Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 25 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 12 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 26 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  11. 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 01 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      Revert "lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time" · dbf520a9
      由 Paul Walmsley 提交于 
      This reverts commit 6aa97070.

Commit 6aa97070 ("lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time")
causes problems with NFS root filesystems.  The failures were noticed on
OMAP2 and 3 boards during kernel init:

  [ BUG: swapper/0/1 still has locks held! ]
  3.9.0-rc3-00344-ga937536b #1 Not tainted
  -------------------------------------
  1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
   #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#13/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<c011e84c>] sget+0x248/0x574

  stack backtrace:
    rpc_wait_bit_killable
    __wait_on_bit
    out_of_line_wait_on_bit
    __rpc_execute
    rpc_run_task
    rpc_call_sync
    nfs_proc_get_root
    nfs_get_root
    nfs_fs_mount_common
    nfs_try_mount
    nfs_fs_mount
    mount_fs
    vfs_kern_mount
    do_mount
    sys_mount
    do_mount_root
    mount_root
    prepare_namespace
    kernel_init_freeable
    kernel_init

Although the rootfs mounts, the system is unstable.  Here's a transcript
from a PM test:

  http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.9-rc3/20130317194234/pm/37xxevm/37xxevm_log.txt

Here's what the test log should look like:

  http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.8/20130218214403/pm/37xxevm/37xxevm_log.txt

Mailing list discussion is here:

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/4/221

Deal with this for v3.9 by reverting the problem commit, until folks can
figure out the right long-term course of action.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Chan <benchan@chromium.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      dbf520a9
  15. 24 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • K
      Export __lockdep_no_validate__ · ea6749c7
      由 Kent Overstreet 提交于 
      Hack, but bcache needs a way around lockdep for locking during garbage
collection - we need to keep multiple btree nodes locked for coalescing
and rw_lock_nested() isn't really sufficient or appropriate here.
Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      ea6749c7
  17. 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 19 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  21. 13 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 22 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  25. 12 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 07 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  29. 06 12月, 2011 3 次提交
  31. 14 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 08 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      lockdep: Show subclass in pretty print of lockdep output · e5e78d08
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      The pretty print of the lockdep debug splat uses just the lock name
to show how the locking scenario happens. But when it comes to
nesting locks, the output becomes confusing which takes away the point
of the pretty printing of the lock scenario.

Without displaying the subclass info, we get the following output:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(slock-AF_INET);
                                lock(slock-AF_INET);
                                lock(slock-AF_INET);
   lock(slock-AF_INET);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

The above looks more of a A->A locking bug than a A->B B->A.
By adding the subclass to the output, we can see what really happened:

 other info that might help us debug this:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(slock-AF_INET);
                                lock(slock-AF_INET/1);
                                lock(slock-AF_INET);
   lock(slock-AF_INET/1);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

This bug was discovered while tracking down a real bug caught by lockdep.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111025202049.GB25043@hostway.ca

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reported-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NSimon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      e5e78d08
  35. 29 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Restore checks for blocking in RCU read-side critical sections · b3fbab05
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Long ago, using TREE_RCU with PREEMPT would result in "scheduling
while atomic" diagnostics if you blocked in an RCU read-side critical
section.  However, PREEMPT now implies TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, which defeats
this diagnostic.  This commit therefore adds a replacement diagnostic
based on PROVE_RCU.

Because rcu_lockdep_assert() and lockdep_rcu_dereference() are now being
used for things that have nothing to do with rcu_dereference(), rename
lockdep_rcu_dereference() to lockdep_rcu_suspicious() and add a third
argument that is a string indicating what is suspicious.  This third
argument is passed in from a new third argument to rcu_lockdep_assert().
Update all calls to rcu_lockdep_assert() to add an informative third
argument.

Also, add a pair of rcu_lockdep_assert() calls from within
rcu_note_context_switch(), one complaining if a context switch occurs
in an RCU-bh read-side critical section and another complaining if a
context switch occurs in an RCU-sched read-side critical section.
These are present only if the PROVE_RCU kernel parameter is enabled.

Finally, fix some checkpatch whitespace complaints in lockdep.c.

Again, you must enable PROVE_RCU to see these new diagnostics.  But you
are enabling PROVE_RCU to check out new RCU uses in any case, aren't you?
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      b3fbab05
  37. 18 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  39. 09 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  41. 04 8月, 2011 3 次提交
  43. 22 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  45. 22 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  47. 07 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  49. 22 4月, 2011 7 次提交
  51. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  53. 20 1月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      lockdep: Move early boot local IRQ enable/disable status to init/main.c · 2ce802f6
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      During early boot, local IRQ is disabled until IRQ subsystem is
properly initialized.  During this time, no one should enable
local IRQ and some operations which usually are not allowed with
IRQ disabled, e.g. operations which might sleep or require
communications with other processors, are allowed.

lockdep tracked this with early_boot_irqs_off/on() callbacks.
As other subsystems need this information too, move it to
init/main.c and make it generally available.  While at it,
toggle the boolean to early_boot_irqs_disabled instead of
enabled so that it can be initialized with %false and %true
indicates the exceptional condition.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110120110635.GB6036@htj.dyndns.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      2ce802f6
  55. 19 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • H
      lockdep: Check the depth of subclass · 4ba053c0
      由 Hitoshi Mitake 提交于 
      Current look_up_lock_class() doesn't check the parameter "subclass".
This rarely rises problems because the main caller of this function,
register_lock_class(), checks it.

But register_lock_class() is not the only function which calls
look_up_lock_class(). lock_set_class() and its callees also call it.
And lock_set_class() doesn't check this parameter.

This will rise problems when the the value of subclass is larger than
MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES. Because the address (used as the key of class)
caliculated with too large subclass has a probability to point
another key in different lock_class_key.

Of course this problem depends on the memory layout and
occurs with really low probability.
Signed-off-by: NHitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1286958626-986-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      4ba053c0