 8b713a88
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Make ACPI power management routines and PCI power management
      routines depending on ACPI take device PM QoS flags into account
      when deciding what power state to put the device into.
      
      In particular, after this change acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() will
      not return ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as the deepest available low-power
      state if PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF is requested for the device and it
      will not require remote wakeup to work for the device in the returned
      low-power state if there is at least one PM QoS flags request for the
      device, but PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP is not requested for it.
      
      Accordingly, acpi_pci_set_power_state() will refuse to put the
      device into D3cold if PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF is requested for it.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
      Reviewed-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      8b713a88
  19. 16 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  20. 24 6月, 2012 2 次提交
    • H
      PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support · 448bd857
      Huang Ying 提交于
      This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform
      support.  This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not
      enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate.
      
      D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main
      power is removed.  While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at
      all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot).
      Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of
      the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3.
      
      To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which
      allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE#
      signal.  WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE.
      This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices
      request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link.
      
      Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform
      logic.  For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them.  D3cold
      support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading
      to the device.  When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered
      on/off too.  Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the
      corresponding PCIe port.
      
      For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support,
      please refer to:
      
      - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0
      - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0
      
      [bhelgaas: changelog]
      Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Originally-by: NZheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      448bd857
    • H
      ACPI/PM: specify lowest allowed state for device sleep state · ee85f543
      Huang Ying 提交于
      Lower device sleep state can save more power, but has more exit
      latency too.  Sometimes, to satisfy some power QoS and other
      requirement, we need to constrain the lowest device sleep state.
      
      In this patch, a parameter to specify lowest allowed state for
      acpi_pm_device_sleep_state is added.  So that the caller can enforce
      the constraint via the parameter.
      
      This is needed by PCIe D3cold support, where the lowest power state
      allowed may be D3_HOT instead of default D3_COLD.
      
      CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
      Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      ee85f543
  21. 23 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  22. 18 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PCI / PM: Fix device PM regression related to D3hot/D3cold · 5c7dd710
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Commit 1cc0c998 ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a
      bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of
      acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work
      as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument.
      
      First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to
      __acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold
      state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which
      doesn't exist.
      
      Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method
      to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in
      __acpi_bus_set_power().  Also make sure that the explicit_set flag
      for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify
      acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for
      ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist.
      
      Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the
      target state, the function will request a transition to
      ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3.  However,
      ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML
      method is defined for the given device, which is rare.  This causes
      problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put
      into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work
      now.  In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned
      off as a result.
      
      To fix this issue restore the old behavior of
      acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to
      ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or
      PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument.
      
      This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not
      be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state,
      but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to
      restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a
      better solution in the future.
      
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228Reported-by: Nrocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com>
      Reported-by: NCristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5c7dd710
  23. 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion · 1cc0c998
      Lin Ming 提交于
      Before this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 incorrectly referenced D3hot
      in some places, but D3cold in other places.
      
      After this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
      and all references to D3hot use ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT.
      
      ACPI's _PR3 method is used to enter both D3hot and D3cold states.
      What distinguishes D3hot from D3cold is the presence _PR3
      (Power Resources for D3hot)  If these resources are all ON,
      then the state is D3hot.  If _PR3 is not present,
      or all _PR0 resources for the devices are OFF,
      then the state is D3cold.
      
      This patch applies after Linux-3.4-rc1.
      A future syntax cleanup may remove ACPI_STATE_D3
      to emphasize that it always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD.
      Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      1cc0c998
  24. 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  25. 07 1月, 2012 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI/ACPI/PM: Avoid resuming devices that don't signal PME · 4716a450
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify pci_acpi_wake_dev() to avoid resuming PME-capable devices
      whose PME Status bits are not set, which may happen currently if
      several devices are associated with the same wakeup GPE and all
      of them are notified whenever at least one of them signals PME.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      4716a450
    • M
      PCI: Rework ASPM disable code · 10f6dc7e
      Matthew Garrett 提交于
      Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates
      that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation
      "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think
      that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform
      grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features -
      including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless
      the platform has granted us that control.
      
      This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing
      of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS.
      The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the
      ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been
      disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where
      only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the
      BIOS state.
      
      It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do -
      there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these
      components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this
      bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone.
      
      Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      10f6dc7e
  26. 06 12月, 2011 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI/ACPI/PM: Avoid resuming devices that don't signal PME · a424948d
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify pci_acpi_wake_dev() to avoid resuming PME-capable devices
      whose PME Status bits are not set, which may happen currently if
      several devices are associated with the same wakeup GPE and all
      of them are notified whenever at least one of them signals PME.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      a424948d
    • M
      PCI: Rework ASPM disable code · 3c076351
      Matthew Garrett 提交于
      Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates
      that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation
      "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think
      that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform
      grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features -
      including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless
      the platform has granted us that control.
      
      This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing
      of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS.
      The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the
      ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been
      disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where
      only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the
      BIOS state.
      
      It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do -
      there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these
      components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this
      bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone.
      
      Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      3c076351
  27. 15 10月, 2011 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI / PM: Remove unnecessary error variable from acpi_dev_run_wake() · 78d090b0
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The result returned by acpi_dev_run_wake() is always either -EINVAL
      or -ENODEV, while obviously it should return 0 on success.  The
      problem is that the leftover error variable, that's not really used
      in the function, is initialized with -ENODEV and then returned
      without modification.
      
      To fix this issue remove the error variable from acpi_dev_run_wake()
      and make the function return 0 on success as appropriate.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      78d090b0
    • R
      PCI / PM: Extend PME polling to all PCI devices · 379021d5
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The land of PCI power management is a land of sorrow and ugliness,
      especially in the area of signaling events by devices.  There are
      devices that set their PME Status bits, but don't really bother
      to send a PME message or assert PME#.  There are hardware vendors
      who don't connect PME# lines to the system core logic (they know
      who they are).  There are PCI Express Root Ports that don't bother
      to trigger interrupts when they receive PME messages from the devices
      below.  There are ACPI BIOSes that forget to provide _PRW methods for
      devices capable of signaling wakeup.  Finally, there are BIOSes that
      do provide _PRW methods for such devices, but then don't bother to
      call Notify() for those devices from the corresponding _Lxx/_Exx
      GPE-handling methods.  In all of these cases the kernel doesn't have
      a chance to receive a proper notification that it should wake up a
      device, so devices stay in low-power states forever.  Worse yet, in
      some cases they continuously send PME Messages that are silently
      ignored, because the kernel simply doesn't know that it should clear
      the device's PME Status bit.
      
      This problem was first observed for "parallel" (non-Express) PCI
      devices on add-on cards and Matthew Garrett addressed it by adding
      code that polls PME Status bits of such devices, if they are enabled
      to signal PME, to the kernel.  Recently, however, it has turned out
      that PCI Express devices are also affected by this issue and that it
      is not limited to add-on devices, so it seems necessary to extend
      the PME polling to all PCI devices, including PCI Express and planar
      ones.  Still, it would be wasteful to poll the PME Status bits of
      devices that are known to receive proper PME notifications, so make
      the kernel (1) poll the PME Status bits of all PCI and PCIe devices
      enabled to signal PME and (2) disable the PME Status polling for
      devices for which correct PME notifications are received.
      Tested-by: NSarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      379021d5
  28. 29 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  29. 25 2月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device field · 51907267
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
      runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
      generating wakeup signals more than once in a row.  However, it
      really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
      functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
      effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
      wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
      wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
      acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
      threads for the same device.
      
      Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
      unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      51907267
  30. 15 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  31. 24 12月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      PCI: Disable ASPM if BIOS asks us to · 2f671e2d
      Matthew Garrett 提交于
      We currently refuse to touch the ASPM registers if the BIOS tells us that
      ASPM isn't supported. This can cause problems if the BIOS has (for any
      reason) enabled ASPM on some devices anyway. Change the code such that we
      explicitly clear ASPM if the FADT indicates that ASPM isn't supported,
      and make sure we tidy up appropriately on device removal in order to deal
      with the hotplug case. If ASPM is disabled because the BIOS doesn't hand
      over control then we won't touch the registers.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      2f671e2d