- 16 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Haller 提交于
Refactor the deletion/update of prefix routes when removing an address. Now also consider IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE and if there is an address present with this flag, to not cleanup the route. Instead, assume that userspace is taking care of this route. Also perform the same cleanup, when userspace changes an existing address to add NOPREFIXROUTE (to an address that didn't have this flag). This is done because when the address was added, a prefix route was created for it. Since the user now wants to handle this route by himself, we cleanup this route. This cleanup of the route is not totally robust. There is no guarantee, that the route we are about to delete was really the one added by the kernel. This behavior does not change by the patch, and in practice it should work just fine. Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Haller 提交于
When adding/modifying an IPv6 address, the userspace application needs a way to suppress adding a prefix route. This is for example relevant together with IFA_F_MANAGERTEMPADDR, where userspace creates autoconf generated addresses, but depending on on-link, no route for the prefix should be added. Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 stephen hemminger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Aruna-Hewapathirane 提交于
This patch removes the net_random and net_srandom macros and replaces them with direct calls to the prandom ones. As new commits only seem to use prandom_u32 there is no use to keep them around. This change makes it easier to grep for users of prandom_u32. Signed-off-by: NAruna-Hewapathirane <aruna.hewapathirane@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
In the past the IFA_PERMANENT flag indicated, that the valid and preferred lifetime where ignored. Since change fad8da3e ("ipv6 addrconf: fix preferred lifetime state-changing behavior while valid_lft is infinity") we honour at least the preferred lifetime on those addresses. As such the valid lifetime gets recalculated and updated to 0. If loopback address is added manually this problem does not occur. Also if NetworkManager manages IPv6, those addresses will get added via inet6_rtm_newaddr and thus will have a correct lifetime, too. Reported-by: NFrançois-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@yahoo.com> Reported-by: NDamien Wyart <damien.wyart@gmail.com> Fixes: fad8da3e ("ipv6 addrconf: fix preferred lifetime state-changing behavior while valid_lft is infinity") Cc: Yasushi Asano <yasushi.asano@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
It does not make sense to create an anycast address for an /128-prefix. Suppress it. As 32019e65 ("ipv6: Do not leave router anycast address for /127 prefixes.") shows we also may not leave them, because we could accidentally remove an anycast address the user has allocated or got added via another prefix. Cc: François-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@yahoo.com> Cc: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yasushi Asano 提交于
Fixed a problem with setting the lifetime of an IPv6 address. When setting preferred_lft to a value not zero or infinity, while valid_lft is infinity(0xffffffff) preferred lifetime is set to forever and does not update. Therefore preferred lifetime never becomes deprecated. valid lifetime and preferred lifetime should be set independently, even if valid lifetime is infinity, preferred lifetime must expire correctly (meaning it must eventually become deprecated) Signed-off-by: NYasushi Asano <yasushi.asano@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 stephen hemminger 提交于
The function __rtnl_af_register is never called outside this code, and the return value is always 0. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li RongQing 提交于
Since addrconf_get_prefix_route inputs the address prefix to fib6_locate, which does not uses the data which is out of the prefix_len length, so do not need to use ipv6_addr_prefix to get address prefix. Signed-off-by: NLi RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 stephen hemminger 提交于
Need to be able to see changes to proxy NDP status on a per interface basis via netlink (analog to proxy_arp). Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Acked-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jukka Rissanen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 11 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Turned out that applications like ifconfig do not handle the change. So revert ifa_flag format back to 2-letter hex value. Introduced by: commit 479840ff "ipv6 addrconf: extend ifa_flags to u32" Reported-by: NAlexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Tested-by: NFLorent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@enst-bretagne.fr> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 12月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Make the behaviour similar to ipv4. This will allow user to set sysctl default neigh param values and these values will be respected even by devices registered before (that ones what do not have address set yet). Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
This patch converts the neigh param members to an array. This allows easier manipulation which will be needed later on to provide better management of default values. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 12月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Creating an address with this flag set will result in kernel taking care of temporary addresses in the same way as if the address was created by kernel itself (after RA receive). This allows userspace applications implementing the autoconfiguration (NetworkManager for example) to implement ipv6 addresses privacy. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
There is no more space in u8 ifa_flags. So do what davem suffested and add another netlink attr called IFA_FLAGS for carry more flags. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 François-Xavier Le Bail 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFrancois-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 11月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Dichtel 提交于
addrconf_add_linklocal() already adds the link local route, so there is no reason to add it before calling this function. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Nicolas Dichtel 提交于
When a link local address was added to a sit interface, the corresponding route was not configured. This breaks routing protocols that use the link local address, like OSPFv3. To ease the code reading, I remove sit_route_add(), which only adds v4 mapped routes, and add this kind of route directly in sit_add_v4_addrs(). Thus link local and v4 mapped routes are configured in the same place. Reported-by: NLi Hongjun <hongjun.li@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Nicolas Dichtel 提交于
When the local IPv4 endpoint is wilcard (0.0.0.0), the prefix length is correctly set, ie 64 if the address is a link local one or 96 if the address is a v4 mapped one. But when the local endpoint is specified, the prefix length is set to 128 for both kind of address. This patch fix this wrong prefix length. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Stultz 提交于
In order to enable lockdep on seqcount/seqlock structures, we must explicitly initialize any locks. The u64_stats_sync structure, uses a seqcount, and thus we need to introduce a u64_stats_init() function and use it to initialize the structure. This unfortunately adds a lot of fairly trivial initialization code to a number of drivers. But the benefit of ensuring correctness makes this worth while. Because these changes are required for lockdep to be enabled, and the changes are quite trivial, I've not yet split this patch out into 30-some separate patches, as I figured it would be better to get the various maintainers thoughts on how to best merge this change along with the seqcount lockdep enablement. Feedback would be appreciated! Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Acked-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Mirko Lindner <mlindner@marvell.com> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Cc: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381186321-4906-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
The code for privacy extentions is very mature, and making it configurable only gives marginal memory/code savings in exchange for obfuscation and hard to read code via CPP ifdef'ery. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Marks 提交于
Consider the scenario where an IPv6 router is advertising a fixed preferred_lft of 1800 seconds, while the valid_lft begins at 3600 seconds and counts down in realtime. A client should reset its preferred_lft to 1800 every time the RA is received, but a bug is causing Linux to ignore the update. The core problem is here: if (prefered_lft != ifp->prefered_lft) { Note that ifp->prefered_lft is an offset, so it doesn't decrease over time. Thus, the comparison is always (1800 != 1800), which fails to trigger an update. The most direct solution would be to compute a "stored_prefered_lft", and use that value in the comparison. But I think that trying to filter out unnecessary updates here is a premature optimization. In order for the filter to apply, both of these would need to hold: - The advertised valid_lft and preferred_lft are both declining in real time. - No clock skew exists between the router & client. So in this patch, I've set "update_lft = 1" unconditionally, which allows the surrounding code to be greatly simplified. Signed-off-by: NPaul Marks <pmarks@google.com> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Catalin\(ux\) M. BOIE 提交于
When a router is doing DNAT for 6to4/6rd packets the latest anti-spoofing commit 218774dc ("ipv6: add anti-spoofing checks for 6to4 and 6rd") will drop them because the IPv6 address embedded does not match the IPv4 destination. This patch will allow them to pass by testing if we have an address that matches on 6to4/6rd interface. I have been hit by this problem using Fedora and IPV6TO4_IPV4ADDR. Also, log the dropped packets (with rate limit). Signed-off-by: NCatalin(ux) M. BOIE <catab@embedromix.ro> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Petr Holasek 提交于
This two-liner removes max_addresses variable which is now unecessary related to patch [ipv6: remove max_addresses check from ipv6_create_tempaddr]. Signed-off-by: NPetr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Acked-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 9月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Cong Wang 提交于
in6_dev_put() will be needed by vxlan module, so is in6_dev_finish_destroy(). Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Cong Wang 提交于
Because vxlan module will call ip6_dst_lookup() in TX path, which will hold write lock. So we have to release this write lock before calling ndisc_send_rs(), otherwise could deadlock. Reviewed-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Cong Wang 提交于
It is needed by vxlan module. Noticed by Mike. Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@ravellosystems.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
This patch implements RFC6980: Drop fragmented ndisc packets by default. If a fragmented ndisc packet is received the user is informed that it is possible to disable the check. Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 8月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Dichtel 提交于
When an Xin6 tunnel is set up, we check other netdevices to inherit the link- local address. If none is available, the interface will not have any link-local address. RFC4862 expects that each interface has a link local address. Now than this kind of tunnels supports x-netns, it's easy to fall in this case (by creating the tunnel in a netns where ethernet interfaces stand and then moving it to a other netns where no ethernet interface is available). RFC4291, Appendix A suggests two methods: the first is the one currently implemented, the second is to generate a unique identifier, so that we can always generate the link-local address. Let's use eth_random_addr() to generate this interface indentifier. I remove completly the previous method, hence for the whole life of the interface, the link-local address remains the same (previously, it depends on which ethernet interfaces were up when the tunnel interface was set up). Signed-off-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This reverts commit df8372ca. These changes are buggy and make unintended semantic changes to ip6_tnl_add_linklocal(). Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible: fix 2. ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition: fix 5. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
Just follow the Joe Perches's opinion, it is a better way to fix the style errors. Suggested-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
Because of the max_addresses check attackers were able to disable privacy extensions on an interface by creating enough autoconfigured addresses: <http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/292> But the check is not actually needed: max_addresses protects the kernel to install too many ipv6 addresses on an interface and guards addrconf_prefix_rcv to install further addresses as soon as this limit is reached. We only generate temporary addresses in direct response of a new address showing up. As soon as we filled up the maximum number of addresses of an interface, we stop installing more addresses and thus also stop generating more temp addresses. Even if the attacker tries to generate a lot of temporary addresses by announcing a prefix and removing it again (lifetime == 0) we won't install more temp addresses, because the temporary addresses do count to the maximum number of addresses, thus we would stop installing new autoconfigured addresses when the limit is reached. This patch fixes CVE-2013-0343 (but other layer-2 attacks are still possible). Thanks to Ding Tianhong to bring this topic up again. Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Cc: George Kargiotakis <kargig@void.gr> Cc: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Acked-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
Commit cab70040 ("net: igmp: Reduce Unsolicited report interval to 1s when using IGMPv3") and 2690048c ("net: igmp: Allow user-space configuration of igmp unsolicited report interval") by William Manley made igmp unsolicited report intervals configurable per interface and corrected the interval of unsolicited igmpv3 report messages resendings to 1s. Same needs to be done for IPv6: MLDv1 (RFC2710 7.10.): 10 seconds MLDv2 (RFC3810 9.11.): 1 second Both intervals are configurable via new procfs knobs mldv1_unsolicited_report_interval and mldv2_unsolicited_report_interval. (also added .force_mld_version to ipv6_devconf_dflt to bring structs in line without semantic changes) v2: a) Joined documentation update for IPv4 and IPv6 MLD/IGMP unsolicited_report_interval procfs knobs. b) incorporate stylistic feedback from William Manley v3: a) add new DEVCONF_* values to the end of the enum (thanks to David Miller) Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Cc: William Manley <william.manley@youview.com> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 8月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 fan.du 提交于
Server Client 2001:1::803/64 <-> 2001:1::805/64 2001:2::804/64 <-> 2001:2::806/64 Server side fib binary tree looks like this: (2001:/64) / / ffff88002103c380 / \ (2) / \ (2001::803/128) ffff880037ac07c0 / \ / \ (3) ffff880037ac0640 (2001::806/128) / \ (1) / \ (2001::804/128) (2001::805/128) Delete 2001::804/64 won't cause prefix route deleted as well as rt in (3) destinate to 2001::806 with source address as 2001::804/64. That's because 2001::803/64 is still alive, which make onlink=1 in ipv6_del_addr, this is where the substantial difference between same prefix configuration and different prefix configuration :) So packet are still transmitted out to 2001::806 with source address as 2001::804/64. So bump genid will clear rt in (3), and up layer protocol will eventually find the right one for themselves. This problem arised from the discussion in here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=137404469219410&w=4Signed-off-by: NFan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Benc 提交于
There's a race in IPv6 automatic addess assignment. The address is created with zero lifetime when it's added to various address lists. Before it gets assigned the correct lifetime, there's a window where a new address may be configured. This causes the semi-initiated address to be deleted in addrconf_verify. This was discovered as a reference leak caused by concurrent run of __ipv6_ifa_notify for both RTM_NEWADDR and RTM_DELADDR with the same address. Fix this by setting the lifetime before the address is added to inet6_addr_lst. A few notes: 1. In addrconf_prefix_rcv, by setting update_lft to zero, the if (update_lft) { ... } condition is no longer executed for newly created addresses. This is okay, as the ifp fields are set in ipv6_add_addr now and ipv6_ifa_notify is called (and has been called) through addrconf_dad_start. 2. The removal of the whole block under ifp->lock in inet6_addr_add is okay, too, as tstamp is initialized to jiffies in ipv6_add_addr. Signed-off-by: NJiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Amerigo Wang 提交于
dingtianhong reported the following deadlock detected by lockdep: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.4.24.05-0.1-default #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- ksoftirqd/0/3 is trying to acquire lock: (&ndev->lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8147f804>] ipv6_get_lladdr+0x74/0x120 but task is already holding lock: (&mc->mca_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8149d130>] mld_send_report+0x40/0x150 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mc->mca_lock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff810a8027>] validate_chain+0x637/0x730 [<ffffffff810a8417>] __lock_acquire+0x2f7/0x500 [<ffffffff810a8734>] lock_acquire+0x114/0x150 [<ffffffff814f691a>] rt_spin_lock+0x4a/0x60 [<ffffffff8149e4bb>] igmp6_group_added+0x3b/0x120 [<ffffffff8149e5d8>] ipv6_mc_up+0x38/0x60 [<ffffffff81480a4d>] ipv6_find_idev+0x3d/0x80 [<ffffffff81483175>] addrconf_notify+0x3d5/0x4b0 [<ffffffff814fae3f>] notifier_call_chain+0x3f/0x80 [<ffffffff81073471>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20 [<ffffffff813d8722>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x32/0x60 [<ffffffff813d92d4>] __dev_notify_flags+0x34/0x80 [<ffffffff813d9360>] dev_change_flags+0x40/0x70 [<ffffffff813ea627>] do_setlink+0x237/0x8a0 [<ffffffff813ebb6c>] rtnl_newlink+0x3ec/0x600 [<ffffffff813eb4d0>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x160/0x310 [<ffffffff814040b9>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x89/0xb0 [<ffffffff813eb357>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x27/0x40 [<ffffffff81403e20>] netlink_unicast+0x140/0x180 [<ffffffff81404a9e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x33e/0x380 [<ffffffff813c4252>] sock_sendmsg+0x112/0x130 [<ffffffff813c537e>] __sys_sendmsg+0x44e/0x460 [<ffffffff813c5544>] sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff814feab9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -> #0 (&ndev->lock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff810a798e>] check_prev_add+0x3de/0x440 [<ffffffff810a8027>] validate_chain+0x637/0x730 [<ffffffff810a8417>] __lock_acquire+0x2f7/0x500 [<ffffffff810a8734>] lock_acquire+0x114/0x150 [<ffffffff814f6c82>] rt_read_lock+0x42/0x60 [<ffffffff8147f804>] ipv6_get_lladdr+0x74/0x120 [<ffffffff8149b036>] mld_newpack+0xb6/0x160 [<ffffffff8149b18b>] add_grhead+0xab/0xc0 [<ffffffff8149d03b>] add_grec+0x3ab/0x460 [<ffffffff8149d14a>] mld_send_report+0x5a/0x150 [<ffffffff8149f99e>] igmp6_timer_handler+0x4e/0xb0 [<ffffffff8105705a>] call_timer_fn+0xca/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81057b9f>] run_timer_softirq+0x1df/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8104e8c7>] handle_pending_softirqs+0xf7/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8104ea3b>] __do_softirq_common+0x7b/0xf0 [<ffffffff8104f07f>] __thread_do_softirq+0x1af/0x210 [<ffffffff8104f1c1>] run_ksoftirqd+0xe1/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8106c7de>] kthread+0xae/0xc0 [<ffffffff814fff74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 actually we can just hold idev->lock before taking pmc->mca_lock, and avoid taking idev->lock again when iterating idev->addr_list, since the upper callers of mld_newpack() already take read_lock_bh(&idev->lock). Reported-by: Ndingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Cc: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Tested-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Tested-by: NChen Weilong <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-