Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 5月, 2015 10 次提交
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Simplify put_exclusive_constraints() · ba040653
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Don't bother with taking locks if we're not actually going to do
anything. Also, drop the _irqsave(), this is very much only called
from IRQ-disabled context.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      ba040653
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Remove intel_excl_states::init_state · 43ef205b
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      For some obscure reason intel_{start,stop}_scheduling() copy the HT
state to an intermediate array. This would make sense if we ever were
to make changes to it which we'd have to discard.

Except we don't. By the time we call intel_commit_scheduling() we're;
as the name implies; committed to them. We'll never back out.

A further hint its pointless is that stop_scheduling() unconditionally
publishes the state.

So the intermediate array is pointless, modify the state in place and
kill the extra array.

And remove the pointless array initialization: INTEL_EXCL_UNUSED == 0.

Note; all is serialized by intel_excl_cntr::lock.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      43ef205b
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Remove pointless tests · 1fe684e3
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Both intel_commit_scheduling() and intel_get_excl_contraints() test
for cntr < 0.

The only way that can happen (aside from a bug) is through
validate_event(), however that is already captured by the
cpuc->is_fake test.

So remove these test and simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      1fe684e3
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Clean up intel_commit_scheduling() placement · 0c41e756
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Move the code of intel_commit_scheduling() to the right place, which is
in between start() and stop().

No change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      0c41e756
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Make WARN()ings consistent · 17186ccd
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      The intel_commit_scheduling() callback is pointlessly different from
the start and stop scheduling callback.

Furthermore, the constraint should never be NULL, so remove that test.

Even though we'll never get called (because we NULL the callbacks)
when !is_ht_workaround_enabled() put that test in.

Collapse the (pointless) WARN_ON_ONCE() and bail on !cpuc->excl_cntrs --
this is doubly pointless, because its the same condition as
is_ht_workaround_enabled() which was already pointless because the
whole method won't ever be called.

Furthremore, make all the !excl_cntrs test WARN_ON_ONCE(); they're all
pointless, because the above, either the function
({get,put}_excl_constraint) are already predicated on it existing or
the is_ht_workaround_enabled() thing is the same test.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      17186ccd
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Simplify the dynamic constraint code somewhat · aaf932e8
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      We have two 'struct event_constraint' local variables in
intel_get_excl_constraints(): 'cx' and 'c'.

Instead of using 'cx' after the dynamic allocation, put all 'cx' inside
the dynamic allocation block and use 'c' outside of it.

Also use direct assignment to copy the structure; let the compiler
figure it out.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      aaf932e8
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Add lockdep assert · b32ed7f5
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Lockdep is very good at finding incorrect IRQ state while locking and
is far better at telling us if we hold a lock than the _is_locked()
API. It also generates less code for !DEBUG kernels.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b32ed7f5
    • P
      perf/x86/intel: Correct local vs remote sibling state · 1c565833
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      For some obscure reason the current code accounts the current SMT
thread's state on the remote thread and reads the remote's state on
the local SMT thread.

While internally consistent, and 'correct' its pointless confusion we
can do without.

Flip them the right way around.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      1c565833
    • P
      perf/x86: Improve HT workaround GP counter constraint · cc1790cf
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      The (SNB/IVB/HSW) HT bug only affects events that can be programmed
onto GP counters, therefore we should only limit the number of GP
counters that can be used per cpu -- iow we should not constrain the
FP counters.

Furthermore, we should only enfore such a limit when there are in fact
exclusive events being scheduled on either sibling.
Reported-by: NVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Fixed build fail for the !CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL case. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      cc1790cf
    • P
      perf/x86: Fix event/group validation · b371b594
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Commit 43b45780 ("perf/x86: Reduce stack usage of
x86_schedule_events()") violated the rule that 'fake' scheduling; as
used for event/group validation; should not change the event state.

This went mostly un-noticed because repeated calls of
x86_pmu::get_event_constraints() would give the same result. And
x86_pmu::put_event_constraints() would mostly not do anything.

Commit e979121b ("perf/x86/intel: Implement cross-HT corruption
bug workaround") made the situation much worse by actually setting the
event->hw.constraint value to NULL, so when validation and actual
scheduling interact we get NULL ptr derefs.

Fix it by removing the constraint pointer from the event and move it
back to an array, this time in cpuc instead of on the stack.

validate_group()
  x86_schedule_events()
    event->hw.constraint = c; # store

      <context switch>
        perf_task_event_sched_in()
          ...
            x86_schedule_events();
              event->hw.constraint = c2; # store

              ...

              put_event_constraints(event); # assume failure to schedule
                intel_put_event_constraints()
                  event->hw.constraint = NULL;

      <context switch end>

    c = event->hw.constraint; # read -> NULL

    if (!test_bit(hwc->idx, c->idxmsk)) # <- *BOOM* NULL deref

This in particular is possible when the event in question is a
cpu-wide event and group-leader, where the validate_group() tries to
add an event to the group.
Reported-by: NVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maria Dimakopoulou <maria.n.dimakopoulou@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 43b45780 ("perf/x86: Reduce stack usage of x86_schedule_events()")
Fixes: e979121b ("perf/x86/intel: Implement cross-HT corruption bug workaround")
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b371b594
  3. 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 22 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      perf/x86/intel: Add cpu_(prepare|starting|dying) for core_pmu · 3b6e0421
      由 Jiri Olsa 提交于 
      The core_pmu does not define cpu_* callbacks, which handles
allocation of 'struct cpu_hw_events::shared_regs' data,
initialization of debug store and PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS counters.

While this probably won't happen on bare metal, virtual CPU can
define x86_pmu.extra_regs together with PMU version 1 and thus
be using core_pmu -> using shared_regs data without it being
allocated. That could could leave to following panic:

	BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
	IP: [<ffffffff8152cd4f>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x1f/0x40

	SNIP

	 [<ffffffff81024bd9>] __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints+0x69/0x1e0
	 [<ffffffff81024deb>] intel_get_event_constraints+0x9b/0x180
	 [<ffffffff8101e815>] x86_schedule_events+0x75/0x1d0
	 [<ffffffff810586dc>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x7c/0x90
	 [<ffffffff810649fe>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x24e/0x3e0
	 [<ffffffff81064ba2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
	 [<ffffffff8109eb16>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x16/0x40
	 [<ffffffff810577e9>] ? __wake_up_common+0x59/0x90
	 [<ffffffff811a9517>] ? __d_lookup+0xa7/0x150
	 [<ffffffff8119db5f>] ? do_lookup+0x9f/0x230
	 [<ffffffff811a993a>] ? dput+0x9a/0x150
	 [<ffffffff8119c8f5>] ? path_to_nameidata+0x25/0x60
	 [<ffffffff8119e90a>] ? __link_path_walk+0x7da/0x1000
	 [<ffffffff8101d8f9>] ? x86_pmu_add+0xb9/0x170
	 [<ffffffff8101d7a7>] x86_pmu_commit_txn+0x67/0xc0
	 [<ffffffff811b07b0>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110
	 [<ffffffff8119c731>] ? path_put+0x31/0x40
	 [<ffffffff8107c297>] ? current_fs_time+0x27/0x30
	 [<ffffffff8117d170>] ? mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page+0x20/0x70
	 [<ffffffff8111b7aa>] group_sched_in+0x13a/0x170
	 [<ffffffff81014a29>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
	 [<ffffffff8111bac8>] ctx_sched_in+0x2e8/0x330
	 [<ffffffff8111bb7b>] perf_event_sched_in+0x6b/0xb0
	 [<ffffffff8111bc36>] perf_event_context_sched_in+0x76/0xc0
	 [<ffffffff8111eb3b>] perf_event_comm+0x1bb/0x2e0
	 [<ffffffff81195ee9>] set_task_comm+0x69/0x80
	 [<ffffffff81195fe1>] setup_new_exec+0xe1/0x2e0
	 [<ffffffff811ea68e>] load_elf_binary+0x3ce/0x1ab0

Adding cpu_(prepare|starting|dying) for core_pmu to have
shared_regs data allocated for core_pmu. AFAICS there's no harm
to initialize debug store and PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS either for
core_pmu.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150421152623.GC13169@krava.redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      3b6e0421
  7. 17 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 02 4月, 2015 16 次提交
  11. 27 3月, 2015 3 次提交
    • A
      perf/x86/intel: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds · 294fe0f5
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
should not be smaller than 128.

This is erratum BDM11 and BDM55:

  http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/5th-gen-core-family-spec-update.pdf

BDM11: When using a period < 100; we may get incorrect PEBS/PMI
interrupts and/or an invalid counter state.
BDM55: When bit0-5 of the period are !0 we may get redundant PEBS
records on overflow.

Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.

How does this handle the case when an app requests a specific
period with some of the bottom bits set?

Short answer:

Any useful instruction sampling period needs to be 4-6 orders
of magnitude larger than 128, as an PMI every 128 instructions
would instantly overwhelm the system and be throttled.
So the +-64 error from this is really small compared to the
period, much smaller than normal system jitter.

Long answer (by Peterz):

IFF we guarantee perf_event_attr::sample_period >= 128.

Suppose we start out with sample_period=192; then we'll set period_left
to 192, we'll end up with left = 128 (we truncate the lower bits). We
get an interrupt, find that period_left = 64 (>0 so we return 0 and
don't get an overflow handler), up that to 128. Then we trigger again,
at n=256. Then we find period_left = -64 (<=0 so we return 1 and do get
an overflow). We increment with sample_period so we get left = 128. We
fire again, at n=384, period_left = 0 (<=0 so we return 1 and get an
overflow). And on and on.

So while the individual interrupts are 'wrong' we get then with
interval=256,128 in exactly the right ratio to average out at 192. And
this works for everything >=128.

So the num_samples*fixed_period thing is still entirely correct +- 127,
which is good enough I'd say, as you already have that error anyhow.

So no need to 'fix' the tools, al we need to do is refuse to create
INST_RETIRED:ALL events with sample_period < 128.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
[ Updated comments and changelog a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424225886-18652-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      294fe0f5
    • A
      perf/x86/intel: Add Broadwell core support · 91f1b705
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Add Broadwell support for Broadwell to perf.

The basic support is very similar to Haswell. We use the new cache
event list added for Haswell earlier. The only differences
are a few bits related to remote nodes. To avoid an extra,
mostly identical, table these are patched up in the initialization code.

The constraint list has one new event that needs to be handled over Haswell.

Includes code and testing from Kan Liang.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424225886-18652-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      91f1b705
    • A
      perf/x86/intel: Add new cache events table for Haswell · 0f1b5ca2
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Haswell offcore events are quite different from Sandy Bridge.
Add a new table to handle Haswell properly.

Note that the offcore bits listed in the SDM are not quite correct
(this is currently being fixed). An uptodate list of bits is
in the patch.

The basic setup is similar to Sandy Bridge. The prefetch columns
have been removed, as prefetch counting is not very reliable
on Haswell. One L1 event that is not in the event list anymore
has been also removed.

- data reads do not include code reads (comparable to earlier Sandy Bridge tables)
- data counts include speculative execution (except L1 write, dtlb, bpu)
- remote node access includes both remote memory, remote cache, remote mmio.
- prefetches are not included in the counts for consistency
  (different from Sandy Bridge, which includes prefetches in the remote node)
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
[ Removed the HSM30 comments; we don't have them for SNB/IVB either. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424225886-18652-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      0f1b5ca2
  13. 19 2月, 2015 3 次提交
  15. 28 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 29 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • I
      perf/x86/intel: Revert incomplete and undocumented Broadwell client support · 1776b106
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      These patches:

  86a349a2 ("perf/x86/intel: Add Broadwell core support")
  c46e665f ("perf/x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")
  fdda3c4a ("perf/x86/intel: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell")

introduced magic constants and unexplained changes:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/28/1128
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/27/325
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/27/546
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/28/546

Peter Zijlstra has attempted to help out, to clean up the mess:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/28/543

But has not received helpful and constructive replies which makes
me doubt wether it can all be finished in time until v3.18 is
released.

Despite various review feedback the author (Andi Kleen) has answered
only few of the review questions and has generally been uncooperative,
only giving replies when prompted repeatedly, and only giving minimal
answers instead of constructively explaining and helping along the effort.

That kind of behavior is not acceptable.

There's also a boot crash on Intel E5-1630 v3 CPUs reported for another
commit from Andi Kleen:

  e735b9db ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Haswell-EP uncore support")

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/22/730

Which is not yet resolved. The uncore driver is independent in theory,
but the crash makes me worry about how well all these patches were
tested and makes me uneasy about the level of interminging that the
Broadwell and Haswell code has received by the commits above.

As a first step to resolve the mess revert the Broadwell client commits
back to the v3.17 version, before we run out of time and problematic
code hits a stable upstream kernel.

( If the Haswell-EP crash is not resolved via a simple fix then we'll have
  to revert the Haswell-EP uncore driver as well. )

The Broadwell client series has to be submitted in a clean fashion, with
single, well documented changes per patch. If they are submitted in time
and are accepted during review then they can possibly go into v3.19 but
will need additional scrutiny due to the rocky history of this patch set.

Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409683455-29168-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      1776b106
  19. 24 9月, 2014 3 次提交
    • A
      perf/x86/intel: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell · fdda3c4a
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Use the newly added Broadwell cache event list for Haswell too.
All Haswell and Broadwell events and offcore masks used in these lists
are identical.

However Haswell is very different from the Sandy Bridge
list that was used previously. That fixes a wide range of mis-counting
cache events.

The node events are now only for retired memory events, so prefetching
and speculative memory accesses are not included. They are PEBS
capable now, which makes it much easier to sample for them, plus it's
possible to create address maps with -d.

The prefetch events are gone now. They way the hardware counts
them is very misleading (some prefetches included, others not), so
it seemed best to leave them out.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409683455-29168-5-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      fdda3c4a
    • A
      perf/x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds · c46e665f
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
should not be smaller than 128.

Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.

This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.

How does this handle the case when an app requests a specific
period with some of the bottom bits set

The apps thinks it is sampling at X occurences per sample, when it is
in fact at X - 63 (worst case).

Short answer:

Any useful instruction sampling period needs to be 4-6 orders
of magnitude larger than 128, as an PMI every 128 instructions
would instantly overwhelm the system and be throttled.
So the +-64 error from this is really small compared to the
period, much smaller than normal system jitter.

Long answer:

<write up by Peter:>

IFF we guarantee perf_event_attr::sample_period >= 128.

Suppose we start out with sample_period=192; then we'll set period_left
to 192, we'll end up with left = 128 (we truncate the lower bits). We
get an interrupt, find that period_left = 64 (>0 so we return 0 and
don't get an overflow handler), up that to 128. Then we trigger again,
at n=256. Then we find period_left = -64 (<=0 so we return 1 and do get
an overflow). We increment with sample_period so we get left = 128. We
fire again, at n=384, period_left = 0 (<=0 so we return 1 and get an
overflow). And on and on.

So while the individual interrupts are 'wrong' we get then with
interval=256,128 in exactly the right ratio to average out at 192. And
this works for everything >=128.

So the num_samples*fixed_period thing is still entirely correct +- 127,
which is good enough I'd say, as you already have that error anyhow.

So no need to 'fix' the tools, al we need to do is refuse to create
INST_RETIRED:ALL events with sample_period < 128.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Maria Dimakopoulou <maria.n.dimakopoulou@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Davies <junk@eslaf.co.uk>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409683455-29168-4-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c46e665f
    • A
      perf/x86/intel: Add Broadwell core support · 86a349a2
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Add Broadwell support for Broadwell Client to perf.  This is very
similar to Haswell.  It uses a new cache event table, because there
were various changes there.

The constraint list has one new event that needs to be handled over
Haswell.

The PEBS event list is the same, so we reuse Haswell's.

[fengguang.wu: make intel_bdw_event_constraints[] static]
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409683455-29168-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      86a349a2