1. 25 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • H
      s390: remove 31 bit support · 5a79859a
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Remove the 31 bit support in order to reduce maintenance cost and
      effectively remove dead code. Since a couple of years there is no
      distribution left that comes with a 31 bit kernel.
      
      The 31 bit kernel also has been broken since more than a year before
      anybody noticed. In addition I added a removal warning to the kernel
      shown at ipl for 5 minutes: a960062e ("s390: add 31 bit warning
      message") which let everybody know about the plan to remove 31 bit
      code. We didn't get any response.
      
      Given that the last 31 bit only machine was introduced in 1999 let's
      remove the code.
      Anybody with 31 bit user space code can still use the compat mode.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      5a79859a
  2. 26 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • H
      s390/comments: unify copyright messages and remove file names · a53c8fab
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Remove the file name from the comment at top of many files. In most
      cases the file name was wrong anyway, so it's rather pointless.
      
      Also unify the IBM copyright statement. We did have a lot of sightly
      different statements and wanted to change them one after another
      whenever a file gets touched. However that never happened. Instead
      people start to take the old/"wrong" statements to use as a template
      for new files.
      So unify all of them in one go.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      a53c8fab
  4. 02 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 28 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • M
      [S390] Inline assembly cleanup. · 94c12cc7
      Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
      Major cleanup of all s390 inline assemblies. They now have a common
      coding style. Quite a few have been shortened, mainly by using register
      asm variables. Use of the EX_TABLE macro helps  as well. The atomic ops,
      bit ops and locking inlines new use the Q-constraint if a newer gcc
      is used.  That results in slightly better code.
      
      Thanks to Christian Borntraeger for proof reading the changes.
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      94c12cc7
  6. 20 9月, 2006 1 次提交