Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 2月, 2009 4 次提交
  3. 25 2月, 2009 3 次提交
  5. 20 2月, 2009 7 次提交
  7. 19 2月, 2009 7 次提交
  9. 18 2月, 2009 5 次提交
    • A
      x86, mce: fix ifdef for 64bit thermal apic vector clear on shutdown · 07db1c14
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Impact: Bugfix

The ifdef for the apic clear on shutdown for the 64bit intel thermal
vector was incorrect and never triggered. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      07db1c14
    • A
      x86, mce: use force_sig_info to kill process in machine check · 380851bc
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Impact: bug fix (with tolerant == 3)

do_exit cannot be called directly from the exception handler because
it can sleep and the exception handler runs on the exception stack.
Use force_sig() instead.

Based on a earlier patch by Ying Huang who debugged the problem.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      380851bc
    • A
      x86, mce: reinitialize per cpu features on resume · 6ec68bff
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Impact: Bug fix

This fixes a long standing bug in the machine check code. On resume the
boot CPU wouldn't get its vendor specific state like thermal handling
reinitialized. This means the boot cpu wouldn't ever get any thermal
events reported again.

Call the respective initialization functions on resume

v2: Remove ancient init because they don't have a resume device anyways.
    Pointed out by Thomas Gleixner.
v3: Now fix the Subject too to reflect v2 change
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      6ec68bff
    • N
      [ARM] 5401/1: Orion: fix edge triggered GPIO interrupt support · fd4b9b36
      由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于 
      The GPIO interrupts can be configured as either level triggered or edge
triggered, with a default of level triggered.  When an edge triggered
interrupt is requested, the gpio_irq_set_type method is called which
currently switches the given IRQ descriptor between two struct irq_chip
instances: orion_gpio_irq_level_chip and orion_gpio_irq_edge_chip. This
happens via __setup_irq() which also calls irq_chip_set_defaults() to
assign default methods to uninitialized ones.  The problem is that
irq_chip_set_defaults() is called before the irq_chip reference is
switched, leaving the new irq_chip (orion_gpio_irq_edge_chip in this
case) with uninitialized methods such as chip->startup() causing a kernel
oops.

Many solutions are possible, such as making irq_chip_set_defaults() global
and calling it from gpio_irq_set_type(), or calling __irq_set_trigger()
before irq_chip_set_defaults() in __setup_irq().  But those require
modifications to the generic IRQ code which might have adverse effect on
other architectures, and that would still be a fragile arrangement.
Manually copying the missing methods from within gpio_irq_set_type()
would be really ugly and it would break again the day new methods with
automatic defaults are added.

A better solution is to have a single irq_chip instance which can deal
with both edge and level triggered interrupts.  It is also a good idea
to switch the IRQ handler instead, as the edge IRQ handler allows for
one edge IRQ event to be queued as the IRQ is actually masked only when
that second IRQ is received, at which point the hardware can queue an
additional IRQ event, making edge triggered interrupts a bit more
reliable.
Tested-by: NMartin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      fd4b9b36
    • P
      x86, rcu: fix strange load average and ksoftirqd behavior · bf51935f
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Damien Wyart reported high ksoftirqd CPU usage (20%) on an
otherwise idle system.

The function-graph trace Damien provided:

>   799.521187 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.521371 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.521555 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.521738 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.521934 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.522068 |   1)  ksoftir-2324  |               |                rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.522208 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.522392 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.522575 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.522759 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.522956 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.523074 |   1)  ksoftir-2324  |               |                  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.523214 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.523397 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.523579 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.523762 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.523960 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.524079 |   1)  ksoftir-2324  |               |                  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.524220 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.524403 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.524587 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
>   799.524770 |   1)    <idle>-0    |               |  rcu_check_callbacks() {
> [ . . . ]

Shows rcu_check_callbacks() being invoked way too often. It should be called
once per jiffy, and here it is called no less than 22 times in about
3.5 milliseconds, meaning one call every 160 microseconds or so.

Why do we need to call rcu_pending() and rcu_check_callbacks() from the
idle loop of 32-bit x86, especially given that no other architecture does
this?

The following patch removes the call to rcu_pending() and
rcu_check_callbacks() from the x86 32-bit idle loop in order to
reduce the softirq load on idle systems.
Reported-by: NDamien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      bf51935f
  11. 17 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 16 2月, 2009 3 次提交
  15. 15 2月, 2009 10 次提交